Assessing the Impact of Systems Modeling in the Redesign of an Emergency Department
Systems modeling has been used to redesign care in the National Health Service in the United Kingdom. However, assessing the benefits of such modeling is problematic. This paper examines the impact of two complementary techniques, process mapping and simulation, in the redesign of Emergency Department (ED) systems. Using the example of one significant change prompted by systems modeling, the introduction of a new staff roster, the impact on patient-time in the ED is examined. Any assessment has to recognize the effect of changes in the environment, notably staff experience and volume of activity. Using a performance model that incorporates these variables, the main quantifiable impact of the new roster was identified as a reduction in the mean patient-time of 16 min, for the 87% of ED patients classified as minor. Attributing credit for any improvement requires care but systems modeling can provide valuable insights into the design of ED systems resulting in quantifiable improvements.
KeywordsEmergency Department National Health Service Junior Doctor Operational Research Society Flow Group
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Fone D, Hollinghurst S, Temple M, Round A, Lester N, Weightman A, Roberts K, Coyle E, Bevan G and Palmer S (2003) Systematic review of the use and value of computer simulation modelling in population health and health care delivery. Journal of Public Health Medicine 25 (3), 325–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gunal MM and Pidd M (2011) DGHPSIM: generic simulation of hospital performance. ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation 21(4), article 23, doi: 10.1145/2000494.200496, http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2000494.2000496 (accessed 19 September 2012).
- Mould G, Bowers J and Ghattas M (2010) The evolution of the pathway and its role in improving patient care. Quality and Safety in Health Care 19 (5), 1–6.Google Scholar
- Proudlove N, Moxham C and Boaden R (2008) Lessons for lean in healthcare from using six sigma in the NHS. Public Money & Management 28 (1), 27–34.Google Scholar