Abstract

The world is globalizing, although maybe not as much as we think. Nevertheless, there is a trend that emerged in the early 1980s that could be considered the starting point of what these days we call globalization. Over time, it has changed its dynamics and seen its fair share of setbacks, and the underlying drivers of development have been shifting. Those drivers ultimately resulted in the paradigm shifts that we have been undergoing in recent decades. Globalization was initially a one-way street along which the OECD or developed countries exported their products and services into non-developed economies and markets. Alternatively, those non-developed nations were used as a manufacturing hub for the world by Western companies, thereby engaging in labor arbitrage that fueled Western consumption with products that could be offered at steeply discount prices relative to average Western purchasing levels. These markets are called ‘emerging markets’1 these days, although the term has become quite obsolete as it now captures pretty much every country in the world outside the OECD region. Some of them have even made it onto the OECD list in recent years. In the last 10–15 years those initial dynamics have been changing somewhat. The emerging economies now account for a large part of global growth, absorb their fair (and increasing) share of global consumption and involve approximately five billion out of the seven billion people on this planet.2

Keywords

Europe Attenuation Income Radar Tate 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    A. van Agtmael (2007), The Emerging Markets Century: How a Breed of World-Class Companies Is Overtaken the World, Free City Press, London.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    J. Merikyll and T. Room (2014), Are Foreign-Owned Firms Different? Comparison of Employment Volatility and Elasticity of Labor Demand, ECB Working Paper Series, Nr. 1704.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    Despite the evidence, what government spending can do to regain competitiveness and restore external imbalances is described in D. Clancy, P. Jacquinot and M. Lozej (2014), The Effects of Government Spending in a Small Open Economy within a Monetary Union, ECB Working Paper Series, Nr. 1727.Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    B. R. Scott (2007), The Political Economy of Capitalism, Harvard Business School Working Paper, Nr. 07–037, p. 2.Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    A. Korinek and J. Kreamer (2013), The Redistributive Effects of Financial Deregulation: Wall Street Versus Main Street, IMF Working Paper, WP/13/247. Updated version September 2014 as BIS Working Paper Nr. 468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 7.
    J. Meek (2014), Private Island: Why Britain Now Belongs to Someone Else, Verso, London.Google Scholar
  7. 9.
    M. J. Sandel (2012), What Money Can’t Buy: The Moral Limits of the Market, Farrar, Straus & Giroux, New York, in particular pp. 91–128.Google Scholar
  8. 10.
    J. Vogl (2014), The Spectre of Capital, Stanford University Press, Palo Alto CA.Google Scholar
  9. 12.
    P. de Grauwe (2014), De limieten van de markt: de slinger tussen overhead en kapitalisme, Lannoo.Google Scholar
  10. P. de Grauwe (1986), De zichtbare hand, Het conflict tussen economie en politiek, Lannoo, Tielt.Google Scholar
  11. 14.
    William Safire (2004), No Uncertain Terms: More Writing from the Popular ‘On Language’ Column in The New York Times Magazine, Simon and Schuster, New York, pp. 23–43.Google Scholar
  12. 16.
    W. Streeck (2013), Politics in the Age of Austerity, Polity, New York, in particular Chapter 2: ‘Public Finance and the Decline of State Capacity in Democratic Capitalism’, pp. 26–58.Google Scholar
  13. 17.
    G. Zucman (2014), Taxing across Borders. Tracking Personal Wealth and Corporate Profits, London School of Economics Working Paper, August.Google Scholar
  14. 20.
    C. Peters (2014), On the Legitimacy of International Tax Law, IBFD Doctoral Series Nr. 31, IBFD, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  15. 21.
    D. Akyel (2014), Ökonomisierung und moralischer Wandel: Die Ausweitung von Marktbeziehungen als Prozess der moralischen Bewertung von Gütern. MPIfG Discussion Paper 14/13.Google Scholar
  16. R. Mayntz (2014), Mayntz, Markt oder Staat? Kooperationsprobleme in der Europäischen Union, Leviathan Vol. 42, Issue 2, pp. 292–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 22.
    T. Paster (2014), Why Did Austrian Business Oppose Welfare Cuts? How the Organization of Interests Shapes Business Attitudes Toward Social Partnership, Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 47, Nr. 7, pp. 966–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 25.
    L. Nijs (2011), Shaping Tomorrow’s Marketplace: Investment Strategies for Emerging Markets and a Semi-Globalized World, Euromoney Books, London.Google Scholar
  19. 26.
    T. Jenkins (2011), Prosperity without Growth. Economics for a Finite Planet, Routledge, London, pp. 25–56, passim.Google Scholar
  20. 27.
    W. Schinkel (2012), De nieuwe democratie. Naar andere vormen van politiek, De Bezige Bij, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Luc Nijs 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luc Nijs

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations