Who’s Laughing Now? Indigenous Media and the Politics of Humor

  • Freya Schiwy
Part of the New Directions in Latino American Cultures book series (NDLAC)


In Canada and the United States, satire and comedy have long been staple elements in Native cultural performances, literature, and film, and humor has found some incipient discussion in critical literature.1 In the southern part of the hemisphere, by contrast, there has been much less work on the role of humor in indigenous media.2 Theories of humor have, of course, a long genealogy in the West, usually including contributions by Aristotle, Hobbes, Kant, Freud, Bergson, Bakhtin, and so forth. I will draw on some of these authors in my readings of indigenous videos, but am not interested in a formalistic analysis of the comic mode in film. Although formalist analyses of joke-work and humor seek to understand how mirth is constituted through a given text or action, I agree with scholars such as James English, Kristina Fagan, and Jonna Mackin that humor is more productively understood, not as an utterance, but as an event—what English calls a “comic transaction”3 that is constituted by the contextual aspects of shared or contested social norms and popular cultural texts. That is not to affirm the commonplace notion that all humor is culturally or nationally specific4 and that an essay on indigenous media shall focus on what creates this specificity. Rather, I am interested in the sociopolitical dimension of what humor effects in a cultural politics of decolonization in which indigenous video partakes.


Indigenous People Comic Mode Mayan Community Latin American Context Shared Affect 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Works Cited

  1. Bakhtin, Mikhail. “Rabelais and His World.” Literary Theory: An Anthology. Revised Edition. Eds. Julie Rivkin and Michael Ryan. Maiden, MA: Blackwell, 1998,45–51.Google Scholar
  2. Bergson, Henri. “Laughter.” Comedy. Ed. Wylie Sypher. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1956, 59–190.Google Scholar
  3. Billig, Michael. “Comic Racism and Violence” and Dennis Howitt. In Beyond the Joke. The Limits of Humor. Eds. Sharon Lockyer and Michael Pickering. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.Google Scholar
  4. Briggs, Lucy T. and Domingo Llanque Chana. “Humor in Aymara Oral Narrative.” Latin American Indian Literatures, 3, 1979: 1–10.Google Scholar
  5. English, James. Comic Transactions. Literature, Humor, and the Politics of Community in Twenthieth-Century Britain. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  6. Fagan, Kristina. “Teasing, Tolerating, Teaching: Laughter and Community in Native Literature.” In Me Funny. Ed. Drew Hayden Taylor. Vancouver, Toronto, and Berkeley: Douglas & Mclntyre, 2005, 23–50.Google Scholar
  7. Freud, Sigmund. Jokes and Their Relation to the Unconscious. Translated and edited by James Strachey. The Standard Edition. New York and London: W.W. Norton, 1960.Google Scholar
  8. Gruber, Eva. Reimagining Nativeness. Humor in Contemporary Native North American Literature. Rochester, NY: Camden House, 2008.Google Scholar
  9. Halkin, Alexandra “Outside the Indigenous Lens: Zapatistas and Indigenous Videomaking.” In Global Indigenous Media. Cultures, Practices, Politics. Eds. Pamela Wilson and Michelle Stewart. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2008, 160–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Howitt, Dennis and Kwame Owusu-Bempah. “Race and Ethnicity in Popular Humour.” Beyond the Joke. The Limits of Humor. Eds. Sharon Lockyer and Michael Pickering. Houndsmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.Google Scholar
  11. King, Geoff. Film Comedy. London and New York: Wallflower Press, 2002.Google Scholar
  12. Köhler, Axel. “Nuestros antepasados no tenían cámaras: el video como machete y otros retos de la video-producción indígena en Chiapas, México.” Revista Chilena de Antropología Visual, 4, 2004: 391–406. www.antropologiavisual.cl/imagenes4/imprimir/kohler.pdf April 3, 2012.
  13. Kümmels, Ingrid. “Cine Indígena: Video, Migration and the Dynamics of Belonging between Mexico and the USA.” http://www.lai.fu-berlin.de/homepages/kummels/publikationen/index.html. April 3, 2012.
  14. Lerner, Jesse. Dante Cerano’s Dia Dos. Sex, Kinship, and Videotape. In Resolutions 3. Global Networks of Video. Eds. Ming-Yuen S. Ma and Erika Suderberg. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press, 2012, 174–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lockyer, Sharon and Michael Pickering, eds. Beyond the Joke. The Limits of Humor. Houndsmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.Google Scholar
  16. Mackin, Jonna. “Trickster-Outlaws and the Comedy of Survival.” Comedy, Fantasy and Colonialism. Ed. Graeme Harper. New York: Continuum, 2002,189–204.Google Scholar
  17. McClintock, Anne. Imperial Leather: Race, Gender and Sexuality in the Colonial Conquest. New York: Routledge, 1995.Google Scholar
  18. Miracle, Andrew W. “Aymara Joking Behavior.” Play and Culture, 4, 1991: 144–152.Google Scholar
  19. Nichols, Bill. Representing Reality. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
  20. Raheja, Michelle. Reservation Reelism. Redfacing, Visual Sovereignty and Representations of Native Americans in Film. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2011.Google Scholar
  21. —. Reading Nanook’s Smile: Visual Sovereignty, Indigenous Revisions of Ethnography, and Atanarjuat (The Fast Runner)T American Quarterly, 59(4), 2007: 1159–1185.Google Scholar
  22. Rancière, Jacques. Dis-agreement, Translated by Julie Rose. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, [1995] 1999.Google Scholar
  23. Round, Nicholas G. “Preface.” In Essays on Luso[-Hispanic Humor. Ed. Paul W. Seaver. Lewiston, NY, Queenston, ON, and Lampeter: The Edwin Mellen Press, 2004, i–iv.Google Scholar
  24. Schiwy, Freya. Indianizing Film. Decolonization, the Andes, and the Question of Technology. Newark, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
  25. Shohat, Ella. “Imaging Terra Incognita. The Disciplinary Gaze of Empire.” Public Culture, 3(2), 1991: 41–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Smith, Laurel C. “Decolonizing Hybridity: Indigenous Video, Knowledge, and Diffraction.” Cultural Geographies, 19(3), 2012: 329–348..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. —. “Mobilizing Indigenous Video. The Mexican Case.” Journal of Latin American Geography, 5(1), 2006: 113–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stam, Robert and Louise Spence. “Colonialism, Racism, Representation. An Introduction.” Screen, 24(2), 1983: 2–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Taylor, Drew Hayden, ed. Me Funny. Vancouver, Toronto, and Berkeley: Douglas & Mclntyre, 2005.Google Scholar
  30. Wammack Weber, Byrt. “(Re) Imagining Diaspora: Two Decades of Video with a Mayan Accent.” In Adjusting the Lens. Eds. Freya Schiwy and Byrt Wammack Weber. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  31. Wortham, Erica Cusi. Indigenous Media in Mexico. Culture, Community, and the State. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zamorano Villarreal, Gabriela. “‘Intervenir en la realidad’: usos políticos del video indígena en Bolivia.” Revista Colombiana de Antropología, 45(2), 2009:259–285.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Freya Schiwy 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Freya Schiwy

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations