Luis Sandrini’s Stutter, Early Argentine Film Comedy, and the Representability of Time

  • Nilo Fernando Couret
Part of the New Directions in Latino American Cultures book series (NDLAC)


Comedy as a popular genre has received little serious attention in general Latin American film histories. If social anthropologist Ernest Gellner and Angel Rama both understand national culture as politically willed by a privileged cadre of citizens who identify a well-defined, educationally sanctioned, unified culture, then popular culture, in general, and comedy, in particular, are often excluded from national cultures (Gellner, 55; Rama, 19). Film studies literature that examines the “commercial prehistory” of New Latin American Cinema recovers popular texts that have been excluded from earlier national canons; however, this literature often privileges the melodrama and its cast of international female stars (King, 2). The limited discussion of comedy is often articulated to what Mexican cultural critic Carlos Monsiváis calls the socializing function of cinema (Monsiváis, 149). In order to consider comedy as comedy and not as an inadequate realism or a derivation of melodrama, I engage with a general study of comedy as a broader cultural form with a long-standing history—in tension with, and transformed by, realism. Much like Linda Williams’s revision of melodrama, this project requires less a semantic decoding than an exploration of the bodily effects of the genre (“Revised,” 42). In other words, I discuss the comedic films not in terms of representation, but rather, in terms of embodiment.


Popular Culture Musical Note Sound Track Sound Practice Early Film 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Works Cited

  1. Altman, Rick, McGraw Jones, and Sonia Tatroe. “Inventing the Cinema. Soundtrack: Hollywood’s Multiplane Sound System.” In Music and Cinema. Eds. lames Buhler, Caryl Flinn, and David Neumeyer. Hanover, NH: Wesleyan University Press, 2000. 339–359.Google Scholar
  2. —. “Deep-Focus Sound: Citizen Kane and the Radio Aesthetic.” Quarterly Review of Film and Video, 15(3), 1994: 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. —. “Moving Lips: Cinema as Ventriloquism.” Tale French Studies, 60, 1980: 67–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benjamin, Walter. “On the Mimetic Faculty.” In Selected Writings, 1926–1934. Eds. Michael W. Jennings, Howard Eiland, and Gary Smith. Trans. Rodney Livingstone et al., Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  5. Bergson, Henri. Creative Evolution. Trans. Arthur Mitchell. 1911. Reprint. New York: Cosimo, 2007.Google Scholar
  6. —. Laughter: An Essay on the Meaning of the Comic. New York: Macmillan, 1914.Google Scholar
  7. —. Matter and Memory. Trans. Nancy Paul and W. Scott Palmer. 1912. Reprint. New York: Cosimo, 2007.Google Scholar
  8. Chion, Michel. Audio-Vision. Ed. and Trans. Claudia Gorbman. New York: Columbia University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  9. Di Nubila, Domingo. Historia del cine argentino. Buenos Aires: Editorial Schapire, 1959.Google Scholar
  10. Falicov, Tamara L. “Argentine Cinema and the Construction of National Popular Identity, 1930–1942.” Studies in Latin American Popular Culture, 17, 1998: 61–79.Google Scholar
  11. Gellner, Ernest. Nations and Nationalisms. Oxford: Blackwell, 1983.Google Scholar
  12. Getino, Octavio. Cine Argentino: entre lo posible y lo deseable. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Ciccus, 1998.Google Scholar
  13. Hansen, Miriam. “Room-for-Play: Benjamin’s Gamble with Cinema.” October, 109, 2004: 3–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. —. “Benjamin and Cinema: Not a One-Way Street.” Critical Inquiry, 25(2), 1999: 306–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. —. “Benjamin, Cinema and Experience: ‘The Blue Flower in the Land of Technology.’” New German Critique, 40, 1987: 179–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Karush, Matthew. Culture of Class: Radio and Cinema in the Making of a Divided Argentina, 1920–1946. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. King, John. Magical Reels: A History of Cinema in Latin America. Revised Edition. London: Verso, 2000.Google Scholar
  18. Kracauer, Sigfried. Theory of Film: the Redemption of Physical Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997Google Scholar
  19. Lukács, Gyorgy. Significación actual del realismo crítico. 5th Edition. Mexico, D.F.: Ediciones Era, 1984.Google Scholar
  20. Monsiváis, Carlos. “All the People Came and Did Not Fit onto the Screen: Notes on the Cinema Audience in Mexico.” In Mexican Cinema. Ed. Paulo Antonio Paranaguá. Trans. Ana M. López. London: Verso, 1995, 145–151.Google Scholar
  21. Pellettieri, Osvaldo. De Totó a Sandrini: del cómico italiano al ‘actor nacional’ argentino. Buenos Aires: Galerna, 2001.Google Scholar
  22. Rama, Angel. La ciudad letrada. Hanover, NH: Ediciones del Norte, 1984.Google Scholar
  23. Stewart, Garrett. “Modern Hard Times: Chaplin and the Cinema of Self-Reflection.” Critical Inquiry, 30(2),1976: 295–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Williams, Linda. “Melodrama Revised.” In Refiguring American Film Genres: History and Theory. Ed. Nick Browne. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1998, 42–88.Google Scholar
  25. —. “Film Bodies: Gender, Genre, and Excess.” Film Quarterly, 44(4), 1991:2–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Nilo Fernando Couret 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nilo Fernando Couret

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations