Advertisement

Solvency Assessment for Insurance Groups in the United States and Europe—A Comparison of Regulatory Frameworks

  • Caroline Siegel

Abstract

As a reaction to the increasing trend of insurers forming and participating in financial conglomerates and insurance groups, supervisory authorities are currently developing group-wide solvency regulations. The International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS) recently published an issues paper that discusses the challenges to group supervision and defines criteria for a thorough group solvency framework. Based on these criteria, this article provides an overview and comparison of three important approaches—the U.S. solo-plus approach of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, Switzerland’s group structure model and the Solvency II Directive on Group Solvency Assessment. The analysis reveals various deficits within the group regulation of the United States implying the need for future regulatory work. By contrast, the performance of the European frameworks with regard to the IAIS criteria is good. In particular, the Swiss framework can be seen as a prime example of an innovative and solid group solvency assessment.

Keywords

Corporate Governance Group Solvency Capital Requirement Legal Entity Insurance Group 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Casualty Actuarial Society (CAS) (2012) ‘CAS Research Working Party on Risk-Based Capital Dependencies and Calibration’, Report 1 Overview of Dependencies and Calibration in the RBC Formula. 1, from www.casact.org.Google Scholar
  2. Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pension Supervisors (CEIOPS) (2009a) ‘CEIOPS’ advice for Level 2 implementing measures on Solvency II: Assessment of group solvency’, from www.eiopa.europa.eu.Google Scholar
  3. Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pension Supervisors (CEIOPS) (2009b) ‘Lessons learned from the crisis’, from www.eiopa.europa.eu.Google Scholar
  4. Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pension Supervisors (CEIOPS) (2010) ‘Solvency II—Calibration Paper’, from www.eiopa.europa.eu.Google Scholar
  5. Cummins, J. and Phillips, R. (2009) Capital adequacy and insurance risk-based capital systems, working paper, from www.rmi.gsu.edu.Google Scholar
  6. Darlap, P. and Mayr, B. (2006) ‘Group aspects of regulatory reform in the insurance sector’, Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance — Issues and Practice 31(1): 96–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eling, M. and Holzmuller, I. (2008) ‘An overview and comparison of risk-based capital standards’, Journal of Insurance Regulation 26(4): 31–60.Google Scholar
  8. Embrechts, P., McNeil, A. and Straumann, D. (2002) ‘Correlation and Dependence in Risk Management: Properties and Pitfalls’, in M. Dempster (ed.) Risk Management: Value at Risk and Beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 176–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. European Commission (EC) (1998) ‘Directive 98/78/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 October 1998 on the supplementary supervision of insurance undertakings in an insurance group’, Official Journal of the European Communities, from www.eur-lex.europa.eu.
  10. European Commission (EC) (2002) ‘Directive 2002/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2002 on the supplementary supervision of credit institutions, insurance undertakings and investment firms in a financial conglomerate’, Official Journal of the European Union, from www.eur-lex.europa.eu.
  11. European Commission (EC) (2009) ‘Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of insurance and reinsurance (Solvency II)’, Official Journal of the European Union, from www.eur-lex.europa.eu.
  12. European Commission (EC) (2010) ‘QIS5 technical specifications’, from www.ec.europa.eu.Google Scholar
  13. European Commission (EC) (2011a) ‘Directive 2011/89/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 November 2011 amending directives 98/78/EC, 2002/87/EC, 2006/48/EC and 2009/138/EC as regards the supplementary supervision of financial entities in a financial conglomerate’, Official Journal of the European Union, from www.eur-lex.europa.eu.
  14. European Commission (EC) (2011b) ‘“SOLVENCY II”: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)’, from www.ec.europa.eu.Google Scholar
  15. European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) (2012) ‘Request for the EU-U.S. Dialogue Project for Public Comment on the Technical Committee Reports; Comparing Certain Aspects of the Insurance Supervisory and Regulatory Regimes in the European Union and the United States’, from https://eiopa.europa.eu.Google Scholar
  16. Federal Assembly of the Swiss Confederation (2004) ‘Insurance Supervision Act’, from www.finma.ch.Google Scholar
  17. Filipovic, D. and Kupper, M. (2007) ‘On the group level Swiss Solvency test’, Bulletin of the Swiss Association of Actuaries 1(1): 97–115.Google Scholar
  18. Filipovic, D. and Kupper, M. (2008) ‘Optimal capital and risk transfer for group diversification’, Mathematical Finance 18(1): 55–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Holzmuller, I. (2009) ‘The United States RBC standards, Solvency II and the Swiss Solvency test: A comparative assessment’, The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance—Issues and Practice 34(1): 56–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS) (2008a) ‘Guidance paper on the role and responsibilities of a group-wide supervisor’, from www.iaisweb.org.Google Scholar
  21. International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS) (2008b) ‘Principles on group-wide supervision’, from www.iaisweb.org.Google Scholar
  22. International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS) (2009a) ‘Guidance paper on the use of supervisory colleges in group-wide supervision’, from www.iaisweb.org.Google Scholar
  23. International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS) (2009b) ‘Issues Paper on Group-wide Solvency Assessment and Supervision’, from www.iaisweb.org.Google Scholar
  24. International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS) (2010) ‘Guidance paper on the treatment of non-regulated entities in group-wide supervision’, from www.iaisweb.org.Google Scholar
  25. Joint Forum on Financial Conglomerates (1999) ‘Supervision of financial conglomerates’, from www.bis.org.Google Scholar
  26. Keller, P. (2006) ‘Draft: Modelling of groups and group effects’, from www.finma.ch.Google Scholar
  27. Keller, P. (2007) ‘Group diversification’, The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance—Issues and Practice 32(3): 382–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Luder, T. (2007) ‘Modelling of risks in insurance groups for the Swiss Solvency test’, Bulletin of the Swiss Association of Actuaries 1(1): 85–97.Google Scholar
  29. National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) (2009a) ‘Issues for consideration in the Solvency Modernization Initiative’, from www.naic.org.Google Scholar
  30. National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) (2009b) ‘NAIC and state insurance regulators involved in the U.S. FSAP’, from www.naic.org.Google Scholar
  31. National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) (2009c) ‘Risk-based capital—General overview’, from www.naic.org.Google Scholar
  32. National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) (2010a) ‘Insurance Holding Company System Model Regulation with Reporting Forms and Instructions; Model #450 8/5/10—as adopted by Financial Condition (E) Committee’, from www.naic.org.Google Scholar
  33. National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) (2010b) ‘Insurance Holding Company System Regulatory Act, Model #440 08/05/10—As Adopted by Financial Condition (E) Committee’, from www.naic.org.Google Scholar
  34. National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) (2010c) ‘Memorandum, February 26, 2010’, from www.naic.org.Google Scholar
  35. National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) (2011a) ‘Group Capital Assessment Proposal for U.S. Compliance with the International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS) Insurance Core Principles (ICP) on Group Capital and to Observe Financial Sector Assessment Program Recommendations’, from www.naic.org.Google Scholar
  36. National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) (2011b) ‘Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) Guidance Manual’, from www.naic.org.Google Scholar
  37. National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) (2011c) ‘Solvency modernization initiative — Roadmap’, from www.casact.org.Google Scholar
  38. National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) (2011d) ‘Solvency modernization initiative –Update as of January 2011’, from www.naic.org.Google Scholar
  39. National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) (2011e) ‘White Paper on High-Level Corporate Governance Principles for Use in U.S. Insurance Regulation’, from www.naic.org.Google Scholar
  40. Pfeiffer, T. (2008) ‘The SST Group Structure Model’, presentation at the prize ceremony of the Walter Saxer-Versicherungs-Hochschulpreis, Zurich, from www.finma.ch.Google Scholar
  41. Swiss Federal Office of Private Insurance (FOPI) (2004) ‘White Paper of the Swiss Solvency Test’, from www.finma.ch.Google Scholar
  42. Swiss Federal Office of Private Insurance (FOPI) (2006) ‘Technical Document on the Swiss Solvency Test’, from www.finma.ch.Google Scholar
  43. Swiss Federal Office of Private Insurance (FOPI) (2007) ‘Directives on Corporate Governance, Risk Management, and the Internal Control System’, from www.finma.ch.Google Scholar
  44. Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) (2008a) ‘Circular 2008/29 Internal Business Transactions Insurance Groups’, from www.finma.ch.Google Scholar
  45. Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) (2008b) ‘Rundschreiben 2008/30 Solvabilitat I Versicherungskonzerne’, from www.finma.ch.Google Scholar
  46. Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) (2008c) ‘Swiss Solvency Test: Circular 2008/44 SST’, from www.finma.ch.Google Scholar
  47. Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) (2010a) ‘Annual Report 2010’, from www.finma.ch.Google Scholar
  48. Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) (2010b) ‘Wegleitung zum SST-Marktrisiko-Standardmodell’, from www.finma.ch.Google Scholar
  49. Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) (2012) ‘FINMA Policy on Insurance Supervisory Colleges’, from www.finma.ch.Google Scholar
  50. The Chief Risk Officer Forum (2005) ‘A Framework for Incorporating Diversification in the Solvency assessment of insurers’, from www.thecroforum.org.Google Scholar
  51. van Rossum, A. (2005) ‘Regulation and insurance economics’, The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance—Issues and Practice 30(1): 43–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Vaughan, T.M. (2009) ‘The Implications of Solvency II for U.S. Insurance Regulation’, from www.naic.org.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Caroline Siegel
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Insurance EconomicsUniversity of St. GallenSt. GallenSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations