The Disputed Numbers: In Search of the Demographic Basis for Studies of Armenian Population Losses, 1915–1923

  • Jakub Bijak
  • Sarah Lubman
Part of the Palgrave Studies in the History of Genocide book series (PSHG)


This chapter looks at the Armenian Catastrophe through the lens of demography. The availability of statistical information about the tragic events of 1915–23, even about the overall number of victims, is very limited, especially after a hundred years. This makes an empirical analysis very difficult. The existing estimates are quoted as ranging ‘from 600,000 to 2 million’,2 and are heavily disputed.3


Population Change Local Record Government Accountability Khmer Rouge Genocidal Intent 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 2.
    For example, R. G. Hovannisian (ed.) (1998) Remembrance and Denial: The Case of the Armenian Genocide ( Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press ), p. 15.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    For a general discussion of the role of statistics in the study of the Armenian Genocide, see F. Dündar (2010) Crime of Numbers: The Role of Statistics in the Armenian Question (1878–1918) ( New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers).Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    International Union for the Scientific Study of the Populations (1982), Multilingual Demographic Dictionary (2nd edn.) ( Liège: Ordina).Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    H. Brunborg, E. Tabeau and H. Urdal (eds) (2006) The Demography of Armed Conflict, International Studies of Population, Vol. 5 ( Berlin–Heidelberg: Springer ).Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    J. M. Winter (1976) ‘Some Aspects of the Demographics Consequences of the First World War in Britain’, Population Studies, Vol. 30 (3): 539–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 7.
    See Brunborg, Tabeau and Urdal (2006); J. Asher, D. Banks and F. J. Scheuren (eds) (2008) Statistical Methods for Human Rights ( New York: Springer );Google Scholar
  7. T. Seybolt, J. Aronson and B. Fischhoff (eds) (2013) Counting Civilian Casualties: An Introduction to Recording and Estimating Nonmilitary Deaths in Conflict ( Oxford: Oxford University Press ). There are about 30 testimonies of demographic experts before the ICTY.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    The statistics for the Ottoman Greeks include: their pre-war population, 1.75–1.81 million people; the post-war population of 110,000 Greeks in Turkey in 1928 S. Mutlu (2003) ‘Late Ottoman Population and Its Ethnic Distribution’, Turkish Journal of Population Studies, Vol. 25: 3–38, esp. 18–20); and 1.2–1.4 million refugeesGoogle Scholar
  9. D. Pentzopoulos (ed.) (2008) The Balkan Exchange of Minorities and its Impact on Greece (London: Hurst & Company), pp. 98–9). The difference of 240,000–500,000 people can be largely attributed to mortality. As for the Assyrian casualties, only very rough estimates are available, up to a quarter of a million people; see Gaunt (2006), p. 300. We are grateful to Hannibal Travis for these references.Google Scholar
  10. 9.
    J. McCarthy (1995) Death and Exile: The Ethnic Cleansing of Ottoman Muslims, 1821–1922 ( Princeton, NJ: Darwin Press );Google Scholar
  11. J. McCarthy, E. Arslan, C. Taşkıran and Ö. Turan (1996) The Armenian Rebellion at Van (Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press).Google Scholar
  12. 11.
    A. Jones (2010) Genocide: A Comprehensive Introduction ( London: Routledge ), pp. 16–20.Google Scholar
  13. 12.
    The definitions that do not require intent are exceptions (for example, I. Charny (1994) ‘Toward a Generic Definition of Genocide’, in G. J. Andreopoulos (ed.) Genocide: Conceptual and Historical Dimensions ( Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press ), pp. 64–94Google Scholar
  14. 19.
    Z. Obermeyer, C. J. L. Murray and E. Gakidou (2008) ‘Fifty Years of Violent War Deaths from Vietnam to Bosnia: Analysis of Data from the World Health Survey Programme’, British Medical Journal, Vol. 336 (7659): 1482–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 20.
    Examples related to the Armenian massacres include contemporary accounts by J. Bryce and A. Toynbee [ 1916 ] (2005) The Treatment of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire, 1915–16: Documents Presented to Viscount Grey of Fallodon by Viscount Bryce ( 2nd edn. ), Uncensored Edition, edited by Ara Sarafian (London: Gomidas Institute). The authors fully acknowledge the uncertainty and limitations of the resulting estimates (see comments on pp. 647 and 660). A more recent example, based on a simple summation of counts, and not offering a critical analysis of the sources, isGoogle Scholar
  16. R. J. Rummel (1997) Statistics of Democide: Genocide and Mass Murder since 1900 ( Charlottesville, VA: Center for National Security Law ), Tables 5.1 A–B.Google Scholar
  17. 23.
    Cohort-component projections are calculations of past or future population size and structure, based on assumptions on birth and death rates, and migration rates or volumes, by sex and age. These assumptions are applied to the initial population, to calculate the number of survivors, newborn children, and migrants in the intervening periods. For examples, see P. Heuveline (1998) ‘“Between One and Three Million”: Towards the Demographic Reconstruction of a Decade of Cambodian History (1970–79)’, Population Studies, Vol. 52 (1): 49–65; orCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. T. Spoorenberg and D. Schwekendiek (2012) ‘Demographic Changes in North Korea: 1993–2008’, Population and Development Review, Vol. 38 (1): 133–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 25.
    US Government Accountability Office (2006) ‘Darfur Crisis: Death Estimates Demonstrate Severity of Crisis, but their Accuracy and Credibility could be Enhanced’, Report to Congressional Requesters, GAO-07–24. Washington DC.Google Scholar
  20. 27.
    M. W. Gray and S. Marek (2008) ‘The Statistics of Genocide’, in Asher, Banks and Scheuren ( 2008 ), pp. 37–50.Google Scholar
  21. 30.
    Bryce and Toynbee (1916). For further details, see K. Karpat (1984) Ottoman Population, 1830–1914: Demographic and Social Characteristics, Turkish and Ottoman studies ( Madison: University of Wiscons in Press).Google Scholar
  22. 33.
    A. Sarafian (2011) Talaat Pasha’s Report on the Armenian Genocide, 1917, Gomidas Institute Studies Series ( London: Taderon Press/Gomidas Institute ), p. 9.Google Scholar
  23. 34.
    The predilection for collecting statistical information about the victims by the perpetrators was a striking feature of 20th century war crimes, especially those involving genocide (Sarafian (2011), p. 10). Key examples include the Holocaust, the Rwandan genocide, and several other instances of organised state terror, such as in Stalinist USSR; see W. Seltzer (1998) ‘Population Statistics, the Holocaust, and the Nuremberg Trials’, Population and Development Review, Vol. 24 (3): 511–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. W. Seltzer and M. Anderson (2001) ‘The Dark Side of Numbers: The Role of Population Data Systems in Human Rights Abuses’, Social Research, Vol. 68 (2): 481–513. Tellingly, sometimes the sources used by the perpetrators to target their victims have been later used as evidence against these perpetrators in war crimes trials.Google Scholar
  25. 36.
    J. McCarthy (1983) Muslims and Minorities: The Population of Ottoman Anatolia and the End of the Empire ( New York and London: New York University Press).Google Scholar
  26. 38.
    R. Kévorkian and P. B. Paboudjian (1992) Les Arméniens dans l’Empire Ottoman à la vielle du génocide ( Paris: Editions d’art et d’histoire ), cited byGoogle Scholar
  27. J. McCarthy (2001) ‘The Population of the Ottoman Armenians’, in T. Ataöv (ed.) The Armenians in the Late Ottoman Period ( Ankara: The Grand National Assembly of Turkey ), pp. 65–85.Google Scholar
  28. 39.
    For a detailed discussion of McCarthy’s pre-conflict population estimates and suggestion that the real figure was at least two million, see L. Marashlian (1991) Politics and Demography: Armenians, Turks and Kurds in the Ottoman Empire, Zoryan Institute Special Report ( Cambridge, MA: Zoryan Institute).Google Scholar
  29. 40.
    V. N. Dadrian (1995) The History of the Armenian Genocide: Ethnic Conflict from the Balkans to Anatolia to the Caucasus ( New York: Berghahn Books ), p. 225.Google Scholar
  30. 44.
    T. Akçam (2012), The Young Turks’ Crime Against Humanity: The Armenian Genocide and Ethnic Cleansing in the Ottoman Empire (Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
  31. 45.
    The ‘Armenian sources’ of this estimate are not specified, and the reader is referred to R. Kévorkian (ed.) (1998) ‘L’extermination des déportés arméniens ottomans dans les camps de concentration de Syrie-Mésopotamie (1915–1916)’, Revue d’histoire arménienne contemporaine, Vol. 2 (cited after: Akçam (2012)).Google Scholar
  32. 48.
    B. O. Daponte, J. B. Kadane and L. J. Wolfson (1997) ‘Bayesian Demography: Projecting the Iraqi Kurdish Population, 1977–1990’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 92 (440): 256–67.Google Scholar
  33. 49.
    An excellent example of a very similar approach, recently applied to estimating the extent of the 1970s Khmer Rouge atrocities in Cambodia, has been nearly simultaneously published by P. Heuveline (2015), ‘The Boundaries of Genocide: Quantifying the Uncertainty of the Death Toll during the Pol Pot Regime in Cambodia (1975–79)’, Population Studies: A Journal of Demography, Online first, DOI: 10.1080/00324728.2015.1045546. The key difference is that Heuveline’s work is based on a much wider range of data, especially about the age structures, which are not available in the Armenian context.Google Scholar
  34. 52.
    F. Scheuren (2007) ‘The “Pro Bono” Statistician’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 102 (477): 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Jakub Bijak and Sarah Lubman 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jakub Bijak
    • 1
  • Sarah Lubman
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Social Statistics and DemographyUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK

Personalised recommendations