Latin American Regionalism Faces the Rise of Brazil

  • Andrés Malamud
Part of the Palgrave Studies in International Relations Series book series (PSIR)


In the last two decades, Brazil has emerged as a global actor. Its rise is embodied in such acronyms as BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa), IBSA (India, Brazil, South Africa), and BASIC (Brazil, South Africa, India, China), which include emerging states from several world regions. Brazil’s emergence has been an unintended outcome of its foreign policy, not because the government did not seek international recognition but because it planned to reach it through regional blocs rather than transregional alliances. There are two reasons for this unpre-dicted result: first, Brazil has been widening the gap with its neighbours; second, the organizations it has created as regional means to global ends have not delivered as expected.


Foreign Policy Regional Integration South American Country Home Region Physical Integration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Burges, Sean W. (2005) ‘Bounded by the Reality of Trade: Practical Limits to a South American Region’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs 18(3), 437–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Campbell, Jorge (ed.) (1999) Mercosur. Entre la realidad y la utopía, Buenos Aires: Editorial Nuevohacer/CEI.Google Scholar
  3. CEBRI-CINDES — Centro Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais — Centro de Estudos de Integração e Desenvolvimento (2007) Força-Tarefa ‘O Brasil na América do Sul’, Relatório Final, Rio de Janeiro, June,, date accessed 7 July 2011.Google Scholar
  4. Darnton, Christopher (2015) ‘The Rise of Brazil: Concepts and Comparisons’, in David R. Mares and Arie M. Kacowicz (eds), Routledge Handbook of Latin American Security Studies, London and New York: Routledge, 197–209.Google Scholar
  5. Fawcett, Louise and Andrew Hurrell (1995) Regionalism in World Politics. Regional Organization and International Order, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Gardini, Gian Luca (2010) ‘Proyectos de integración regional sudamericana: hacia una teoría de convergencia regional’, Relaciones Internacionales 15, 11–31.Google Scholar
  7. Garzón, Jorge (2015) ‘Multipolarity and the Future of Regionalism: Latin America and Beyond’, GIGA Working Paper, No. 264, Hamburg: GIGA.Google Scholar
  8. Herzog, Marc and Philip Robbins, eds (2014) The Role, Position and Agency of Cusp States in International Relations, Abingdon and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Hochstetler, Kathryn (2014) ‘The Brazilian National Development Bank Goes International: Innovations and Limitations of BNDES’ Internationalization’, Global Policy 5(3), 360–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hochstetler, Kathryn and Alfred P. Montero (2013) ‘The Renewed Developmentalist State: The National Development Bank and the Brazil Model’, Journal of Development Studies 49(11), 1484–1499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. IADB (2008) Evaluation of IDB Action in the Initiative for Integration of Regional Infrastructure in South America (IIRSA), Washington, DC: IADB.Google Scholar
  12. La Nación (2007) ‘No sera fácil el gasoducto de Venezuela’, 22 May,, date accessed 4 August 2015.
  13. Lima, Maria Regina Soares and Monica Hirst (2006) ‘Brazil as an Intermediate State and Regional Power: Action, Choice and Responsibilities’, International Affairs 82(1), 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Malamud, Andrés (2011) ‘A Leader without Followers? The Growing Divergence between the Regional and Global Performance of Brazilian Foreign Policy’, Latin American Politics and Society 53(3), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Malamud, Andrés (2013) ‘Overlapping Regionalism, No Integration: The Latin American Experiences’, EUI Working Paper RSCAS [Florence] 2013/20.Google Scholar
  16. Malamud, Andrés (2015) ‘Interdependence, Leadership and Institutionalization: The Triple Deficit and Fading Prospects of Mercosur’, in Søren Dosenrode (ed.), Limits to Regional Integration, Farnham: Ashgate, 163–178.Google Scholar
  17. Malamud, Andrés and Eduardo Viola (2015) Multipolarity, Minilateralism and the Downgrading of Regionalism, manuscript under review.Google Scholar
  18. Malamud, Andrés and Gian Luca Gardini (2012) ‘Has Regionalism Peaked? The Latin American Quagmire and its Lessons’, The International Spectator 47(1), 116–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Malamud, Andrés and Isabella Alcañiz (2014) ‘Managing Security in a Zone of Peace: Brazil’s Soft Approach to Regional Governance’, EUI Working Paper RSCAS [Florence] 2014/50.Google Scholar
  20. Malamud, Andrés and Julio C. Rodriguez (2014) ‘Straddling a Region and the World: Brazil’s Dual Foreign Policy Comes of Age’, in Marc Herzog and Philip Robbins (eds), The Role, Position and Agency of Cusp States in International Relations, London and New York: Routledge, 111–128.Google Scholar
  21. Malamud, Andrés and Philippe C. Schmitter (2011) ‘The Experience of European Integration and the Potential for Integration in South America’, in Alex Warleigh-Lack, Nick Robinson, and Ben Rosamond (eds), New Regionalism and the European Union. Dialogues, Comparisons and New Research Directions, London and New York: Routledge, 135–157.Google Scholar
  22. Merke, Federico (2013) ‘Neither Balance nor Bandwagon: South American International Society Meets Brazil’s Rising Power’, prepared for the Conference ‘Rising Powers and Contested Orders in the Multipolar System’, September 19–20, PUC-Rio, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.Google Scholar
  23. Phillips, Nicola and Germán C. Prieto (2011) ‘The Demise of New Regionalism. Reframing the Study of Contemporary Regional Integration in Latin America’, in Alex Warleigh-Lack, Nick Robinson, and Ben Rosamond (eds), New Regionalism and the European Union. Dialogues, Comparisons and New Research Directions, London and New York: Routledge, 116–134.Google Scholar
  24. Prys, Miriam (2010) ‘Hegemony, Domination, Detachment: Differences in Regional Powerhood’, International Studies Review 12(4), 479–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Resende-Santos, João (2002) ‘The Origins of Security Cooperation in the Southern Cone’, Latin American Politics and Society 44(4), 89–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Riggirozzi, Pía (2014) ‘Regionalism through Social Policy: Collective Action and Health Diplomacy in South America’, Economy and Society 43(3), 432–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Riggirozzi, Pía and Diana Tussie (2012) The Rise of Post-Hegemonic Regionalism in Latin America, Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rodriguez, Júlio César Cossio (2012) ‘Chacal ou Cordeiro? O Brasil frente aos desafios e oportunidades do Sistema Internacional’, Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 55(2), 70–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sanahuja, José Antonio (2009) ‘Del ‘regionalismo abierto’ al ‘regionalismo post-liberal’. Crisis y cambio en la integración regional en América Latina’, in Anuario de la Integración Regional de América Latina y el Gran Caribe, vol. 7, Buenos Aires: Coordinadora Regional de Investigaciones Económicas y Sociales, 12–54.Google Scholar
  30. Schenoni, Luis L. (2014) ‘Brasil en América del Sur: la lógica de la unipolaridad regional’, Nueva Sociedad 250, 138–149.Google Scholar
  31. Scholvin, Sören and Andrés Malamud (2014) ‘Is There a Geoeconomic Node in South America? Geography, Politics and Brazil’s Role in Regional Economic Integration’, ICS Working Paper [Lisbon] 2/2014.Google Scholar
  32. Souza, Amaury (2009) A agenda internacional do Brasil: A política externa brasileira de FHC a Lula, Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, CEBRI and Campus.Google Scholar
  33. Spektor, Matias (2010) ‘Brazil: The Underlying Ideas of Regional Policies’, in Daniel Flemes (ed.), Regional Leadership in the Global System: Ideas, Interests and Strategies of Regional Powers, Aldershot: Ashgate, 191–204.Google Scholar
  34. Stuenkel, Oliver (2013) ‘Is Brazil the New Regional Champion of Democracy?’ Americas Quarterly,, date accessed 6 January 2014.
  35. Tussie, Diana (2009) ‘Latin America: Contrasting Motivations for Regional Projects’, Review of International Studies 35(s1), 169–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Weiffen, Britta, Leslie Wehner, and Detlef Nolte (2013) ‘Overlapping Regional Security Institutions in South America: The Case of OAS and UNASUR’, International Area Studies Review 16(4), 370–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Andrés Malamud 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrés Malamud

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations