Abstract
On 30 January 2014, British Home Secretary Theresa May of the Conservative Party.1 then with the support of Nick Clegg (Liberal Democrats) and Hazel Blears (Labour Party, former cabinet member), proposed a security amendment to the Immigration Bill, “deprivation of citizenship”:2
(60) Deprivation if conduct seriously prejudicial to vital interests of the UK.
- (1)
In section 40 of the British Nationality Act 1981 (deprivation of citizenship), after subsection (4) insert–.
“(4A) But that does not prevent the Secretary of State from making an order under subsection (2) to deprive a person of a citizenship status if—.
- (a)
the citizenship status results from the person’s naturalisation, and
- (b)
the Secretary of State is satisfied that the deprivation is conducive to the public good because the person, while having that citizenship status, has conducted him or herself in a manner which is seriously prejudicial to the vital interests of the United Kingdom, any of the Islands, or any British overseas territory.” [emphasis added]
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Fisher, Kathryn. ‘Exploring the temporality in/of British counterterrorism law and law making,’ Critical Studies on Terrorism 6(1) (2013): 1–23.
Wilkinson, Paul. “Introduction”, in Homeland Security in the UK: Future Preparedness for Terrorist Attack Since 9/11, edited by Paul Wilkinson, 6–7. Abingdon: Routledge, 2007.
Aradau, Claudia and Van Munster, Rens. “Exceptionalism and the ‘War on Terror’: Criminology Meets International Relations,” British Journal of Criminology 49 (2009): 689.
Mark B. Salter. ‘When the exception becomes the rule: borders, sovereignty, and citizenship,’ Citizenship Studies 12(4) (2008): 365–380.
For language as power, see Janice Bially Mattern, Ordering International Politics: Identity, Crisis, and Representational Force (New York: Routledge, 2005);
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus. Civilizing the Enemy: German Reconstruction and the invention of the West. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2006.
For other discussion on mechanisms, see Lichbach, Mark Irving. “Modeling Mechanisms of Contention: MTT’s Positivist Constructivism, Symposium on McAdam, Tarrow and Tilly’s ‘Measuring Mechanisms of Contention,’” Qualitative Sociology 31 (2008): 345–354;
Tilly, Charles. “To Explain Political Processes,” The American Journal of Sociology 100(6) (1995): 1594–1610;
Tilly, Charles. “Mechanisms in Political Processes,” Annual Review of Political Science 4 (2001): 21–41.
Abdelal, Rawi, Herrera, Yoshiko M., Johnston, Alastair Iain, and McDermott, Rose (eds.). Measuring Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009, 6–7.
Jackson, Richard. Writing the War on Terrorism: Language, Politics and Counter-Terrorism. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2005;
Croft, Stuart. Culture, Crisis and America’s War on Terror. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006;
Williams, Michael C. ‘Words, Images, Enemies: Securitization and International Politics’, International Studies Quarterly 47 (2003): 511–553.
On normativity, see Aradau, “Security and the democratic scene: desecuritization and emancipation,” Journal of International Relations and Development 7 (2004): 388–413;
Floyd, Rita. “Can securitization theory be used in normative analysis? Towards a just securitization theory,” Security Dialogue 42 (2011): 427–439.
Zulaika, Joseba. Terrorism: The Self-fulfilling Prophecy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009.
Daase, Christopher and Kessler, Oliver. “Knowns and Unknowns in the ‘War on Terror’: Uncertainty and the Political Construction of Danger,” Security Dialogue 38 (2007): 411–434.
Waever, Ole. “Securitization and desecuritization.” In On Security, edited by Ronnie D. Lipschutz, 46–86. New York: Columbia University Press, 1995;
Buzan, Barry, Waever, Ole, and de Wilde, Jaap. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder, CO: Lynn Rienner Publishers, 1998.
Huysmans, Jef. “Revisiting Copenhagen: Or, On the Creative Development of a Security Studies Agenda in Europe.” European Journal of International Relations 4 (4) (1998): 490.
Buzan, Barry and Waever, Ole. “Macrosecuritisation and security constellations: reconsidering scale in securitisation theory,” Review of International Studies 35(2) (2009): 261.
Cf. Waever, Ole, Buzan, Barry, Kelstrup, Morten, and Lemaitre, Pierre. Identity, Migration and the New Security Agenda in Europe. London: Printer Publishers Ltd, 1993.
Hansen, Lene. Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War (37). London: Routledge, 2006.
Boyce, D. G. Englishmen and Irish Troubles: British Public Opinion and the Making of Irish Policy, 1918–1922 (107). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1972.
Moody, T. W. and Martin, F. X. The Course of Irish History. 4th ed. Lanham: Roberts Rinehart Publishers, 2001, 131.
Sanchez-Cuenca, Ignacio and de la Calle, Luis. “Domestic Terrorism: The Hidden Side of Political Violence,” Annual Review of Political Science 12 (2009): 32.
Croft, Stuart and Moore, Cerwyn. “The evolution of threat narratives in the age of terror: understanding terrorist threats in Britain,” International Affairs 86(4) (2010): 823.
John Shotter, Cultural Politics of Everyday Life. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1993, 24.
Pouliot, Vincent. “‘Sobjectivisim’: Toward a Constructivist Methodology,” International Studies Quarterly 51(2) (2007): 366.
On parliamentary debate, see Neal, Andrew. “Legislative Practices.” In Research Methods in Critical Security Studies: An Introduction, edited by Mark B. Salter and Can E. Mutlu. New York: Routledge, 2012 and “Normalization and legislative exceptionalism: counterterrorist lawmaking and the changing times of security emergencies,” International Political Sociology 6(3) (2012): 260–276.
Nexon, Daniel H. The Struggle for Power in Early Modern Europe: Religious conflict, dynastic empires and international change. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009, 44–45.
On “constraints” and “opportunities”, see Almond, Gabriel A. and Guenca, Stephen. “Clouds, Clocks, and the Study of Politics.” In A Discipline Divided: Schools and sects in political science. Newbury Park: Sage Publications, 1990, 35.
Butler, Judith. “Explanation and Exoneration, or What We Can Hear,” Theory and Event 5(4) (2002): paragraph 3.
Blair, Tony. “A Battle for Global Values,” Foreign Affairs 86(1) (2007): 79–90.
Hall, Martin and Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus (eds.). Civilizational Identities: The production and reproduction of “civilizations” in International Relations. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2007.
Krebs, Ronald R. and Lobasz, Jennifer. “The sound of silence: Rhetorical coercion, Democratic acquiescence, and the Iraq War.” In American Foreign Policy and the Politics of Fear: Threat inflation since 9/11, edited by A. Trevor Thrall and Jane K. Cramer, 117–134. London: Routledge, 2007;
Jackson, Richard. Writing the War on Terrorism: Language, Politics and Counter-Terrorism. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2005.
Amoore, Louise and de Goode, Marieke (eds.). Risk and the War on Terror. Abingdon: Routledge, 2008.
Lawson, George. “Introduction: the ‘what’, ‘when’ and ‘where’ of the global 1989.” In The Global 1989: Continuity and Change in World Politics, edited by George Lawson, Chris Armbruster, and Michael Cox, 11. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
Jackson. Civilizing the Enemy, 236 (with reference to Laffey, Mark and Weldes, Jutta. “Beyond Belief: Ideas and Symbolic Technologies in the Study of International Relations,” European Journal of International Relations 3(2) (1997): 209;
Ringmar, Erik. Identity, interest and action: A Cultural Explanation of Sweden’s intervention in the Thirty Years War (74). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996;
Shotter, John. Cultural Politics 1993, 65–69: 170–171).
Guzzini, Stefano. “A Reconstruction of Constructivism in International Relations,” European Journal of International Relations 6(2) (2000): 149.
Hopf, Ted. “The Promise of Constructivism in IR Theory,” International Security 23(1) (1998): 199.
Inayatullah, Naeem and Blaney, David. International Relations and the Problems of Difference. New York: Routledge, 2004.
Campbell, David. Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. Revised ed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1998, 70.
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus. “Foregrounding ontology: dualism, monism, and IR theory,” Review of International Studies 34 (2008): 131.
Wilkinson, Paul. Terrorism versus Democracy: The Liberal State Response, 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2006, 88.
Crenshaw, Martha. “The Psychology of Terrorism: An Agenda for the 21st Century,” Political Psychology 21(2) (2000): 415.
English, Richard. Terrorism: How to respond. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009, 56–117. “Amnesia” was also a discussion point at the “Belfast International Terrorism Workshop” (Queens University Belfast, 2009) and the British Academy Conference “9/11 Ten Years On” (British Academy, 2011).
David Campbell, “Time Is Broken: The Return of the Past In the Response to September 11,” Theory and Event 5, no. 4 (2002): paragraph 8.
English, Richard. Irish Freedom: A history of nationalism in Ireland. London: Pan Macmillan, 2006, 370;
Guelke, Adrian. The Age of Terrorism and the International Political System. London: Tauris Publishers, 1995, 52.
Donohue, Laura. “Regulating Northern Ireland: The Special Powers Acts, 1922–1972,” The Historical Journal 41(4) (1998): 1089–1120;
Donohue, Laura. The Costs of Counterterrorism: Power, politics, and liberty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008;
Hogan, Gerard and Walker, Clive. Political Violence and the Law in Ireland. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1989;
Walker, Clive. Blackstone’s Guide to the Anti-Terrorism Legislation. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
Lustick, Ian. “NO: Why terrorism is a much smaller threat than you think.” In Contemporary Debates on Terrorism, edited by Richard Jackson and Samuel Justin Sinclair, 74. London: Routledge, 2012.
Williams, Michael C. “Modernity, identity and security: a comment on the ‘Copenhagen controversy,” Review of International Studies 24 (1998): 439.
Jackson, Richard, Breen-Smyth, Marie, and Gunning, Jeroen (eds.). Critical Terrorism Studies: A New Research Agenda. London: Routledge, 2009;
Jackson, Richard, Jarvis, Lee, Gunning, Jeroen, and Breen-Smyth, Marie. Terrorism: A Critical Introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.
Shotter, John., Shotter, John. “Wittgenstein and our talk of feelings in inquiries into the dynamics of language use” International Journal of Critical Psychology (discontinued in 2008, now is journal Subjectivity) 21 (2007): 131. Thus there is a background “structure of possibilities” (Ibid., 136), but this background is not determinate or determining.
Kurki, Milja. Causation in International Relations: Reclaiming Causal Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. The account is in line with the idea of redefining cause and reclaiming causal analysis broadly speaking.
Wendt, Alexander. “On constitution and causation in International Relations,” Review of International Studies 24(5) (1998): 104–105. A comparison here noted by Sherrill Stroschein is chess, as discussed by Friedrich Kratochwil (Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989) in which “the meaning of the move [‘check’] and its explanation crucially depend upon the knowledge of the rule-structure” (26).
Balzacq, Thierry. “The Three Faces of Securitization: Political Agency, Audience and Context” European Journal of International Relations 11(2) (2005): 172.
Waever, Ole. “Identity, communities and foreign policy: discourse analysis as foreign policy theory.” In European integration and national identity: The challenge of the Nordic states, edited by Lene Hansen and Ole Waever, 44, note 15. London: Routledge, 2002.
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus. The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of science and its implications for the study of world politics. London: Routledge, 2011, 135.
Gearty, Conor. Liberty & Security. Cambridge: Polity, 2013.
Amoore, Louise. “Vigilant Visualities: The Watchful Politics of the War on Terror,” Security Dialogue 38 (2007): 215–232.
Tilly, Charles. Durable Inequality. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1998.
On “Islam” and fear, see Woods, Joshua. ‘Framing terror: an experimental framing effects study of the perceived threat of terrorism,’ Critical Studies on Terrorism 4(2) (2011), 199–217.
Schneider, Cathy. “Police Power and Race Riots in Paris,” Politics and Society 36(1) (2008): 133–159.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Kathryn Marie Fisher
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fisher, K.M. (2015). Counterterrorism, Identity, (In)security. In: Security, Identity, and British Counterterrorism Policy. New Security Challenges. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-52422-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-52422-5_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-57208-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-52422-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political Science CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)