Early Modern Space Travel and the English Man in the Moon

  • David Cressy
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Literature, Science and Medicine book series (PLSM)


The Moon, for Early Modern Englishmen, was comfortingly familiar yet achingly distant.


Seventeenth Century Space Travel Lunar Eclipse Eternal Life Copernican System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 5.
    Pioneers of this subject include Marjorie Hope Nicolson, Voyages to the Moon (1948; New York: Macmillan, 1960);Google Scholar
  2. Steven J. Dick, Plurality of Worlds: The Origins of the Extraterrestrial Life Debate from Democritus to Kant (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982);Google Scholar
  3. Scott L. Montgomery, The Moon and the Western Imagination (Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press, 1999). See also Karl S. Guthke, “Nightmare and Utopia: Extraterrestrial Worlds from Galileo to Goethe,” Early Science and Medicine 8.3 (2003), 173–195.Google Scholar
  4. 6.
    John Wilkins, The Discovery of a World in the Moone. Or, A Discourse Tending to Prove, that ‘tis probable there may be another habitable world in that planet (London, 1638), licensed by the bishop of London’s chaplain, March 29, 1638, entered in the Stationers register on 30 March; Francis Godwin, The Man in the Moone: Or A Discourse of a Voyage Thither by Domingo Gonsales (London, 1638), registered on August 1, 1638; John Wilkins, A Discourse Concerning a New World & Another Planet (London, 1640).Google Scholar
  5. 7.
    Many of these early theorists are cited in Walter Charleton, Physiologia Epicuro-Gassendon-Charltoniana: or, A Fabrick of Natural Science Upon the Hypothesis of Atoms (London, 1654), andGoogle Scholar
  6. Pierre Borell, A New Treatise, Proving a Multiplicity of Worlds (London, 1658). See also Grant McColley, “The Seventeenth-Century Doctrine of a Plurality of Worlds,” Annals of Science 1.4 (1936), 385–387; Dick, Plurality of Worlds, 1–11;Milton K. Munitz, “One Universe or Many?” in Roots of Scientific Thought: A Cultural Persepective, ed. Philip P. Wiener and Aaron Noland (New York: Basic Books, 1957); Paolo Rossi, “Nobility of Man and Plurality of Worlds,” in Science, Medicine and Society in the Renaissance, ed. Allen G. Debus, 2 vols. (New York: Science History Publications, 1972), 2: 131–162.Google Scholar
  7. 8.
    Grant McColley and H. W. Miller, “Saint Bonaventure, Francis Mayron, William Vorilong, and the Doctrine of a Plurality of Worlds,” Speculum 12.3 (July 1937), 386–389; Pierre Duhem, Medieval Cosmology: Theories of Infinity, Place, Time, Void, and Plurality of Worlds, ed. and trans. Roger Ariew (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1985), 431–510;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Amos Funkenstein, Theology and the Scientific Imagination from the Middles Ages to the Seventeenth Century (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986), 141;Google Scholar
  9. Edward Grant, Planets, Stars, and Orbs: The Medieval Cosmos, 1200–1687 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), 150–168.Google Scholar
  10. 11.
    Giordano Bruno, De l’infinito universo et mondi (London, 1584); Campanella, Apologia pro Galileo (Frankfurt, 1622); Nicholas Hill, Philosophia Epicurea, Democritiana, Theophrastica (Paris, 1601 and Geneva, 1619). For Hill’s influence, see Daniel Massa, “Giordano Bruno’s Ideas in Seventeenth-Century England,” Journal of the History of Ideas 38.2 (1977), 227–242. Google Scholar
  11. 15.
    Lambert Daneau, The Wonderfull Woorkmanship of the World (London, 1578), ff. 25–27.Google Scholar
  12. 16.
    Thomas Heywood, The Hierarchie of the Blessed Angels (London, 1635), 153–154. See also John Swan, Speculum Mundi. Or A Glasse Representing the Face of the World (Cambridge, 1635), 210–228; George Hakewill, An Apologieof the Power and Providence of God in the Government of the World, 3rd edn (Oxford, 1635); Andreas Tacquet, Opera Mathematica (Antwerp, 1669), section on astronomy.Google Scholar
  13. 17.
    Percy G. Adams, Travel Literature and the Evolution of the Novel (Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky Press, 1983), 261, 275; A. G. H. Bachrach, “Lunar Mendax: Some reflections on moon-voyages in early seventeenth-century England,” in Between Dream and Nature: Essays on Utopia and Dystopia, ed. Dominic Baker-Smith and C. C. Barfoot (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1987), 70–90; Mary Baine Campbell, “Impossible Voyages: Seventeenth-Century Space Travel and the Impulse of Ethnology,” Literature and History, 3rd series, 6.2 (1997), 1–17. Google Scholar
  14. 19.
    John L. Russell, “The Copernican System in Great Britain,” in The Reception of Copernicus’ Heliocentric Theory, ed. Jerzy Dobrzycki (Dordrecht, Holland, and Boston, MA: D. Reidell Publishing Company, 1972), 189–239.Google Scholar
  15. 20.
    Most of these works feature in standard histories of astronomy. The Englishman Thomas Harriot (1560–1621) preceded Galileo’s observations with the telescope by several months, but did not describe his discoveries in print. Ewen A. Whitaker, Mapping and Naming the Moon: A History of Lunar Cartography and Nomenclature (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), 25–32; Montgomery, Moon and the Western Imagination, 29, 151–153, 165. Google Scholar
  16. 31.
    Francis Godwin, The Man in the Moone and Nuncius Inanimnatus (Smith College Studies in Modern Languages, vol XIX, Northampton, Massachusetts, 1937); H. W. Lawton, “Bishop Godwin’s Man in the Moone,” The Review of English Studies 7.25 (January 1931), 23–55. On the identification of the author, see Wilkins, Discourse, 240. Godwin may have attended Giordano Bruno’s Oxford lectures in the infinity of worlds; Anna Marie E. Roos, Luminaries in the Natural World: The Sun and the Moon in England, 1400–1720 (New York: Peter Lang, 2001), 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 37.
    John White, A New Almanacke and Prognostication, for … 1638 (London, 1638), unnumbered pages [27].Google Scholar
  18. 40.
    Richard Westfall, Science and Religion in Seventeenth-Century England (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1958), 17, noted that many of the scientific virtuosi were “deeply religious” clergymen. Evoking the debate on the relationship of Puritanism and science, Charles Webster, “Puritanism, Separatism, and Science,” in God and Nature: Historical Essays on the Encounter between Christianity and Science, ed. David C. Lindberg and Ronald L. Numbers (Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press, 1986), 198, 213, noted that “a long line of leading figures in science were ordained clergymen” and concluded that “any truly historical account of the Scientific Revolution must pay due attention to the deep interpenetration of scientific and religious ideas.” See also Adrian Johns, “Prudence and Pedantry in Early Modern Cosmology: The Trade of Al Ross,” History of Science 36.1 (March 1998), 23–59; Mordechai Feingold, “Science as a Calling? The Early Modern Dilemma,” Science in Context 15.1 (March 2002), 79–119. Google Scholar
  19. 42.
    Annabel Patterson, Censorship and Interpretation: The Conditions of Writing and Reading in Early Modern England (Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1984). See also A. B. Worden, “Literature and Political Censorship in Early Modern England,” in Too Mighty to be Free: Censorship and the Press in Britain and the Netherlands, ed. A. C. Duke and C. A. Tamse (Zutphen: De Walburg Pers, 1987), 45–62; Anthony Milton, “Licensing, Censorship, and Religious Orthodoxy in Early Stuart England,” Historical Journal 41.3 (September 1998), 625–652; Anthony Hadfield, “The Politics of Early Modern Censorship,” Literature and Censorship in Renaissance England, ed. Anthony Hadfield (Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave, 2001), 1–13; and David Cressy, “Book Burning in Tudor and Stuart England,” Sixteenth Century Journal 36.2 (Summer 2005), 359–374. Google Scholar
  20. 44.
    Neil Rhodes, Jennifer Richards and Joseph Marshall, ed., King James VI and I: Selected Writings (Aldershot, England and Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2003), 379–384; David Cressy and Lori Anne Ferrell, ed., Religion and Society in Early Modern England, 2nd edn (1996; London and New York: Routledge, 2005), 164–165.Google Scholar
  21. 47.
    Nehemiah Rogers, A Sermon Preached at the Second Triennial Visitation (London, 1632), 10.Google Scholar
  22. 48.
    Christopher Dow, Innovations Unjustly Charged Upon the Present Church and State (London, 1637), 40–41.Google Scholar
  23. 50.
    Hugh Trevor-Roper, Catholics, Anglicans and Puritans: Seventeenth Century Essays (1987; Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988), 166–230.Google Scholar
  24. 55.
    Henry More, Democritus Platonissans, or, An Essay Upon the Infinity of Worlds out of Platonick Principles (Cambridge, 1646), A2, stanzas 19, 26, 51.Google Scholar
  25. 60.
    Pierre Borell, Discourse nouveau prouvant la pluralité des mondes (1657), trans. as A New Treatise, Proving a Multiplicity of Worlds (London, 1658), 139. Google Scholar
  26. 62.
    Christiaan Huygens, The Celestial Worlds Discover’d: or, Conjectures Concerning the Inhabitants, Plants and Productions of the Worlds in the Planets (London, 1698), 37, 66.Google Scholar
  27. 77.
    Anthony Grafton, New Worlds, Ancient Texts: The Power of Tradition and the Shock of Discovery (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992), 148–149, 153, 205–207; Anthony Pagden, The Fall of Natural Man: The American Indian and the Origins of Comparative Ethnology (1982; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986), 22–23; idem., European Encounters with the New World from Renaissance to Romanticism (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1993), 11–12; Lewis Hanke, “The Theological Significance of the Discovery of America,” First Images of America: The Impact of the New World on the Old, ed. Fredi Chiappelli, Michael B. Allen and Robert Benson, 2 vols. (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1976), 1: 363–389.Google Scholar
  28. 80.
    John Donne, “The First Anniversary,” The Poems of John Donne, ed. Sir Herbert J. C. Grierson (1912; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1957), 213. On disruptions of the Caroline established order, see David Cressy, England on Edge: Crisis and Revolution 1640–1642 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© David Cressy 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Cressy

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations