Skip to main content

Space for Gender Equality in the Security and Development Agenda? Insights from Three Donors

  • Chapter
The Securitization of Foreign Aid

Part of the book series: Rethinking International Development Series ((RID))

Abstract

In 2004, representatives of the 22 wealthiest foreign aid donor countries met under the auspices of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and agreed to the above statement at a meeting that concretized the donor community’s views on the relationship between security and development. It is tempting to think that foreign aid’s recent alliance with security emerged primarily from renewed interest in national security in the wake of the September 2001 attacks on the United States. However, as the introductory chapter in this volume establishes, this assumption overlooks a lengthier dialogue between security and development communities that grew from the early-1990s turn towards human security as an organizing principle for some donors’ aid and their foreign policy objectives.

Security from violence is fundamental for reducing poverty and achieving the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and, more broadly, for sustainable economic, social and political development. (OECD 2004: 2)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baaz, Maria Eriksson and Maria Stern (2009) ‘Why Do Soldiers Rape? Masculinity, Violence, and Sexuality in the Armed Forces in the Congo (DRC)’, International Studies Quarterly, 53.2: 495–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byron, Gabriela and Charlotte Örnemark (2010) ‘Gender Equality in Swedish Development Cooperation: Final Report’, Sida Evaluation. Stockholm: Sida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, R. Charli (2006) ‘Recognizing Gender-Based Violence against Civilian Men and Boys in Conflict Situations’, Security Dialogue, 37.1: 83–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CIDA (2010) Statistical Report on International Assistance, Fiscal Year 2008–2009. Gatineau: CIDA.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIDA (2013) Statistical Report on International Assistance, Fiscal Year 2011–2012. Gatineau: CIDA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleaver, Frances (2003) Masculinities Matter! Men, Gender, and Development. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornwall, Andrea (1997) ‘Men, Masculinity and “Gender in Development”’, Gender and Development, 5.2: 8–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DFID (2004) The Africa Conflict Prevention Pool: A Joint UK Government Approach to Preventing and Reducing Conflict in Sub-Saharan Africa, September, http://www.fco.gov.uk/Files/kfile/ACPP%20Information%20Doc%20-%20final,0.pdf, accessed 9 May 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunz, Rahel (2014) ‘Gender and Security Sector Reform: Gendering Differently?’ International Peacekeeping, 21.5: 604–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, Carol (2007) Foreign Aid: Diplomacy, Development, Domestic Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, Carol (2008) George Bush’s Foreign Aid: Transformation or Chaos? Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, C. (2005) ‘Has Gender Mainstreaming Failed?’ International Feminist Journal of Politics, 7.4: 576–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser, C. and A. Moser (2005) ‘Gender Mainstreaming since Beijing: A Review of Success and Limitations in International Institutions’, Gender and Development, 13. 2: 11–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2004) The Security and Development Nexus: Challenges for Aid. Paris: OECD, http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/40/59/31526546.pdf, accessed 9 May 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2010a) Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2010b) Aid in Support of Gender Equality in Fragile and Conflict-affected States. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2015) Financing UN Security Council Resolution 1325: Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women’s Rights in Fragile Contexts. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parpart, Jane L. (2014) ‘Exploring the Transformative Potential of Gender Main-streaming in International Development Institutions,’ Journal of International Development, 26.3: 382–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plewes, Betty and Joanna Kerr (2010) ‘Politicizing, Undermining Gender Equality’, Embassy Magazine, 5 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rathgeber, Eva (1990) ‘WID, WAD, GAD: Trends in Research and Practice’, The Journal of Developing Areas, 24: 489–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rathgeber, Eva (1995) ‘Gender and Development in Action’, in Marianne Marchand and Jane Parpart (eds.), Feminism/Postmodernism/Development, pp. 204–20. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sida (2005a) Promoting Gender Equality in Development Cooperation. Stockholm: Sida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sida (2005b) Promoting Peace and Security through Development Cooperation. Stockholm: Sida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sida (2011) Peace and Security Important Areas for Cooperation, http://www.sida.se/English/About-us/How-we-operate/Important-Areas-of-Development/Human-security1/Human-security/, accessed 9 May 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweden (2003) ‘Shared Responsibility: Sweden’s Policy for Global Development’, Government Bill, 2002 /03: 122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swiss, Liam (2009) Developing Consensus: The Globalisation of Development Assistance Policies. PhD Dissertation, Department of Sociology, McGill University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swiss, Liam (2011) ‘Security Sector Reform and Development Assistance: Explaining the Diffusion of Policy Priorities Among Donor Agencies’, Qualitative Sociology, 34.2: 371–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swiss, Liam (2012a) ‘The Adoption of Women and Gender as Development Assistance Priorities: An Event History Analysis of World Polity Effects’, International Sociology, 27.1: 96–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swiss, Liam (2012b) ‘Gender, Security, and Instrumentalism: Canada’s Foreign Aid in Support of National Interest?’ in Stephen Brown (ed.), Struggling for Effectiveness: CIDA and Canadian Aid Policy, pp. 135–58. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibault, Paul (2003) CIDA’s Approach to Peacebuilding, http://www.humansecurity.info/sites/cchs/files/pdfs/Consultation%20Papers/thibault_-_pdf.pdf, accessed 9 May 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorsell, Jerker, and Lindsey Weber (2006) ‘The Challenge of Walking the Coherent Line’, in Management Committee: The Reality of Aid (ed.), The Reality of Aid 2006: Focus on Conflict, Security and Development, pp. 333–36. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiessen, Rebecca (2007) Everywhere/Nowhere: Gender Mainstreaming in Development Agencies. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiessen, Rebecca (2014) ‘Gender Equality and the “Two CIDAs”: Successes and Setbacks, 1976–2013’, in Stephen Brown, Molly den Heyer, and David R. Black (eds.), Rethinking Canadian Aid, pp. 195–209. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiessen, Rebecca (2015) ‘Gender Essentialism in Canadian Foreign Aid Commitments to Women, Peace, and Security’, International Journal, 70.1: 84–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiessen, Rebecca and Krystel Carrier (2015) ‘The Erasure of “Gender” in Canadian Foreign Policy under the Harper Conservatives: The Significance of the Discursive Shift from “Gender Equality” to “Equality between Women and Men”,’ Canadian Foreign Policy Journal, 21. 2: 95–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Towns, Ann (2002) ‘Paradoxes of (In)Equality’, Cooperation and Conflict, 37.2: 157–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2000) Women, Peace, and Security. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2008) Women, Peace, and Security. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • USAID (2002) Foreign Aid in the National Interest: Promoting Freedom, Security, and Opportunity. Washington, DC: USAID.

    Google Scholar 

  • USAID (2005) Conflict Mitigation and Management Policy. Washington, DC: USAID.

    Google Scholar 

  • USAID (2006) Women, Men, and Development. Washington, DC: USAID.

    Google Scholar 

  • USAID (2007) US Overseas Loans and Grants: Obligations and Loan Authorizations, 1 July 1945–30 September 2006. Washington, DC: USAID.

    Google Scholar 

  • USAID (2009a) Security Sector Reform. Washington, DC: USAID, DOD, State Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • USAID (2009b) Supporting Peace Processes: A Toolkit for Development Intervention. Washington, DC: USAID.

    Google Scholar 

  • USAID and State Department (2007) Strategic Plan Fiscal Years 2007–2012: Transformational Diplomacy. Washington, DC: USAID and State Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valasek, Kristin (2008) ‘Security Sector Reform and Gender’, in Kristin Valasek and Megan Bastick (eds.), Gender and Security Sector Reform Toolkit. Geneva: DCAF, OSCE, UN-INSTRAW.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 Liam Swiss

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Swiss, L. (2016). Space for Gender Equality in the Security and Development Agenda? Insights from Three Donors. In: Brown, S., Grävingholt, J. (eds) The Securitization of Foreign Aid. Rethinking International Development Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-56882-3_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics