Abstract
In one of his frequent taped messages about his investigation into the disturbing and often intersecting mysteries in the town of Twin Peaks, FBI agent Dale Cooper (Kyle MacLachlan) confesses a problem he faces simply in categorizing these events: “It would seem logic would dictate that these investigations be considered separate entities. However, I believe otherwise. I believe that these mysteries… are complementary verses of the same song. Now I cannot hear it yet, but I can feel it, and that’s enough for me.” It is a reaction that anticipates one line of critical response to David Lynch and Mark Frost’s landmark series, the problematic genre classification that has always attended a narrative that frequently shifts tone, subject, and even plot trajectory. How are audiences supposed to approach this constantly surprising narrative? In what context should they read—or “hear”— its various “verses”? That generic framing seems especially telling, a mystery—or “mysteries”—worthy of some investigation, especially since recent critical commentary has begun to frame it in what might seem an unlikely context. For Twin Peaks is a series that, like several other more recent efforts, most notably Buffy the Vampire Slayer (1997–2003) and The Walking Dead (2010–present), and almost in spite of conventional markers, has frequently been embraced by science fiction (sf) critics and historians, and cited in their recent accounts of the genre.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Works Cited
Desmet, Christy. “The Canonization of Laura Palmer.” Full of Secrets: Critical Approaches to Twin Peaks. Ed. David Lavery. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press, 1995. 93–108.
Freedman, Carl. Critical Theory and Science Fiction. Hanover: Wesleyan University Press, 2000.
Geraghty, Lincoln. American Science Fiction Film and Television. Oxford: Berg, 2009a.
——. “Television Since 1980.” The Routledge Companion to Science Fiction. Eds. Mark Bould, Andrew M. Butler, Adam Roberts, and Sherryl Vint. London: Routledge, 2009b. 144–52.
Hodges, Lacy. “Mainstreaming Marginality: Genre, Hybridity, and Postmodernism in The X-Files.” The Essential Science Fiction Television Reader. Ed. J. P. Telotte. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 2008. 231–45.
Johnson, Catherine. Telefantasy. London: British Film Institute, 2005.
Johnson-Smith, Jan. American Science Fiction TV: Star Trek, Stargate, and Beyond. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 2005.
Jowett, Lorna and Stacey Abbott. TV Horror: Investigating the Dark Side of the Small Screen. London: I. B. Tauris, 2013.
Lavery, David. “Introduction: The Semiotics of Cobbler: Twin Peaks’ Interpretive Community.” Full of Secrets: Critical Approaches to Twin Peaks. Ed. David Lavery. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press, 1995. 1–21.
Mittell, Jason. Genre and Television: From Cop Shows to Cartoons in American Culture. London: Routledge, 2004.
Muir, John Kenneth. Terror Tele vision: American Series, 1970 –1999. Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 2001.
Nochimson, Martha. “Desire Under the Douglas Firs: Entering the Body of Reality in Twin Peaks.” Full of Secrets: Critical Approaches to Twin Peaks. Ed. David Lavery. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press, 1995. 144–59.
Reeves, Jimmie L., et al. “Postmodernism and Television: Speaking of Twin Peaks.” Full of Secrets: Critical Approaches to Twin Peaks. Ed. David Lavery. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press, 1995. 173–95.
Roberts, Adam. The History of Science Fiction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
Short, Sue. Cult Telefantasy Series: A Critical Analysis of The Prisoner, Twin Peaks, The X-Files, Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Lost, Heroes, Doctor Who and Star Trek. Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 2011.
Sontag, Susan. “The Imagination of Disaster.” Against Interpretation. New York: Dell, 1966. 212–28.
Suvin, Darko. Metamorphoses of Science Fiction: On the Poetics and Discourse of a Literary Genre. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1979.
Telotte, J. P. Science Fiction Film. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
To dorov, Tzvetan. The Fantastic: A Structural Approach to a Literary Genre. Trans. Richard Howard. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1975.
Wilcox, Rhonda. “Unreal TV.” Thinking Outside the Box: A Contemporary Television Genre Reader. Eds. Gary R. Edgerton and Brian Rose. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 2008. 201–25.
Williams, Linda Ruth. “ Twin Peaks, David Lynch, and the Serial-Killer Soap.” The Contemporary Television Series. Eds. Michael Hammond and Lucy Mazdon. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2005. 37–56.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2016 J. P. Telotte
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Telotte, J.P. (2016). “Complementary Verses”: The Science Fiction of Twin Peaks. In: Weinstock, J.A., Spooner, C. (eds) Return to Twin Peaks. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-55695-0_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-55695-0_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-57140-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-55695-0
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)