The Armenian Genocide in the Context of 20th-Century Paramilitarism

  • Uğur Ümit Üngör
Part of the Palgrave Studies in the History of Genocide book series (PSHG)


Genocide can be defined as a complex process of systematic persecution and annihilation of a group of people by a government. In the 20th century, approximately 40 to 60 million defenceless people became victims of deliberate genocidal policies. The beginning of the 21st century has not shown signs of improvement, with genocidal episodes flaring up in Darfur, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Myanmar, and Syria. Genocide can best be understood as the persecution and destruction of human beings on the basis of their presumed or imputed membership in a group, rather than on their individual properties or participation in certain acts.


Organize Crime Political Elite Mass Murder Mass Violence Turkish State 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 2.
    For three recent volumes summarizing the state of the art of the research field, see D. Stone (ed.) (2008) The Historiography of Genocide ( Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan );Google Scholar
  2. S. Totten and P. R. Bartrop (eds) (2009) The Genocide Studies Reader ( New York: Routledge );Google Scholar
  3. D. Bloxham and A. D. Moses (eds) (2010) The Oxford Handbook of Genocide Studies ( Oxford: Oxford University Press ).Google Scholar
  4. 3.
    See Chapter 16, Holslag; A. de Swaan (2001) ‘Dyscivilization, Mass Extermination and the State’, Theory, Culture and Society, Vol. 18 (2–3): 265–76;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. E. Weitz (2005) A Century of Genocide: Utopias of Race and Nation ( Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press);Google Scholar
  6. M. Levene (2013a) The Crisis of Genocide, Vol. 1: Devastation: The European Rimlands, 1912–1938 ( Oxford: Oxford University Press );Google Scholar
  7. M. Levene (2013b) The Crisis of Genocide, Vol. 2: Annihilation: The European Rimlands, 1938–1953 ( Oxford: Oxford University Press );Google Scholar
  8. A. de Swaan (2015) The Killing Compartment ( New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
  9. 5.
    A. Alvarez (2010) Genocidal Crimes ( London: Routledge);Google Scholar
  10. T. Wilson (2013) ‘State Terrorism: An Historical Overview’, in G. Duncan et al. (eds) State Terrorism and Human Rights: International Responses Since the End of the Cold War ( New York: Routledge ), pp. 14–31.Google Scholar
  11. 7.
    A. Robben (2005) Political Violence in Argentina ( Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press).Google Scholar
  12. 8.
    D. E. Davis (2003) ‘Contemporary Challenges and Historical Reflections on the Study of Militaries, States, and Politics’, in D. E. Davis and A. W. Pereira (eds) Irregular Armed Forces and their Role in Politics and State Formation ( New York: Cambridge University Press ), pp. 3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 9.
    B. Campbell and A. Brenner (eds) (2000) Death Squads in Global Perspective: Murder with Deniability ( New York: St Martin’s Press ).Google Scholar
  14. 10.
    P. Andreas (2005) ‘Criminalizing Consequences of Sanctions: Embargo Busting and its Legacy’, International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 49: 335–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 11.
    D. Gambetta (1996) The Sicilian Mafia: The Business of Private Protection ( Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press);Google Scholar
  16. F. Varese (ed.) (2010) Organized Crime: Critical Concepts in Criminology ( London: Routledge ).Google Scholar
  17. 12.
    W. Lippmann (1962) ‘The Underworld as Servant’, in G. Tyler (ed.) Organized Crime in America ( Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press ), pp. 58–69.Google Scholar
  18. 13.
    O. Tunander (2009) ‘Democratic State vs. Deep State: Approaching the Dual State of the West’, in Eric Wilson (ed.) Government of the Shadows: Parapolitics and Criminal Sovereignty ( New York: Pluto Books ), pp. 56–72.Google Scholar
  19. 14.
    R. Jamieson (1998) ‘Towards a Criminology of War in Europe’, in V. Ruggiero, N. South and I. Taylor (eds) The New European Criminology: Crime and Social Order in Europe ( London: Routledge ), pp. 480–506.Google Scholar
  20. 15.
    For a brief treatment, see G. V. Brandolini (2002) Low Intensity Conflicts ( Bergamo: CRF Press).Google Scholar
  21. 16.
    J. Klein (2002) Power in the Periphery: The Hamidiye Light Cavalry and the Struggle over Ottoman Kurdistan, 1890–1914 (unpublished PhD thesis, University of Princeton).Google Scholar
  22. 17.
    S. Hanioğlu (2001) Preparation for a Revolution: The Young Turks, 1902–1908 ( Oxford: Oxford University Press ), p. 223.Google Scholar
  23. 19.
    H. C. Yalçın (1976) Siyasal Anılar ( Istanbul: Türkiye iŞ Bankası Kültür Yayınları ), p. 170.Google Scholar
  24. 20.
    F. Ahmad (1969) The Young Turks: The Committee of Union and Progress in Turkish Politics ( Oxford: Oxford University Press ), p. 163.Google Scholar
  25. 22.
    R. Gingeras (2009) Sorrowful Shores: Violence, Ethnicity, and the End of the Ottoman Empire 1912–1923 (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 6 and 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 25.
    T. Z. Tunaya (1997) Türkiye’de Siyasal Partiler (Istanbul: İletiŞim), Vol. 3, İttihat ve Terakki, pp. 285–6. See also Chapter 8, Demirdjian.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    A. Refik [ 1919 ] (1998) Kafkas Yollarında: İki Komite, İki Kıtal ( Istanbul: Temel ), p. 157.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    M. Aksakal (2008) The Ottoman Road to War in 1914: The Ottoman Empire and the First World War ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ), p. 191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    U. Ü. Üngör (2011) The Making of Modern Turkey: Nation and State in Eastern Anatolia, 1913–1950 ( Oxford: Oxford University Press ), p. 58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    E. Erickson (2006) ‘Armenian Massacres: New Records Undercut Old Blame’, Middle East Quarterly (Summer 2006): 67–75.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    For one of the first official Turkish histories of these campaigns, seeGoogle Scholar
  32. F. Çakmak (1936) Büyük Harpte Şark Cephesi Hareketleri: Şark Vilâyetlerimizde, Kafkasyada ve I · randa ( Ankara: Genelkurmay Matbaası).Google Scholar
  33. 32.
    E. J. Erickson (2000) Ordered to Die: A History of the Ottoman Army in the First World War (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press), pp. 51–74.Google Scholar
  34. For a detailed account of the Sarikamish disaster, see A. Müderrisoğlu (1997) SarıkamıŞ Dramı (Istanbul: KaŞtaŞ), 2 Vols.Google Scholar
  35. 33.
    See, for example, A. I. Elkus (2004) Memoirs of Abram Elkus: Lawyer, Ambassador, Statesman ( London: Gomidas Institute).Google Scholar
  36. 34.
    Quoted in T. Akçam (2007) A Shameful Act: The Armenian Genocide and the Question of Turkish Responsibility ( New York: Metropolitan Books ), p. 138.Google Scholar
  37. 35.
    A. Samih, ‘Umumi Harpte Kafkas Cephesi Hatıraları’, Kurun, 19 April 1935.Google Scholar
  38. 36.
    K. Ş. İlden (1998) Sarıkamış: Birinci Dünya Savaiı Başlangıcında Üçüncü Ordu: Kuiatma Manevrası ve Meydan Savaiı: Anı, Sami Önal (ed.) (Istanbul: Türkiye iş Bankası Kültür Yayınları ), pp. 158–60.Google Scholar
  39. 37.
    Conventional accounts of the Ottoman Empire’s two eastern campaigns hold that it was an ideological attempt to open the way to Central Asia and establish a great Turkish Empire, named ‘Turan’. Recent research has convincingly suggested that the Young Turks were driven mostly by security concerns. M. A. Reynolds (2009) ‘Buffers, not Brethren: Young Turk Military Policy in the First World War and the Myth of Panturanism’, Past and Present, Vol. 203 (1): 137–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 38.
    For a detailed account of the violence against civilians in Persia, see D. Gaunt (2006) Massacres, Resistance, Protectors: Muslim-Christian Relations in Eastern Anatolia during World War I ( Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias Press ), pp. 81–120.Google Scholar
  41. 39.
    J. Lepsius (1919) Der Todesgang des Armenischen Volkes: Bericht über das Schicksal des Armenischen Volkes in der Türkei während des Weltkrieges ( Potsdam: Tempelverlag ), pp. 161–2.Google Scholar
  42. 41.
    H. Adak (2007) ‘Identifying the “Internal Tumors” of World War I: Talaat Pasha’nın Hatıraları [Talaat Pasha’s Memoirs], or the Travels of a Unionist Apologia into “History”’, in A. Bähr et al. (eds) Räume des Selbst: Selbstzeugnisforschung Transkulturell ( Cologne: Böhlau ), pp. 151–72.Google Scholar
  43. 42.
    L. Einstein (1918) Inside Constantinople: A Diplomatist’s Diary during the Dardanelles Expedition, April –September, 1915 ( London: John Murray ), pp. 175–6.Google Scholar
  44. 43.
    H. Barby (1917) Au pays de l’épouvante ( Paris: A. Michel ), pp. 230–40.Google Scholar
  45. 44.
    Z. Der Yeghiayan (2002) My Patriarchal Memoirs ( Barrington, RI: Mayreni ), p. 273.Google Scholar
  46. 45.
    V. N. Dadrian (1993) ‘The Role of the Special Organization in the Armenian Genocide during the First World War’, in P. Panayi (ed.) Minorities in Wartime: National and Racial Groupings in Europe, North America and Australia during the World Wars ( Oxford: Berg ), pp. 50–82, esp. p. 63.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    M. Shamtanchian (2007) The Fatal Night: An Eyewitness Account of the Extermination of Armenian Intellectuals in 1915 ( Studio City, CA: H. and K. Majikian Publications ).Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    R. H. Kévorkian (2006) Le génocide des Arméniens ( Paris: Odile Jacob).Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    H. Çiçek (2004) Dr Bahattin Shakir: ittihat ve Terakki’den Teşkilatı Mahsusa’ya bir Türk Jakobeni ( Istanbul: Kaynak ), p. 110.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    A. F. Erden (2003) Birinci Dünya Harbi’nde Suriye Hatıraları ( Istanbul: Türkiye iŞ Bankası Kültür Yayınları ), pp. 267–9.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    C. Gerlach (2010) Extremely Violent Societies: Mass Violence in the Twentieth-Century World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. S. Straus (2013) The Order of Genocide: Race, Power, and War in Rwanda ( Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
  53. 52.
    A. Alvarez (2006) ‘Militias and Genocide’, War Crimes, Genocide, and Crimes against Humanity, Vol. 2: 1–33.Google Scholar
  54. 53.
    M. Duffield (1998) ‘Post-modern Conflict: Warlords, Post-adjustment States and Private Protection, Civil Wars, Vol. 1(1): 65–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 54.
    A. K. Özcan (2006) Turkey’s Kurds: A Theoretical Analysis of the PKK and Abdullah Öcalan ( London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  56. 55.
    S. Ç elik (1998) Verbrecher Staat: der ‘Susurluk-Zwischenfall’ und die Verflechtung von Staat, Unterwelt und Konterguerilla in der Türkei ( Frankfurt: Zambon);Google Scholar
  57. S. Çelik (1999) Die Todesmaschinerie: tü rkische Konterguerilla ( Cologne: Mesopotamien Verlag).Google Scholar
  58. 56.
    U. Ü. Üngör (2012) ‘Paramilitary Violence in the Collapsing Ottoman Empire’, in R. Gerwarth and J. Horne (eds) War in Peace: Paramilitary Violence after the Great War ( Oxford: Oxford University Press ), pp. 162–81.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Uğur Ümit Üngör 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Uğur Ümit Üngör
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of HistoryNetherlands

Personalised recommendations