Macro-regions, ‘Macro-regionalization’ and Macro-regional Strategies in the European Union: Towards a New Form of European Governance?

  • Stefan Gänzle
  • Kristine Kern
Part of the Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics book series (PSEUP)


With the adoption of its first ‘macro-regional’ strategy in 2009 — the EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region (EUSBSR) — the European Union has started to charter new territory in transnational cooperation and cohesion policy. Subsequently, other ‘macro-regions’ have begun to self-identify — such as the Danube (2011), the Adriatic-Ionian basin (2014), the Alpine (2015) and the North Sea regions1 (see European Parliament, 2015) — and are in the process of developing similar strategies of their own, often drawing on ‘the inspiration from the EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region and the Danube Region’ (North Sea Commission, 2011, p. 2). These developments suggest that some parts of Europe, if not the entire EU, could come to be covered by some kind of macro-regional strategy. Indeed, in 2013, the Lithuanian Presidency of the EU Council proposed a ‘Europe of macro-regions’ (Lithuanian Presidency of the EU Council, 2013, p. 9) and an ever-increasing area has been described as having succumbed to a kind of ‘macro-regional fever’ (Dühr, 2011, p. 3). Such observations and the concrete developments that underpin them warrant a critical assessment of this ‘“nouvelle vogue” of transnational cooperation’ (Cugusi and Stocchiero, 2012), which has also been depicted as a new ‘tool of European integration’ (Dubois et al., 2009, p. 9; see also Bellini and Hilpert, 2013).2


Multilevel Governance European Governance Governance Architecture Transnational Cooperation Territorial Cohesion 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ágh, A. (2010) ‘Regionalisation as a Driving Force of EU Widening Recovering from the EU “Carrot Crisis” in the East’, Europe-Asia Studies, 62(8): 1239–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antola, E. (2009) EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region. Report for the Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung London Office (London: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung).Google Scholar
  3. Beazley, C. (2007) ‘A EU-strategy for the Baltic Sea Region Making a Success of the 2004 Enlargement’, Baltic Rim Economies, 6: 14.Google Scholar
  4. Bellini, N. and Hilpert, U. (eds) (2013) Europe’s Changing Geography. The Impact of Interregional Networks (London and New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
  5. Blatter, J., Kreutzer, M., Rentl, M. and Thiele, J. (2008) ‘The Foreign Relations of European Regions: Competences and Strategies’, West European Politics, 31(3): 464–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borrás, S. and Radaelli, C. M. (2011) ’The Politics of Governance Architectures: Creation, Change and Effects of the EU Lisbon Strategy’, Journal of European Public Policy, 18(4): 463–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Christiansen, T. (1997) ‘A European Meso-region? European Union Perspectives on the Baltic Sea Region’, in P. Joenniemi (ed.) Neo-nationalism or Regionalism? The Re-structuring of Political Space around the Baltic Rim (Stockholm: NordREFO), 254–92.Google Scholar
  8. Committee of the Regions (2009) White Paper on Multilevel Governance, Brussels.Google Scholar
  9. Cottey, A. (ed.) (1999) Subregional Cooperation in the New Europe. Building Security, Prosperity and Solidarity from the Barents to the Black Sea (Houndmills and London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
  10. Dangerfield, M. (2009) ‘Contribution — Macro-regions a Case of Multilevel Governance?’, Proceedings of the Committee of the Regions 6th Atelier ‘EU Macro-regional Strategies and European Governance’, Brussels, 26 November 2009.Google Scholar
  11. Cugusi, B. and Stocchiero, A. (2012) ‘Macro-regions, “la Nouvelle Vogue” of Transnational Cooperation, the Geopolitical Case of the Mediterranean Basin’, EUBORDERREGIONS Working Paper Series 4 (Rome: CeSPI).Google Scholar
  12. Dangerfield, M. (2010) ‘Macro-regions as a Concept’, Proceedings of the Forum at the Committee of the Regions on ‘Europe’s Macro-regions: Integration through Territorial Co-operation, Brussels, 13 April 2010.Google Scholar
  13. Delamaide, D. (1994) The New Superregions of Europe (New York: Dutton).Google Scholar
  14. Dubois, A., Hedin, S., Schmitt, P. and Sterling, J. (2009) ‘EU Macro-regions and Macro-regional Strategies — A Scoping Study’, Nordregio Electronic Working Paper 4 (Stockholm: Nordregio).Google Scholar
  15. Dühr, S. (2011) ‘Baltic Sea, Danube and Macro-regional Strategies – A Model for Transnational Cooperation in the EU?’ Notre Europe Study &Research, 86, Paris.Google Scholar
  16. Dwan, R. (2000) ‘Subregional, Regional and Global Levels Making the Connections’, in G. Herolf (ed.) Subregional Cooperation and Integration in Europe (Stockholm: Utrikespolitiska Institute), 81–100.Google Scholar
  17. Dyson, K. and Sepos, A. (eds) (2010) Which Europe? The Politics of Differentiated Integration, Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
  18. Elias, A. (2008) ‘Introduction: Whatever Happened to the Europe of the Regions? Revisiting the Regional Dimension of European Politics’, Regional and Federal Studies, 18(5): 483–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. European Commission (2009) ‘Macro-regional Strategies in the European Union’, Discussion Paper, Brussels, available online: (accessed 24 January 2014).Google Scholar
  20. European Commission (2011) Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the Implementation of the EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region (EUSBSR), COM(2011) 381 final, Brussels, 22 June 2011.Google Scholar
  21. European Commission (2013) Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Concerning the Added Value of Macro-regional Strategies, COM(2013) 468 final, Brussels, 27 June 2013.Google Scholar
  22. European Commission (2013) Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Concerning the European Union Strategy for the Danube Region, COM(2013) 181 final, Brussels, 8 April 2013.Google Scholar
  23. European Council (2012) Presidency Conclusions, 20 December 2012, Brussels.Google Scholar
  24. European Parliament (2013) Motion for a Resolution for a Macro-regional Strategy for the Alps, B7-0196, Brussels, 15 May 2013.Google Scholar
  25. European Parliament (2015) The New Role of Macro-regions in European Territorial Cooperation. Study Commissioned by the Directorate General for Internal Policies, Brussels.Google Scholar
  26. Forsyth, M. (1996) ‘The Political Theory of Federalism. The Relevance of Classical Approaches’, in J. J. Hesse and V. Wright (eds) Federalizing Europe? (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 25–45.Google Scholar
  27. Frey, B. (2012) ‘Europas Zukunft. Weg mit dem Nationalstaat’, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 24 November 2012, available online: http// (accessed 24 November 2012).Google Scholar
  28. Gänzle, S. (2014) ‘Macro-regional Strategies and the EU. Building Inter- and Trans-government Relations’, Public Administration Times. International Supplement, (31)1, 14.Google Scholar
  29. Gänzle, S. and Kern, K. (2011) ‘“EUROPE 2020” and Macro-regional Europe Coping with the Prospect of Differentiation in the EU’, in A. Ágh (ed.) The European Union at the Crossroads: The European Perspectives after the Global Crisis (Budapest: Budapest College of Communication, Business and Arts), 263–88.Google Scholar
  30. Groenendijk, N. (2013) ‘Macro-regions: Regional Integration within and beyond the EU’, Paper presented at the 21st NISPAcee Conference on ‘Regionalism and Interregional Cooperation’, 16–18 May 2013, Belgrade.Google Scholar
  31. Herolf, G. (2010) ‘Cooperation in the North — Multilateralism or Mess?’, MERCURY E-paper, No. 7, Multilateralism and the EU in the Contemporary Global Order.Google Scholar
  32. Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (1996) ‘“Europe with the Regions”: Channels of Regional Representation in the European Union’, Publius, 26(1): 73–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2003) ‘Unravelling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-level Governance’, American Political Science Review, 97(2): 233–43.Google Scholar
  34. Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2010) ‘Types of Multi-level Governance’, in H. Enderlein, S. Wälti and M. Zürn (eds) Handbook on Multi-level Governance (Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar), 17–31.Google Scholar
  35. Hubel, H. and Gänzle, S. (2002) ‘The Council of the Baltic Sea States (CBSS) and the EU Dealing with Soft Security Risks in a European Subregion’, in H. Hubel (with the assistance of S. Gänzle and A. Bannwart) (ed.) EU Enlargement and Beyond: The Baltic States and Russia (Berlin: A. Spitz Verlag), 393–415.Google Scholar
  36. Joas, M., Sandberg, S. and Kern, K. (2007) ‘Actors and Arenas in Hybrid Networks Implications for Environmental Policy-making in the Baltic Sea Region’, Ambio, 35(3): 237–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Johansson, E. (2002) ‘EU Foreign Policy and Subregionalisation in North-East Europe’, in H. Hubel (with the assistance of S. Gänzle and A. Bannwart) (ed.) EU Enlargement and Beyond: The Baltic States and Russia (Berlin: Arno Spitz), 371–92.Google Scholar
  38. Keating, M. (2009) ‘Rescaling Europe’, Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 10(1): 34–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kern, K. (2001) ‘Transnationale Städtenetzwerke in Europa’, in E. Schröter (ed.) Empirische Policy- und Verwaltungsforschung. Lokale, nationale und internationale Perspektiven (Opladen: Leske + Budrich), 95–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kern, K. (2011) ‘Governance for Sustainable Development in the Baltic Sea Region’, Journal of Baltic Studies, 42(1): 67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kern, K. (2014) ‘Climate Governance in the EU Multi-level System: The Role of Cities’, in I. Weibust and J. Meadowcroft (eds) Multilevel Environmental Governance Managing Water and Climate Change in Europe and North America (Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar), 111–30.Google Scholar
  42. Kern, K. and Bulkeley, H. (2009) ‘Cities, Europeanization and Multi-level Governance Governing Climate Change through Transnational Municipal Networks’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 47(1): 309–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kern, K. and Löffelsend, T. (2008) ‘Governance Beyond the Nation State. Transnationalization and Europeanization of the Baltic Sea Region’, in M. Joas, D. Jahn and K. Kern (eds) Governing a Common Sea: Environmental Policies in the Baltic Sea Region (London: Earthscan), 115–41.Google Scholar
  44. Leggewie, C. (2012) ‘For a Different Europe of the Region’, German Institute for Development/Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (ed.) The Current Column (Bonn: Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik).Google Scholar
  45. Lithuanian Presidency of the EU Council (2013) Program of the Lithuanian Presidency of the Council of the European Union, 1 July to 31 December 2013, available online: (accessed 1 October 2014).Google Scholar
  46. Majone, G. (2014) Rethinking the Union of Europe Post-crisis. Has Integration Gone too Far? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Metzger, J. and Schmitt, P. (2012) ‘When Soft Spaces Harden: the EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region’, Environment and Planning, A 44(2): 263–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nagler, A. (2013) ‘European Macro-regions as a New Dimension of European Geography: Networks of Collaboration in the Light of Culture, History and Language Capabilities’, in N. Bellini and U. Hilpert (eds) Europe’s Changing Geography. The Impact of Interregional Networks (London and New York: Routledge), 31–63.Google Scholar
  49. North Sea Commission (2011) North Sea Region 2020, Draft document for consultation approved by the Annual Business Meeting of the NSC on the 21 June 2011.Google Scholar
  50. Oberthür, S. and Schram Stokke, O. (eds) (2011) Managing Institutional Complexity. Regime Interplay and Global Environmental Change (Cambridge and London: MIT Press).Google Scholar
  51. Ostrom, E. (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ostrom, E. (2010) ‘Polycentric Systems for Coping with Collective Action and Global Environmental Change’, Global Environmental Change, 20: 550–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Piattoni, S. (2009) ‘Multilevel Governance in the EU. Does It Work?’, Paper presented at the ‘Sub-national Governance Workshop’, University of Konstanz, 26 June 2009.Google Scholar
  54. Piattoni, S. (2010) The Theory of Multi-level Governance. Conceptual, Empirical, and Normative Challenges (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ruge, U. (2003) Die Erfindung des’Europa der Regionen’. Kritische Ideengeschichte eines konservativen Konzepts (Frankfurt a. M. and New York: Campus).Google Scholar
  56. Salines, M. (2010) ‘Success Factors of Macro-regional Cooperation: The Example of the Baltic Sea Region’, Bruges Political Research Papers, No. 12.Google Scholar
  57. Schmitter, P. (2004) ‘Neo-functionalism’, in A. Wiener and T. Dietz (eds) European Integration Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 45–74.Google Scholar
  58. Schymik, C. (2011) Modellversuch Makroregion. Die EU-Strategien für den Ostsee- und den Donauraum, Berlin Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik.Google Scholar
  59. Stead, D. (2011) ‘European Macro-regional Strategies: Indications of Spatial Rescaling’, Planning Theory & Practice, 12(1): 163–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Stead, D. (2014) ‘European Integration and Spatial Rescaling in the Baltic Region: Soft Spaces, Soft Planning and Soft Security’, European Planning Studies, 22(4): 680–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Treib, O., Bähr, H. and Falkner, G. (2007) ‘Modes of Governance: Towards a Conceptual Clarification’, Journal of European Public Policy, 14(1): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Warleigh, A. (2001) ‘The Committee of the Regions’, in A. Warleigh (ed.) Understanding European Union Institutions (London: Routledge), 177–90.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Stefan Gänzle and Kristine Kern 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefan Gänzle
  • Kristine Kern

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations