Macro-regional Strategies: Agents of Europeanization and Rescaling?

  • Dominic Stead
  • Franziska Sielker
  • Tobias Chilla
Part of the Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics book series (PSEUP)


The launch of the first EU macro-regional strategy in the Baltic Sea Region in 2009 marked the start of a number of similar initiatives across Europe. According to various commentators in the planning and geography disciplines, the new macro-regional strategies signal the redefinition of regional policy rationales, new scales of policy intervention, new actor constellations and variable geometries of governance (see e.g. Allmendinger et al., 2014; Antola, 2009; Bialiasiewicz et al., 2013; Faludi, 2012; Stead, 2011). In short, they argue that the appearance of these new strategies has created new policy arenas which exist either between or alongside formal institutions and which arise from cooperation across various spatial scales, and involve different policy sectors and actor constellations.


Spatial Planning Territorial Development Common Market Study Transnational Cooperation Territorial Cohesion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adams, N., Cotella, G. and Nunes, R. (2011) Territorial Development, Cohesion and Spatial Planning: Knowledge and Policy Development in an Enlarged EU (Regions and Cities) (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  2. Allmendinger, P., Chilla, T. and Sielker, F. (2014) ‘Europeanizing Territoriality — Towards Soft Spaces?’, Environment and Planning A, 46(11): 2703–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Antola, E. (2009) EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region. Report for the Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung London Office (London: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung).Google Scholar
  4. Bache, I. (2006) ‘The Europeanization of Higher Education: Markets, Politics and Learning?’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(2): 231–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartolini, S. (2005) Restructuring Europe (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Batt, J. R. and Wolczuk, K. (1999) ‘The Political Context: Building New States’, in P. Hare, J. Batt, and S. Estrin (eds) Reconstituting the Market: The Political Economy of Microeconomic Transformation (Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers), 33–48.Google Scholar
  7. Beyers, J. (2007) ‘Critical Resource Dependencies and the Europeanization of Domestic Interest Groups’, Journal of European Public Policy, 14(3): 460–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bialiasiewicz, L., Giaccaria, P., Jones, A. and Minca, C. (2013) ‘Rescaling “EU” rope: EU Macro-regional Fantasies in the Mediterranean’, European Urban and Regional Studies, 20(1): 59–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Börzel, T. A. and Risse, T. (2000) ‘When Europe Hits Home: Europeanization and Domestic Change’, European Integration Online Papers, 4(15): 1–20, available online: (accessed 30 November 2014).Google Scholar
  10. Brenner, N. (1999) ‘Globalisation as Reterritorialisation. The Re-scaling of Urban Governance in the European Union’, Urban Studies, 36(3): 413–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bulmer, S. and Lequesne, C. (2005) The Member States of the European Union (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  12. Cappellin, R. (1998) ‘Transborder Co-operation along the EU’s External Borders and the Turnabout of Regional Development Policies: A Mediterranean Perspective’, in L. Hedegaard, B. Lindström, P. Joenniemi, A. Östhol, K. Peschel and C.-E. Stålvant (eds) The NEBI Yearbook 1998. North European and Baltic Sea Integration (Berlin: Springer Verlag), 323–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chilla, T. (2010) ‘Europäisierung aus räumlicher Perspektive? Konzeptionelle Beiträge und Potenziale’, Europa Regional, 18(1): 1–12.Google Scholar
  14. Clark, J. and Jones, A. (2008) ‘The Spatialities of Europeanisation: Territory, Government and Power in “EUrope”’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 33(3): 300–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Colomb, C. (2007) ‘The Added Value of Transnational Cooperation: Towards a New Framework for Evaluating Learning and Policy Change’, Planning Practice and Research, 22(3): 347–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. danube-navigation (undated) ‘Fairway Rehabilitation and Maintenance Master Plan Endorsed by Danube Ministerial Meeting on 3rd December 2014’, available online: http://www.danube– (accessed on 25 January 2015).
  17. danube-navigation (2013): ‘Appeal of the Steering Group of Priority Area 1a of the EU Strategy for the Danube Region (EUSDR) Concerning the Implementation of the Luxembourg Declaration’, available online: (accessed 25 January 2015).
  18. Davoudi, S. and Wishardt, M. (2005) ‘The Polycentric Turn in the Irish Spatial Strategy’, Built Environment, 31(2): 122–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Delanty, G. and Rumford, C. (2005) Rethinking Europe: Social Theory and the Implications of Europeanization (London: Taylor and Francis).Google Scholar
  20. Dühr, S. and Nadin, V. (2007) ‘Europeanization through Transnational Territorial Cooperation? The Case of INTERREG IIIB North-West Europe’, Planning Practice and Research, 22(3): 373–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dühr, S., Colomb, C. and Nadin, V. (2010) European Spatial Planning and Territorial Cooperation (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  22. European Commission (1991) Europe 2000: Outlook for the Development of the Community’s Territory (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities).Google Scholar
  23. European Commission (1994) Europe 2000+: Cooperation for European Territorial Development (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities).Google Scholar
  24. European Commission (2009) ‘Macro-regional strategies in the EU. A Discussion Paper presented by Commissioner Pawel Samecki on 16/09/09’. Brussels: DG Regional Policy European Commission, available online: (accessed 25 January 2015).
  25. European Commission (2014) ‘Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions concerning the governance of macro-regional strategies’. Brussels COM (2014) 284 final, available online:
  26. Faludi, A. (2001) ‘The Application of the European Spatial Development Perspective: Evidence from the North-West Metropolitan Area’, European Planning Studies, 9(5): 663–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Faludi, A. (2004) ‘Spatial Planning Traditions in Europe: Their Role in the ESDP Process’, International Planning Studies, 9(2–3): 155–72.Google Scholar
  28. Faludi, A. (2012) ‘Multi-Level (Territorial) Governance: Three Criticisms’, Planning Theory and Practice, 13(2): 197–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Faludi, A. and Waterhout, B. (2002) The Making of the European Spatial Development Perspective (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  30. Farthing, S. and Carrière, J. P. (2007) ‘Reflections on Policy-oriented Learning in Transnational Visioning Processes. The Case of the Atlantic Spatial Development Perspective (ASDP)’, Planning Practice and Research, 22(3): 329–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Friis, J. (2012) ‘Danish Presidency of the Council: The European Priorities’, Newsletter INTERACT, Winter 2011/2012, 12–13, available online: (accessed 30 November 2014).Google Scholar
  32. Giannakourou, G. (2005) ‘Transforming Spatial Planning Policy in Mediterranean Countries: Europeanization and Domestic Change’, European Planning Studies, 13(2): 319–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gløersen, E., Lähteenäki-Smith, K. and Dubois, A. (2007) ‘Polycentricity in Transnational Planning Initiatives: ESDP Applied or ESDP Reinvented?’, Planning Practice and Research, 22(3): 417–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Grabbe, H. (2001) ‘How Does Europeanisation Affect CEE Governance? Conditionality, Diffusion and Diversity’, Journal of European Public Policy, 8(4): 1013–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Green Cowles, M., Caporaso, J. and Risse, T. (eds) (2001) Transforming Europe: Europeanization and Domestic Change (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
  36. Gualini, E. (2004) ‘Regionalization as “Experimental Regionalism”: The Rescaling of Territorial Policy-making in Germany’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(2): 329–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gualini, E. (2006) ‘The Rescaling of Governance in Europe: New Spatial and Institutional Rationales’, European Planning Studies, 14(7): 881–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Haughton, G., Allmendinger, P. and Oosterlynck, S. (2013) ‘Spaces of Neoliberal Experimentation: Soft Spaces, Post-politics and Neoliberal Governmentality’, Environment and Planning A, 45(1): 217–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Herod, A. and Wright, M. (eds) (2002) Geographies of Power: Placing Scale (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  40. Hughes, J., Sasse, G. and Gordon, C. (2005) Europeanization and Regionalization in the EU’s Enlargement to Central and Eastern Europe: The Myth of Conditionality (London: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar
  41. Keating, M. (2009) ‘Rescaling Europe’, Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 10(1): 34–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Keating, M. (2013) Rescaling the European State — The Making of Territory and the Rise of the Meso (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  43. Keil, R. and Mahon, R. (eds) (2008) Leviathan Undone? The Political Economy of Scale (Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press).Google Scholar
  44. Kern, K. and Löffelsend, T. (2004) ‘Sustainable Development in the Baltic Sea Region. Governance beyond the Nation State’, Local Environment, 9(5): 451–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Knill, C. and Lehmkuhl, D. (2002) ‘The National Impact of European Union Regulatory Policy: Three Europeanization Mechanisms’, European Journal of Political Research, 41(2): 255–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Knippschild, R. (2011) ‘With “Regional Territorial Agendas” Towards Territorial Cohesion? The Emergence of Supra-regional Coalitions in Europe and Their Future Role in Cohesion Policy’, Studies in Agricultural Economics, 113(2): 133–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kodric, M. (2011) ‘The EU Strategy for the Danube Region: What Potential Contribution to Regional Stability and Co-operation?’, Regional Integration & Global Governance Papers, No. 4 (Bruges: College of Europe).Google Scholar
  48. Kohler-Koch, B. (1999) ‘The Evolution and Transformation of European Governance’, in B. Kohler-Koch and R. Eising (eds) The Transformation of Governance in the European Union (London: Routledge), 14–35.Google Scholar
  49. Kunzmann, K. (2006) ‘The Europeanization of Spatial Planning’, in N. Adams, J. Alden and N. Harris (eds) Regional Development and Spatial Planning in an Enlarged European Union (Aldershot, UK: Ashgate), 43–63.Google Scholar
  50. Lenschow, A. (2006) ‘Europeanisation of Public Policy’, in J. Richardson (ed.) European Union — Power and Policy Making, 3rd edn (Abingdon, UK: Routledge), 55–71.Google Scholar
  51. Luukkonen, J. and Moilanen, H. (2012) ‘European Briefing. Territoriality in the Strategies and Practices of Territorial Cohesion Policy of the European Union: Territorial Challenges in Implementing “Soft Planning”’, European Planning Studies, 20(3): 481–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Marston, A. S., Jones III, J. P. and Woodward, K. (2005) ‘Human Geography without Scale’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, (20): 316–432.Google Scholar
  53. McCann, E. (2003) ‘Framing Space and Time in the City: Urban Policy and the Politics of Spatial and Temporal Scale’, Journal of Urban Affairs, 25(2): 159–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Metzger, J. and Schmitt, P. (2012) ‘When Soft Spaces Harden: The EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region’, Environment and Planning A, 44(2): 263–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Milward, A. S. (1992) The European Rescue of the Nation-state (London: Routledge). Moravcsik, A. (1998) The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht (London: Routledge/UCL Press).Google Scholar
  56. Moss, T. and Newig, J. (2010) ‘Multilevel Water Governance and Problems of Scale: Setting the Stage for a Broader Debate’, Environmental Management, 46(1): 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. O’Dwyer, C. (2006) ‘Reforming Regional Governance in East Central Europe: Europeanization or Domestic Politics as Usual?’, East European Politics and Societies, 20(2): 219–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Olsen, J. P. (2002) ‘The Many Faces of Europeanization’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(5): 921–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Peterlin, M. and Kreitmayer McKenzie, J. (2007) ‘The Europeanization of Spatial Planning in Slovenia’, Planning Practice and Research, 22(3): 455–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Princen, S. (2007) ‘Agenda-setting in the European Union: A Theoretical Exploration and Agenda for Research’, Journal of European Public Policy, 14(1): 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Radaelli, C. M. (2004) ‘Europeanisation: Solution or Problem?’, European Integration online Papers (EIoP), 8(16): 1–23, available online: (accessed 30 November 2014).Google Scholar
  62. Schneider, V. and Häge, F. M. (2008) ‘Europeanization and the Retreat of the State’, Journal of European Public Policy, 15(1): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Scott, J. (2002) ‘Cross–border Governance in the Baltic Sea Region’, Regional and Federal Studies, 12(4): 135–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Shaw, D. and Sykes, O. (2003) ‘Investigating the Application of the European Spatial Development Perspective (ESDP) to Regional Planning in the United Kingdom’, Town Planning Review, 74(1): 31–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sheppard, E. and McMaster, R. B. (eds) (2004) Scale and Geographic Inquiry: Nature, Society, and Method (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  66. Sifft, S., Bruggemann, M., Konigslow, K., Peters, B. and Wimmel, A. (2007) ‘Segmented Europeanization: Exploring the Legitimacy of the European Union from a Public Discourse Perspective’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(1): 127–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Stead, D. (2011) ‘Policy and Planning Brief. European Macro-regional Strategies: Indications of Spatial Rescaling?’, Planning Theory and Practice, 12(1): 163–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Stead, D. (2014) ‘European Integration and Spatial Rescaling in the Baltic Region: Soft Spaces, Soft Planning and Soft Security’, European Planning Studies, 22(4): 680–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Vetik, R., Nimmerfelft, G. and Taru, M. (2006) ‘Reactive Identity versus EU Integration’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(5): 1079–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Waterhout, B. (2007) ‘Episodes of Europeanization of Dutch National Spatial Planning’, Planning Practice and Research, 22(3): 309–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Waterhout, B. and Stead, D. (2007) ‘Mixed Messages: How the ESDP’s Concepts Have Been Applied in INTERREG IIIB Programmes, Priorities and Projects’, Planning, Practice and Research, 22(3): 395–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zaucha, J. (2007) ‘Is Spatial Planning a Driver for Sustainable Development in Poland?’, Planning Practice and Research, 22(3): 463–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Dominic Stead, Franziska Sielker and Tobias Chilla 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dominic Stead
  • Franziska Sielker
  • Tobias Chilla

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations