Rights, Pressures and Conservation in Forest Regions of Mexico

  • Leticia Merino


The drivers of environmental degradation and the strategies to counter them are the subjects of heated debate. Several conceptual and policy approaches consider the key factors of this degradation to be the weakness and instability of property rights over natural resources. The commons perspective, on the other hand, emphasizes the viability and potential of the self-governance of shared resources such as forests. This perspective calls for a better understanding of the roles of local users and their institutions – understood as “rules in use” – with regard to natural resources (Ostrom, 1991; McKean, 2000; Berkes, 2006; McCay, 2007). In this literature, collective action is understood as cooperation and coordination to solve collective dilemmas related to the management of the commons (Cárdenas, 2008; Meinzen-Dick, 2010). The influence of the commons perspective goes beyond academia, gaining recognition among some international funders, environmental agencies and practitioners. It follows the repeated failures of previous efforts of international aid to halt deforestation through the support of governmental agencies.


Social Capital Forest Area Forest Resource Forest Community Latin American Country 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Agrawal, A. and Ashwini, C. (2009) ‘Trade-Offs and Synergies Between Carbon Storage and Livelihood Benefits from Forest Commons’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 106(42), 17667–17670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alatorre, G. (2000) La Construcción de una Cultura Gerencial Democrática en las Empresas Forestales Comunitarias (México, D.F: Editorial Juan Pablos, Procu-raduría Agraria).Google Scholar
  3. Bautista, L. (2000) Las Vedas Forestales en México. Tesis de Maestría en Estudios Regionales (México: Instituto Dr. José María Luis Mora).Google Scholar
  4. Bevir, M. (2013) Governance: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  5. Boyer, C. (2005) ‘Contested Terrain: Forestry Regimes and Community Responses in Northeastern Michoacán, 1940–2000’, in D. Bray, L. Merino and D. Barry (eds), The Community Forests of Mexico: Managing for Sustainable Landscapes (Austin: University of Texas Press), 27–48.Google Scholar
  6. Bray, D. and Merino, L. (2004) La Experiencia de las Comunidades Forestales Mexicanas (México: Instituto Nacional de Ecología).Google Scholar
  7. Bray, D., Merino, L. and Barry, D. (eds) (2005) The Community Forests of Mexico: Managing for Sustainable Landscapes (Austin: University of Texas Press).Google Scholar
  8. Cárdenas Campo, J.C. (2009) Dilemas de lo Colectivo: Instituciones, Pobreza y Cooperación en el Manejo Local de los Recursos de Uso Común (Bogotá: Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE, Ediciones Uniandes).Google Scholar
  9. Chapela, F. (2005) ‘Indigenous Community Forest Management in Sierra de Juánez’, in D. Bray; L. Merino and D. Barry (eds), The Community Forests of Mexico: Managing for Sustainable Landscapes (Austin: University of Texas Press), 91–110.Google Scholar
  10. Durán, E., Mas, J. and Velásquez, A. (2005) ‘Changes in Land Vegetation Cover and Land Use Change in Communities with Forest Management and Protected Areas’, in D. Bray, L. Merino and D. Barry (eds), The Community Forests of Mexico: Managing for Sustainable Landscapes (Austin: University of Texas Press).Google Scholar
  11. De Janvry, A., Salouet, E. and Gordillo, G. (1999) La Segunda Reforma Agraria de México: Respuestas de Familias y Comunidades 1990–1994 (México: El Colegio de México).Google Scholar
  12. Demzets, H. (2002) ‘Towards a Theory of Property Rights II: The Competition Between Private and Collective Property’, The Journal of Legal STudies 31(2):653–672.Google Scholar
  13. Hardin, G. (1968) ‘The Tragedy of the Commons’, Science 162(3859): 1243–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. INEGI (2010) Censo General de Población y Vivienda (Instituto Nacional de Geografía y Estadística).Google Scholar
  15. Larson, A., Cronkleton, P., Barry, D. and Pacheco P. (2008) Tenure Rights and Beyond: Community Access to Forest Resources in Latin America. Occasional Paper no. 50 (Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR).Google Scholar
  16. Manson, R. and Jardel, E. (2012) ‘Perturbaciones y Desastres Naturales: Impactos sobre las Eco-Regiones, la Biodiversidad y el Bienestar Socioeconómico’, in Capital Natural de México, vol. II: Estado de Conservación y Tendencias de Cambio (México: CONABIO), 131–184.Google Scholar
  17. McCay, B.J. (2007) ‘Introduction to Human Ecology. On Marine Resources’, Human Ecology 35(5): 513–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McKean, M. (2000) People and Forests: Communities, Institutions, and Governance (Cambridge: MIT Press).Google Scholar
  19. Meinzen-Dick, R. (2007) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104(39): 15200–15205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Merino, L. (2004) Conservación o Deterioro. El Impacto de las Políticas Públicas en las Comunidades y en los Bosques de México (México: Instituto Nacional de Ecología).Google Scholar
  21. Merino, L. (2010) Interview with Elinor Ostrom. The Commons Digest (also in youtube),, date accessed 12 January 2015.
  22. Merino, L. and Martínez, A.E. A Vuelo de Pájaro. Las Condiciones de las Comunidades con Bosques Templados en México., date accessed 22 January 2015.
  23. Merino, L. and Ortiz, G. (2013) Encuentros y Desencuentros: Las Comunidades Forestales y las Políticas Públicas en Tiempos de Transición (Mexico: Miguel Angel Porrua/ Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales de la UNAM).Google Scholar
  24. Merino, L. and Segura-Warnholtz (2005) ‘Forest and Conservation Policies. Impacts on Forests Communities in Mexico’, in D. Bray; L. Merino and D. Barry (eds), The Community Forests of Mexico: Managing for Sustainable Landscapes (Austin: University of Texas Press), 49–70.Google Scholar
  25. Molnar, A., Scherr, S. and Khare, A. (2004) Who Conserves the World’s Forests. A New Assessment of Conservation and Investment Trends (Washington, DC: Forest Tren ds).Google Scholar
  26. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2003) Ecosystems and Human Wellbeing (San Francisco: Island Press).Google Scholar
  27. Ostrom, E. (1990) Governing the Commons. The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ostrom, E. (2005) Understanding Institutional Diversity (Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
  29. Ostrom, E. (2007) ‘A Diagnostic Approach for Going Beyond Panaceas’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(39):15181–15187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ostrom, E. (2009) A Polycentric Approach for Coping with Climate Change. Policy Working Paper 1 (Washington, DC: The World Bank).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ostrom, E., Dietz, T., Dolšak, N., Stern, P.C., Stonich, S. and Weber, E.U. (eds), (2001) Drama of the Commons (Washington, DC: National Academy of Science).Google Scholar
  32. Pierce-Colfer, C. (eds) (1997) Who Counts Most for Sustainable Forest Management? (CIFOR).Google Scholar
  33. Ribot, J., Agrawal, A. and Larson, A. (2006) ‘Recentralizing While Decentralizing: How National Governments Re-appropriate Forest Resources’, World Development 34(11): 1864–1886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rockström, J., Will, S. and Noone, K. et al. (2009) ‘Feature: A Safe Operating Space for Humanity’, Nature 461: 472–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schlager, E. and Ostrom, E. (1992) ‘Property-Rights Regimes and Natural Resources: A Conceptual Analysis’, Land Economics, 68(3): 249–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Warman, A. (2000) El Campo en México en el Siglo XX. Siglo de Luces y Sombras (México: Fondo de Cultura Económica).Google Scholar
  37. Cornleius, W. Ejido Reform: Stimulus or Alternative to Migration. The Transformation of Rural Mexico. Transforming the Ejido Sector (San Diego: Center for US-Mexico Studies).Google Scholar
  38. Wollenberg, E., Merino, L., Agrawal, A. and Ostrom, E. (2007) ‘Fourteen Years of Monitoring Community-Managed Forests: Learning from IFRI’s Experience’, International Forestry Review 9(2): 670–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Leticia Merino 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leticia Merino

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations