Muslimist Cultural Orientations and Everyday Life

  • Neslihan Cevik


For religious orthodoxies—“orthodoxy” denoting a commitment to a sacred truth—religious truth, embodied in a theology and perceived to be objective, is not just a spiritual exercise. It also dictates arrangements of the mundane, providing the believer with a package of values, attitudes and beliefs through which she sees and understands the surrounding world, and fashions her conduct and way of life. As such, marked by radically different theological orientations and attitudes, Muslimist and Islamist orthodoxies also differ from each other in cultural orientations and temperaments; these differences are, again, remarkable.


Muslim Woman Modern Life Emphasis Mine Bodily Practice Moral Boundary 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 2.
    Further on this point see, Nazih Ayubi, Political Islam: Religion and Politics in the Arab World (London: Routledge, 1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Mansoor Moaddel, Islamic Modernism, Nationalism, and Fundamentalism (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005)Google Scholar
  3. Ibrahim Kaya, Social Theory and Later Modernities: The Turkish Experience (Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 3.
    For a more detailed discussion see, Aziz Al-Azmah, Islams and Modernities (London: Verso, 1993).Google Scholar
  5. Shmuel N. Eisenstadt, Fundamentalism, Sectarianism, and Revolution: The Jacobin Dimension of Modernity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
  6. 4.
    For a similar argument also see, Sennur Özdemir, MÙSIAD: Anadolu Sermayesinin Dönücümü ve Türk Modernleçmesinin Derinlesmesi (Kizilay, Ankara: Vadi Yayi nlari, 2006)Google Scholar
  7. Sennur Özdemir, “Islami Sermaye ve sinif: Turkiye/Konya MUSIAD ornegi,” Calisma Iliskileri Dergisi 1, no. 1 (2010): 37–57.Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    Neslihan Cevik and Thomas George, “Muslimism in Turkey and New Religious Orthodoxies: Implications for Theorizing Religious Movements in World Society,” Ortadogu Etütleri 3, no. 2 (January 2012): 143–181Google Scholar
  9. 8.
    John Meyer, John Boli, George Thomas, and Francisco Ramirez, “World Society and the Nation-State,” The American Journal of Sociology 103 (1997): 144–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 12.
    More on this process, see Frank Peter, “Individualization and Religious Authority in Western European Islam,” Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations 17, no. 1 (2006): 105–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jocelyn Cesari, “Muslim Minorities in Europe and Silent Revolution,” in Modernizing Islam: Religion in the Public Sphere in the Middle East and Europe, ed. Francois Burgat and John Esposito (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
  12. 14.
    Mustafa Ozel, “Gercek Degisim FFB (Fenomene Farkli Bakis) Gerektirir!,” Cerceve 14, no. 39 (2006): 90–94Google Scholar
  13. 15.
    for a broader discussion on traditionalism, see Samuel Eisenstadt, “Post-Traditional Societies and the Continuity and Reconstruction of Tradition,” Daedalus 102, no. 1: 1–27. William A. Graham, “Traditionalism in Islam: An Essay in Interpretation,” The Journal of Interdisciplinary History 23, no. 3 (Winter, 1993): 495–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 16.
    Ibrahim Ozturk, “Samuray, mi Koroglu mu? Yenilikcilige Romantik Bir Bakis,” Cerceve 14, no. 39 (2006): 105–108Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Neslihan Cevik 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Neslihan Cevik

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations