Advertisement

Conclusion: The Politics of Self-Harm: Social Setting and Self-Regulation

  • Chris Millard
Open Access
Chapter
Part of the Mental Health in Historical Perspective book series (MHHP)

Abstract

Almost three decades ago, historian Howard Kushner writes of his unease at increasingly neurological understandings of behaviour such as suicide. He argues that ‘[o]ne feature of neuropathological approaches, however, seems unaffected by this increasing sophistication: the more scientifically complex these investigations become, the more they tend to ignore the social and historical context in which the behavior that they seek to explain takes place’.1 In these accounts, neurology displaces social context. In characteristically forthright terms, in 2014 Roger Cooter describes the turn to neurological explanations as ‘like becoming the victim of mind parasites’ because these explanations foreclose the ability to think critically about the social and cultural context of the explanations themselves: they are presented as universally true and outside of culture or history.2

Keywords

Attempted Suicide Welfare State Economic Freedom Social Setting Borderline Personality Disorder 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

  1. 1.
    H. Kushner, ‘Biochemistry, Suicide and History: Possibilities and Problems’ Journal of Interdisciplinary History 16(1) (1985): 71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Roger Cooter, ‘Neural Veils and the Will to Historical Critique’ Isis 105(1) (2014): 145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    E.T.O. Slater, ‘Psychiatry in the ’Thirties’ Contemporary Review 226, 1309 (1975): 75Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. Millard, ‘Reinventing Intention: “Self-Harm” and the “Cry for Help” in Post-War Britain’ Current Opinion in Psychiatry 25(6) (2012): 503–7Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    B. Walsh and P. Rosen, Self-Mutilation: Theory, Research and Treatment Guildford, Guildford Press (1988); two more recent statements are:Google Scholar
  6. J. Sutton, Healing the Hurt Within: Understand Self-Injury and Self-Harm, and Heal the Emotional Wounds, 3rd ed. Oxford, How To Books (2007); andGoogle Scholar
  7. K. Skegg, ‘Self-harm’ Lancet 366, 9495 (2005): 1471–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 7.
    R. Gardner, R. Hanka, V.C. O’Brien, A.J. Page and R. Rees, ‘Psychological and social evaluation in cases of deliberate self-poisoning admitted to a general hospital’ British Medical Journal 2, 6102 (1977): 1567–70;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. R. Gardner, R. Hanka, B. Evison, P.M. Mountford, V.C. O’Brien and S.J. Roberts, ‘Consultation-liaison scheme for self-poisoned patients in a general hospital’ British Medical Journal 2, 6149 (1978): 1392–4;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. J. Catalan, P. Marsack, K.E. Hawton, D. Whitwell, J. Fagg and J.H.J. Bancroft, ‘Comparison of doctors and nurses in the assessment of self-poisoning patients’ Psychological Medicine 10 (1980): 483–91;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. J.G.B Newson-Smith, ‘Use of social workers as alernatives to psychiatrists in assessing parasuicide’ in The Suicide Syndrome R. Farmer and S. Hirsch (eds) London, Croom Helm (1980): 215–25;Google Scholar
  12. D.R Blake and M.G. Bramble, ‘Self-poisoning: psychiatric assessment by junior staff’ British Medical Journal 1, 6180 (1979): 1763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 9.
    R. Porter, ‘The Patient’s View: Doing Medical History from Below’ Theory and Society 14(2) (1985): 175–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 10.
    J.W. Scott, ‘The Evidence of Experience’ Critical Enquiry 17(4) (1991): 777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 11.
    For the former, see A. Bechara, ‘The neurology of social cognition’ Brain: A Journal of Neurology 125(8) (2002): 1673–5; for the latter, seeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. M. Pickersgill ‘Between soma and society: Neuroscience and the ontology of psychopathy’ BioSocieties 4 (2009): 45–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 12.
    H. Rose and S. Rose, Genes, Cells and Brains: The Promethean Promises of the New Biology London, Verso (2012): 22–3Google Scholar
  18. 13.
    M.A. Simpson, ‘Self Mutilation and Suicide’ in Suicidology: Contemporary Developments E.S. Shneidman (ed) New York, Grune and Stratton (1976) 309–10Google Scholar
  19. 14.
    F. Gardner, Self-Harm: A Psychotherapeutic Approach Hove, Brunner-Routledge (2001) 26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 15.
    S.R. Schroeder, M.L. Oster-Granite and T. Thompson, Self-Injurious Behavior: Gene-Brain-Behavior-Relationships American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C. (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 16.
    D. Brent, ‘Prevention of self harm in adolescents’ British Medical Journal 342 (2011): 592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 17.
    B. Stanley and L. Siever, ‘The interpersonal dimension of borderline personality disorder: toward a neuropeptide model’ American Journal of Psychiatry 167 (2010): 24–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 18.
    M. Anguelova, C. Benkelfat and G. Turecki, ‘A systematic review of association studies investigating genes coding for serotonin receptors and the serotonin transporter. II: Suicidal behavior’ Molecular Psychiatry 8 (2003): 646–53;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. J.G. Keilp, M.A. Oquendo, B.H. Stanley, A.K. Burke, T.B. Cooper, K.M. Malone and J.J. Mann, ‘Future suicide attempt and responses to serotonergic challenge.’ Neuropsychopharmacology 35 (2010): 1063–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 19.
    A.R. Favazza, Bodies Under Siege: Self-Mutilation, Nonsuicidal Self-Injury, and Body Modification in Culture and Psychiatry 3rd ed. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press (2011) xGoogle Scholar
  26. 20.
    P.A. Adler and P. Adler, ‘The De-Medicalization of Self-Injury: From Psychopathology to Sociological Deviance’ Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 36 (2007): 537–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 21.
    W. Bareiss, ‘“Mauled by a Bear”: Narrative analysis of self-injury among adolescents in US news, 2007–2012’ Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine 18(3) (2014): 279–301Google Scholar
  28. 24.
    A. McSmith, No Such Thing as Society London, Constable (2010) 4Google Scholar
  29. 25.
    McSmith, No Such Thing as Society (2010) 5Google Scholar
  30. 26.
    M. Foucault, The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the College de France, 1978–1979 A.I. Davidson (ed.) and Graham Burchell (trans.) Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan (2008) 78–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 28.
    P. Anderson, Spectrum: From Left to Right in the World of Ideas London, Verso (2005) 54Google Scholar
  32. 29.
    I. Butler and M. Drakeford Social Policy, Social Welfare and Scandal: How British Public Policy is Made Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan (2003) 200Google Scholar
  33. 31.
    R. Duschinsky and L.A. Rocha, ‘Introduction: The problem of the family in Foucault’s work’ in Foucault the Family and Politics R. Duschinsky and L.A. Rocha (eds) Basingstoke, Palgrave Macillan (2012) 12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 32.
    G. Harkins, ‘Foucault, the family and the cold monster of neoliberalism’ in Foucault the Family and Politics R. Duschinsky and L.A. Rocha (eds) Basingstoke, Palgrave Macillan (2012) 87Google Scholar
  35. 34.
    K.S. Rajan, Biocapital: The Constitution of Postgenomic Life Durham, NC, Duke University Press (2006) 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 37.
    L. Daston and P. Gallison, Objectivity London, Zone Books (2005)Google Scholar
  37. 38.
    S. Shapin and S. Schaffer, Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle and the Experimental Life Princeton, Princeton University Press (1985);Google Scholar
  38. B. Latour and S. Woolgar, Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts London, Sage Publications (1979)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    D. Smail, On Deep History and the Brain Berkeley: University of California Press (2008). For some critical context, seeGoogle Scholar
  40. M. Littlefield and J. Johnson (eds), The Neuroscientific Turn: Transdisciplinarity in the Age of the Brain Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press (2012)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    S. Bell, When Salem Came to the Boro: the True Story of the Cleveland Child Abuse Crisis London, Pan (1988)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chris Millard 2015

Open Access This Chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License, which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chris Millard
    • 1
  1. 1.Queen MaryUniversity of LondonUK

Personalised recommendations