Advertisement

Introduction Nobody Likes a Middleman, But Most of us are Middlemen

  • Marina Krakovsky

Abstract

IN JANUARY 2014, AFTER PRESIDENT OBAMA DELIVERED his annual State of the Union address to Congress, several Republican senators responded with predictable disappointment. One detractor, Mike Lee, the junior senator from Utah, focused his carefully prepared critique on what the government should do to make the American Dream a reality for more people. To show that the president had failed to keep his word about the problem of income inequality, Lee said that for the past five years, the president “has promised an economy for the middle class, but all he’s delivered is an economy for the middlemen.”1

Keywords

Venture Capitalist Fair Trade Travel Agent Reduce Transaction Cost Real Estate Agent 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

  1. 6.
    Bill Gates, The Road Ahead (New York: Viking, 1995), 182. Although some of his predictions proved incorrect, Gates did accurately predict that those middlemen who continue to add value will thrive.Google Scholar
  2. 12.
    Daniel F. Spulber, Market Microstructure: Intermediaries and the Theory of the Firm (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999), 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 13.
    E-mail correspondence with Daniel Spulber, September 28, 2011. See also Daniel F. Spulber, “Should Business Method Inventions Be Patentable?” Journal of Legal Analysis 3, no. 1(2011): 279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 17.
    Scholars in various fields have proposed many different ways of classifying middleman roles. One pair of sociologists have suggested the roles of coordinator, liaison, representative, gatekeeper, and itinerant broker. See Roger V. Gould and Roberto M. Fernandez, “Structures of Mediation: a Formal Approach to Brokerage in Transaction Networks,” Sociological Methodology 19 (1989): 89–126. Marketing scholars have long catalogued middlemen’s functions, such as sharing risk, transporting goods, and others; for an overview, see Eric H. Shaw and D. G. Brian Jones, “A History of Schools of Marketing Thought,” Marketing Theory 5, no. 3 (2005): 239–81. My approach, which organizes middlemen’s roles by the type of problems they alleviate, combines elements from theories of marketing, economics, and sociology.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 23.
    Thomas Petzinger Jr., The New Pioneers: The Men and Women Who Are Transforming the Workplace and Marketplace (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1999): 61.Google Scholar
  6. 24.
    Susan T. Fiske, Amy J. C. Cuddy, and Peter Glick, “Universal Dimensions of Social Cognition: Warmth and Competence,” TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences 11, no. 2 (2007): 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 26.
    Caroline Tipler and Janet B. Ruscher, “Agency’s Role in Dehumanization: Non-Human Metaphors of Out-Groups,” Social and Personality Psychology Compass 8, no. 5 (2014): 214–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 27.
    Robert L. Steiner, “The Prejudice against Marketing,” Journal of Marketing 40 (July 1976): 2–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 28.
    Edna Bonacich, “A Theory of Middleman Minorities,” American Sociological Review 38, no. 5 (October 1973): 583–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 30.
    Other brands in this quadrant were AIG (bailed out by taxpayers), BP (following the fatal explosion and oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico), and Marlboro (the cigarette brand). See Nicolas Kervyn, Susan T. Fiske, and Chris Malone, “Brands As Intentional Agents Framework: How Perceived Intentions and Ability Can Map Brand Perception,” Journal of Consumer Psychology 22, no. 2 (2012): 166–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 31.
    Eugene F. Fama and Kenneth R. French, “Luck versus Skill in the Cross-Section of Mutual Fund Returns,” The Journal of Finance 65, no. 5 (October 2010): 1915–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 35.
    Amy Cuddy, Susan Fiske, and Peter Glick, “Warmth and Competence as Universal Dimensions of Social Perception: The Stereotype Content Model and the BIAS Map,” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 40 (2008): 61–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 40.
    Edward Wyatt, “Inventive, At Least in Court,” New York Times, July 16, 2013; and Andrei Hagiu and David B. Yoffie, “The New Patent Intermediaries: Platforms: Defensive Aggregators, and Super-Aggregators”, Journal of Economic Perspectives 27, no. 1 (Winter 2013): 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 42.
    Amy Cuddy, Susan Fiske, and Peter Glick, “The BIAS Map: Behaviors from Intergroup Affect and Stereotypes,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 92, no. 4 (2007): 631–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Marina Krakovsky 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marina Krakovsky

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations