Advertisement

Colonialism and Migration: From the Landscapes of Toyohara

  • Tessa Morris-Suzuki
Part of the Palgrave Macmillan Transnational History Series book series (PMSTH)

Abstract

Emerging transnational visions of Japanese history draw attention to two dimensions of Japan’s modern historical experience that had been relatively neglected until the last decades of the twentieth century. The first is the dimension of migration both into and out of the Japanese archipelago. Japan’s relatively low levels of migration in the period from the 1950s to the early 1980s encouraged an image of the nation as an enclosed and homogeneous unit; but this image obscured the very complex flows of people between the Japanese archipelago and Japan’s overseas empire, which had profoundly shaped the history of East Asia in the first half of the twentieth century.

Keywords

Mass Culture Railway Station Pulp Industry Popular Song Japanese Colonial 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Gaimushō Ryōji Ijūbu, Waga kokumin no kaigai hatten—ijū hyakunen no ayumi (honhen) (Tokyo: Gaimushō, 1971), p. 7.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Allison, J. M., “Trend of Migratory Movements—Japan,” in Records of the US Department of State Relating to the Internal Affairs of Japan 1930–1939 (Washington: Department of State, 1963).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bruno Lasker ed., Problems of the Pacific 1931: Proceedings of the Fourth Conference of the Institute of Pacific Relations (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1932), p. 424.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hōmushō Nyūkoku Kanrishitsu, Nyūkoku kanri to sono jittai (Tokyo: Ōkurashō Insatsukyoku, 1964), p. 10;Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    The relatively few works on thesubject include Takenaka Nobuko, Shokuminchi Taiwan no Nihon josei seikatsushi (4 vols) (Tokyo: Tabata Shoten, 1995, 1996 and 2001);Google Scholar
  6. Kawamura Minato, Sōru toshi monogatari (Tokyo: Heibonsha, 2000), pp. 117–64.Google Scholar
  7. 6.
    Oguma Shigenobu, “Imin no shinzui,” in Saikin ishokumin kenkyū, vol. 1, ed. Nihon Imin Kyōkai (Tokyo: Tôyōsha, 1918), pp. 1–3.Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    See, for example, Louise Young, Japan’s Total Empire: Manchuria and the Culture of Wartime Imperialism (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998), p. 319;Google Scholar
  9. Sandra Wilson, The Manchurian Crisis and Japanese Society 1931–33 (London: Routledge, 2002), p. 32.Google Scholar
  10. 8.
    Yanaihara Tadao, “Jinkō mondai to imin,” in Ishokumin mondai kōshūkai kōenshū, ed. Shakaikyoku Shakaibu (Tokyo: Shakaikyoku Shakaibu, 1927), pp. 75–112.Google Scholar
  11. 10.
    Muromachi Yasushi, Karafuto ijū annai (Tokyo: Aikokusha, 1913,) p. 138.Google Scholar
  12. 11.
    Hyungmin Pai, “Modernism, Development and the Transformation of Seoul: A Study of the Development of Sae’oon Sang’ga and Yoido,” in Culture and the City in East Asia, ed. Won Bae Kim (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997), pp. 110–11;Google Scholar
  13. see also Roger Mark Selya, Taipei (Chichester: J. Wiley, 1995), pp. 23–4.Google Scholar
  14. 12.
    Imamura Takeshi, “Shi Toyohara no sugata,” Karafuto Chōhō, no. 3 (July 1937): 202.Google Scholar
  15. 13.
    Saitō Toshio, “Tsuimite kanpei taisha Karafuto Jinja o kataru,” Karafuto Chōhō, no. 4 (1937).Google Scholar
  16. 14.
    Nihon Tetsudō Bunka Zaidan, Karafuto Tetsudō shiryōshū (Tokyo: Nihon Tetsudō Bunka Zaidan, 1995), pp. 32–4.Google Scholar
  17. 15.
    see Tessa Morris-Suzuki, “Northern Lights: The Making and Unmaking of Karafuto Identity,” Journal of Asian Studies 60, no. 3 (2001): 645–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 17.
    Hatayama Teiji, “Karafuto no kinenhi to shiminsei: Karafuto meishō no hiwa 45 shū chū yori,” Karafuto Chōhō, no. 31 (1930): 83.Google Scholar
  19. 18.
    Tamura Shizue, Hajime ni eiga ga atta: Shokuminchi Taiwan to Nihon (Tokyo: Chūō Kōromsha, 2000).Google Scholar
  20. 19.
    Doi Takeo. “Kyōdominyō‘Karafuto yoikoto’,‘hirakeyuku Karafuto,’” Karafuto Chōhō, no. 3 (1937): 295.Google Scholar
  21. 20.
    Narita Ryūichi, ‘Furusato’ toiu monogatari:Toshikūkan non rekishigaku (Tokyo: Yoshikawa Kōbunkan, 1998).Google Scholar
  22. 21.
    Sugawara Eizō, “Karafuto Hakubutsukan,” Karafuto Chōho, no. 4 (1937): 116.Google Scholar
  23. 22.
    Karafuto Chō Naimubu Eizenka “Chikaku rakusei suru Karafutochō hakubutsukan,” Karafuto Chōhō, no. 2, (1937): 102–3.Google Scholar
  24. 23.
    Inuzuka Yasuhiro, “Tenrankai nonikusei,” in Shinhakubutsukantaisei: Manshūkoku no hakubutsukan ga sengo nihon ni tsutaeteiru koto, ed. Nagoya-Shi Hakubutsukan (Nagoya: Nagoya-Shi Hakubutsukan, 1995), pp. 25–8.Google Scholar
  25. 26.
    Denpōya Hidemaru, “Kyōdo niokeru kagaku bunka ni tsuite,” in Hoppō Bunka 1, no. 2 (1938): 53.Google Scholar
  26. 28.
    Herman Friis, “Pioneer Economy of Sakhalin Island,” Economic Geography 5, no. 1 (1939): 63–4.Google Scholar
  27. 29.
    Karafuto Chō, Karafuto Chō shisei sanjūnen shi. 2 vols. (Tokyo: Hara Shobō, 1973 [1936]), p. 472.Google Scholar
  28. 30.
    Honjō Eijirō, “Karafuto wo megurite,” Karafuto Chōhō, no. 17 (1938): 23.Google Scholar
  29. 32.
    Karafuto Chō Tetsudō Jimusho, Karafuto no tetsudō ryokō (Tokyo: Karafuto Cho, 1928), p. 17.Google Scholar
  30. 33.
    Kihara Naohiro, Karafuto bungakunotabi. vol. 1. (Sapporo:Kyōdō Bunkasha, 1994), pp. 362–9.Google Scholar
  31. 34.
    Samukawa Kōtarō, “Karafutokikō: Nosutarujia Sagaren,” in Kusabito (Tokyo: Chuō Kōronsha, 1941), p. 152–3.Google Scholar
  32. 35.
    See Kawamura Minato, Nanyō, Karafuto no Nihon bungaku (Tokyo: Chikuma Shobō, 1994), pp. 183–6;Google Scholar
  33. 39.
    Yanaihara Tadao, “Shokumin mata shokuminseisaku,” Yanaihara Tadao zenshū, vol.1 (Tokyo: Inawami Shoten, 1963), p. 308.Google Scholar
  34. 40.
    Quoted in Kojima Reiitsu, “Nihon Teikoku-shugi no Taiwan Sanchi Shihai—Musha-hōki jiken made,” in Taiwan Musha-hōki Jiken—Kenkyū to Shiryō, ed. Tai Kokuki hen (Tokyo, Shakai Shisō-sha, 1981), p. 48.Google Scholar
  35. 41.
    Government of Formosa, Report on the Control of the Aborigines in Formosa (Taihoku, Bureau of Aboriginal Affairs, 1911), p. 20.Google Scholar
  36. 43.
    Shuhsi Hsu, “Japanese Subjects in Manchuria: A Chinese View,” in Problems of the Pacific 1931: Proceedings of the Fourth Conference of the Institute of Pacific Relations, ed. Bruno Lasker (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1932), p. 283Google Scholar
  37. 44.
    Youn-Cha Shin Chey “Soviet Koreans and the Politics of Ethnic Education,” in The Politics of Nationality and the Erosion of the USSR, ed. World Congress for Soviet and East European Studies (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1992), pp. 126–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 46.
    Karafuto Keisatsubu, “Karafuto Zairyū Chō senjin Ippan, 1929,” in Nihon shokuminchika no zainichi chōsenjin no jōkyō. 12 vol., ed. Pak Kyong-Shik hen (Tokyo: Ajia Mondai Kenkyūsho, 1990), pp. 387–92.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Tessa Morris-Suzuki 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tessa Morris-Suzuki

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations