Advertisement

Conclusion

  • Matthew Sussex
  • Roger E. Kanet

Abstract

In a widely read article published in 2001, shortly after the election of Vladimir Putin as President of the Russian Federation, Michael T. Klare predicted a new form of geopolitics driven by conflicts over energy. Noting that the US military’s upgrade of its senior command authority for Central Asia had received little more than a passing mention, Klare referred to the sub-region as shifting from a peripheral concern to a ‘major strategic prize’ (Klare, 2001, p. 49). He went on to note that, whereas Cold War-era alliances and lines of conflict were legitimated by ideology, economic competition had come to dominate international relations, and contests over natural resources were bound to intensify. Rather than focusing on ideational divides or ethnic violence, Klare argued that a much better predictor of political and economic stresses, and hence the potential for conflict, lay in seeing international politics through the prism of contested resources.

Keywords

Foreign Policy Regional Order Democracy Promotion Russian Energy Ethnic Violence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Buzan, Barry (2005) ‘The Security Dynamics of a 1+4 World’, in Ersel Aydinli and James Rosenau (eds), Globalization, Security and the Nation-State: Paradigms in Transition. New York: State University of New York Press, pp. 177–198.Google Scholar
  2. Jamestown Foundation (2014) ‘Putin’s Crimea Speech: A Manifesto of Greater-Russia Irredentism’, Eurasia Daily Monitor, 11(56).Google Scholar
  3. Kanet, Roger and Maria Raquel Freire (2012) ‘Introduction’, in Roger E. Kanet and Maria Raquel Freire (eds), Russia and its Near Neighbors, Houndmills: Palgrave, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
  4. Klare, Michael T. (2001) ‘The New Geography of Conflict’, Foreign Affairs, May–June, pp. 49–61.Google Scholar
  5. Lebedeva, Nina (2014) ‘Second wind for China’s string of pearls strategy’, New Eastern Outlook, 15 April. http://journal-neo.org/2014/04/15/rus-vtoroe-dy-hanie-kitajskoj-strategii-nit-zhemchuga-chast-1/.
  6. Montgomery, Katarina (2014) ‘Understanding the oil money fuelling ISIS’, World Policy, 13 November. http://www.worldpolicy.org/blog/2014/11/13/understanding-oil-money-fueling-isis.
  7. Moscow Times (2015) ‘Armenia joins Russian-led Eurasian Economic Union’, 2 February. http://www.themoscowtimes.com/business/article/armenia-joins-russia-led-eurasian-economic-union/514035.html.
  8. Nygren, Bertil (2008) ‘Putin’s Use of Natural Gas to Reintegrate the CIS region’, Problems of Post-Communism, 55(4), July/August, pp. 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Sussex, Matthew (2012) ‘Understanding Conflict in the Former USSR’, in Matthew Sussex (ed.), Conflict in the Former USSR, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Zandoli, Blaise (2014) ‘Oil in the Hourglass: The Energy-Conflict Nexus in the South China Sea’, Journal of Energy Security, 23 April.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Matthew Sussex and Roger E. Kanet 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthew Sussex
  • Roger E. Kanet

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations