Skip to main content
  • 201 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter analyzes the institution of the VOR in both the PRC and Taiwan. First of all it is important to point out that in the PRC as well as in Taiwan different conciliatory mechanisms are effective, both in civil and criminal matters. They are placed at different levels, both pre-trial, that involve the social workers who handle the case, and after the criminal investigation, where different powers in reconciliatory perspective are reserved to the prosecution and to the judge. It is therefore important to isolate and identify the institution of the VOR and to also define in which different versions it may arise. Even before these distinctions, it is important to discern what criminal mediation is and what restorative justice is.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Zher, Howard (1990). Changing Lenses, a new focus on crime and justice. Scottsdale, PA: Herald Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. — Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, Shame and Reintegration. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. — Braithwaite, J. (2002). Restorative justice and responsive regulation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. — Braithwaite, J. (2002). Setting Standards for Restorative Justice. The British Journal of Criminology. 42, 563–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. — Braithwaite, J. (1999). Restorative justice: assessing optimistic and pessimistic accounts. Crime and Justice, 25, 1–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. — Braithwaite, J. (2014). Crime in Asia: Toward a better future. Asian Journal of Criminology, 9:65–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Schafer, S. (1960). Restitution to Victims of Crime. London: Stevens.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Eglash, A. (1958). Creative Restitution. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science. 48:6, 619–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gibbs, J. L. Jr (1967). The Kpelle Moot. Africa, 33:1, 1–10, reprinted in: Law and Warfare Studies in Anthropology of Conflict — NY Natural History Press.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nader, L. (1969). Law in Culture and Society. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nader, L.; Todd, H. (1978) The Disputing Process: Law in Ten Societies. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See Wright M., Galaway B. (1989). Mediation and criminal justice. Victims, offenders and community. London: Sage Publications, where it is also discusses the positive effect resulting from the inclusion of the community in the conciliation process.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Castellucci, I. (2007). Rule of Law with Chinese Characteristics. Annual Survey of International and Comparative Law, 13:1, 35

    Google Scholar 

  14. Translation of Shi Yan’an (2008). On restorative justice practiced in China. Front. law China. 3:2, 294–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Translation in Shi Yan’an (2008) On restorative justice practiced in China. Front. law China, (3)2, 294–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Page 254, Yan Xiang (2013) Criminal Mediation in Mainland China: A Leap from Judicial Endeavor to Legal Norm. Asian Journal of Criminology, 8:247–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Page 254, Yan Xiang (2013) Criminal Mediation in Mainland China: A Leap from Judicial Endeavor to Legal Norm. Asian Journal of Criminology, 8:247–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Page 254, Yan Xiang (2013) Criminal Mediation in Mainland China: A Leap from Judicial Endeavor to Legal Norm. Asian Journal of Criminology, 8:247–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Page 255, Yan Xiang (2013) Criminal Mediation in Mainland China: A Leap from Judicial Endeavor to Legal Norm. Asian Journal of Criminology, 8:247–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ajani, G.; Serafino, A.; Timoteo, M. (2006). Diritto dell’Asia Orientale. Torino, Italy: UTET.

    Google Scholar 

  21. See in this regard, Shi Yan’an (2008). On restorative justice practiced in China. Front. law China. 3:2, 294–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Source: AFP, (5 Jan 2010). Taiwan hopes Japanese comics can teach prosecutors. (http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5jiK8Hwmfv5EcC0nbU0_-KmJWKcPg) Retrieved September 01, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 Riccardo Berti

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Berti, R. (2016). The Xingshi Hejie in Chinese and Taiwanese Law. In: Victim-Offender Reconciliation in the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan. Palgrave Advances in Criminology and Criminal Justice in Asia. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-52754-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics