Exploring Regional-Level Impact of Corruption and Crime on Multinational and Domestic Firms: The Evidence from Russia

  • Natalya Victor Smith
Part of the The Academy of International Business book series


It is now common knowledge that foreign direct investment (FDI) can be one of the key catalysts for technological development of a country. Indeed, to the extent it entails a transfer of technological, managerial and organisational skills, or provides access to other resources unavailable to certain economies, FDI can have a marked impact on the productivity spillovers, resulting in economic growth as technology transferred by multinationals enterprises (MNEs) stimulates domestic investment (Blomström et al., 20 01) and facilitates improvements in institutions (Smith and Thomas, 2015b). Since FDI constitutes a very large share of capital formation in transition countries (UNCTAD, 2015), the FDI-promoting effect of good institutions should be the key channel in the overall growth and development for these economies.


Foreign Direct Investment Violent Crime Foreign Firm Domestic Firm Institutional Quality 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Acemoglu, Daron, Simon Johnson, and James A. Robinson (2002), ‘Reversal of Fortune: Geography and Institutions in Making of the Modern World Income Distribution’. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 1231–1294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aidis, Ruta, Saul Estrin, and Tomasz Michiewicz (2008), ‘Institutions and Entrepre-neurship Development in Russia: A Comparative Perspective.’ Journal of Business Venturing, 23, 656–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aidt, S. Toke (2003), ‘Economic Analysis of Corruption: A Survey.’ Economic Journal, 113(491), 632–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anokhin, Sergey and William S. Schulze (2009), ‘Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Corruption’. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 465–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arellano, Manuel and Stephen Bond (1991), ‘Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations’. Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arellano, Manuel and Olympia Bover (1995), ‘Another Look at the Instrumental Variable Estimation of Error Component Models’. Journal of Econometrics, 68, 29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baumol, William J. (1990), ‘Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive.’ Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 893–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bevan, Alan and Saul Estrin (2004), ‘The Deter minants of Foreign Direct Invest ment into European Transition Economies’. Journal of Comparative Economics, 32(4), 775–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blomström, Magnus, Ari Kokko, and Steven Globerman (2001), ‘The Determinants of Host Country Spillovers from Foreign Direct Investment: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature’, in Nigel Pain (ed.), Inward Investment, Technological Change and Growth: The Impact of Multinational Corporations on the UK Economy, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 34–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blundell, Richard and Steve Bond (2000), ‘GMM Estimation with Persistent Panel Data: An Application to Production Functions’. Econometric Reviews, 19(3), 321–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boycko, Maxim, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert W. Vishny (1996), ‘A Theory of Privatisation.’ Economic Journal, 106(435), 309–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brock, Gregory J. (1998), ‘Foreign Direct Investment in Russia’s Regions 1993–95. Why So Little and Where Has It Gone?’ Economics of Transition, 6(2), 349–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Buchanan, Bonnie G., Quan V. Le, and Meenakshi Rishi (2012), ‘Foreign Direct Investment and Institutional Quality: Some Empirical Evidence’. International Review of Financial Analysis, 21, 81–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Busse, Matthias and Carsten Hefeker (2007), ‘Political Risk, Institutions and Foreign Direct Investment’. European Journal of Political Economy, 23(2), 397–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dacin, Tina M., Gerry Goodstein, and Richard W. Scott (2002), ‘Institutional Theory and Institutional Change: Introduction to the Special Research Forum’. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Daniele, Vittorio and Ugo Marani (2010), ‘Organised Crime, the Quality of Local Institutions and FDI in Italy: A Panel Data Analysis’. European Journal of Political Economy, 27(1), 132–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Daude, Christian and Ernesto Stein (2007), ‘The Quality of Institutions and Foreign Direct Investment’. Economics and Politics, 19(3), 317–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dawid, Herbert, Gustav Feichtinger, and Andreas Novak (2002), ‘Extortion as an Obstacle to Economic Growth: A Dynamic Game Analysis’. European Journal of Political Economy, 18, 499–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dickson, Pat H. and Mark K. Weaver (2011), ‘Institutional Readiness and Small to Medium-Sized Enterprise Alliance Formation’. Journal of Small Business Management, 49(1), 126–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Djelic, Marie L. and Sigrid Quack (2003), ‘Governing Globalisation – Bringing Institutions Back In’, in Djelic L. Marie and Sigrid Quack (eds), Globalisation and Institutions: Redefining the Rules of the Economic Game , Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Donohue, Joan J. (1998), ‘Understanding the Time Path of Crime’. The Journal of Criminal Law or Criminology, 88(4), 1423–1452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fajnzylber, Pablo, Daniel Lederman, and Norman Loayza (2000), ‘Crime and Victimisation: An Economic Perspective’. Economia, 1, 219–302.Google Scholar
  23. Feng, Yi (2001), ‘Political Freedom, Political Instability, and Policy Uncertainty: A Study of Political Institutions and Private Investment in Developing Countries.’ International Studies Quarterly, 45(2), 271–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Foreign Investment Advisory Council (2012), Russia’s Investment Climate 2012, available at: www.fiac.ru [accessed 25 January 2013].Google Scholar
  25. Fox, James A. and Marianne W. Zawitz (2000), Homicide Trends in the United States: 1998 Update , Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  26. Getz, Kathleen A. and Roger J. Volkema (2002), ‘Culture, Perceived Corruption, and Economics: A Model of Predictors and Outcomes’. Business and Society, 40(1), 7–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ghoshal, Sumantra (1987), ‘Global Strategy: An Organising Framework’. Strategic Management Journal, 8(5), 425–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ghura, Dhaneshwar and Barry Goodwin (2000), ‘Determinants of Private Investment: A Cross-Regional Empirical Investigation.’ Applied Economics, 32(14), 1819–1829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gohmann, Stephan F. (2012), ‘Institutions, Latent Entrepreneurship, and Self-Employment: An International Comparison’. Entrepreneurial Theory and Practice, 36(2), 295–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gupta, Vishal K., Chun Guo, Mario Canever, Hyung R. Yim, Gaganjeet K. Sraw, and Ming Liu (2012), ‘Institutional Environment for Entrepreneurship in Rapidly Emerging Major Economies: The Case of Brazil, China, India, and Korea’. International Entrepreneurship Management Journal, 10(2), 376–384.Google Scholar
  31. Habib, Mohsin and Leon Zurawicki (2002), ‘Corruption and Foreign Direct Investment’. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(2), 291–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Henisz, Witold J. (2000), ‘The Institutional Environment for Multinational Investment’. Journal of Law, Economics and Organisation, 16(2), 334–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hitt, Michael A., Duane R. Ireland, David G. Sirmon, and Cheryl A. Trahms (2011), ‘Strategic Entrepreneurship: Creating Value for Individuals, Organisations, and Society’. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(2), 57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hoffman, Andrew J. and Mark J. Ventresca (2002), Organisations, Policy and the Natural Environment . Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Jain, Arvind K. (2001), ‘Corruption: A Review’. Journal of Economic Surveys, 15(1), 71–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kinoshita, Yuko and Nauro Campos (2003), ‘Why Does FDI Go Where it Goes? New Evidence from the Transition Economies’. IMF Working Papers, 03 (228).Google Scholar
  37. Kostova, Tatiana, Kendall Roth, and Tina M. Dacin (2008), ‘Institutional Theory in the Study of Multinational Corporations: A Critique and New Directions’. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 994–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lambsdorff, Johann G. (2003), ‘How Corruption Affects Productivity’. Kyklos, 56(4), 457–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lederman, Daniel, Norman Loayza, and Ana María Menéndez (2002), ‘Violent Crime: Social Capital Matter?’ Economic Development and Cultural Change, 50(3), 509–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Leff, Nathaniel H. (1964), ‘Economic Development through Bureaucratic Corruption’. American Behavioural Scientist, 8(3), 8–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Li, Quan and Adam Resnick (2003), ‘Reversal of Fortunes: Democratic Institutions and Foreign Direct Investment Inf lows to Developing Countries’. International Organisation, 57(1), 175–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lotspeich, Richard (1995), ‘Crime in the Transition Economies’. Europe–Asia Studies, 47(4), 555–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mathur, Aparna and Katikeya Singh (2013), ‘Foreign Direct Investment, Corruption and Democracy’. Applied Economics, 45(8), 991–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Meyer, Klaus E. (2001), ‘Institutions, Transaction Costs, and Entry Mode Choice in Eastern Europe’. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(2), 357–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Meyer, Klaus E. and Michael W. Peng (2005), ‘Probing Theoretically into Central and Eastern Europe: Transactions, Resources, and Institutions’. Journal of International Business Studies, 36, 600–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. North, Douglass C. (1990), Institutional Change and Economic Performance . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Oxley, Joanne E . (1999), ‘Institutional Environment and the Mechanisms of Governance: The Impact of Intellectual Property Protection on the Structure of Inter-Firm Alliances’. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organisation, 38(3), 283–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Resmini, Laura (2000), ‘The Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in the CEECs: New Evidence from Sectoral Patterns’. Economics of Transition, 8(3), 665–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Roodman, David M. (2009), ‘A Note on the Theme of Too Many Instruments’. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 71(1), 135–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Scott, Richard W. (2008), Institutions and Organisations: Ideas and Interests . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  51. Shleifer, Andrei and Robert W. Vishny (1993), ‘Corruption’. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(3), 599–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Smith, Natalya V. and Ekaterina Thomas (2014), ‘Innovation in Emerging Economies: The Spillover Effects of Foreign Direct Investment and Institutions in Russia’, in Svetla Marinova (ed.), Institutional Impacts on Firm Internalisation, London: Palgrave McMillan, 146–172.Google Scholar
  53. Smith, Natalya V., Ekaterina Thomas and Christos Antoniou (2014), ‘Multi-National Firms, Corruption and Innovation in Russia’, in Alan Verbeke, Rob Van Tulder, and Sarianna Lundan (eds), Multinational Enterprises, Markets and Institutional Diversity, Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 9, 347–371.Google Scholar
  54. Smith, Natalya V., Ekaterina Thomas and Christos Antoniou (2015a), ‘Determinants of Russia’s Informal Economy: The Impact of Corruption and Multinational Firms’. Journal of East–West Business, 21(2), 102–128.Google Scholar
  55. Smith, Natalya V., Ekaterina Thomas and Christos Antoniou (2015b), ‘The Role of FDI and State Capture in Shaping Innovation Outcome in Russia’. Europe–Asia Studies, 67 (5), 777–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Stenholm, Pekka, Zoltan J. Acs, and Robert Wuebker (2013), ‘Exploring Country-Level Institutional Arrangements on the Rate and Type of the Entrepreneurial Activity’. Journal of Business Venturing, 28 (1), 176–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tanzi, Vito and Hamid R. Davoodi (2000), ‘Corruption, Growth, and Public Finances’. IMF Working Papers, 1–27.Google Scholar
  58. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) (2015), United Nations Statistical Databases, United Nations Statistics Division, available at: http://unstats.un.org/unsd/databases.htm, [accessed 25 June 2015].Google Scholar
  59. Voyer, Peter A. and Paul W. Beamish (2004), ‘The Effect of Corruption on Japanese Foreign Direct Investment’. Journal of Business Ethics, 50 (3), 211–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Windmeijer, Frank (2005), ‘A Finite Sample Correction for the Variance of Linear Eff icient Two-Step GMM Estimators’. Journal of Econometrics, 126 (1), 25–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. World Bank (2003), World Development Indicators 2003. Sustainable Development in a Dynamic World . Washington: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  62. World Bank Group (2010), Doing Business: Measuring Business Regulations, available at: http://www.doingbusiness.org/, [accessed 24 June 2015].Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Natalya Victor Smith 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Natalya Victor Smith

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations