Advertisement

The European Union Strategy for the Danube Region

  • Attila Ágh
Part of the Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics book series (PSEUP)

Abstract

Since its inception in 2011, the EU Strategy for the Danube Region (EUSDR) has undergone a tumultuous, roller-coaster-like evolutionary path. It cannot be understood when stripped from its wider context, requiring a broader perspective, that appreciates how deeply embedded EUSDR has been and still is in the wider history of the EU and its new member states (NMS). More so, the EUSDR is inextricably linked with wider processes of globalization and can be seen as merely constituting a rather short chapter in the very complex history of the EU. Here, we will therefore examine the EUSDR within its appropriate context, which will allow us to see that there has been no linear or evolutionary process in the EUSDR’s development, with the process having instead been largely shaped by external circumstances. Despite the potential capacity that the strategy still holds to shape the future, it is enough to allude to the Ukrainian crisis (and the ‘new Cold War’ this has produced with Russia) to cast serious doubt over its future prospects. Nevertheless, the EUSDR may be on the correct side of history, as there has been a long-run tendency in governance for regional strategies to take hold, which has been brought about by general trends towards greater globalization, so that what has emerged can be termed ‘globalization-cum-regionalization’.

Keywords

Global Economic Crisis Historical Trajectory Economist Intelligence Unit Poor Governance Annual Forum 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ágh, A. (2010) ‘Regionalisation as a Driving Force of EU Widening: Recovering from the EU “Carrot Crisis” in the “East”’, Europe-Asia Studies, 62(8): 1239–1266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ágh, A. (2012a) ‘Global Governance and Integrative Balancing: EU Efforts to Respond to the Global Challenge’, Journal of Global Policy, 3(2): 145–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ágh, A. (2012b) ‘The Hungarian Rhapsodies: The Conflict of Adventurism and Professionalism in the European Union Presidency’, Journal of Common Market Studies, Annual Review of the European Union in 2011: 68–75.Google Scholar
  4. Ágh, A. (2013) Progress Report on the New Member States: Twenty Years of Social and Political Developments (Budapest: Together for Europe Research Centre).Google Scholar
  5. Ágh, A. (2014) ‘Decline of Democracy in East-Central Europe: The Last Decade as the Lost Decade in Democratization’, Journal of Comparative Politics, 7(2): 4–33.Google Scholar
  6. Ágh, A., Kaiser, T. and Koller, B. (eds) (2010) Europeanization of the Danube Region: The Blue Ribbon Project (Budapest: Together for Europe Research Centre and King Sigismund College).Google Scholar
  7. Ágh, A., Kaiser, T. and Koller, B. (eds) (2011) The New Horizons for the Cohesion Policy in the European Union: The Challenge of the Danube Strategy (Budapest: Together for Europe Research Centre and King Sigismund College).Google Scholar
  8. Ágh, A., Kaiser, T. and Koller, B. (eds) (2014) 10 Years After: Multi-level Governance and Differentiated Integration in the EU (Budapest: Together for Europe Research Centre and King Sigismund College).Google Scholar
  9. Annual Forum of Danube Strategy (2014) Third Conference in Vienna, 26–27 June 2014, http://www.danube-region.eu/item/554219; 3rd Annual Forum of the EU Strategy for the Danube Region, 26–27 June 2014, Vienna.Google Scholar
  10. Annual Forum of Danube Strategy (2014) ‘Joint Statement of the Ministers of Foreign Affairs and the European Commission’, 3rd Annual Forum of the EU Strategy for the Danube Region, 26–27 June 2014, Vienna.Google Scholar
  11. Barroso, J. (2014) On Europe: Considerations on the Present and the Future of the European Union, Berlin, 8 May 2014, available online: http://ec.europa.eu/com-mission_2010-2014/president/on-europe/on-europe-web_en.pdf (accessed on February 20, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bertelsmann (2014) Bertelsmann Transformation Index, East-Central and South-East European Reports, available online: http://www.bti-project.org/downloads/bti-2014/country-reports-2014/east-central-and-southeast-europe/ (accessed on February 20, 2014).Google Scholar
  13. Bugaric, B. (2014) ‘Protecting Democracy and the Rule of Law in the European Union: The Hungarian Challenge’, LSE ‘Europe in Question’ Paper Series, No. 79, London: London School of Economics (LSE).Google Scholar
  14. Carpathian Convention (CC) (2013) Workshop of Spatial Planning of Carpathian Convention in CoR to Promote DS 28 May 2013, available online: http://www.carpathianconvention.org/eventdetailwg-spatial-planning/events/workshop-towards-a-eu-strategy-for-the-carpathian-region-148.html (accessed on February 20, 2014).Google Scholar
  15. CEE Bankwatch Network (2014) Danube Dam-busting, 28 March 2014, available online: http://bankwatch.org/news-media/blog/danube-dam-busting-under-radar-eu-funds-grab-spotted-slovakia (accessed on February 20, 2014).Google Scholar
  16. Centrope (2013) The Centrope Strategy 2013+, available online: http://www.cen-trope.com/repository/centrope/downloads/centrope_Strategy_Action_Plan_2013_en.pdf (accessed on February 20, 2014).Google Scholar
  17. Committee of Regions (CoR) (2009) ‘The Draft Opinion of the Committee of Regions: An EU Strategy for the Danube Area’, 81st Plenary Session, 5–7 October 2009, RELEX–IV–025.Google Scholar
  18. Council of the European Union (2006) Conclusions of the Council, Governance on the European Consensus for the Development, Luxembourg, 16 October 2006, 14024/06.Google Scholar
  19. Council of the European Union (2009) ‘Council Conclusions the on Support to Democratic Governance — Towards an Enhanced EU Framework’, 2943rd External Relations Council Meeting, 19 May 2009.Google Scholar
  20. Council of the European Union (2011) ‘Territorial Agenda of the European Union 2020: Towards an Inclusive, Smart and Sustainable Europe of Diverse Regions’, Informal Ministerial Meeting of Ministers Responsible for Spatial Planning and Territorial Development on 19th May 2011, Gödöllő, Hungary.Google Scholar
  21. Council of the European Union (2013) Council Conclusions on Added Value of Macro-regional Strategies, Brussels, 22.10.2013.Google Scholar
  22. Dobrinsky, R. (2012) ‘Reflections on the State of the Danube Region’, Presentation of Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies at the 1st Annual Forum of the EU Strategy for Danube Region, Regensburg.Google Scholar
  23. Dühr, S. (2011) ‘Baltic Sea, Danube and Macro-Regional Strategies — A Model for Transnational Cooperation in the EU?’, Notre Europe Study & Research, 86, Paris.Google Scholar
  24. EC — European Commission (2006) Governance in the Consensus on Development, COM(2006) 421 Final, Brussels, 30.8.2006.Google Scholar
  25. EC — European Commission (2009) GDP and Beyond: Measuring Progress in a Changing World, COM(2009) 433 Final, Brussels, 20.8.2009.Google Scholar
  26. EC — European Commission (2010) European Union Strategy for Danube Region, COM(2010) 715 Final, Brussels, 8.12.2010.Google Scholar
  27. EC — European Commission (2013) Report from the Commission Concerning the European Union Strategy for the Danube Region, COM(2013) 181 Final, Brussels, 8.4.2013.Google Scholar
  28. EC — European Commission (with Transparency International) (2014a) EU Anti-Corruption Report, COM(2014) 38 Final, Brussels, 3.2.2014.Google Scholar
  29. EC — European Commission (2014b) European Commission Presents a Framework to Safeguard the Rule of Law in the European Union, (IP/14/237), Strasbourg, 11 March 2014.Google Scholar
  30. EC — European Commission (2014) Report from the Commission Concerning the Governance of Macro-regional Strategies, COM(2014) 284 Final, Brussels, 20.5.2014.Google Scholar
  31. EC — European Commission (2014d) Communication from the Commission Concerning the European Union Strategy for the Adriatic and Ionian Region, COM(2014) 357 Final, Brussels, 17.6.2014.Google Scholar
  32. EIU — The Economist Intelligence Unit (2014) What’s Gone Wrong with Democracy and How to Revive It, Brussels, 1.3.2014.Google Scholar
  33. Epstein, R. and Jacoby, W. (eds) (2014) ‘Eastern Enlargement Ten Years On: Transcending the East-West Divide?’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Euractiv (2014) Danube Dam–busting, 25 March 2014, available online: http://bankwatch.blogactiv.eu/2014/03/25/danube-dam-busting-under-the-radar-eu-funds-grab-spotted-in-slovakia/ (accessed on December 20, 2014).Google Scholar
  35. EUSDR (2014) Danube Region Project Fund, 21 July 2014, available online: http://www.danube-region.eu/communication/news/616499-start-danube-region-project-fund-first-call-for-proposals-now-open (accessed on December 20, 2014).Google Scholar
  36. EUSDR Report (2013) Priority Area Implementation Reports, available online: http://www.danube-region.eu/pages/reports (accessed on December 20, 2014).Google Scholar
  37. FH, Freedom House (2014) Nations in Transit 2014, available online: http://freedomhouse.org/report/nations-transit/nations-transit-2014#.U84V77GjJGM (accessed on December 20, 2014).Google Scholar
  38. GKI, Economic Research Co. (2013) New Progressive Economic Perspectives in the Central and Eastern European Member States of the EU, available online: http://www.progressiveeconomy.eu/content/central-and-eastern-europe-under-spotlight-progressive-economy-conference-4-october-budapest (accessed on December 20, 2014).Google Scholar
  39. Grabbe, H. (2014) ‘Six Lessons of Enlargement Ten Years On: The EU’s Transformative Power in Retrospect and Prospect’, Journal of Common Market Studies. Annual Review of the European Union in 2013, 52: 40–56.Google Scholar
  40. Handelsblatt (2013) Europas vergessene Krise, 9 January 2013, available online: http://www.handelsblatt-shop.com/downloads/europas-vergessene-krise-p4417.html (accessed on December 20, 2014).Google Scholar
  41. Innes, A. (2014) ‘The Political Economy of State Capture in Central Europe’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(1): 88–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mannheim University (2014) Socio-Economic Assessment of the Danube Region: State of the Region, Challenges and Strategy Development, March 2014, available online: http://ftp.zew.de/pub/zew-docs/gutachten/DanubeRegionFinalReportPartI2014. pdf (accessed on December 20, 2014).Google Scholar
  43. Nicolaidis, K. and Kleinfeld, R. (2012) ‘Rethinking Europe’s “Rule of Law” and Enlargement Agenda: The Fundamental Dilemma’, OECD Sigma Paper, No. 49, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  44. Ondarza, N. von (2013) ‘Strengthening the Core or Splitting Europe? Prospects and Pitfalls of a Strategy of Differentiated Integration’, SWP Research Paper, No. 2, Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik.Google Scholar
  45. Pappas, T. (2014) ‘Populist Democracies: Post-Authoritarian Greece and Post-Communist Hungary’, Government and Opposition, 49(1): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rupnik, J. and Zielonka, J. (2013) ‘The State of Democracy 20 Years on: Domestic and External Factors’, East European Politics and Societies, 27(3): 1–25.Google Scholar
  47. Sedelmeier, U. (2014) ‘Anchoring Democracy from Above? The European Union and Democratic Backsliding in Hungary and Romania after Accession’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(1): 105–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tavares, R. (2013) Draft Report on the Situation of Human Rights: Standards and Practices in Hungary, European Parliament, Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, 2012/2130(INI), 2.5.2013.Google Scholar
  49. Veugelers, R. (2014) ‘Undercutting the Future? European Research Spending in Times of Consolidation’, Bruegel Policy Papers, No. 2, Brussels.Google Scholar
  50. Warleigh-Lack, A., Robinson, N. and Rosamond, B. (eds) (2011) New Regionalism and the European Union: Dialogues, Comparisons and New Research Directions (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  51. WEF — World Economic Forum (2012) The Europe 2020 Competitiveness Report: Building a More Competitive Europe, available online: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/CSI/2012/Europe2020_Competitiveness_Report_2012.pdf (accessed on December 20, 2014).Google Scholar
  52. WEF — World Economic Forum (2013) Global Competitiveness Report 2012–2013, available online: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalCompetitivenessReport_2012-13.pdf (accessed on December 20, 2014).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Attila Ágh 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Attila Ágh

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations