Skip to main content
  • 212 Accesses

Abstract

Over the past three decades, scholars of the early-modern period have become increasingly interested in exploring the relationship between the individual early-modern writer and the larger social, cultural, political and economic contexts within which s/he operated. Moving away from the idea of the author-as-origin, we are developing a greater appreciation for the ways in which playwrights’ works were influenced and shaped by a multitude of external factors, such as the theatrical conventions and traditions of their time; the influence of rivals and collaborators and literary fashions; the tastes and expectations of audiences; the practical concerns of playing companies; and the strictures imposed by theatre economics.1 In this book, I have attempted to develop a hermeneutic that bridges some of the gaps between literary analysis, performance criticism, biographical approaches and theatrical and audience history, in order to explore how the works of Jonson and Marston came to be written.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Robert C. Elliott, The Power of Satire: Magic, Ritual, Art (Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press, 1960) p. 271.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jonathan Haynes, The Social Relations of Jonson’s Theatre (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992) p. 64. Amanda Bailey’s Flaunting, meanwhile, takes this argument still further, arguing that, ‘the theatre kept itself commercially and culturally viable by paying close attention to the evolving attitudes and habits of its young male attendees. […] Jonson and his fellow playwrights had a stake in promoting the playhouse as a site where the material markers of subcultural style, like satin suits and tobacco, were advertised and disseminated.’ According to Bailey, plays like Jonson’s Every Man Out essentially promoted the latest fashions of dress and behaviour (even as they ostensibly mocked the young men who cared about them), and so may well have stimulated spectators’ desire for commodities, rather than curbing it. Bailey, Flaunting: Style and the Subversive Male Body in Renaissance England (London, Buffalo, Toronto: Toronto University Press, 2007) p. 106.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 Rebecca Yearling

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yearling, R. (2016). Conclusion. In: Ben Jonson, John Marston and Early Modern Drama. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-56399-6_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics