Advertisement

A North Sea Macro-region? Partnerships, Networking and Macro-regional Dimensions

  • Mike Danson
Part of the Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics book series (PSEUP)

Abstract

Within the framework of Europe 2020 (CEC, 2010), there is a stress on the territorial coverage of the regional policies and complementary EU activities. There is increasing attention on the performance and effectiveness of such policies, the efficiency of governance structures and implementation arrangements, and the relationship between cohesion policy and other EU structural policies. Over the last few years, there has also been a growing recognition and support for the concept of ‘macro-regions’, which some have promoted as serving to meet these objectives.1 The Fifth Cohesion Report (CEC, 2010) broadly embraces this approach of defining geographies which extend beyond national borders and conventional ‘Territorial Cooperation’ collaborations, but within specifically defined quadrants of the continent. The future architecture of cohesion policy, therefore, is likely to see demand for similar strategies for parts of Europe as already apply for the Baltic Sea, the Danube and the Adriatic-Ionian area.

Keywords

Cohesion Policy Inclusive Growth Smart Specialization Common Fishery Policy Multilevel Governance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beatty, C. and Fothergill, S. (2004) ‘Economic Change and the Labour Market in Britain’s Seaside Towns’, Regional Studies, 38: 461–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bellini, N., Danson, M. and Halkier, H. (eds) (2012) Regional Development Agencies: The Next Generation? Networking, Knowledge and Regional Policies (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  3. Braun, G. and Kovács, Z. (2011) ‘Macro-regional Strategies Experiment for the Renewal of Economic Policy of the European Union’, Public Finance Quarterly, 56(1): 79–93.Google Scholar
  4. CEC (Commission of the European Communities) (2007a) The Treaty of Lisbon: Taking Europe into the 21st Century, Brussels, available online: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2007:306:SOM:EN:HTML (accessed 2 February 2015).Google Scholar
  5. CEC (2008) Report Hearing Paper 1, Hearing on Growth, Institutions and Policy — State Of The Art and Territorial Dimension, Brussels, 1–2, July.Google Scholar
  6. CEC (2009) European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region, COM(2009) 248 Final, Brussels.Google Scholar
  7. CEC (2010) Europe 2020: A Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth, Brussels.Google Scholar
  8. CEC (2010) Investing in Europe’s Future, Fifth Report on Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion, Brussels.Google Scholar
  9. CEC (2010c) Commission Work Programme 2010: Time to Act Annexes, COM (2010) 135 Final, Brussels.Google Scholar
  10. CEC (2010d) The European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region: Background & Analysis, Office for Official Publications of the European Union.Google Scholar
  11. CEC (2011) Research and Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialisation, Brussels.Google Scholar
  12. CEC (2012) Industrial Innovation. Innovation Union Scoreboard, Brussels, available online: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/innovation/facts-figures-analy-sis/innovation-scoreboard/index_en.htm (accessed 2 February 2015).Google Scholar
  13. CEC (2013) Concerning the Added Value of Macro-regional Strategies, Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, available online: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/official/communic/baltic/com_added_value_macro_region_strategy_en.pdf (accessed 2 February 2015).Google Scholar
  14. CEC (2014a) Investment for Jobs and Growth. Promoting Development and Good Governance in EU Regions and Cities. Sixth Report on Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion, Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy, Brussels.Google Scholar
  15. CEC (2014b) Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No C(2014) 7012 Final of 9.10.2014 Laying Down Detailed Rules on the Functioning of the Advisory Councils under the Common Fisheries Policy, available online: http://www.fishsec.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Advisory-Councils.pdf (accessed 2 February 2015).Google Scholar
  16. Cecchini, P. (1988) The European Challenge 1992: The Benefits of a Single European Market (Aldershot: Wildwood House).Google Scholar
  17. Common Weal (2014) Common Weal — Practical Idealism for Scotland, available online: http://allofusfirst.bigcartel.com/product/common-weal-book (accessed 2 February 2015).Google Scholar
  18. CoR (2011) ‘A Strategy for the North Sea-Channel Area (own-initiative opinion)’, Opinion of the Committee of the Regions 2011/C 15/06, available online: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.C_.2011.015.01.0026.01.ENG (accessed 25 June 2015).Google Scholar
  19. CPMR (2013) 40 Successful Years and Many More to Come, CPMR/CRPM, available online: http://www.france-media.net/crpm/2013-4/#/1/f (accessed 2 February 2015).Google Scholar
  20. CPMR (2013) ‘Macro-regional and Sea Basin Strategies — Preparing the Future of European Integration’, CPMR Policy Position: Opinion from the CPMR Political Bureau, available online: http://www.crpm.org/pub/docs/398_opinion-mac-roregions_pb_cpmr-malmo.pdf (accessed 2 February 2015).
  21. Danson, M. (2012) Presentation to ‘Growth versus the Scottish Government’s “Golden Rules” and Economic Strategy’, Economy, Energy and Tourism Committee and Scottish Trades Union Congress Seminar, 13–20, Scottish Parliament, 21 February 2011, available online: http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/S4_EconomyEnergyandTourismCommittee/General%20Documents/Proceedings_v2.pdf (accessed 2 February 2015).Google Scholar
  22. Danson, M., Fairley, J., Lloyd, G. and Turok, I. (1999) ‘The European Structural Fund Partnerships in Scotland: New Forms of Governance for Regional Development?’, Scottish Affairs, 27: 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Danson, M. and Mather, J. (2014) ‘Doing Business with the Scottish Diaspora’, in D. Sim and M. Leith (eds), The Modern Scottish Diaspora: Contemporary Debates and Perspectives (Edinburgh: EUP), 64–80.Google Scholar
  24. Danson, M., Sosenko, F., Matthews, P. and Besemer, K. (2013) ‘Part 3 — The Use of Equality Conditions in Public Sector Skills Development and Economic Development in the UK and Europe’, in M. Danson, F. Sosenko and G. Netto (eds), Modern Apprenticeships Equality & The Economy: Spreading The Benefits (Glasgow: EHRC).Google Scholar
  25. Danson, M. and de Souza, P. (eds) (2012) Peripherality, Marginality and Border Issues in Northern Europe (Abingdon: Routledge).Google Scholar
  26. Dubois, A., Hedin, S., Schmitt, P. and Sterling, J. (2009) ‘EU Macro-regions and Macro-regional Strategies — A Scoping Study’, Nordregio Electronic Working Paper, No. 4, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  27. Elliott, L. and Atkinson, D. (2012) Going South: Why Britain Will Have a Third World Economy by 2014 (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar
  28. ENTSO-E (European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity) (2014) The North Seas Countries’ Offshore Grid Initiative (NSCOGI), available online: https://www.entsoe.eu/about-entso-e/system-development/the-north-seas-coun-tries-offshore-grid-initiative-nscogi/Pages/default.aspx (accessed 2 February 2015).Google Scholar
  29. Ernst & Young (2012) Staying Ahead of the Game. Ernst & Young’s 2012 Attractiveness Survey, United Kingdom, available online: http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwL-UAssets/2012_UK_Attractiveness_Survey/$FILE/EY_2012_UK_Attractiveness_Survey%20.pdf (accessed 2 February 2015).Google Scholar
  30. ESPON (2010) First ESPON 2013 Synthesis Report: Results by Summer 2010: New Evidence on Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Territories, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  31. ESPON (2013) ‘Territorial Dynamics in Europe: Trends in Accessibility’, Territorial Observation No. 2, available online: http://www.espon.eu/export/sites/default/Documents/Publications/TerritorialObservations/TrendsInAccessibility/to-no2.pdf (accessed 2 February 2015).Google Scholar
  32. Etzkowitz, H. and Ranga, M. (2010) ‘A Triple Helix System for Knowledge-based Regional Development: From “Spheres” to “Spaces”’, Paper to The Triple Helix VIII International Conference on University, Industry and Government Linkages, Madrid, Spain, available online: http://www.slideshare.net/ivankuz86/a-triple-helix-system-for-knowledge-based-regional-development (accessed 2 February 2015).
  33. Farole, T., Rodríguez-Pose, A. and Storper, M. (2011) ‘Cohesion Policy in the European Union: Growth, Geography, Institutions’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 49(5): 1089–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Flynn, B. (2014) ‘Understanding the Politics of Europe’ Offshore Electricity Grids: An Ambiguous Affair?’, Paper presented at the UACES 44th Annual Conference, Cork, 1–3 September.Google Scholar
  35. Foray, D., David, P. and Hall, B. (2011) ‘Smart Specialization. From Academic Idea to Political Instrument, the Surprising Career of a Concept and the Difficulties Involved in Its Implementation’, MTEI-Working Paper-2011-001 (Lausanne: Management of Technology & Entrepreneurship Institute).Google Scholar
  36. German Federal Government (January 2011) ‘Comments by the Federal Government on the Conclusions of the European Commission’s Fifth Report on Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion: The Future of Cohesion Policy’, available online: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/consultation/5cr/pdf/answers/national/germany_lander_contribution_2011_01_11_en.pdf (accessed 2 February 2015).
  37. Hubel, H. and Gänzle, S. (2002) ‘The Council of the Baltic Sea States (CBSS) and the EU Dealing with Soft Security Risks in a European Subregion’, in H. Hubel (with the assistance of S. Gänzle and A. Bannwart) (ed.), EU Enlargement and Beyond: The Baltic States and Russia (Berlin: A. Spitz Verlag), 393–415.Google Scholar
  38. Herrschel, T. (2009) ‘Regionalisation, “Virtual” Spaces and “Real” Territories: A View from Europe and North America’, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 22(3): 272–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jeffery, C. (1997) The Regional Dimension of the European Union. Towards a Third Level in Europe? (London: Frank Cass).Google Scholar
  40. Keating, M. (2009) ‘Rescaling Europe’, Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 10(1): 34–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Krugman, P. (1991) ‘Increasing Returns and Economic Geography’, Journal of Political Economy, 99(3): 483–99 (University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
  42. Kuhn, H. (2010) Member of the Bremen City Parliament, Draft Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on A Strategy for the North Sea-Channel Area, COTER-V-006, 86th Plenary Session, 6–7 October.Google Scholar
  43. Long, R. (2010) ‘The Role of Regional Advisory Councils in the European Common Fisheries Policy: Legal Constraints and Future Options’, The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 25: 289–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lorentzen, A. and van Heur, B. (eds) (2011) Cultural Political Economy of Small Cities (London and New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
  45. Lundvall, B.-A. and Lorenz, E. (2012) ‘On the Role of Social Investment in the Globalising Learning Economy – A European Perspective’, in N. Morel, B. Palier and J. Palme (eds), Towards a Social Investment Welfare State? Ideas, Policies, Challenges (Bristol: Policy Press), 235–59.Google Scholar
  46. MacKay, D. (ed.) (2011) Scotland’s Economic Future (Edinburgh: Reform Scotland).Google Scholar
  47. Martin, M. (2010) ‘Regional Economic Resilience, Hysteresis and Recessionary Shocks’, Journal of Economic Geography, 12(1): 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Maxwell, S. (2012) Arguing for Independence: Evidence, Risk and the Wicked Issues (Edinburgh: Luath Press).Google Scholar
  49. Moulaert, F. and Sekia, F. (2003) ‘Territorial Innovation Models: A Critical Survey’, Regional Studies, 3(37): 289–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nordic Horizons (2014) Welcome to Nordic Horizons, available online: http://www.nordichorizons.org/ (accessed 2 February 2015).Google Scholar
  51. North Sea Commission (2009) 52nd Executive Committee Meeting Papers — North Sea Strategy Briefing, Kiel.Google Scholar
  52. Parr, J., Hewings, G., Sohn, J. and Nazara, S. (2002) ‘Agglomeration and Trade: Some Additional Perspectives’, Regional Studies, 36: 675–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Perkmann, M. (2003) ‘Cross-border Regions in Europe: Significance and Drivers of Regional Cross-border Co-operation’, European Urban and Regional Studies, 10: 153–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Peterlin, M. (2011) ‘Territorial Coordination: Aligning Territorial Development in Macro-regions without a Governance Framework’, Paper to European Commission, the Regional Studies Association and the Government Office for Local Self-Government and Regional Policy in Slovenia Conference, ‘What Future for Cohesion Policy? An Academic and Policy Debate’, 16–18 March, Bled, Slovenia (Seaford: Regional Studies Association).Google Scholar
  55. Piattoni, S. (2008) ‘The Committee of the Regions: Multi-level Governance After Enlargement’, in E. Best, T. Christiansen and P. Settembri (eds), The Institutions of the Enlarged European Union (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing).Google Scholar
  56. Pike, A., Tomaney, J., Coombes, M. and McCarthy, A. (2012) ‘Governing Uneven Development: The Politics of Local and Regional Development in England’, in N. Bellini, M. Danson and H. Halkier (eds), Regional Development Agencies: The Next Generation? Networking, Knowledge and Regional Policies (London: Routledge), 102–21.Google Scholar
  57. Porter, M. (2000) ‘Location, Competition, and Economic Development: Local Clusters in a Global Economy’, Economic Development Quarterly, 14(1): 15–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Price, A. and Levinger, B. (2011) ‘The Flotilla Effect: Europe’s Small Economies through the Eye of the Storm’, mimeo, Center for International Development, Harvard.Google Scholar
  59. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1990) ‘Policy Networks: A British Perspective’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2(3): 293–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2002) ‘Innovation Prone and Innovation Averse Societies: Economic Performance in Europe’, Growth and Change, 30(1): 75–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Romanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs (January 2010) ‘Seminar on “EU Strategy for the Danube Region”’, available online: http://www.mae.ro/en/node/3770 (accessed 15 February 2011).
  62. Samecki, P. (2009) ‘Macro-regional Strategies in the European Union’, Discussion Paper presented by Commissioner P. Samecki, Stockholm, 18 September.Google Scholar
  63. Schmidt, I. (2011) The European Blue Banana: From the Super Lamb Banana to the Wealthy Blue Banana, available online: http://www.eu-partner.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=9:the-blue-banana&catid=1:news&Itemid=16 (accessed 2 February 2015).Google Scholar
  64. Schymik, C. and Krumrey, P. (2009) ‘EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region: Core Europe in the Northern Periphery’, Working Paper FG 1 2009/08 (Berlin: German Institute for International and Security Affairs).Google Scholar
  65. Scottish Government (2013) European Structural and Investment Funds 2014–2020 Programmes (Edinburgh: Scottish Government).Google Scholar
  66. Scottish Government (2014a) European Structural Funds. European Social Fund 2014–2020 Scottish Operational Programme, ESF (draft) (Edinburgh: Scottish Government).Google Scholar
  67. Scottish Government (2014b) European Structural Funds. European Social Fund 2014–2020 Scottish Operational Programme, ERDF (draft) (Edinburgh: Scottish Government).Google Scholar
  68. Skilling, D. (2012) ‘In Uncertain Seas: Positioning Small Countries to Succeed in a Changing World’, Discussion Paper (Singapore: Landfall Strategy Group).Google Scholar
  69. Smith, B., Taylor, S. and Williams, G. (2007) West Over Sea: Studies in Scandinavian Sea-borne Expansion and Settlement (Leiden: Koninkilje Brill NV).Google Scholar
  70. Stocchiero, A. (2010) ‘Macro-regions of Europe: Old Wine in a New Bottle?’, Working Papers 65/2010(ENG) (Rome: CeSPI).Google Scholar
  71. Swedish Government (2011) Swedish Government’s Contribution to the Commission Consultation on the Fifth Report on Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion: The Future of Cohesion Policy, available online: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/consultation/5cr/pdf/answers/national/sweden_national%20government_2011_02_01.pdf (accessed 2 February 2015).Google Scholar
  72. TiPSE (The Territorial Dimension of Poverty and Social Exclusion in Europe) (2014) Draft Final Report — Main Report, available online: http://www.espon.eu/export/sites/default/Documents/Projects/AppliedResearch/TIPSE/DFR/TIPSE_Draft_Final_Report.pdf (accessed 2 February 2015).Google Scholar
  73. United Kingdom Government (2011) UK Government Response to the European Commission’s Consultation on the Conclusions of the Fifth Report on Economic and Social Cohesion, available online: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/consultation/5cr/pdf/answers/national/uk_government_contribution_2011_02_08.pdf (accessed 2 February 2015).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Mike Danson 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mike Danson

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations