Skip to main content

Conclusion

  • Chapter

Abstract

In a widely read article published in 2001, shortly after the election of Vladimir Putin as President of the Russian Federation, Michael T. Klare predicted a new form of geopolitics driven by conflicts over energy. Noting that the US military’s upgrade of its senior command authority for Central Asia had received little more than a passing mention, Klare referred to the sub-region as shifting from a peripheral concern to a ‘major strategic prize’ (Klare, 2001, p. 49). He went on to note that, whereas Cold War-era alliances and lines of conflict were legitimated by ideology, economic competition had come to dominate international relations, and contests over natural resources were bound to intensify. Rather than focusing on ideational divides or ethnic violence, Klare argued that a much better predictor of political and economic stresses, and hence the potential for conflict, lay in seeing international politics through the prism of contested resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Buzan, Barry (2005) ‘The Security Dynamics of a 1+4 World’, in Ersel Aydinli and James Rosenau (eds), Globalization, Security and the Nation-State: Paradigms in Transition. New York: State University of New York Press, pp. 177–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamestown Foundation (2014) ‘Putin’s Crimea Speech: A Manifesto of Greater-Russia Irredentism’, Eurasia Daily Monitor, 11(56).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanet, Roger and Maria Raquel Freire (2012) ‘Introduction’, in Roger E. Kanet and Maria Raquel Freire (eds), Russia and its Near Neighbors, Houndmills: Palgrave, pp. 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klare, Michael T. (2001) ‘The New Geography of Conflict’, Foreign Affairs, May–June, pp. 49–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebedeva, Nina (2014) ‘Second wind for China’s string of pearls strategy’, New Eastern Outlook, 15 April. http://journal-neo.org/2014/04/15/rus-vtoroe-dy-hanie-kitajskoj-strategii-nit-zhemchuga-chast-1/.

  • Montgomery, Katarina (2014) ‘Understanding the oil money fuelling ISIS’, World Policy, 13 November. http://www.worldpolicy.org/blog/2014/11/13/understanding-oil-money-fueling-isis.

  • Moscow Times (2015) ‘Armenia joins Russian-led Eurasian Economic Union’, 2 February. http://www.themoscowtimes.com/business/article/armenia-joins-russia-led-eurasian-economic-union/514035.html.

  • Nygren, Bertil (2008) ‘Putin’s Use of Natural Gas to Reintegrate the CIS region’, Problems of Post-Communism, 55(4), July/August, pp. 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sussex, Matthew (2012) ‘Understanding Conflict in the Former USSR’, in Matthew Sussex (ed.), Conflict in the Former USSR, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–14.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zandoli, Blaise (2014) ‘Oil in the Hourglass: The Energy-Conflict Nexus in the South China Sea’, Journal of Energy Security, 23 April.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Matthew Sussex and Roger E. Kanet

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sussex, M., Kanet, R.E. (2015). Conclusion. In: Sussex, M., Kanet, R.E. (eds) Russia, Eurasia and the New Geopolitics of Energy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-52373-0_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics