Transition Experiences: A Statistical Analysis

  • Caroline Freund
  • Melise Jaud
Part of the International Economic Association Series book series (IEA)


In 2011, the people of Tunisia, Egypt, Libya and Yemen toppled autocratic regimes that had governed these nations for decades. The revolutions brought hope for democracy and prosperity in these countries, with more voice for the citizens, accountability of the government, and more opportunities for the youth. Completing the transition to democratic rule has proven more difficult than initially envisioned, as the elections in Egypt and Tunisia resulted in only short-lived governments. Meanwhile unrest has spread rapidly in Libya and Yemen, while Syria descended into civil war as the opposition failed to remove the long-term dictator. In contrast, the Kingdoms of Jordan and Morocco responded to demands for change with partial reform, resulting in less unrest and more consistent economic growth.


Comparative International Development Transition Experience Democratic Transition Military Regime Political Transition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Acemoglu, Daron and James A. Robinson. 2001. “A Theory of Political Transitions.” American Economic Review. 91:938–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acemoglu, Daron, James A. Robinson, and Thierry Verdier. 2004. “Kleptocracy and Divide-and-Rule: A Model of Personal Rule.” Journal of The European Economic Association, 2(2–3): 162–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Acemoglu, Daron, Simon Johnson, and James A. Robinson. 2005. “The Rise of Europe: Atlantic Trade, Institutional Change, and Economic Growth.” American Economic Review, 95(3): 546–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alesina, Alberto, Arnaud Devleeschauwer, William Easterly, Sergio Kurlat, and Romain Wacziarg. “Fractionalization.” Journal of Economic Growth, 2003, 8(2), pp. 155–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barro, R. J., 1999. “The Determinants of Democracy.” Journal of Political Economy, 107, pp. S158–S183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Collier, P. and A. Hoeffler. 2004. “Greed and Grievance in Civil War.” Oxford Economic Papers 56: 563–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Huntington, S. P. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
  8. Friedman, Milton. 1962. Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago, ILL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Freund, Caroline and Mélise Jaud. 2012a. “Regime Change, Democracy and Growth.” Working paper.Google Scholar
  10. Freund, Caroline and Mélise Jaud. 2012b. “Democratic transitions: successful, gradual and failed.” Mimeo.Google Scholar
  11. Freund, Caroline and Mé lise Jaud. 2013. “On The Determinants Of Democratic Transitions.” Journal of Middle East Economic Development 5.Google Scholar
  12. Glaeser, E., G. Ponzetto, and A. Shleifer. 2007. “Why Does Democracy Need Education?” Journal of Economic Growth, 12(2): 77–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gleditsch, K. S., and M. D. Ward. 1997. “Double take: a reexamination of democracy and autocracy in modern polities.” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41(3): 361–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. IMF. 2007. International Monetary Fund Guide on Resource Revenue Transparency.Google Scholar
  15. Lipset, Martin Seymour. 1959. “Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy.” American Political Science Review, 53(1): 69–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mainwaring, S., D. Brinks, and A. Pérez-Liñán. 2001. “Classifying political regimes in Latin America, 1945–1999.” Studies in Comparative International Development, 36(1): 37–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Marshall, Monty, Keith Gurr, and Ted Jaggers. 2011. The Polity IV Project: Dataset Users’ Manual. Vienna, VA: Center for Systematic Peace.Google Scholar
  18. Midlarsky, M. 1998. “Democracy and Islam: Implications for Civilizational Conflict and the Democratic Peace.” International Studies Quarterly 42.Google Scholar
  19. Montalvo, J.G. and M. Reynal-Querol. 2005. “Ethnic Polarization, Potential Conflict, and Civil Wars.” American Economic Review 95: 796–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Papaioannou, Elias and Gregorios Siourounis, 2008. “Economic and Social Factors Driving the Third Wave of Democratization.” The Journal of Comparative Economics, 36: 365–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Przeworski, A., Michael E. Alvarez, Jose Antonio Cheibub, and Fernando Limongi, 1996. “Classifying political regimes.” Studies in Comparative International Development, 31(2): 1–37.Google Scholar
  22. Przeworski, A., Michael E. Alvarez, Jose Antonio Cheibub, and Fernando Limongi, 2000. Democracy and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ross, M. L. 2001. “Does Oil Hinder Democracy?” World Politics, 53(3): 325–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Economic Association 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Caroline Freund
  • Melise Jaud

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations