Abstract
Post-war Taiwan’s environment paid dearly for its so-called economic ‘miracle’. Various environmental problems resulted from Taiwan’s specific political economy, namely, that of a ‘developmental state’, favouring economic growth and development. Such a political-economic structure has affected, if not determined, environmental policy in Taiwan. This research adopts the theory of ecological modernization (EM) to investigate and understand the historical course of shifts in land use and industrial policy in relation to the imperatives of Taiwan’s developmental state.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Donald Hughes, What is Environmental History? (Malden, MA: Polity Press, 2006), 1.
J. R. McNeill, Something New under the Sun: An Environmental History of the Twentieth-Century World (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2001), xxii.
Donald Hughes, An Environmental History of the World: Humankind’s Changing Role in the Community of Life (New York: Routledge, 2001), 1–11.
John Agnew, Place and Politics: The Geographical Mediation of State and Society (Boston, MA: Allen & Unwin, 1987), 28.
Liu Hwa-Jen 劉華真, ‘Vanishing Farmers: Taiwan’s Early Environmental Protests Revisited’, Taiwanese Sociology 21 (2011): 1–49, especially 38.
Lester R. Brown, Plan B 3.0: Mobilizing to Save Civilization (New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2008);
Joel Kovel, The Enemy of Nature: The End of Capitalism or the End of the World (New York: Zed Books, 2007);
Clive Ponting, A Green History of the World: Nature, Pollution, and the Collapse of Societies (New York: Penguin Books, 1993).
Arthur P. J. Mol, Gert Spaargaren, and David A. Sonnenfeld, ‘Ecological Modernisation: Three Decades of Policy, Practice and Theoretical Reflection’, in The Ecological Modernisation Reader, ed. Arthur P. J. Mol, David A. Sonnenfeld, and Gert Spaargaren (New York: Routledge, 2009), 3.
Mol et al. eds., Ecological Modernisation Reader, 359–497; Arthur P. J. Mol and David Sonnenfeld, eds., Ecological Modernisation around the World (New York: Frank Cass, 2000), 171–292;
Yang Li-Fang, ‘Embedded Autonomy and Ecological Modernisation in Taiwan’, International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development 4, no. 3 (2005): 310–30;
Tsai Tsai-Hsiu 蔡采秀, ‘Nature, Urban Planning and Environment Consciousness: On the Problems of Ecological Modernization in Taiwan’, Thought and Words 42, no. 2 (2004): 117–81;
Tseng Hua-Pi 曾華璧, ‘Environmental Governance in Taiwan (1950–2000): An Analytical Study in the Light of Ecological Modernization and Eco State Theory’, Taiwan Historical Research 15, no. 4 (2008): 121–48.
Arthur P. J. Mol and Gert Spaargaren, ‘Ecological Modernisation and Industrial Transformation’, in A Companion to Environmental Geography, ed. N. Castree, D. Demeritt, D. Liverman and B. Rhoads (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009), 259.
György Pataki, ‘Ecological Modernization as a Paradigm of Corporate Sustainability’, Sustainable Development 17, no. 2 (2009): 83;
Stephen C. Young, ‘Introduction: The Origins and Evolving Nature of Ecological Modernization’, in The Emergence of Ecological Modernisation: Integrating the Environment and the Economy? ed. Stephen C. Young (New York: Routledge, 2000), 1–40.
Maarten A. Hajer, ‘Ecological Modernization as Cultural Politics’, in Risk, Environment, and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology, ed. S. Lash, Bronisiaw Szerszynski, and Brian Wynne (Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 1996), 251.
Frederick Buttel, ‘Ecological Modernization as Social Theory’, Geoforum 31, no. 1 (2000): 60.
Joseph Murphy, ‘Ecological Modernization’, Geoforum 31, no. 1 (2000): 2.
Gert Spaargaren and Arthur P. J. Mol, ‘Sociology, Environment and Modernity: Ecological Modernization as a Theory of Social Theory’, Society and Natural Resources 5, no. 4 (1992): 329.
Arthur P. J. Mol, Globalization and Environmental Reform (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001), 58.
John Barry, ‘Ecological Modernization’, in Debating the Earth: The Environmental Politics Reader, ed. John Dryzek and David Schlosberg (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 306.
Arthur P. J. Mol, Environmental Reform in the Information Age (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008), 72.
Wolfgang Sachs, Planet Dialectics (New York: Zed Books, 1999), 127.
Eco-efficiency primarily means ‘doing more with less’. Reduction is its central tenet, for example, by cutting the amount of toxic waste created, the quantity of raw materials used, or the product size itself. It is mostly measured by ‘the rate of environmental damage caused per unit of output’. See Andrew Gouldson and Joseph Murphy, ‘Ecological Modernisation: Economic Restructuring and the Environment’, The Political Quarterly 68 B (1997): 74. The consumption of basic resources is used as proxy variables for environmental impact. See Murphy, ‘Ecological Modernization’, 2.
Steven Yearley, ‘The Social Construction of Environmental Problems: A Theoretical Review and Some Not-Very-Herculean Labors’, in Sociological Theory and the Environment: Classical Foundations, Contemporary Insights, ed. Riley E. Dunlap, Frederick H. Buttel, Peter Dickens, and August Gijswijt (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2002), 281.
Richard York and Eugene A Rosa, ‘Key Challenges to Ecological Modernization Theory’, Organization & Environment, Vol. 16, No. 3 (Sep 2003), 273–88.
John S. Dryzek, ‘Ecological Modernization, Risk Society, and the Green State’, in Ecological Modernisation Reader, ed. Mol et al., 226–53; Christian Hunold and John S. Dryzek, ‘Green Political Strategy and the State: Combining Political Theory and Comparative History’, in The State and the Global Ecological Crisis, ed. John Barry and Robyn Eckersley (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005), 75–95.
Arthur P. J. Mol, ‘From Environmental Sociologies to Environmental Sociology? A Comparison of U.S. and European Environmental Sociology’, Organization & Environment 19, no. 1 (2006): 5–27.
Maurie J. Cohen, ‘Risk Society and Ecological Modernisation’, Futures 29, no. 2 (1997): 105–19.
Richard York and Eugene A. Rosa, ‘Key Challenges to Ecological Modernization Theory: Institutional Efficacy, Case Study Evidence, Units of Analysis, and the Pace of Eco-Efficiency’, Organization & Environment September 16, no. 3 (2003): 273–88.
Arthur P. J. Mol, ‘The Environmental Movement in an Era of Ecological Modernization’, Geoforum 31, no. 1 (2000): 45–57.
Renato J. Orsato and Stewart R. Clegg, ‘Radical Reformism: Towards Critical Ecological Modernization’, Sustainable Development 13, no. 4 (2005): 253–67.
Bill Tomlinson, Greening through IT: Information Technology for Environmental Sustainability (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2010).
Maarten A. Hajer, The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1995), 26.
Thomas Gold, State and Society in the Taiwan Miracle (Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 1986);
Robert Wade, Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990).
Lee Chen-Jai 李承嘉, An Analysis of Land Policy in Postwar Taiwan (Taipei: Jenq-Yang, 1998);
Hsia Chu-Joe 夏鑄九 and Zhang Jin-Sen 張景森, ‘A Review of National Land Planning in Taiwan’, in Challenges to National Land Planning, ed. Chyuan-Jenq Shiau (Taipei: Yeh-Chiang, 1993), 11–30.
CEPD 經建會, Economic Development, R.O.C. (Taiwan) (Taipei: Council for Economic Planning and Development, 2012), 42.
Hsu Song-Ken 許松根 and Chuang Chao-Jung 莊朝榮, ‘A Review of Current Issues and Strategy of Industrial Land’, Taiwan Economic Forecast and Policy 23, no. 1 (1992): 155–82.
Liu, ‘Vanishing Farmers’, 16–17; Jheng Cin-Sian 鄭親憲, ‘The Retrospection and Prospection of Taiwan’s Industrial District Policy’, Journal of the Land Bank of Taiwan 28, no. 4 (1991): 95–115.
CEPD, Taiwan Statistical Data Book (Taipei: Council for Economic Planning and Development, 2010), 36.
G. S. Shieh 謝國雄, ‘Invisible Factory: Subcontracting Points and Homeworkers in Taiwan’, Taiwan: A Radical Quarterly in Social Studies 13 (1992): 137–60.
Liao Cheng-Hung 廖正宏, Chun-chieh Huang 黃俊傑, and Hsin-huang Hsiao 蕭新煌, Changes in Taiwan’s Agricultural Policy after World War Two (Taipei: The Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica, 1986), 55–6.
Zhang Jin-Sen 張景森, Urban Planning in Taiwan: 1895–1988 (Taipei: Yeh-Chian, 1993), 72.
Generally speaking, there are four crises: diplomatic setback, social challenges, oil shocks, international economic competition. See Hsin-Hsun Huang, ‘An Investigation of Taiwan’s Persistent Environmental Plight: A Political and Ecological Critique of Science-Based Industrial Parks in Taiwan’ (Ph.D. diss., University of Delaware, 2012), 169–74.
Chu Yun-han, ‘The East Asian NICs: A State-led Path to the Developed World’, in Global Change, Regional Response: The New International Context of Development, ed. Barbara Stallings (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995), 208.
Chu Wan-Wen 瞿宛文, The Mechanism of Economic Growth (Taipei: Tonsan, 2002).
The Ten Major Construction Projects period was from 1974 to 1979 and its total expenditure was more than US$50 million. It included the electrification of the railways, the construction of the first Freeway, Taoyuan International Airport, the north line of the Taiwan Railway, Taichung Harbour, Suao Harbour, and the first nuclear power plant, as well as the establishment of the China Shipbuilding Corporation shipyard, the China Steel plant and the CPC Kaohsiung petroleum refinery. See Yu Tzong-Shian 于宗先 and Wang Chin-Lih 王金利, A Visible Hand: The Government’s Role in the Process of Economic Development (Taipei: Linking, 2003), 83.
Sasamoto Takeji 笹本武治, ‘The Process of Industrialization’, in Industrialization in Taiwan, ed. Taniura Takao (Taipei: Renjian, 2003), 27.
Lin Yu-Shan 林育萱, ‘The Study of the Influences of Linyuan Industrial Park on Industrial and Environmental Changes of Linyuan Township’ (Master’s diss., National Kaohsiung Normal University, 2011), 16.
Hsin-Huang Michael Hsiao 蕭新煌, Local Environmental Protest Movements in Taiwan: 1980–1996 (Hong Kong: Center for Cross-strait Relations, 1999), 11;
Ho Ming-Sho 何明修, Green Democracy (Taipei: Socio Publishing, 2006), 367.
Hsin-Huang Michael Hsiao, ‘New Environmental Paradigm and Social Change: An Analysis of Environmental Values in Taiwan’, National Taiwan University Journal of Sociology 18 (1986): 81–133.
Yeh Jiunn-Rong 葉俊榮, Environmental Policy and Law (Taipei: Angle, 2010), 116.
Tseng Hua-Pi 曾華璧, Human and Environment (Taipei: Cheng-Chung, 2001), 121;
Chen Mei-Chuan 陳美娟, ‘The Development of Nature Conservation Policy in Taiwan: A Case Study of the Wild Society of Taipei’ (Master’s diss., National Taiwan University, 2007), 41.
Wang Shin 王鑫, Community Participation and the Management of Wildlife Conservation Area (Taipei: Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan, 1998), 7, 31.
Chu Wan-Wen, ‘Water Resource and Petrochemical Industry’, in Environmental Protection and Industrial Policy, ed. Taiwan Research Fund (Taipei: Taiwan Research Fund. 1994), 39–53.
Hi-tech industry was favoured because it was value-added, technology-intensive, and both low in pollution and energy intensity, as well as because it produced an industrial-linkage effect. Hsu Hsien-Hsiu 徐賢修, ‘Retrospect to the Establishment of Hsinchu Science-based Industrial Park’, Biographical Literature 66, no. 6 (1995): 23–8; Yu and Wang, A Visible Hand, 96.
For example, Chiang Ching-kuo, at the opening ceremony of the Hsinchu SIP, said that hi-tech industry relies ‘more on hi-tech manpower and less on natural resources’, such as land and energy, and therefore ‘it would be less polluting’. See President[’s] Office Gazette (19 December 1980), 1–2. According to Article 3 of the Act for Establishment and Administration of Science Parks (1979), ‘science-based industry’ refers to an enterprise involved in ‘manufacturing, research and development of high-tech industrial products’, which should ‘conform with domestic industrial development requirements and preferably employ or cultivate local high-tech professionals … [and] not create any public hazards’ (italics added). Huang Chao-Mou 黃昭謀, ‘The Informational Society Construction of Taiwan’s Technocracy: Referring to Technology Policy’ (Ph.D. diss., Shih Hsin University, 2005).
CEPD, A Brief Introduction to the Plan for National Land Comprehensive Development (Taipei: Council for Economic Planning and Development, 1996), 6;
NSC 國科會, White Paper in Science and Technology 1997 (Taipei: National Science Council, 1997), 12.
STSIPA 南科管理局, Special Issue for Southern Taiwan Science-based Industrial Park Administration (Tainan: STSIPA, 2009), 16. Yang Yeou-Ren 楊友仁, ‘From Hsinchu to Tainan: The Political Economy of Science Park, New Industry and Local Development’ (Master’s diss., National Taiwan University, 1998), 6–1 to 6–21.
Liao Kun-Jung 廖坤榮 and Chen Ya-Feng 陳雅芬, ‘Local Developmental Policy from the Perspective of Post-materialism: The Pin-Nan Case of Tainan County’, The Chinese Public Administration Review 12, no. 4 (2003): 43–76;
Tseng Hua-Pi, ‘Ecological Thought and Politics: A Preliminary Study on Tainan’s Conservation Movement in 1990s’, Thought and Words 44, no. 2 (2006): 89–131.
‘Green’ denotes sustainable development, a reflection on industrialization. It is a pro-environment developmental strategy that balances economic, social, and ecological interests. ‘Silicon Island’ refers to the essences of Silicon Valley, such as innovation and entrepreneurship, as leading powers in Taiwan’s economy. See CEDP, Construction Blueprint of Green Silicon Island and its related Policy Program (Taipei: Council for Economic Planning and Development, 2001), 1.
Chen Shui-bian 陳水扁, New Century, New Course: Chen Shui-bian’s National Blueprint (Taipei: Chen Shui-bian Presidential Campaign Operation Center), 4 (2000): 3.
CEDP, Construction Blueprint of Green Silicon Island and its related Policy Program, 18; OECD, Knowledge-based Industries in Asia (Paris: OECD, 2000), 16.
Tseng Hua-Pi, ‘Ecological Thought and Politics’, 89–131; Tang Ching-Ping 湯京平 and Lu Chi-Jung 呂季蓉, ‘Global Ecological Conservation Movements and Local Factions: A Politico-economic Analysis of Aogu Development Projects’, Chinese Political Science Review 42 (2006): 1–35.
Yang Yung-Nane 楊永年 et al., ‘A Review of Tainan City’s Governance: A Case of Developing Taijiang National Park’, Chinese Local Autonomy 66, no. 7 (2013): 5–28.
Chung Ming-Kuang 鍾明光 et al., ‘An Endeavor to Integrate the Protected Area into Rural Development: A Case Study of Conservation Development for Community Movement in Mei-Nung since 1990s’, Journal of City and Planning 40, no. 3 (2013): 217–41.
Taiwan BOE 能源局, Energy Statistics Handbook 2013 (Taipei: Bureau of Energy, MOEA, 2013), 35.
SGPRF 土壤及地下水污染整治基金管理委員會, 2009 Soil and Groundwater Pollution Remediation Annual Report (Taipei: EPA, 2010), 102.
HSIPA, Hsinchu Science Park Annual Report 2012 (Hsinchu: Science Park Administration, 2013), 7;
CTSIPA, Central Taiwan Science Park Annual Report 2012 (Taichung: Central Taiwan Science Park Administration, 2013), 9; STSIPA, Southern Taiwan Science Park Annual Report 2012, 5.
The industrial sector contributed 45.2 per cent of total GHG emissions and 43.7 per cent of domestic energy consumption in 1993, and the figures had respectively grown to 48.5 per cent and 53.4 per cent by 2011. Taiwan BOE, Energy Statistics Handbook 2013, 130; Taiwan EPA, The History of Greenhouse Gases Reduction Management (Taipei: Environmental Protection Administration, 2012), 215.
Hajer, The Politics of Environmental Discourse, 260–94; Peter Christoff, ‘Ecological modernisation, ecological modernities’, Environmental Politics, Vol. 5, Issue 3 (1996): 476–500.
Christoff, ‘Ecological modernisation, ecological modernities’, 490; John S. Dryzek, David Downes, Christian Hunold, David Schlosberg and Hans-Kristian Hernes, ‘Ecological Modernization, Risk Society, and the Green State’, in Green State and Social Movement (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003), 230; Hajer, The Politics of Environmental Discourse, 281.
Dunlap Riley and Brent Marshall, ‘Environmental Sociology’, in 21st Century Sociology: A Reference Handbook, ed. Clifton Bryant and Dennis Peck, vol. 2 (Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2007), 329–40.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 Hsin-Hsun Huang, Hsin-Huang Michael Hsiao, and Shih-Jung Hsu
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Huang, HH., Hsiao, HH.M., Hsu, SJ. (2016). Taiwan’s Land Use after World War II: An Ecological Modernization Approach. In: Liu, Tj., Beattie, J. (eds) Environment, Modernization and Development in East Asia. Palgrave Studies in World Environmental History. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-57231-8_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-57231-8_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-84803-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-57231-8
eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)