Advertisement

“Christ as Primary Sacrament”

Ways to Ecumenical Convergence in Sacramental Ecclesiology
  • C. Pierson Shaw
Part of the Pathways for Ecumenical and Interreligious Dialogue book series (PEID)

Abstract

As part of its endeavor to “return to the sources,” the Second Vatican Council spoke of the “Church as Sacrament” and provided a critical element of ecclesiology, offering great ecumenical promise. Lumen Gentium refers to the Church as “sacrament” at least three times (LG 1, 9, 48). This concept was repeated in Sacrosanctum Concilium (5, 26), Gaudium et Spes (42, 45), and Ad Gentes (1, 5). While the Church is understood as sacrament, Lumen Gentium states that the Church is centered in Christ. Christ, not the Church, is the light of the world. The Church is the body of Christ and Christ is the primordial Sacrament. The notion of the Church being a Sacrament is rooted in Augustine and his medieval interpreters. One modern interpreter, Hans Urs von Balthasar, similarly writes, “The sending (missio) has its roots in a primordial proceeding (processio) from God… This in turn presupposes that the Son was always, and has always been, ‘with’ God (Jn 1:1, 18).”1 While the documents of the Second Vatican Council do not specifically use the term primordial, clearly what is behind the use of the phrase “Church as Sacrament” is in the Son’s “primordial proceeding,” which Balthasar had understood in terms of Irenaeus’s theology of recapitulation.

Keywords

Grand Rapid Joint Declaration Latin Text Christian Life Vatican Council 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Hans Urs Von Balthasar, Theo-Drama: Theological Dramatic Theory, 5 vols. (San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press, 1992), iii, 154.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Walter Kasper, Harvesting the Fruits: Basic Aspects of Christian Faith in Ecumenical Dialogue (New York: Continuum, 2009), 70.Google Scholar
  3. 6.
    Ola Tjørhom, Visible Church—Visible Unity: Ecumenical Ecclesiology and “The Great Tradition of the Church” (Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 2004), 50, esp. footnote 10.Google Scholar
  4. 9.
    Kenan B. Osborne OFM, The Christian Sacraments of Initiation: Baptism, Confirmation, Eucharist (Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press, 1987), 228.Google Scholar
  5. 10.
    Michael Root, “The Implications of the Joint Declaration on Justification and Its Wider Impact for Lutheran Participation in the Ecumenical Movement,” in Justification and the Future of the Ecumenical Movement: The Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification, ed. William G. Rusch (Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 2003), 47–60.Google Scholar
  6. 16.
    Michael Root, “The Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification: A Lutheran Systematic Theological Perspective,” in Rereading Paul Together; Protestant and Catholic Perspectives on Justification, ed. David E. Aune (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2006), 60–76.Google Scholar
  7. 17.
    Root, “Implications of the Joint Declaration,” 63f; see also David S. Yeago, “Theological Impasse and Ecclesial Future,” Lutheran Forum 26, no. 4 (November 1992): 36–45.Google Scholar
  8. see also Robert W. Jenson, Visible Words: The Interpretation and Practice of Christian Sacraments (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1978).Google Scholar
  9. 22.
    T. Austin Murphy, Joseph A. Burgess, and George Anderson, eds., Justification by Faith: Lutherans and Catholics in Dialogue VII (Minneapolis, MN: Augsburg, 1985), 52.Google Scholar
  10. 23.
    A study of the history of Luther’s “Lectures on the Letter to the Romans” can be found in Gunther Wenz and Theodor Schneider, eds., Gerecht und Sünder zugleich? Ökumenische Klärungen. Dialog der Kirchen Band 11 (Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder, 2001), 317.Google Scholar
  11. 24.
    Michael Root, “Continuing the Conversation: Justification as Criterion and on the Christianas Simmul Iustus Et Peccator,” in The Gospel Of Justification In Christ: Where Does The Church Stand Today?, ed. Wayne C. Stumme (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2006), 42–61.Google Scholar
  12. 25.
    Martin Luther, “Lectures on Romans,” in Luther’s Works (hereafter LW), vol. 25, trans. Jacob A. O. Preus and Walter G. Tillmanns, ed. Hilton C. Oswald (St. Louis: Concordia, 1972), 259.Google Scholar
  13. 27.
    Vitalis Mshanga, “Simul Iustus et Peccaor: Ecumenical Reflections on the Lutheran—Roman Catholic Simul Controversy,” Australian Journal of Theology 14, no. 1 (2009): 14.Google Scholar
  14. 28.
    Martin Luther, “Against Latomus, 1521,” in LW, vol. 32, Career of the Reformer II, ed. J. J. Pelikan, H. C. Oswald, and H. T. Lehmann (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1958), 137–215.Google Scholar
  15. 29.
    Martin Luther, “The Large Catechism” (hereafter LC), in The Book of Concord: The Confessions of the Evangelical Lutheran Church, ed. Robert Kolb and Timothy J. Wengert (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1959), 377–480.Google Scholar
  16. 30.
    David S. Yeago, “Martin Luther on Renewal and Sanctification; Simul Iustus et Peccator Revisited,” in Theological Knowledge and Unity of the Faith Studies in Honor of Prof. Jared Wicks, ed. Carmen Aparicio Valls, Carmelo Dotolo and Gianluigi Pasquale (Rome: Gregorian Pontifical University, 2004), 655–74. (Published in Italian under the title: Sapere teologico e unita della fede Studi in onore del Prof. Jared Wicks.)Google Scholar
  17. 32.
    Martin Luther, “Commentary on the Letter to the Galatians,” in LW, vol. 26, ed. Jeroslav Pelikan and Walter A. Hansen (St. Louis: Concordia, 1963), 229–30.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© C. Pierson Shaw 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Pierson Shaw

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations