Skip to main content

Russian Grand Strategy and the Ukraine Crisis: An Historical Cut

  • Chapter
Power, Politics and Confrontation in Eurasia

Abstract

Following the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, as the Russian Federation struggled to find its new place as a reduced Great Power within post-Cold War Eurasia, its relations with the newly-independent state of Ukraine were a matter of prime concern to Moscow. What had been its chief partner in the 293 million-strong Soviet Union was now its largest post-Soviet neighbour with a population of around 52 million as compared to Russia’s reduced population of 154 million. Moreover 11 million (22%) of Ukrainian citizens were Russian, constituting almost half of the 25 million who then found themselves outside the borders of the new Russia, while Ukraine enjoyed a largely unregulated 2,063-km common border with Russia, not to speak of a 1,720-km Black Sea coastline. Unfortunately, Ukraine soon came to be seen as a geopolitical ‘pivot state’ on the Eurasian chessboard, its status derived not from its internal strength but from the deep divisions within its borders between communities enjoying different civilizational identities, its sensitive strategic position, and its vulnerability to manipulation by Great Power diplomacy (Chase, Hill & Kennedy, 1996, pp. 33–37; Brzezinski, 1997, pp. 40–41). The potential for Ukraine to become the focus of an international struggle for influence, with the risk that it might be torn apart by a combination of internal or external forces, was therefore high.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allison, Roy (2014) ‘Russia’s “Deniable” Intervention in Ukraine: How and Why Russia Broke the Rules’, International Affairs, 90(6), November, pp. 1255–1297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aslund, Anders and Andrew Kuchins (2009) The Russia Balance Sheet. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economic. Centre for Strategic and International Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berryman, John (2009) ‘Russia, NATO Enlargement and the New Lands in Between’, in Roger E. Kanet (ed.), A Resurgent Russia and the West: The European Union, NATO and Beyond. Dordrecht: Republic of Letters, pp. 161–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berryman, John (2011) ‘Russia, NATO Enlargement, and “Regions of Privileged Interests”’, in Roger E. Kanet (ed.), Russian Foreign Policy in the 21st Century. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 228–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berryman, John (2012) ‘Geopolitics and Russian Foreign Policy’, International Politics, 49(4), pp. 530–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berryman, John, 2014. ‘“Fear and Loathing” in the Kremlin: Russia and the Challenge of Intervention’, in Roger E. Kanet and Remi Piet (eds), Shifting Priorities in Russia’s Foreign and Security Policy. Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 51–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betts, Richard K. (2013) American Force: Dangers, Delusions, and Dilemmas in National Security. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boltenkov, Dmitry (2014) ‘Home of the Black Sea Fleet: History and Disposition of Russian Forces in Crimea’, in Colby Howard and Ruslan Pukhov (eds), Brothers Armed: Military Aspects of the Crisis in Ukraine. Minneapolis: East View Press, pp. 135–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridge, Francis Roy. (1990) The Habsburg Monarchy Among the Great Powers, 1815–1918. New York, Oxford and Munich: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brzezinski, Zbigniew (1997) The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brzezinski, Zbigniew (1998) ‘Ukraine’s Critical Role in the Post-Soviet Space’, in Lubomyr A. Hajda (ed.), Ukraine in the World: Studies in the International Relations and Security Structures of a Newly Independent State. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bukvoll, Tor (1997) Ukraine and European Security. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, Barry and Ole Waever (2003) Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Charap, Samuel and Keith Darden (2014) ‘Russia and Ukraine’, Survival, 56(2), April-May, pp. 7–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charap, Samuel and Mikhail Troitsky (2013/14) ‘Russia, the West and the Integration Dilemma’, Survival, 55(6), December 2013–January 2014, pp. 49–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chase, Robert S., Emily B. Hill and Paul Kennedy (1996) ‘Pivotal States and U.S. Strategy’, Foreign Affairs, 75(1), January/February, pp. 33–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Josh (2015) ‘Putin wants Ukraine intact, but on his terms’, The Moscow Times, 5 February. http://www.themoscowtimes.com/opinion/article/newsletter/515497.html?.

  • Cohen, Saul Bernard (2009) Geopolitics: The Geopolitics of International Relations. 2nd edn. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coones, Paul (2005) ‘The Heartland in Russian History’, in Brian W. Blouet (ed.), Global Geostrategy: Mackinder and the Defence of the West. London and New York: Frank Cass, pp. 64–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, Dale C. (2000) The Origins of Major War. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denisentsev, Sergey (2014) ‘The Soviet Inheritance of Ukrainian Armed Forces’, in Colby Howard and Ruslan Pukhov (eds), Brothers Armed: Military Aspects of the Crisis in Ukraine. Minneapolis: East View Press, pp. 25–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, Robert H. and Joseph L. Nogee and Vidya Nadkarni (2014) The Foreign Policy of Russia: Changing Systems, Enduring Interests. Armonk, New York: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlop, John, (1997) ‘Russia: In Search of an Identity?’, in Ian Bremmer and Ray Taras (eds), New States, New Politics: Building the Post-Soviet Nations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 29–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedyshyn, Oleh S. (1971) Germany’s Drive to the East and the Ukraine Revolution, 1917–1918. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figes, Orlando (2010) Crimea: The Last Crusade. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, Fritz (1967) Germany’s Aims in the First World War. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, Fritz (1986) From Kaiserreich to Third Reich: Elements of Continuity in German History, 1871–1945. London: Unwin Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaddis, John Lewis (1998) ‘History, Grand Strategy and NATO Enlargement’, Survival, 40(1), Spring, pp. 145–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gates, Robert M. (2014) Duty: Memoirs of a Secretary at War. London: WH Allen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, Martin (1994) The First World War. New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, James (2012) Russian Responses to NATO and EU: Enlargement and Outreach. Chatham House Briefing Paper REP RSP BP 2012/02, June. London: The Royal Institute of International Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hast, Susanna (2014) Spheres of Influence in International Relations: History, Theory and Politics. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herwig, Holger (1997) The First World War: Germany and Austria-Hungary, 1914–1918. London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvath, Robert (2013) Putin’s Preventive Counter-revolution: Post-Soviet Authoritarianism and the Spectre of Velvet Revolution. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) (2015) ‘European defence spending rises, but well short of NATO target’, Strategic Comments, 12: 14, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jervis, Robert (1998) ‘U.S. Grand Strategy: Mission Impossible’, Naval War College Review, 51(3), Summer, pp. 22–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, Frederick W. (2002) ‘Russia’s Geopolitical Dilemma and the Question of Backwardness’, in Frederick W. Kagan and Robin Higham (eds), The Military History of Tsarist Russia. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 249–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, Frederick W. and Robin Higham (eds) (2002) The Military History of Tsarist Russia. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanet, Roger E. (2011) ‘From the “New World Order” to “Resetting Relations”’, in Roger E. Kanet (ed.), Russian Foreign Policy in the 21st Century. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 204–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karaganov, Sergei (1994) ‘Russia and the Slav Vicinity’, in Vladimir Baranovsky (ed.), Russia and Europe: The Emerging Security Agenda. Oxford: Oxford University Press for the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, pp. 289–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karaganov, Sergei (2014) ‘How to avoid a second Afghanistan’, Russia in Global Affairs, 6 August. http://eng.globalaffairs.ru/print/pubcol/How-to-avoid-second-Afghanistan-16858.

  • Kashin, Vasiliy (2014) ‘Khrushchev’s Gift: The Questionable Ownership of Crimea’, in Colby Howard and Ruslan Pukhov (eds), Brothers Armed: Military Aspects of the Crisis in Ukraine. Minneapolis: East View Press, pp. 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinzer, Stephen (2006) Overthrow: America’s Century of Regime Change from Hawaii to Iraq. New York: Times Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kissinger, Henry (1994) Diplomacy. London: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kissinger, Henry (2014) ‘To settle the Ukraine crisis, start at the end’, Washington Post, 5 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, Stephen D. (2010) ‘An Orienting Principle of Foreign Policy. The Deficiencies of Grand Strategy’, Policy Review, 163, 1 October. www.hoover.org/publications/policy-review/article/49786.

  • Kupchan, Charles (1999) ‘Turning Adversity into Advantage: Russia in NATO’, in Mathias Jopp and Hanna Ojanen (eds), European Security Integration: Implications for Non-Alignment and Alliance. Helsinki: Ulkopoliitinen instituutti & Institut fur Europaische Politik and WEU Institute for Security Studies, pp. 215–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupchan, Charles (2002) The End of the American Era: U.S. Foreign Policy and the Geopolitics of the Twenty-first Century. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, Andrew (2011) The Crimean War: Britain’s Grand Strategy against Russia, 1853–1856, 2nd edn. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavrov, Anton and Aleksey Nikolsky (2014) ‘Neglect and Rot: Degradation and Ukraine’s Military’, in Colby Howard and Ruslan Pukhov (eds), Brothers Armed: Military Aspects of the Crisis in Ukraine. Minneapolis: East View Press, pp. 57–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, Jack S. (2008) ‘Preventive War and Democratic Politics: Presidential Address to the International Studies Association March 1, 2007, Chicago’, International Studies Quarterly, 52, pp. 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieven, Anatole (1999) Ukraine and Russia: A Fraternal Rivalry. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liik, Kadri and Andrew Wilson (2014) What Will Happen With Eastern Ukraine? European Council on Foreign Relations Policy Memo 119, December. http://www.ecfr.eu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liulevicius, Vejas Gabriel (2009) The German Myth of the East. 1800 to the Present. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lomagin, Nikita (2011) ‘Medvedev’s “Fourteen Points”: Russia’s Proposal for a New European Security Architecture’, in Roger E. Kanet (ed.), Russia’s Foreign Policy in the 21st Century. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 181–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacFarlane, Neil (1999) ‘Realism and Russian Strategy after the Collapse of the USSR’, in Ethan B. Kapstein and Michael Mastanduno (eds), Unipolar Politics: Realism and State Strategies After the Cold War. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 218–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacFarlane, Neil and Anand Menon (2014) ‘The EU and Ukraine’, Survival, 56(3), June-July, pp. 95–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malia, Martin (1999) Russia Under Western Eyes: From the Bronze Horseman to the Lenin Mausoleum. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mankoff, Jeffrey (2014) ‘Russia’s Latest land Grab. How Putin Won Crimea and lost Ukraine’, Foreign Affairs, 93(3), May/June, pp. 60–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marples, David R. (1992) Stalinism in Ukraine in the 1940s. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Terry (2001) The Affirmative Action Empire: Nations and Nationalism in the Soviet Union, 1923–1939. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mawdsley, Evan (2008) The Russian Civil War, 2nd edn. Edinburgh: Birlinn.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDougall, Walter (2010) ‘Can the United States Do Grand Strategy?’, Orbis, 54(1), Spring, pp. 165–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mearsheimer, John (2014) ‘Why the Ukraine Crisis is the West’s Fault: The Liberal Delusions that Provoked Putin’, Foreign Affairs, 93(5), September/October, pp. 77–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medvedev, Roy (2007) ‘A Splintered Ukraine’, Russia in Global Affairs, 8 August. http://eng.globalaffairs.ru/printer/1139.html.

  • Migranyan, Andranik (2014) ‘What Is at Stake in Ukraine?’, The National Interest, 30 July. http://carnegie.ru/eurasiaoutlook/?fa=57604.

  • Molchanov, Mikhail (2002) Political Culture and National Identity in Russian-Ukrainian Relations. College Station, Texas: Texas A&M University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monaghan, Andrew (2010) The Indivisibility of Security: Russia and Euro-Atlantic Security. NDC Forum Paper 13, January. Rome: NATO Defence College Research Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, John (1993) ‘Pereyaslav and After: the Russian-Ukrainian Relationship’, International Affairs, 69(4), pp. 677–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nesuk, Mykola, Viktor Koval, Volodymyr Serhiychuk and Andtiy Martynov (1996) Ukraine in German Strategic Plans. http://litopys.org.ua/ukrxx/e13.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pifer, Steven (2012) ‘Ukraine’s Perilous Balancing Act’, Current History, 111(743), March, pp. 1060–1111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podvig, Pavel (ed.) (2001) Russian Strategic Nuclear Forces. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polyakov, Leonid (2004) US-Ukraine Military Relations and the Value of Interoperability. Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, US Army War College, December. http://www.carlisle.army.mil/ssi/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posen, Barry R. (1984) The Sources of Military Doctrine: France, Britain, and Germany Between the Wars. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putin, Vladimir (2014a) ‘Address by the President of the Russian Federation’, President of Russia Website, 18 March. http://eng.news.kremlin.ru/news/6889/print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putin, Vladimir (2014b) ‘Isolated at G20, Putin showed he won’t be swayed on Ukraine’, The Moscow Times, 18 November. http://www.themoscowtimes.com/top-stories/article/newsletter/511314.html?.

  • Redman, Nicholas (2014) ‘Russia’s Breaking Point’, Survival, 56(2), April-May, pp. 235–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, Michael (2011) Shattering Empires: The Clash and Collapse of the Ottoman and Russian Empires, 1908–1918. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Romanov, Pyotr (2014) ‘The West doesn’t understand Russia’, The Moscow Times, 7 December. http://www.themoscowtimes.co./opinion/article/newsletter/512677.html?.

  • Ruhl, Lothar (1997) ‘The Historical Background of Russian Security Concepts’, in Vladimir Baranovsky (ed.), Russia and Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press for the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, pp. 21–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumer, Eugene B. (2007) Russian Foreign Policy Beyond Putin. Adelphi Paper 390. London: Routledge for the International Institute for Strategic Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakwa, Richard (2015) Frontline Ukraine: Crisis in the Borderlands. London and New York: I.B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statiev, Alexander (2010) The Soviet Counterinsurgency in the Western Borderlands. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, Jonathan (2008) ‘Crisis of lies and hysteria’, The Guardian, 25 August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stent, Angela (2014) The Limits of Partnership: US-Russian Relations in the Twenty-First Century. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talbott, Strobe (2002) The Russia Hand: A Memoir of Presidential Diplomacy. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist (2015) ‘Understanding Putin’s plans’, 31 January, pp. 31–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trenin, Dmitri (2002) The End of Eurasia: Russia on the Border Between Geopolitics and Globalization. Washington, DC and Moscow: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trenin, Dmitri (2011) Post-Imperium: A Eurasian Story. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trenin, Dmitri (2014) The Ukraine Crisis and the Resumption of Great-Power Rivalry, Carnegie Center, Moscow, 9 July. http://carnegie.ru/2014/07/09ukraine-crisis-and-resumption-of-great-power-rivalry/hfgs#.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsygankov, Andrei (2012) Russia and the West from Alexander to Putin: Honour in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Walt, Stephen M. (1989) ‘The Case for Finite Containment: Analyzing U.S. Grand Strategy’, International Security, 14(1), pp. 5–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler-Bennett, John W. (1938) Brest-Litovsk: The Forgotten Peace, March 1918. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Andrew (2009) The Ukrainians: Unexpected Nation. 3rd edn. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlforth, William C. (2001) ‘Russian-Soviet Empire: A Test of Neorealism’, Review of International Studies, 27(Special Issue), December, pp. 213–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yost, David S. (2014) NATO’s Balancing Act. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yost, David S. (2015) ‘The Budapest Memorandum and Russia’s Intervention in Ukraine’, International Affairs, 91 3, May, pp. 505–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 John Berryman

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Berryman, J. (2015). Russian Grand Strategy and the Ukraine Crisis: An Historical Cut. In: Kanet, R.E., Sussex, M. (eds) Power, Politics and Confrontation in Eurasia. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-52367-9_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics