Advertisement

Feeding a Scapegoat? The Political Function of Amoghavajra’s Ritual Services in Protecting the Country

  • Martin Lehnert

Abstract

The career of the eminent Buddhist monk Amoghavajra (Chinese: Bukongjingang or Bukong, 705–774) is closely connected with the crisis of imperial authority in the years after the An Lushan Rebellion (755–763) that led to a near collapse of the Tang dynasty (618–907). This offers valuable reference points for a rethinking of the relation between politics and Buddhist authority and the respective institutional framework supported by the imperial court.

Keywords

Tang Dynasty Ritual Practice Political Function Religious System Tactical Position 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Orlando, R. (1981) A Study of Chinese Documents Concerning the Life of the Tantric Buddhist Patriarch Amoghavajra (PhD thesis: Princeton University);Google Scholar
  2. Orzech, C. (1998) Politics and Transcendent Wisdom (University Park: Penn State Press);Google Scholar
  3. Nakata, M. (2006) ‘Tōchō seijishijō no “Ninnōkyō” honyaku to hōe,’ Shigaku Zasshi 115, 3, 322–47;Google Scholar
  4. Lü, J. (2010) ‘Lun Bukong de zhengjiao sixiang,’ Shijie Zongjiao Yanjiu 4, 39–46;Google Scholar
  5. Lehnert, M. (2011) ‘Amoghavajra: His Role in and Influence on the Development of Buddhism,’ in C. Orzech, R. Payne and H. Sørensen (eds.) Esoteric Buddhism and the Tantras in East Asia (Leiden: Brill), 351–59;Google Scholar
  6. Yu, X. (2012) ‘Zuo tu you shu: Bukong suo jin hupo baosheng rulai xiang jikao,’ in X. Yu (ed.) Bo wang ming sha: zhonggu xieben yanjiu yu xiandai zhongguo xueshushi zhi huitong (Shanghai: Shanghai guji chubanshe) 322–37;Google Scholar
  7. Goble, G. C. (2012) Chinese Esoteric Buddhism: Amoghavajra and the Ruling Elite (PhD thesis: Indiana University).Google Scholar
  8. 2.
    See Sharf, R. H. (2002) Coming to Terms with Chinese Buddhism (Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press), p. 269.Google Scholar
  9. 8.
    Luhmann, N. (1987) Soziale Systeme (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp), pp. 626–27.Google Scholar
  10. 9.
    see Luhmann, N. (2003) Macht (Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius) pp. 60–69.Google Scholar
  11. 10.
    Weber, M. (1968) The Religion of China, translated by H. H. Gerth (Toronto: MacMillan), pp. 30–32.Google Scholar
  12. 15.
    cf. Chen, N. (1994) ‘The Problem of Theodicy in Ancient China,’ Journal of Chinese Religions, 22, 51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 16.
    See Greiner, P. (1985) ‘Der Herrscher und das Gesetz — Gemeinsamkeiten im konfuzianischen und legistischen Staatsdenken,’ in G. Naundorf, K-H. Pohl and H-H. Schmidt (eds.) Religion und Philosophie in Ostasien. Testschrift für Heinz Steininger zum 65. Geburtstag (Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann), p. 423.Google Scholar
  14. 18.
    Puett, M. (2010) ‘Ritualization as Domestication,’ in L. Dolce, G. Raz, and K. Triplett (eds.) Grammars and Morphologies of Ritual Practices in Asia, Section II (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz), pp. 366–67;Google Scholar
  15. 21.
    see Michaels, A. (2010) ‘The Grammar of Rituals,’ in A. Michaels and A. Mishra (eds.) Grammars and Morphologies of Ritual Practices in Asia, Section 1 (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz), pp. 10–14, 18–21.Google Scholar
  16. 22.
    See Dalby, M. T. (1979) ‘Court Politics in late T’ang Times,’ in D. Twitchett and J. K. Fairbank (eds.) The Cambridge History of China, vol. 3, part 1 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 561–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 27.
    Chen, J. (2010) Crossfire. Shingon-Tendai Strife as Seen in Two Twelfth-century Polemics, with Special References to Their Background in Tang China. (Tokyo: The International Institute for Buddhist Studies), pp. 181–83;Google Scholar
  18. Weinstein, S. (1987) Buddhism under the T’ang (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 79–82.Google Scholar
  19. 31.
    see Xiong, V. (1996) ‘Ritual Innovations and Taoism under Tang Xuanzong,’ T’oung Pao LXXXII, pp. 295–96.Google Scholar
  20. 33.
    Chen, J. (2007) Philosopher, Practitioner, Politician (Leiden: Brill), p. 341, n17.Google Scholar
  21. 34.
    Chen, J. (2005) ‘Fazang (643–712),’ Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies, 28, 77.Google Scholar
  22. 37.
    Vanden Broucke, P. (2007) ‘The Accounts of Milbon, Hyet’ong and Myǒngnang in the Samguk Yusa,’ in A. Heirman and S. P. Bumbacher (eds.) The Spread of Buddhism (Leiden: Brill), pp. 298–99.Google Scholar
  23. 40.
    Davidson, R. M. (2002) Indian Esoteric Buddhism (New York: Columbia University Press), pp. 113–31.Google Scholar
  24. 41.
    See Dunnell, R. (1996) The Great State of White and High. Buddhism and State Tormation in Eleventh-Century Xia (Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press);Google Scholar
  25. Abe, R. (1999) The Weaving of Mantra (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
  26. 47.
    See Forte, A. (2003) ‘On the Origin of the Purple Kāṣāya in China,’ in G. Verardi and S. Vita (eds.) Buddhist Asia 1, Papers from the Tirst Conference of Buddhist Studies Held in Naples in May 2001 (Kyoto: Italian School of East Asian Studies).Google Scholar
  27. 49.
    Mochizuki, S. (1974) Mochizuki Bukkyō Daijiten (Tōkyō: Sekai Seiten Kankō Kyōkai), p. 4385b.Google Scholar
  28. 54.
    Peterson, C. A. (1979) ‘Court and Province in Mid- and Late T’ang,’ in D. Twitchett and J. K. Fairbank (eds.), The Cambridge History of China, vol. 3, part 1 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 482–91;Google Scholar
  29. 60.
    Gernet, J. (1995) Buddhism in Chinese Society, translated by F. Verellen (New York: Columbia University Press), pp. 231–47.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martin Lehnert 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Lehnert

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations