Abstract
In a corpus as capacious as Raymond Aron’s, many books might qualify as his chef-d’oeuvre. For example, Introduction to the Philosophy of History could be considered his most foundational work in that the character and limits of historical intelligibility are first discussed here, and this theme would animate nearly all of Aron’s postwar writings. The Century of Total War, by contrast, is a masterful historical account of the military, economic, and political revolutions of the twentieth century that reads as true and insightful today as it did when it was first published. In Clausewitz: Philosopher of War, Aron produces perhaps his most academic or scholarly book, rediscovering and reengaging in the old debates surrounding this central thinker. And finally, The Opium of the Intellectuals is a delicious (albeit trenchant) polemic where Aron repeatedly punctures such sacrosanct ideas as the “Left,” “Revolution,” and the “Proletariat.”1 But however impressive each of these works is, Peace and War surely deserves to be mentioned alongside them as one of Aron’s finest intellectual achievements—and this in many ways because it combines all of the aforementioned elements into a systematic whole. Foundationally, Peace and War enabled Aron to concretize his long meditations on the character or nature of international politics; historically, he presents a lucid analysis of the postwar international system in order to pinpoint its unique attributes; academically, he enters into a range of debates with philosophers and scholars both past and present, from Montesquieu to Morgenthau; and finally, polemically, he deflates the pretensions of behaviorists, positivists, and others who continue to argue and to hope that international relations can be developed into a rigorous science akin to economics.2
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See, respectively, Raymond Aron, Introduction to the Philosophy of History: An Essay on the Limits of Historical Objectivity, trans. George J. Irwin, Boston, MA, Beacon Press, 1961, and
Raymond Aron, “Introduction,” in Miriam Bernheim Conant (ed. and trans.), Politics and History: Selected Essays by Raymond Aron, New York, The Free Press, 1978, xix;
Raymond Aron, The Century of Total War, Boston, MA, Beacon Press, 1954
as well as Pierre Hassner, “Raymond Aron and the History of the Twentieth Century,” International Studies Quarterly, vol. 29, no. 4, 1985, 29–37
Raymond Aron, Clausewitz: Philosopher of War, trans. Christine Booker and Norman Stone, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1983, and
Raymond Aron, Memoirs: Fifty Years of Political Reflection, trans. George Holoch, New York, Holmes & Meier, 1990, 407–411
and Raymond Aron, The Opium of the Intellectuals, trans. Terence Kilmartin, New York, W. W. Norton, 1962.
Raymond Aron, Peace and War: A Theory of International Relations, trans. Richard Howard and Annette Baker Fox, Garden City, Doubleday, 1966, reissued (with a new introduction by Daniel J. Mahoney and Brian C. Anderson) by New Brunswick, NJ, Transaction Publishers, 2003. All emphasized words in quotations are contained in the original.
see Robert Colquhoun, Raymond Aron: The Sociologist in Society, 1955–1983, vol. 2, London, Sage, 1986, 191–197.
John Hall, Diagnoses of Our Time: Six Views on Our Social Condition, London, Heinemann Educational Books, 1981, 164, conjectured the following more than 30 years ago, and it reads as true today as it did then: “one suspects that [Peace and War] is more quoted than read.”
Stanley Hoffmann, “An American Social Science: International Relations,” Daedalus, vol. 106, no. 3, 1977, 45.
David Thomson, “The Three Worlds of Raymond Aron,” International Affairs, vol. 39, no. 1, 1963, 53–55.
Henry Kissinger, “Fuller Explanation,” New York Times Book Review, February 12, 1967, 3.
Raymond Aron, Mémoires: 50 ans de réflexion politique, Paris, Julliard, 1983, 453.
The unorthodox method we propose here is in many ways endorsed by Stanley Hoffmann, “Minerva and Janus,” in his The State of War: Essays on the Theory and Practice of International Politics, New York, Frédérick A. Praeger, 1965, 32–33, whose compressed summary of Peace and War accurately captures the importance of history throughout the book. “[E]ach aspect of research depends on the results achieved at the previous level; they are parts of the same undertaking and the same conception. But each one activates different qualities of the mind, requires different forms of reasoning or methods of verification. At every level [of conceptualization], the research is inseparable from history, but the role of history is not the same in all four cases. At the level of theory in the narrow sense, it is the primary raw material, and the concepts and types defined by theory are drawn from the systematic comparative study of concrete data. At the second level [sociology], where hypotheses about material and moral causes are filtered through historical analysis, history is the touchstone. At the third level [history], it is an object of direct investigation. At the level of philosophy [or praxeology], history is being judged.”
Raymond Aron, 18 Lectures on Industrial Society, trans. Mary K. Bottomore, London, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1967
Raymond Aron, La Lutte de classes: Nouvelles leçons sur les sociétés industrielles, Paris, Gallimard, 1964
Raymond Aron, Democracy and Totalitarianism, trans. Valence Ionescu, New York, Praeger, 1969.
Raymond Aron, Le Grand Schisme, Paris, Gallimard, 1948, 1–31.
Raymond Aron, The Great Debate: Theories of Nuclear Strategy, trans. Ernst Pawel, Garden City, NY, Doubleday, 1965, and Aron, Memoirs, 308.
The final chapter of Peace and War reads in many ways like a commentary upon the end of history thesis, most recently popularized by Francis Fukuyama, The End of History and the Last Man, New York, The Free Press, 1992.
Raymond Aron, On War, trans. Terence Kilmartin, New York, W. W. Norton, 1968, 117–118.
Raymond Aron, “Conflict and War from the Viewpoint of Historical Sociology,” in The Nature of Conflict: Studies on the Sociological Aspects of International Relations, Paris, UNESCO, 1957, 190–198.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2015 José Colen and Elisabeth Dutartre-Michaut
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Frost, BP. (2015). Forward to the Past: History and Theory in Raymond Aron’s Peace and War. In: Colen, J., Dutartre-Michaut, E. (eds) The Companion to Raymond Aron. Recovering Political Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-52243-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-52243-6_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-57463-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-52243-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political Science CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)