A Dynamic Capabilities-Based Entrepreneurial Theory of the Multinational Enterprise

  • David J. Teece


This paper develops a dynamic capabilities-based theory of the multinational enterprise (MNE). It first reviews scholarship on the MNE, with a focus on what has come to be known as “internalization” theory. One prong of this theory develops contractual/transaction cost-informed governance perspectives; and another develops technology transfer and capabilities perspectives. In this paper, it is suggested that the latter has been somewhat neglected. However, if fully integrated as part of a more complete approach, it can buttress transaction cost/governance issues and expand the range of phenomena that can be explained. In this more integrated framework, dynamic capabilities coupled with good strategy are seen as necessary to sustain superior enterprise performance, especially in fast-moving global environments. Entrepreneurial management and transformational leadership are incorporated into a capabilities theory of the MNE. The framework is then used to explain how strategy and dynamic capabilities together determine firm-level sustained competitive advantage in global environments. It is sug-gested that this framework complements contract-based perspectives on the MNE and can help integrate international management and international business perspectives.


Transaction Cost Competitive Advantage International Business Dynamic Capability Entry Mode 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. AFP. 2013. Apple reiterates its ability to “create magic”. Taipei Times, 14 February., accessed 15 February 2013.
  2. Argote, L., & Ingram, P. 2000. Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1): 150–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arregle, J. -L., Miller, T. L., Hitt, M. A., & Beamish, P. W. 2013. Do regions matter? An integrated institutional and semiglobaliza-tion perspective on the internationalization of MNEs. Strategic Management Journal, 34(8): 910–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Augier, M., & Teece, D. J. 2007. Dynamic capabilities and multinational enterprise: Penrosean insights and omissions. Management International Review, 47(2): 175–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Augier, M., & Teece, D. J. 2008. Strategy as evolution with design: The foundations of dynamic capabilities and the role of the managers in the economic system. Organizational Studies, 29(8–9): 1187–1208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barnard, C. I. 1938. The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Barney, J. B. 1986. Organizational culture: Can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage? Academy of Management Review, 11(3): 656–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barney, J. B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1): 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barreto, I. 2010. Dynamic capabilities: A review of past research and an agenda for the future. Journal of Management, 36(1): 256–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. 1989. Managing across borders: The transnational solution. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. 2002. Managing across borders: The transnational solution, 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Busi ness School Press.Google Scholar
  12. Birkinshaw, J. 1997. Entrepreneurship in multinational corporations: The characteristics of subsidiary initiatives. Strategic Management Journal, 18(3): 207–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Birkinshaw, J. 2000. Entrepreneurship in the global firm. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  14. Birkinshaw, J., & Hood, N. 1998. Multinational subsidiary evolu tion: Capability and charter change in foreign-owned subsidi ary companies. Academy of Management Review, 23(4): 773–795.Google Scholar
  15. Birkinshaw, J., Hood, N., & Young, S. 2005. Subsidiary entrepre-neurship, internal and external competitive forces, and subsidiary performance. International Business Review, 14(2): 227–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Birkinshaw, J., & Pedersen, T. 2008. Strategy and management in MNE subsidiaries. In A. M. Rugman (Ed), Oxford handbook of international business, 2nd edn: 367–388. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Bloom, N., & Van Reenen, J. 2010. Why do management practices differ across firms and countries? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(1): 203–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bloom, N., Genakos, C., Sadun, R., & Van Reenen, J. 2012. Management practices across firms and countries. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20(1): 12–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Brouthers, K. 2013. A retrospective on: Institutional, cultural and transaction cost influences on entry mode choice and perfor mance. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(1): 14–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Buckley, P. J. 2007. The strategy of multinational enterprises in the light of the rise of China. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 23(2): 107–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Buckley, P. J. 2009. Internalisation thinking: From the multina tional enterprise to the global factory. International Business Review, 18(3): 224–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Buckley, P. J. Forthcoming. Buckley and Casson. In M. Augier, & D. J. Teece (Eds), Encyclopedia of strategic management. Basing-stoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  23. Buckley, P. J., & Casson, M. C. 1976. The future of the multinational enterprise. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Buckley, P. J., & Casson, M. C. 1998. Analyzing foreign market entry strategies: Extending the internalization approach. Jour nal of International Business Studies, 29(3): 539–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. 1961. The management of innovation. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  26. Cantwell, J. A. 1989. Technological innovation and multinational corporations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  27. Cantwell, J. A. 1995. The globalization of technology: What remains of the product cycle model? Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1): 155–174.Google Scholar
  28. Cantwell, J. A. 1999. From the early internalization of corporate technology to global technology sourcing. Transnational Cor porations, 8(2): 71–92.Google Scholar
  29. Cantwell, J. A. 2009. Location and the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(1): 35–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Cantwell, J., Dunning, J. H., & Lundan, S. M. 2010. An evolutionary approach to understanding international business activity: The co-evolution of MNEs and the institutional environment. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(4): 567–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Cantwell, J. A., & Kosmopoulou, E. 2002. What determines the internationalization of corporate technology? In V. Havila, M. Forsgren, & H. Hakanson (Eds), Critical perspectives on internationalization: 305–334. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  32. Cantwell, J. A., & Mudambi, R. 2005. MNE competence-creating subsidiary mandates. Strategic Management Journal, 26(12): 1109–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Cantwell, J., & Narula, R. 2003. Revisiting the eclectic paradigm. In J. Cantwell, & R. Narula (Eds), International business and the eclectic paradigm: 1–20. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Capron, L., & Mitchell, W. 2009. Selection capability: How capability gaps and internal social frictions affect internal and external strategic renewal. Organization Science, 20(2): 294–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Casson, M. C. 1979. Alternatives to the multinational enterprise. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Casson, M. C. 1982. The entrepreneur: An economic theory. Oxford: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
  37. Casson, M. C. 1986a. Contractual arrangements for technology transfer: New evidence from business history. Business History, 28(4): 5–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Casson, M. C. 1986b. General theories of the multinational enterprise: Their relevance to business history. In P. Hertner, & G. Jones (Eds), Multinationals: Theory and history: 42–68. Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
  39. Casson, M. C. 1997. Information and organization: A new perspec tive on the theory of the firm. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  40. Casson, M. C. 2000. Enterprise and leadership: Studies on firms, networks and institutions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Casson, M. C. 2005. Entrepreneurship and the theory of the firm. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 58(2): 327–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Chandler, A. 1977. The visible hand. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Chandler, A., & Salsbury, S. 1971. Pierre S. Du Pont and the making of the modern corporation. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  44. Chesbrough, H. 2003. Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  45. Chesbrough, H., & Teece, D. J. 1996. When is virtual virtuous? Organizing for innovation. Harvard Business Review, 74(1): 65–73.Google Scholar
  46. Coase, R. 1937. The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16): 386–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Coase, R. 1991. The nature of the firm: Influence. In O. Williamson, & S. Winter (Eds), The nature of the firm: Origins, evolution and development: 61–74. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Dierickx, I., & Cool, K. 1989. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35(12): 1504–1511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Doz, Y., & Kosonen, M. 2008. The dynamics of strategic agility: Nokia’s rollercoaster experience. California Management Review, 50(3): 95–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Doz, Y., & Kosonen, M. 2010. Embedding strategic agility: A leadership agenda for accelerating business model renewal. Long Range Planning, 43(2): 370–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Drnevich, P. L., & Kriauciunas, A. P. 2011. Clarifying the conditions and limits of the contributions of ordinary and dynamic capabilities to relative firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 32(3): 254–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Dunning, J. H. 1981. Alternative channels and modes of interna tional resource transmission. In R. W. Moxon, & H. V. Perlmutter (Eds), Controlling international technology transfer: Issues, per spectives and implications: 3–27. New York: Pergamon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Dunning, J. H. 1995. Reappraising the eclectic paradigm in the age of alliance capitalism. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(3): 461–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Dunning, J. H. 2001. The eclectic (OLI) paradigm of international production: Past, present and future. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 8(2): 173–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Dunning, J. H., & Lundan, S. M. 2008. Multinational enterprises and the global economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  56. Dunning, J. H., & Lundan, S. M. 2010. The institutional origins of dynamic capabilities in multinational enterprises. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(4): 1225–1246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Dunning, J., & Pitelis, C. N. 2008. Stephen Hymer’s contribution to international business scholarship: An assessment and exten sion. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(1): 167–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Eisenhardt, K., & Martin, J. 2000. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11): 1105–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ernst, D., & Guerrieri, P. 1998. International production networks and changing trade patterns in East Asia: The case of the electronics industry. Oxford Development Studies, 26(2): 191–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Gans, J., & Stern, S. 2010. Is there a market for ideas? Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(3): 805–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., & Sturgeon, T. 2005. The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12(1): 78–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ghemawat, P. 2003. Semiglobalization and international business strategy. Journal of International Business Studies, 34 (2): 138–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Goldberg, V. P. 2008. Lawyers asleep at the wheel? The GM-Fisher Body contract. Industrial and Corporate Change, 17(5): 1071–1084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Gratton, L, & Ghoshal, S. 2005. Beyond best practice. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(3): 49–57.Google Scholar
  65. Greiner, L. E. 1998. Evolution and revolution as organizations grow, 1972. Harvard Business Review, 76(3): 55–60, 62.Google Scholar
  66. Hart, O. 1989. An economist’s perspective on the theory of the firm. Columbia Law Review, 89(7): 1757–1774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Hart, O. 2011. Thinking about the firm: A review of Daniel Spulber’s “The Theory of the Firm”. Journal of Economic Litera ture, 49(1): 101–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Helfat, C. E., & Lieberman, M. B. 2002. The birth of capabilities: Market entry and the importance of pre-history. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(4): 725–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Helfat, C. E., & Winter, S. G. 2011. Untangling dynamic and operational capabilities: Strategy for the (n)ever-changing world. Strategic Management Journal, 32(11): 1243–1250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Helper, S., & Sako, M. 2012. Management innovation in supply chain: Appreciating Chandler in the twenty-first century. In W. Lazonick, & D. Teece (Eds), Management innovation: Essays in the spirit of Alfred D. Chandler, Jr.: 147–178. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Hennart, J. F. 1977. A theory of multinational enterprise. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.Google Scholar
  72. Hennart, J. F. 1982. A theory of multinational enterprise. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  73. Hennart, J. F. 2009. Down with MNE-centric theories! Market entry and expansion as the bundling of MNE and local assets. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9): 1432–1454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Hennart, J. F. 2010. Transaction cost theory and international business. Journal of Retailing, 86(3): 257–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Hymer, S. H. 1968. La grande “corporation” multinationale: Analyse de certaines raisons qui poussent à l’intégration inter national des affaires. Revue Economique, 14(6): 949–973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Hymer, S. H. 1976. The international operations of national firms: A study of direct foreign investment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  77. Jones, G. 2005. Multinationals and global capitalism: From the nineteenth to the twenty-first century. New York: Oxford Uni versity Press.Google Scholar
  78. Jones, G., & Wadhwani, R. D. 2007. Entrepreneurial theory and the history of globalization. Business and Economic History, 5., accessed 1 August 2012.
  79. Kesmodel, D. 2011. Boeing examines supply chain for weak links., 30 December., accessed 30 December 2011.
  80. Kirkpatrick, D. 1998. The second coming of Apple: Through a magical fusion of man — Steve Jobs — and company, Apple is becoming itself again: the little anticompany that could, Fortune, 9 November., accessed 8 August 2012.
  81. Knight, F. 1921. Risk, uncertainty and profit. New York: Augustus Kelley.Google Scholar
  82. Knott, A. 2003. The organizational routines factor market paradox. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10): 929–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. 1992. Knowledge of the firm: Combination, capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organizational Sciences, 3(3): 383–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. 1995. Knowledge, market failure and the multinational enterprise: A reply. Journal of International Busi ness Studies, 26(2): 417–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Koopmans, T. C. 1957. Three essays on the state of economic science. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  86. Langlois, R. N. 2007. The entrepreneurial theory of the firm and the theory of the entrepreneurial firm. Journal of Management Studies, 44(7): 1107–1124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Levinthal, D. A. 1997. Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Man agement Science, 43(7): 934–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Lippman, S. A., & Rumelt, R. P. 1982. Uncertain imitability: An analysis of inter-firm differences in efficiency under competition. Bell Journal of Economics, 13(2): 418–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Lutz, B. 2011. Life lessons from the car guy., 11 June., accessed 15 June 2011.
  90. Madhok, A. 1997. Cost, value and foreign market entry mode: The transaction and the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 18(1): 39–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Madhok, A., & Osegowitsch, T. 2000. The international biotech nology industry: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(2): 325–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Mansfield, E., Romeo, A., & Teece, D. 1979. Overseas research and development by US-based firms. Economica, 46(182): 187–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Mell, P., & Grance, T. 2011. The NIST definition of cloud computing. NIST Special Publication 800–145. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.–145/SP800–145.pdf, accessed 10 November 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Miles, R. E., & Snow, C. C. 1978. Organizational strategy, structure, and process. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  95. Monteverde, K., & Teece, D. J. 1982. Supplier switching costs and vertical integration in the automobile industry. The Bell Journal of Economics, 13(1): 206–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Nelson, R. R. (Ed) 1993. National systems of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  97. Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  98. O’Reilly, C. A., Harreld, J. B., & Tushman, M. L. 2009. Organiza tional ambidexterity: IBM and emerging business opportunities. California Management Review, 51(4): 75–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Oviatt, B. M., & McDougall, P. P. 1994. Toward a theory of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(1): 45–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Penrose, E. T. 1959. The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  101. Perlmutter, H. V. 1969. The tortuous evolution of the multinational corporation. Columbia Journal of World Business, 4(1): 9–18.Google Scholar
  102. Phene, A., & Almeida, P. 2008. Innovation in multinational subsidiaries: The role of knowledge assimilation and subsidiary capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(5): 901–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Pitelis, C. N. 2004. Edith Penrose and the resource-based view of (international) business strategy. International Business Review, 13(4): 523–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Pitelis, C. N. 2007. Edith Penrose and a learning-based perspec tive on the MNE and OLI. Management International Review, 47 (2): 207–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Pitelis, C. N., & Teece, D. J. 2010. Cross-border market co-creation, dynamic capabilities and the entrepreneurial theory of the multinational enterprise. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(4): 1247–1270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Polanyi, M. 1958. Personal knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  107. Porter, M. E. 1980. Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  108. Porter, M. E. 1985. Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  109. Prahalad, C. K., & Doz, Y. L. 1981. An approach to strategic control in MNCs. Sloan Management Review, 22(4): 5–13.Google Scholar
  110. Rennie, M. W. 1993. Global competitiveness: Born global. McKinsey Quarterly, 1993(4): 45–52.Google Scholar
  111. Rugman, A. M. 1981. Inside the multinationals: The economics of internal markets. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  112. Rugman, A. M., & Bennett, J. 1982. Technology transfer and world product mandating in Canada. Columbia Journal of World Business, 17(4): 58–62.Google Scholar
  113. Rugman, A. M., & D’Cruz, J. 2000. Multinationals as flagships firms: Regional business networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  114. Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. 1992. A note on the transnational solution and the transaction cost theory of multinational strategic management. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(4): 761–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. 1993. Foreign subsidiaries and multinational strategic management: An extension and correc tion of Porter’s single diamond framework. Management Inter national Review, 33(Special Issue 2): 71–84.Google Scholar
  116. Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. 2001. Subsidiary-specific advan tages in multinational enterprises. Strategic Management Jour nal, 22(3): 237–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. 2002. Location, competitiveness and the multinational enterprise. In A. M. Rugman, & T. L. Brewer (Eds), The Oxford handbook of international business: 150–180. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  118. Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. 2003. Extending the theory of the multinational enterprise: Internalization and strategic manage ment perspectives. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(2): 125–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Rumelt, R. 2011. Good strategy/bad strategy: The difference and why it matters. New York: Crown Business.Google Scholar
  120. Simon, H. A. 1969. The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  121. Starvish, M. 2011. KFC’s explosive growth in China. HBS Working Knowledge., accessed 5 August 2012.
  122. Szulanski, G. 1996. Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Manage ment Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue): 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Tallman, S. 2003. The significance of Bruce Kogut’s and Undo Zander’s article, “Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational enterprise”. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(6): 495–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Teece, D. J. 1975. The multinational corporation and the resource cost of international technology transfer. Philadelphia: Economics Department, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  125. Teece, D.J. 1976. The multinational corporation and the resource cost of international technology transfer. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing.Google Scholar
  126. Teece, D. J. 1977a. Technology transfer by multinational firms: The resource cost of transferring technological know-how. The Economic Journal, 87(346): 242–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Teece, D. J. 1977b. Time–cost tradeoffs: Elasticity estimates and determinants for international technology transfer projects. Management Science, 23(8): 830–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Teece, D. J. 1980. Economies of scope and the scope of the enterprise. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1(3): 223–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Teece, D. J. 1981a. The multinational enterprise: Market failure and market power considerations. Sloan Management Review, 22(3): 3–17.Google Scholar
  130. Teece, D. J. 1981b. The market for know-how and the efficient international transfer of technology. Annals of the Academy of Political and Social Science, 458(1): 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Teece, D. J. 1982. Towards an economic theory of the multi-product firm. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3(1): 39–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Teece, D. J. 1985. Multinational enterprise, internal governance, and industrial organization. American Economic Review, 75(2): 233–238.Google Scholar
  133. Teece, D. J. 1986a. Transaction cost economics and the multi national enterprise: An assessment. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 7(1): 21–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Teece, D. J. 1986b. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15(6): 285–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Teece, D. J. 2000. Managing intellectual capital: Organizational, strategic, and policy dimensions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  136. Teece, D. J. 2006a. Reflections on the Hymer thesis and the multinational enterprise. International Business Review, 15(2): 124–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Teece, D. J. 2006b. Reflections on “Profiting from innovation”. Research Policy, 35(8): 1131–1146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Teece, D. J. 2007. Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfounda-tions of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13): 1319–1350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Teece, D.J. 2009. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management: Organizing for innovation and growth. New York: Oxford Uni versity Press.Google Scholar
  140. Teece, D. J. 2012. Next-generation competition: New concepts for understanding how innovation shapes competition and policy in the digital economy. Journal of Law, Economics, and Policy, 9(1): 97–118.Google Scholar
  141. Teece, D.J. forthcoming. Ordinary capabilities, dynamic capabil ities, and competitive advantage: Synthesizing capabilities and the concept of strategy. Academy of Management Perspectives.Google Scholar
  142. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7): 537–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Vahlne, J. -E., & Johanson, J. 2013. The Uppsala model on evolution of the multinational business enterprise — From internalization to coordination of networks. International Mar keting Review, 30(3): 189–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Van Mieghem, J. A. 2008. Operations strategy: Principles and practices. Belmont, MA: Dynamic Ideas.Google Scholar
  145. Walker, P. 2009. The (non)theory of the knowledge firm. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 57(1): 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Wernerfelt, B. 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2): 171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Williamson, O. E. 1975. Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  148. Williamson, O. E. 1981. The modern corporation: Origins, evolution, attributes. Journal of Economic Literature, 19(4): 1537–1568.Google Scholar
  149. Williamson, O. E. 1985. The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, relational contracting. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  150. Williamson, O. E. 1991. Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2): 269–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. Williamson, O. E. 1999. Strategy research: Governance and competence perspectives. Strategic Management Journal, 20(12): 1087–1108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Wilson, K., & Doz, Y. 2011. Agile innovation: a footprint balan cing distance and immersion. California Management Review, 53(2): 6–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. Winter, S. G. 2003. Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10): 991–995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Zaheer, S. 1995. Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2): 341–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Zahra, S. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hitt, M. A. 2000. International expansion by new venture firms: International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5): 925–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of International Business 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • David J. Teece

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations