Skip to main content

An Introduction to the Eclectic Paradigm as a Meta-Framework for the Cross-Disciplinary Analysis of International Business

  • Chapter
The Eclectic Paradigm

Abstract

A major aim of this book on the eclectic paradigm is to enable scholars coming to the International Business (IB) field from a cognate discipline, perhaps for the first time, to be able to connect their own way of thinking about IB issues to a framework for IB analysis that is already well established in our field. It is also hoped that this collection of chapters originally published in the Journal of International Business Studies (JIBS), the leading journal in the IB field, will help to remind mainstream IB scholars of how the framework of the eclectic paradigm has emerged and developed, and of the contribution that JIBS has played in this development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adams, P., Brusoni, S. and Malerba, F. (2011), ‘Knowledge, supply and demand in industrial development: a sectoral systems perspective’, Innovation and Development, 1(2), 167–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergsten, C.F., Horst, T. and Moran, T.H. (1978), American Multinationals and American Interests, Washington DC: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boddewyn, J.J. (1988), ‘Political aspects of MNE theory’, Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3), 341–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brash, D.T. (1966), American Investment in Australian Industry, Canberra: Australian National University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouthers, L.E., Brouthers, K.D. and Werner, S. (1999), ‘Is Dunning’s eclectic framework descriptive or normative?’, Journal of International Business Studies, 30(4), 831–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P.J. and Casson, M.C. (1976), The Future of the Multinational Enterprise, London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P.J. and Casson, M.C. (2003), ‘The future of the multinational enterprise in retrospect and in prospect’, Journal of International Business Studies, 34(2), 219–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, J.A. (1989), Technological Innovation and Multinational Corporations, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, J.A. (2000), ‘A survey of theories of international production’, in Pitelis, C.N. and Sugden, R. (eds), The Nature of the Transnational Firm, London: Routledge, 10–56 (second edition; first published in 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, J.A. (2005), ‘Innovation and competitiveness’, in Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D.C. and Nelson, R.R. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 543–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, J.A. (2009), ‘Location and the multinational enterprise’, Journal of International Business Studies, 40(1), 35–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, J.A. (2013), ‘Blurred boundaries between firms, and new boundaries within (large multinational) firms: the impact of decentralized networks for innovation’, Seoul Journal of Economics, 26(1), 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, J.A. (2014a), ‘Revisiting international business theory: A capabilities-based theory of the MNE’, Journal of International Business Studies, 45(1), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, J.A. (2014b), ‘A commentary on Grazia Ietto-Gillies’ paper: “The theory of the transnational corporation at 50+”’, Economic Thought, 3(2), 58–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, J.A., Dunning, J.H. and Lundan, S.M. (2010), ‘An evolutionary approach to understanding international business activity: the co-evolution of MNEs and the institutional environment’, Journal of International Business Studies, 41(4), 567–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, J.A. and Mudambi, R. (2005), ‘MNE competence-creating subsidiary mandates’, Strategic Management Journal, 26(12), 1109–1128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, J.A. and Narula, R. (2003), ‘Revisiting the eclectic paradigm: new developments and current issues’, in Cantwell, J.A. and Narula, R. (eds), International Business and the Eclectic Paradigm: Developing the OLI Framework, London: Routledge, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, J.A. and Piscitello, L. (2014), ‘Historical changes in the determinants of the composition of innovative activity in MNC subunits’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 23(3), 633–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, J.A. and Zhang, Y. (2009), ‘The innovative multinational firm: the dispersion of creativity, and its implications for the firm and for world development’, in Collinson, S. and Morgan, G. (eds), Images of the Multinational Firm, Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A.D. (1962), Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of Industrial Enterprise, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A.D. (1977), The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A.D. and Redlich, F. (1961), ‘Recent developments in American business administration and their conceptualization’, Business History Review, 35(1), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J.H. (1958), American Investment in British Manufacturing Industry, London: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J.H. (1970), Studies in International Investment, London: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J.H. (1973), ‘The determinants of international production’, Oxford Economic Papers, 25(3), 289–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J.H. (1977), ‘Trade, location of economic activity and the multinational enterprise: a search for an eclectic approach’, in Ohlin, B., Hesselborn, P.-O. and Wijkman, P.M. (eds) The International Allocation of Economic Activity, London and Basingstoke: Macmillan, 395–418.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J.H. (1980), ‘Toward an eclectic theory of international production: some empirical tests’, Journal of International Business Studies, 11(1), 9–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J.H. (1988), ‘The eclectic paradigm of international production: a restatement and some possible extensions’, Journal of International Business Studies, 19(1), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J.H. (1990), ‘The eclectic paradigm as an envelope for economic and business theories of MNE activity’, International Business Review, 9(2), 163–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J.H. (1995), ‘Reappraising the eclectic paradigm in an age of alliance capitalism’, Journal of International Business Studies, 26(3), 461–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J.H. (2001), ‘The eclectic (OLI) paradigm of international production: past, present and future’, International Journal of the Economics of Business, 8(2), 173–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J.H. (2003), ‘Some antecedents of internalization theory’, Journal of International Business Studies, 34(2), 108–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J.H. (2010), New Challenges for International Business Research: Back to the Future, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J.H. and Cantwell, J.A. (1982), ‘Investissements Américaines direct et compétitivité technologique Européenne’, L’Actualité Économique, 58(3), 341–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J.H. and Lundan, S.M. (2008), Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2nd edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, L. and Dai, L. (2010), ‘Rethinking the O in Dunning’s OLI/eclectic paradigm’, Multinational Business Review, 18(2), 13–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsgren, M., Holm, U. and Johanson, J. (2005), Managing the Embedded Multinational: A Business Network View, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J.K. (1967), The New Industrial State, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashai, N. and Buckley, P.J. (2014), ‘Is competitive advantage a necessary condition for the emergence of the multinational enterprise?’, Global Strategy Journal, 4(1), 35–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J.-F. (2009), ‘The theory of the multinational enterprise’, in Rugman, A.M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of International Business, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press (second edition; first published in 2001, edited by A.M. Rugman and T.L. Brewer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J.-F. and Slangen, A.H.L. (2015), ‘Yes, we really do need more entry mode studies! A commentary on Shaver’, Journal of International Business Studies, 46(1), 114–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, S. (1967), Location of Industry and International Competitiveness, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G.M. and Knudsen, T. (2010), Darwin’s Conjecture: The Search for General Principles of Social and Economic Evolution, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Horaguchi, H. and Toyne, B. (1990), ‘Setting the record straight: Hymer, internaliza-tion theory and transaction cost economics’, Journal of International Business Studies, 21(3), 487–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hufbauer, G.C. and Adler, F.M. (1968), Overseas Manufacturing Investments and the Balance of Payments, Tax Policy Research Study No. 1, Washington DC: US Treasury Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymer, S.H. (1960), The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Foreign Direct Investment, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT (published in 1976 under the same title, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymer, S.H. (1968), ‘La grande ‘corporation’ multinationale: Analyse de certaines raisons qui poussant à l’intégration internationale des affaires’, Revue Economique, 14(6), 949–973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hymer, S.H. (1972), ‘The multinational corporation and the law of uneven development’, in Bhagwati, J. (ed.), Economics and World Order: From the 1970s to the 1990s, London: Collier-Macmillan, 33–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ietto-Gillies, G. (2012), Transnational Corporations and International Production: Concepts, Theories and Effects, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2nd edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ietto-Gillies, G. (2014), ‘The theory of the transnational corporation at 50+’, Economic Thought, 3(2), 38–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Itaki, M. (1991), ‘A critical assessment of the eclectic theory of the multinational enterprise’, Journal of International Business Studies, 22(3), 445–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (1993), ‘Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation’, Journal of International Business Studies, 24(4), 625–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (2003), ‘A memoir and reflection: knowledge and an evolutionary theory of the multinational firm 10 years later’, Journal of International Business Studies, 34(6), 505–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lall, S. (1983), ‘The theoretical background’, in Lall, S. (ed.), The New Multinationals: The Spread of Third World Enterprises, Chichester: John Wiley, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundan, S.M. (2010), ‘What are ownership advantages?’, Multinational Business Review, 18(2), 51–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, J. (2006), ‘Dragon multinationals: new players in 21st century globalization’, Asia Pacifi c Journal of Management, 23(1), 5–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McManus, J.C. (1972), ‘The theory of the multinational firm’, in Paquet, G. (ed.), The Multinational Firm and the Nation State, Toronto: Collier-Macmillan, 66–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudambi, R. and Navarra, P. (2004), ‘Is knowledge power? Knowledge flows, subsidiary power and rent-seeking within MNEs’, Journal of International Business Studies, 35(5), 385–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narula, R. (2010), ‘Keeping the eclectic paradigm simple’, Multinational Business Review, 18(2), 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.R. (2003), ‘Physical and social technologies, and their evolution’, LEM Working Paper, 2003/9, Pisa, June, 23pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.R. and Sampat, B.N. (2001), ‘Making sense of institutions as a factor shaping economic performance’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 44(1), 31–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.R. and Winter, S.G. (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E.T. (1959), The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddaway, W.B. (1970), Effects of UK Direct Investment Overseas: Final Report, Cambridge: Department of Applied Economics, University of Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A.M. (2010), ‘Reconciling internalization theory and the eclectic paradigm’, Multinational Business Review, 18(2), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A.M. and Verbeke, A. (1992), ‘A note on the transnational solution and the transaction cost theory of multinational strategic management’, Journal of International Business Studies, 23(4), 761–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D.J. (2014), ‘A dynamic capabilities-based entrepreneurial theory of the multinational enterprise’, Journal of International Business Studies, 45(1), 8–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolentino, P.E.E. (1993), Technological Innovation and Third World Multinationals, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safarian, A.E. (1969), The Performance of Foreign-Owned Firms in Canada, Washington DC and Montreal: American-Canadian Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, R. (1966), ‘International investment and international trade in the product cycle’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80(2), 190–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. (1964), The Economics of Discretionary Behavior: Managerial Objectives in a Theory of the Firm, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. (1971), ‘The vertical integration of production: market failure considerations’, American Economic Review, 61(1), 112–123.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Academy of International Business

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cantwell, J. (2015). An Introduction to the Eclectic Paradigm as a Meta-Framework for the Cross-Disciplinary Analysis of International Business. In: Cantwell, J. (eds) The Eclectic Paradigm. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-54471-1_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics