The Forests and Railway Fuel Supply
The above denudation of the forests took place in the NWP and Oudh due to the heavy firewood demand of the railways. When railway construction began in colonial India, the initial railway demand from the forests was mainly for sleepers or ties. However by the mid-1860s, as the railways started operating, another demand developed in the form of firewood for railway fuel. This demand further contributed to the exhaustion of forests in colonial India.
The attention of the Government has been directed to the partial denudation of trees that has of late years been taking place in some parts of the Upper Provinces and particularly in the tract known as the Doab, to meet the large demand of the East India Railway for wood-fuel. The consumption of wood has been, and is, going on at a rapid pace while little if anything is being done to supply its place.1
KeywordsForest Conservation Forest Department Railway Line Fuel Supply Railway Company
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 9.Although the species used as firewood varied from district to district, the palmyrah (Borassus flabelliformis), the babul (Acacia arabica), and punga (Pongamia glabra) were some of the species mmonly used as firewood. See H. F. Cleghorn, The Forests and Gardens of South India (London: W. H. Allen, 1861).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.E. Balfour, ed., The Cyclopaedia of India and of Eastern and Southern Asia, Commercial, Industrial and Scientific: Products of the Mineral, Animal and Vegetable Kingdoms, Useful Arts and Manufactures (Madras: Lawrence and Adephi Presses, 1858), 200.Google Scholar
- 31.The forests in the Punjab were of two types, those of the hills and those of the plains. See Punjab Provincial Gazetteer, Imperial Gazetteer of India, Provincial Series: Punjab, Vol. I (Calcutta: Superintendent of Government Printing, 1889), 72.Google Scholar
- 32.Ibid.Google Scholar
- 34.Maund as a unit of weight in colonial India varied from province to province. On average 27 maunds of wood was equal to 1 British ton or 45 cubic feet of wood. See E. P. Stebbing, The Forests of India, Vol. I (London: John Lane, 1922), 284.Google Scholar
- 40.Z. Smith, The Environmental Policy Paradox (New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1992), 38.Google Scholar
- 41.H. F. Cleghorn, Address Delivered at the Nineteenth Annual Meeting of the Scottish Arboricultural Society (Edinburgh: Neill & Company, 1873), 5.Google Scholar
- 42.C. F. Amery, “Report on the Forests of India,” Transactions of the Scottish Arboricultural Society VIII (1876): 216; M. Mann, “Ecological Change in North India: Deforestation and Agrarian Distress in the Ganga-Yamuna Doab 1800–1850.” In Nature and the Orient: The Environmental History of South and Southeast Asia, ed. R. H. Grove, V. Damodaran, and S. Sangwan, 408–9 (New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
- 43.R. Guha and M. Gadgil, “State Forestry and Social Conflict in British India,” Past and Present CXXIII (1989): 147; R. Haeuber, “Indian Forestry Policy in Two Eras: Continuity or Change?,” Environmental History Review 17(1) (Spring 1993): 53; M. Rangarajan, Fencing the Forest: Conservation and Ecological Change in India’s Central Provinces, 1860–1914 (Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1996), 161; K. Sivaramakrishnan, “Colonialism and Forestry in India: Imagining the Past in Present Politics,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 37(1) (1995): 16.Google Scholar
- 90.R. Guha, “Forestry in British and Post British India: An Historical Analysis,” Economic and Political Weekly XVII (1983): 1882–96.Google Scholar