Advertisement

Legacy of Impunity: Sexual Violence against Armenian Women and Girls during the Genocide

  • Najwa Nabti
Part of the Palgrave Studies in the History of Genocide book series (PSHG)

Abstract

Sexual violence against Armenian women and girls during the Armenian Genocide a century ago has been well-documented by survivors, diplomats, missionaries and other eyewitnesses. The means used to subjugate and persecute female Armenians were as diverse and widespread as they were brutal. Unfortunately, such acts have only been repeated in subsequent conflicts, with similarly devastating consequences for the victims, their families and their entire communities. With few exceptions, such devastation has been achieved with impunity. For the past 20 years, however, increasing efforts have been made to prosecute these acts as war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide. The plight of Armenian women and girls, whose trauma has been passed down through generations, reinforces the importance of these efforts.

Keywords

Sexual Violence International Criminal Rome Statute International Crime Forced Marriage 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 3.
    See M. Bjørnlund (2011) ‘A Fate Worse than Dying: Sexual Violence during the Armenian Genocide’, in D. Herzog (ed.) Brutality and Desire: War and Sexuality in Europe’s Twentieth Century ( London: Palgrave Macmillan ), pp. 19–20.Google Scholar
  2. 4.
    A. Sarafian (2001) ‘The Absorption of Armenian Women and Children into Muslim Households as a Structural Component of the Armenian Genocide’, in O. Bartov and P. Mack (eds) In God’s Name: Genocide and Religion in the Twentieth Century ( New York: Berghahn Books ), p. 211.Google Scholar
  3. 7.
    H. Fein (1999) ‘Genocide and Gender: The Uses of Women and Group Destiny’, Journal of Genocide Research, Vol. 1 (1): 43–63 (51) quotingCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. D. E. Miller and D. Miller and L. T. Miller (1999) Survivors: An Oral History of the Armenian Genocide ( Berkeley: University of California Press ), p. 104.Google Scholar
  5. 9.
    M. Bobelian (2009) Children of Armenia: A Forgotten Genocide and the Century-Long Struggle for Justice ( New York: Simon & Schuster ), p. 28.Google Scholar
  6. 16.
    K. Derderian (2005) ‘Common Fate, Different Experience: Gender-Specific Aspects of the Armenian Genocide, 1915–1917’, Holocaust and Genocide Studies, Vol. 19 (1): 6–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 20.
    S. Power (2002) A Problem from Hell: America and the Age of Genocide ( New York: Basic Books ), p. 11.Google Scholar
  8. 23.
    See L. Ekmekçiog˘lu (2013) ‘A Climate for Abduction, a Climate for Redemption: The Politics of Inclusion during and after the Armenian Genocide’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, Vol. 55 (3): 522–53, (534–5); Watenpaugh (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 24.
    U. Ü. Üngör (2012) ‘Orphans, Converts, and Prostitutes: Social Consequences of War and Persecution in the Ottoman Empire, 1914–1923’, War in History, Vol. 19 (2): 184, quotingCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. E. H. Keeling (1924) Adventures in Turkey and Russia ( London: John Murray ), pp. 213, and 225.Google Scholar
  11. 26.
    Many archived files are now available online: D. A. Bilgin, M. Bjørnlund and T. Akçam (eds) (2014) ‘The League of Nations in Aleppo: Armenian Women and Children Survivors 1921–1927’, available at: http://www.armenocide.net/. Photographs of survivors from some of these files can be viewed through the Armenian Genocide Museum-Institute: http://www.genocide-museum.am/eng/online_exhibition_2.php.Google Scholar
  12. 28.
    E. Lous (2003) ‘Karen Jeppe: Denmark’s First Peace Philosopher’, The Danish Peace Academy Online Library, available at: http://www.fredsakademiet.dk/library/ukjeppe.htm.Google Scholar
  13. 32.
    See R. Peroomian (2008) And Those Who Continued Living in Turkey after 1915 ( Yerevan: Armenian Genocide Museum-Institute ).Google Scholar
  14. 33.
    J. A. S. Bucknill and H. A. S. Utidjian (1913) The Imperial Ottoman Penal Code. A Translation from the Turkish Text ( London: Oxford University Press), Book I, Chapter III (‘Outrages on Morals’, Arts. 197–200, prohibiting ‘indecent offences’ and rape); Chapter IV (Art. 206, prohibiting the abduction of children, girls and indecent offences against abducted girls).Google Scholar
  15. 34.
    See K. Askin (2013) ‘Treatment of Sexual Violence in Armed Conflicts: A Historical Perspective and the Way Forward’, in A. M. de Brouwer, C. Ku, R. Römkens and L. van den Herik (eds) Sexual Violence as an International Crime: Interdisciplinary Approaches ( Cambridge: Intersentia ), pp. 25–6.Google Scholar
  16. 37.
    R. P. Adalian (2004) ‘American Diplomatic Correspondence in the Age of Mass Murder: The Armenian Genocide in the US Archives’, in J. M. Winter (ed.) (2008), America and the Armenian Genocide of 1915 ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ), p. 150.Google Scholar
  17. 40.
    V. N. Dadrian (1997) ‘The Turkish Military Tribunal’s Prosecution of the Authors of the Armenian Genocide: Four Major Court-Martial Series’, Holocaust and Genocide Studies, Vol. 11(1): 28–59 (34).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 43.
    V. N. Dadrian (1994) ‘The Armenian Genocide in Official Turkish Records’, Journal of Political and Military Sociology, Vol. 22 (1): 108–9, n. 63; Dadrian (1997), p. 42.Google Scholar
  19. 44.
    A. Hoss (1992) ‘The Trial of Perpetrators by the Turkish Military Tribunals: The Case of Yozgat’, in R. G. Hovannisian (ed.) The Armenian Genocide: History, Politics, Ethics ( London: Palgrave Macmillan ), p. 217; Dadrian and Akçam (2011).Google Scholar
  20. 62.
    Commission on the Responsibility of the Authors of the War and on Enforcement of Penalties (1920), ‘Report Presented to the Preliminary Peace Conference, March 29, 1919’, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 14 (1/2): 114–15. But see partial US dissent: ibid.: 134–41.Google Scholar
  21. 63.
    S. L. Jacobs (2003), ‘Raphael Lemkin and the Armenian Genocide’, in R. G. Hovannisian (ed.), Looking Backward, Moving Forward: Confronting the Armenian Genocide ( New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers ); Power (2002), Chapter 2.Google Scholar
  22. 71.
    H. Brady (2012) ‘The Power of Precedents: Using the Case Law of the Ad Hoc International Criminal Tribunals and Hybrid Courts in Adjudicating Sexual Violence and Gender-Based Crimes at the ICC’, Australian Journal of Human Rights, 18 (2): 75–108, (77–80);Google Scholar
  23. B. Goy (2012) ‘Individual Criminal Responsibility before the International Criminal Court: A Comparison with the Ad Hoc Tribunals’, International Criminal Law Review, Vol. 12 (1): 1–70, (3–5).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 84.
    Bianchi (2013); T. Mazowiecki (1993) Report on the Situation of Human Rights in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia, UN Document E/CN.4/1993/50, para. 85.Google Scholar
  25. 85.
    B. Apple (1998) ‘School for Rape, The Burmese Military and Sexual Violence’, An EarthRights International Report, pp. 24–5.Google Scholar
  26. 97.
    L. Price (2002) ‘Sexual Violence and Ethnic Cleansing: Attacking the Family’, in G. Griffin and R. Braidotti (eds) Thinking Differently: A Reader in European Women’s Studies ( London: Ze d Books ), p. 261.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Najwa Nabti 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Najwa Nabti
    • 1
  1. 1.James E. Rogers College of LawUniversity of ArizonaUSA

Personalised recommendations