Abstract
This paper has tried to give an account of the discipline and application of an institution as complex as Xingshi Hejie, and how this institution is present in two distinct realities: the PRC and Taiwan. The documentation in the English language in this area of law is not very wide,1 although in recent years the interest in the subject has been growing.2 For this reason, it was necessary and useful to carry out a field research on the legal systems that were taken into consideration. In this way, we could get to a satisfactory level of definition with regard to the institution of Xingshi Hejie itself, and with regard to the context in which it is inserted.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Shi Yan’an (2008). On restorative justice practiced in China. Front. law China, (3)2, 294–323;
Xiaofeng Wu, (2010). Understanding of criminal reconciliation in ancient China. Front. law China, 5(1), 91–114;
Liu, Jianhong; & Palermo, G. B. (2009). Restorative justice and chinese traditional legal culture in the context of contemporary Chinese criminal justice. Asia Pacific Journal of Police & Criminal Justice, 7(1), 49–68;
Ota Tatsuya, (2003). Victims and Criminal Justice: Asian Perspective. Hogaku-Kenyu-Kai: Keyo University.
Braithwaite, J. (2002). Restorative Justice and Responsive Regulation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Page. 228 Di Xiaohua & Wu Yuning (2009). The developing trend of the People’s mediation in China. Sociological Focus, Quarterly Journal of the North Central Sociological Association. 42:3, 228–245.
For PRC see: Shi Yan’an (2008). On restorative justice practiced in China. Front. law China, (3)2, 294–323;
Liu, Jianhong & Palermo, G. B. (2009). Restorative justice and Chinese traditional legal culture in the context of contemporary Chinese criminal justice. Asia Pacific Journal of Police & Criminal Justice, 7(1), 49–68.
Page. 243 Di Xiaohua Wu Yuning (2009). The developing trend of the People’s mediation in China. Sociological Focus, Quarterly Journal of the North Central Sociological Association. 42:3, 228–245.
Glenn, H. P. (2001). Are legal traditions incommensurable? The American Journal of Comparative Law, 49:1, 133–145.
see: Shi Yan’an (2008). On restorative justice practiced in China. Front. law China, (3)2, 294–323.
Shi Yan’an (2008). On restorative justice practiced in China. Front. law China, (3)2, 294–323.
For example: Shi Yan’an (2008). On restorative justice practiced in China. Front. law China, (3)2, 294–323.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 Riccardo Berti
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Berti, R. (2016). Conclusions. In: Victim-Offender Reconciliation in the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan. Palgrave Advances in Criminology and Criminal Justice in Asia. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-52754-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-52754-7_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-58006-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-52754-7
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)