Advertisement

Hugh Cleghorn and Forest Conservation in India

  • Pallavi V. Das

Abstract

A public resolution by the Government of India of January 10, 1865, noted:

The Governor General in Council avails himself of this opportunity to express his sense of the great service rendered to the State by Dr. Cleghorn in the cause of forest conservancy…. His long services, from the first organisation of Forest management in Madras, have, without question greatly conduced to the public good in this branch of the administration. In the Punjab also … Dr. Cleghorn’s labours have prepared the way for the establishment of an efficient system of conservancy and working of the forests of that Province.1

The excerpt summarizes the important role played by Dr. Hugh Cleghorn in initiating forest conservancy in the Madras Presidency and in the Punjab. This adoption of forest conservation was one of the responses of the colonial state to the denudation crisis that developed in colonial India in the second half of the nineteenth century. One of the most important reasons for the denudation crisis was the rapid railway establishment and expansion promoted by the colonial state.

Keywords

Public Work Forest Conservation Resource Extraction Forest Department Colonial State 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    R. Grove, Green Imperialism: Colonial Expansion, Tropical Edens and the Origins of Environmentalism, 1600–1860 (Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995), 7.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    Ibid., 12.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    M. L. Anderson, History of Scottish Forestry, Vol. I (London: Nelson, 1967a), 279.Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    W. C. McIntosh, “Dr. Hugh Francis Clarke Cleghorn,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh (September 1895): i.Google Scholar
  5. 6.
  6. 8.
    Royal Scottish Arboricultural Society, “Presentation to Hugh Cleghorn of Stravithie,” Transactions of Scottish Arboricultural Society XII (1890): 202.Google Scholar
  7. 10.
    R. Grove, Ecology, Climate and Empire: Colonialism and Global Environmental History, 1400–1940 (Cambridge: White Horse, 1997), 67.Google Scholar
  8. 11.
    Ibid., 66.Google Scholar
  9. 13.
    H. F. Cleghorn et al., “Report of the Committee appointed by the British Association to consider the probable effects in an Economical and Physical point of View of the Destruction of Tropical Forests,” Transactions of the British Academy for the Advancement of Science (1852): 79.Google Scholar
  10. 14.
    H. F. Cleghorn, “Notes on the Medical and Economical Resources of the Forests of India.” The Pharmaceutical Journal VI (1845): 1.Google Scholar
  11. 19.
    As discussed earlier, the colonial state, by the 1840s under Governor General Dalhousie and especially after the Revolt of 1857, began to focus on technological progress and material development in India. See F. G. Hutchins, The Illusion of Permanence: British Imperialism in India (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1967). Through the application of science and technology to various fields such as agriculture, communications, transport etc. the state wanted to develop India’s resources so that they could be increasingly and efficiently extracted. As found in R. Bryant, “Romancing Colonial Forestry: The Discourse of ‘Forestry as Progress’ in British Burma,” The Geographical Journal 162(2) (July 1996): 169–78. However, because these development strategies were pursued within the structure of colonialism or colonial relations the extraction of resources from India was largely to meet Britain’s requirements.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 23.
    D. Arnold, and R. Guha, eds., Nature, Culture and Imperialism: Essays on the Environmental History of South Asia (Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1995), 13.Google Scholar
  13. 25.
    H. F. Cleghorn, The Forests and Gardens of South India (London: W. H. Allen, 1861), xi.Google Scholar
  14. 29.
    H. F. Cleghorn, Address Delivered at the Nineteenth Annual Meeting of the Scottish Arboricultural Society November 6, 1872 (Edinburgh: Neill & Company, 1873), 3–4.Google Scholar
  15. 30.
  16. 31.
    This was especially so because toward the end of the eighteenth century when exports of timber from America declined, Britain had to meet its heavy naval timber demand from its own oak forests which got exhausted. See M. L. Anderson, History of Scottish Forestry, Vol. II (London: Nelson, 1967b), 1.Google Scholar
  17. 34.
    D. Brandis, “Dr. Cleghorn’s Services to Indian Forestry,” Transactions of Royal Scottish Arboricultural Society XII (1890): 89.Google Scholar
  18. 38.
    V. Elwin, The Baiga (London: John Murray, 1939), 107–8; S. Bose, The Carrying Capacity of Land Under Shifting Cultivation, Vol. 12 (Calcutta: Asiatic Society, 1967), 119–22.Google Scholar
  19. 39.
    M. Rangarajan, Fencing the Forest: Conservation and Ecological Change in India’s Central Provinces, 1860–1914 (Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1996), 8.Google Scholar
  20. 40.
    J. Pouchepadass, “Colonialism and Environment in India, Comparative Perspective,” Economic and Political Weekly XXX(33) (1995): 2065.Google Scholar
  21. 41.
    C. Bayly, The New Cambridge History of India, Vol. 2 (i): Indian Society and the Making of the British Empire (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988), 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 46.
    H. F. Cleghorn, Report upon the Forests of the Punjab and the Western Himalaya (Lahore: Superintendent Government Printing, 1864), ii.Google Scholar
  23. 51.
    B. H. Baden-Powell, “The Political Value of Forest Conservancy,” Indian Forester II (1877): 280.Google Scholar
  24. 58.
    R. Guha, “Forestry in British and Post British India: An Historical Analysis,” Economic and Political Weekly XVII (1983): 1884.Google Scholar
  25. 61.
    Experiments to establish the influence of forests on the climate, particularly on the temperature and humidity of a country, only started around 1873 in Britain, long after Cleghorn’s retirement from the Indian Medical Service. See H. F. Cleghorn, “Address Delivered at the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the Scottish Arboricultural Society,” Transactions of the Scottish Arboricultural Society VII (1874): 7.Google Scholar
  26. 63.
    I. M. Saldanha, “Colonialism and Professionalism: A German Forester in India,” Economic and Political Weekly XXXI(21) (1996): 1265.Google Scholar
  27. 68.
    G. A. Barton, “Empire Forestry and American Environmentalism,” Environment and History 6 (2000): 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 72.
    See R. Miliband, Marxism and Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977); H. Alavi et al., Capitalism and Colonial Production (London: Croom Helm, 1982).Google Scholar
  29. 77.
    R. Guha and M. Gadgil, “State Forestry and Social Conflict in British India,” Past and Present CXXIII (1989): 147; R Haeuber, “Indian Forestry Policy in Two Eras: Continuity or Change?” Environmental History Review (Spring 1993): 53; M. Rangarajan, “Imperial Agendas and India’s Forests: The Early History of Indian Forestry, 1800–1878,” Indian Economic and Social History Review XXXI (1994): 161; K. Sivaramakrishnan, “Colonialism and Forestry in India: Imagining the Past in Present Politics,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 37(1) (January 1995): 16.Google Scholar
  30. 80.
    B. Ribbentrop, Hints on Arboriculture in the Punjab; Intended for the use of District and Forest Officers (Lahore: Superintendent Government Printing, 1873), 73.Google Scholar
  31. 88.
    C. F. Amery, “Report on the Forests of India,” Transactions of the Scottish Arboricultural Society VIII (1876): 219–20.Google Scholar
  32. 89.
    Ibid., 223.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pallavi V. Das 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pallavi V. Das

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations