Advertisement

Brazil: The State of the Art of Its Rise and Power Projection

  • Gian Luca Gardini
Part of the Palgrave Studies in International Relations Series book series (PSIR)

Abstract

The concept of power and the ways to compare it – and necessarily to measure it somehow – is central to international relations (IR) as practice and as an academic discipline (Mearsheimer, 2012). This has been largely inescapable in both historical and conceptual terms and across intellectual paradigms and traditions (Bially Mattern, 2004). The logical consequence is that the international status of a country, or any other actor, has also had to be somehow linked to and assessed against the idea(s) of power. Because the nature and attributes of power are contested, the assessment and definition of a country’s international status also become quite problematic. The current debate on rising powers and their role in global affairs illustrates the point. Brazil in particular seems to epitomize the dissonance between the existing IR literature on power status, on the one hand, and the complexities and peculiarities of the reality of emerging players, on the other.

Keywords

Gross Domestic Product Foreign Policy World Trade Organization Great Power Regional Power 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Amorim, Celso (2011) ‘Reflections on Brazil’s Global Rise’, Americas Quarterly 5(2) (spring), 50–55.Google Scholar
  2. Arnson, Cynthia J. and Paulo Sotero (2010) Brazil as a Regional Power: Views from the Hemisphere, Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center, Latin American Program, Brazil Institute.Google Scholar
  3. Ayllon, Bruno Pino (2010) Brazilian Cooperation: A Model under Construction for an Emerging Power, Madrid: Real Instituto Elcano.Google Scholar
  4. Baldwin, David A. (1989) Paradoxes of Power, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  5. Barros Platiau, Ana Flavia (2010) ‘When Emerging Countries Reform Global Governance of Climate Change: Brazil under Lula’, Revista Brasileira de Politica Internacional 53 special edition, 73–90.Google Scholar
  6. Bertonha, Joao Fabio (2010) ‘Brazil: An Emerging Military Power? The Problem of the Use of Force in Brazilian International Relations in the 21st Century’, Revista Brasileira de Politica Internacional 53(2), 107–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bethell, Leslie (2010) ‘Brazil: Regional Power, Global Power’, Open Democracy, June 8, https://www.opendemocracy.net/leslie-bethell/brazil-regional-power-global-power, date accessed 24 July 2014.
  8. Bially Mattern, Janice (2004) ‘Power in Realist-Constructivist Research’, International Studies Review 6(2), 343–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bull, Hedley (1977) The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, Washington, DC: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burges, Sean (2006) ‘Without Sticks or Carrots: Brazilian Leadership in South America during the Cardoso Era, 1992–2003’, Bulletin of Latin American Research 25(1), 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burges, Sean (2008) ‘Consensual Hegemony: Theorizing Brazilian Foreign Policy after the Cold War’, International Relations 22(1), 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burges, Sean (2013) ‘Brazil as a Bridge between Old and New Powers?’ International Affairs 89(3), 577–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Buzan, Barry and Arne Waever (2003) Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Caballero Santos, Sergio (2010) ‘Brasil y la integración regional sudamericana: entre el liderazgo regional y el poder mundial’, Paper presented at the VI CEISAL Congress, Toulouse.Google Scholar
  15. Castañeda, Jorge (2010) ‘Not Ready for Prime Time’, Foreign Affairs 89(5), 109–122.Google Scholar
  16. Cooper, Andrew (2010) ‘Labels Matter: Interpreting Rising Powers through Acronyms’, in Alan S. Alexandroff and Andrew F. Cooper (eds), Rising States, Rising Institutions, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Press, 63–79.Google Scholar
  17. Correlates of War (2008) CINC. Composite Index of National Capabilities, http://www.correlatesofwar.org/, date accessed 16 January 2015.
  18. Desai, Radhika (2013) The Brics Are Building a Challenge to Western Economic Supremacy, The Guardian, 2 April, http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/apr/02/brics-challenge-western-supremacy, date accessed 20 July 2014.
  19. Duarte Villa, Rafael Antonio, and Manuela Trinidade Viana (2010) ‘Security Issues during Lula’s Administration: From the Reactive to the Assertive Approach’, Revista Brasileira de Politica Internacional 53 – special edition, 91–114.Google Scholar
  20. Etzioni, Amitai (2012) ‘The Domestic Sources of Global Adhocracy’, Social Change Review 10(2), pp. 99–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gilbert, Richard (2011) ‘ATCO Breaks into Brazilian Market with Partnership’, Journal of Commerce, 24 August, http://www.journalofcommerce.com/Home/News/2011/8/ATCO-breaks-into-Brazilian-market-with-partnership-JOC046350W/, date accessed 20 July 2014.
  22. Gomes, Henrique Batista and Gabriela Valente (2013) ‘Des Ambassades Partout’, Courrier International June–August, p. 82.Google Scholar
  23. Guzzini, Stefano (2005) ‘Power’, in Martin Griffiths (ed.), Encyclopedia of International Relations and Global Politics, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Hakim, Peter (2002) ‘Two Ways to Go Global’, Foreign Affairs 81(1), 148–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hurrell, Andrew (2006) ‘Hegemony, Liberalism and Global Order: What Space for Would-be Great Powers?’ International Affairs 82(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hurrell, Andrew (2008) ‘Lula’s Brazil: A Rising Power, but Going Where?’ Current History (February), 51–57.Google Scholar
  27. Hurrell, Andrew (2010) ‘Brazil: What Kind of Rising State in What Kind of Institutional Order?’ in Alan S. Alexandroff and Andrew F. Cooper (eds), Rising States, Rising Institutions, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 128–150.Google Scholar
  28. Hurrell, Andrew, Andrew F. Cooper, Guadalupe Gonzalez, Ricardo Ubiraci Sennes, and Srini Sitaraman (2000) ‘Paths to Power: Foreign Policy Strategies of Intermediate States’, Working paper Nr 44, Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Centre, Latin American Program.Google Scholar
  29. IMF (2011) IMF Members’ Quotas and Voting Power 2014, http://www.imf.org/external/np/sec/memdir/members.aspx, date accessed 20 July 2014.
  30. IMF (2015) IMF Members’ Quotas and Voting Power, and IMF Board of Governors, https://www.imf.org/external/np/sec/memdir/members.aspx, date accessed 2 November 2015.
  31. Jordaan, Eduard (2003) ‘The Concept of a Middle Power in International Relations: Distinguishing between Emerging and Traditional Middle Powers’, Politicon: South African Journal of Political Studies 30(2), 165–181.Google Scholar
  32. Keohane, Robert (1969) ‘Lilliputian Dilemmas: Small States in International Politics’, International Organization 23(2), 291–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kotter, John (1990) A Force for Change: How Leadership Differs from Management, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  34. Malamud, Andres (2011) ‘A Leader without Followers? The Growing Divergence between the Regional and Global Performance of Brazilian Foreign Policy’, Latin American Politics and Society 53(3), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mearsheimer, John J. (2012) ‘Power as the Currency of International Relations, Disciplining US Foreign Policy, and Being an Independent Variable’, interview with Theory Talks, 24 June, http://www.theory-talks.org/2012/06/theory-talk-49.html, date accessed 23 July 2015.
  36. Narlikar, Amrita (2010) New Powers. How to Become One and How to Manage Them, Washington, DC: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Narlikar, Amrita (2013) ‘Introduction. Negotiating the Rise of New Powers’, International Affairs 89(3), 561–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Neumann, Iver B. (ed.) (1992) Regional Great Powers in International Politics, Basingstoke: St Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  39. Never, Babette (2013) ‘Toward the Green Economy: Assessing Countries’ Green Power’, GIGA Working Paper Nr 226, Hamburg: German Institute of Global and Area Studies.Google Scholar
  40. Nolte, Detlef (2010) ‘How to Compare Regional Powers: Analytical Concepts and Research Topics’, Review of International Studies 36(4), 881–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nye, Joseph (1990) Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  42. Olivié, Iliana and Ignacio Molina (2011) ‘Indice Elcano de Presencia Global’, Estudio Elcano 2, Madrid: Real Instituto Elcano.Google Scholar
  43. Omestad, Thomas (2008) ‘The New Food Superpower’, US News and World Report, 7–14 July, 35–38.Google Scholar
  44. Schirm, Stefan (2010) ‘Leaders in Need of Followers: Emerging Powers in Global Governance’, European Journal of International Relations 16(2), 197–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schoeman, Maxi (2000) ‘South Africa as an Emerging Middle Power’, African Security Review 9(3), https://www.issafrica.org/pubs/ASR/9No3/SAMiddlePower.html, date accessed 24 July 2015.
  46. Soares de Lima, Maria Regina (2014) ‘Desafios globais e regionais para a Politica Externa Brasileira’, paper presented at the WM Special Brazil, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, 16 May.Google Scholar
  47. Soares de Lima, Maria Regina, and Monica Hirst (2006) ‘Brazil as an Intermediate State and Regional Power: Action, Choice and Responsibilities’, International Affairs 82(1), 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Spektor, Matias (2011) ‘One Foot in the Region; Eyes on the Global Prize’, Americas Quarterly 5(2) (Spring), 56–61.Google Scholar
  49. Sweig, Julia E. (2010) ‘A New Global Player. Brazil’s Far-Flung Agenda’, Foreign Affairs 89(6), 173–184.Google Scholar
  50. The Economist (2010) ‘Brazil Takes Off’, 14–20 November.Google Scholar
  51. Wight, Martin (1978) Power Politics, London: Royal Institute of International Affairs.Google Scholar
  52. Wilson, Dominic and Roopa Purushothaman (2003) ‘Dreaming with the BRICS: the Path to 2050’, Goldman Sachs, Global Economics Paper Nr 99, London.Google Scholar
  53. World Bank (2015) GDP Ranking, http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/GDP-ranking-table, date accessed 24 July 2015.
  54. WTO (2011) Members’ Contributions to the WTO Budget and the Budget of the Appellate Body for the Year 2011, http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/secre_e/contrib11_e.htm, date accessed 20 July 2014.
  55. WTO (2014) Trade Profiles, updated September 2014, http://stat.wto.org/CountryProfile/WSDBCountryPFReporter.aspx?Language=E, date accessed 29 January 2015.
  56. Zweig, Stefan (1941) Brazil Land of the Future, New York: The Viking Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Gian Luca Gardini 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gian Luca Gardini

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations