Skip to main content

Heliocentrism, Plurality of Worlds and Ethics: Anton Francesco Doni and Giordano Bruno

  • Chapter
  • 315 Accesses

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Literature, Science and Medicine ((PLSM))

Abstract

The publication of Nicholas Copernicus’s (1473–1543) De revolutionibus orbium coelestium, which presented a mathematical planetary theory based on heliocentric hypotheses, has often been regarded as a watershed in the history of science and civilization.3 The new planetary conception had a tremendous impact on European culture and undermined the medieval theology-loaded understanding of nature, with man at its center as the spectator of God’s Creation. Thomas Kuhn even argued in The Copernican Revolution that the heliocentric theory and the motion of the Earth eventually exploded the entire cultural system of beliefs and values received from the Middle Ages. In particular, many ideas descending from literal exegesis of the Bible were irremediably cast into doubt.4

Da poi che noi altri plebei possiamo legger nella lingua maternal non accade che voi altri dotti vi maravigliate, e diciate: “egli non è stato a studio”; perché, se voi sapete le cose in greco e in latino, noi le sappiamo in vulgare.1

—Anton Francesco Doni, I Marmi

Se cossì renderemo novo il nostro cielo, nove saranno le costellazioni et influssi, nuove l’impressioni, nuove fortune.2

—Giordano Bruno, Spaccio de la bestia trionfante

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Anton Francesco Doni, I Marmi, ed. Ezio Chiaroboli (Vinegia: Per Francesco Marcolini, 1552; Bari: Laterza, 1928). “From the moment when we the people [plebei] can read in our maternal language, you, the learned people [dotti], should not be surprised, and say: ‘he has not been to university’; in fact, while you know things in Greek and Latin, we know them in the vernacular [vulgare]” (11).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Giordano Bruno, Spaccio de la bestia trionfante, in Dialoghi filosofici italiani, ed. Michele Ciliberto (1584; Milano: Mondadori, 2000), 509.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nicholas Copernicus, De revolutionibus orbium coelestium (On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres) (Norimbergae: apud Ioh. Petreium, 1543).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Thomas S. Kuhn, The Copernican Revolution: Planetary Astronomy in the Development of Western Thought (1957; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985), 193.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Anton Francesco Doni, IMondi (Vinegia: Francesco Marcolini, 1552–1553). The text went through eight Italian editions between 1552 and 1606.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Leon Battista Alberti, Momus (Romae: Mazocchius, 1520).

    Google Scholar 

  7. See Henning S. Hufnagel, Ein Stück von jeder Wissenschaft: Gattungshybridisierung, Argumentation und Erkenntnis in Giordano Brunos italienischen Dialogen (Stuttgart: Steiner, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cf. Giovanni Aquilecchia, “Pietro Aretino e altri poligrafi a Venezia,” in Storia della cultura veneta, ed. Girolamo Arnaldi and Manlio Pastora Stocchi (Vicenza: Neri Pozza, 1980), 61–98.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Paul F. Grendler, Critics of the Italian World (1530–1560): Anton Francesco Doni, Nicolò Franco and Ortensio Lando (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1969), 200.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Anton Francesco Doni, Terremoto (Earthquake) (Roma, 1556).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Georg Joachim Rheticus, Narratio prima (Gedani: Per Franciscum Rhodum, 1540).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Erasmus Rheinhold, Tabulae Prutenicae (Tubingae: Per Ulricium Morhardium, 1551).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Celio Calcagnini, Quod Coelum stet, Terra autem moveatur, in Opera aliquot (Basileae: Froben, 1544), 388–395.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cf. Miguel A. Granada and Dario Tessicini, “Copernicus and Fracastoro: The Dedicatory Letters to Pope Paul III, the History of Astronomy, and the Quest for Patronage,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 36.3 (2005), 431–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Concerning the Renaissance debate on the elements and their motion, see Michele Camerota and Mario Otto Helbing, “Galileo and Pisan Aristotelianism: Galileo’s De motu antiquiora and the Questiones de motu elementorum of the Pisan Professors,” Early Science and Medicine 5.4 (2000), 319–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cf. Dilwyn Knox, “Ficino, Copernicus and Bruno on the Motion of the Earth,” Bruniana & Campanelliana 5 (1999), 333–366.

    Google Scholar 

  17. On account of this passage, Boffito compared Doni to Galileo: G. Boffito, “Il Doni precursore di Galileo?” Annuario storico di meteorologia italiano 1 (1898), 23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Doni refers here to some vulgarization of De sphera like Leonardo Dati, La spera vulgare (Florence, c. 1495 and Florence, 1513), or Mauro da Firenze, Annotationi sopra la lettione della Spera del Sacro Bosco (Firenze: Torrentino, 1550). On the sphera as a scentific genre, cf. Lynn Thorndike, The Sphere of Sacrobosco and its Commentators (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1949).

    Google Scholar 

  19. As quoted in Giovanni Aquilecchia, “Bruno at Oxford: Between Aristotle and Copernicus,” in Giordano Bruno 1583–1585: The English Experience, ed. Michele Ciliberto and Nicholas Mann (Firenze: Olschki, 1997), 117–124.

    Google Scholar 

  20. The real existence of the Accademia Pellegrina in Venice has been debated at length. If it did exist, Doni was its president between 1553 and 1563. Cf. G. Romei, “Doni, Anton Francesco,” Dizionario Biografico degli Italiani 41 (1992), 158–167, 162.

    Google Scholar 

  21. See, for instance, Carlo Curcio, Dal Rinascimento alla Controriforma: Contributo alla storia del pensiero politico italiano do Guicciardini a Botero (Roma: Colombo, 1934); and Luigi Firpo, “Il pensiero politico del Rinascimento e della Controriforma,” in Questioni di storia moderna, ed. Ettore Rota (Milano: Marzorati, 1951), 345–403.

    Google Scholar 

  22. See, among others, Alexandre Koyré, From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press, 1957).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Arthur Oncken Lovejoy, The Great Chain of Being: A Study of the History of an Idea (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1936); and Granada, “Il rifiuto della distinzione tra potentia absoluta e potentia ordinata di Dio e l’affermazione dell’universo infinito in Giordano Bruno,” Rivista di storia de lla filosofia 49.3 (1994), 495–532.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cf. Gilberto Sacerdoti, Sacrificio e sovranità. Teologia e politica nell’Europa di Shakespeare e Bruno (Torino: Einaudi, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Judy A. Hayden

Copyright information

© 2016 Pietro Daniel Omodeo

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Omodeo, P.D. (2016). Heliocentrism, Plurality of Worlds and Ethics: Anton Francesco Doni and Giordano Bruno. In: Hayden, J.A. (eds) Literature in the Age of Celestial Discovery. Palgrave Studies in Literature, Science and Medicine. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-56803-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics