Abstract
The recent financial crisis has given rise to a re-examination by regulators and academics of the conventional wisdom regarding the implications of the spectacular growth of the financial sector of the economy. In the pre-crisis era, there was a widespread common wisdom that “bigger is better.” The arguments underpinning this view ranged from potential economies of scale and scope, to a better competitive stance at the international level. However, in the post-crisis world the common wisdom has been altered somewhat as large banks have come to be viewed as problematic for policy makers and regulators, for various reasons. One reason often given is that economic agents who are insured have the incentive to take on too much ex ante risk; also known as the moral hazard problem. Second, there is the “too-big-to-fail” problem: the fear that large and interconnected financial institutions may become a source of systemic risk if allowed to go out of business, especially in a “disorderly” fashion (Bernanke (2009)). Support for or against large banking institutions turns on the central issue of whether or not efficiencies of scale and scope are economically and statistically significant and are positively associated with bank size. If they are positively associated with bank size then the expected benefits of the cost savings generated by increased efficiencies passed on to consumers in terms of better services or reduced banking service fees are traded off with the expected costs implicit in the moral hazard and systemic risk arguments.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allen, F. and Santomero, A.M. 2001. “What Do Financial Intermediaries Do?” Journal of Banking and Finance, 25: 271–294.
Balk, B.M. 2001. “Scale Efficiency and Productivity Change.” Journal of Productivity Analysis, 15: 159–183.
Balk, B.M. 2008. Price and Quantity Index Numbers: Models for Measuring Aggregate Change and Difference. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Baltensperger, E. 1980. “Alternative Approaches to the Theory of the Banking Firm.” Journal of Monetary Economics, 6: 1–37.
Battese, G.E., and Coelli, T.J. 1992. “Frontier Production Functions, Technical Efficiency and Panel Data: with Application to Paddy Farmers in India.” Journal of Productivity Analysis, 3: 153–169.
BCBS. 2009a. Revisions to the Basel II market risk framework. Updated December 2010.
BCBS. 2009b. Principles for Sound Stress Testing Practices and Supervision. Consultative Paper, May (No. 155).
BCBS. 2012. Fundamental Review of the Trading Book, http://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs219.pdf
Bernanke, B. 2009. Financial Reform to Address Systemic Risk. Council on Foreign Relations, Washington, DC March 10, 2009.
Caves, D.W., Christensen, L.R. and Diewert, W.E. 1982. “The Economic Theory of Index Numbers and the Measurement of Input, Output, and Productivity.” Econometrica, 50: 1393–1414.
Coelli, T. 2000. On the Econometric Estimation of the Distance Function Representation of a Production Technology. Center for Operations Research & Econometrics, Universite Catholique de Louvain.
Coelli, T., and Perelman, S. 1996. “Efficiency Measurement, Multiple-output Technologie and Distance Functions: With Application to European Railways.” CREPP Working Paper 96/05, University of Liege.
DeYoung, R. 2010. Scale Economies Are a Distraction. The Region, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.
Efron, B., and Tibshirani, R. 1986. “Bootstrap Methods for Standard Errors, Confidence Intervals, and Other Measures of Statistical Accuracy.” Statistical Science, 1: 54–75.
Feldman, R. 2010. Size and Regulatory Reform in Finance: Important but Difficult Questions. The Region, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.
Frye, J., and Pelz, E. 2008. BankCaR (Bank Capital-at-Risk): US Commercial Bank Chargeoffs. Working Paper, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (2008: 3).
Galvao, A.F. 2011. “Quantile Regression for Dynamic Panel Data with Fixed Effects.” Journal of Econometrics, 164: 142–157.
Gregory, J. 2014. Central Counterparties: Mandatory Clearing and Bilateral Margin Requirements for OTC Derivatives. John Wiley & Sons.
Hajargasht, G., Coelli, T., and Rao, D. 2008. “A Dual Measure of Economies of Scope.” Economics Letters, 100: 185–188.
Haldane 2009. “Banking on the State.” http://www.bis.org/review/r091111e.pdf
Hausman, J.A., and Taylor, W.E. 1981. “Panel Data and Unobservable Individual Effects.” Econometrica, 49: 1377–1398.
Hughes, J.P., and Mester, L.J. 1998. “Bank Capitalization and Cost: Evidence of Scale Economies in Risk Management and Signaling.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 80: 314–325.
Hughes, J.P., and Mester, L.J. 2008. “Efficiency in Banking: Theory, Practice and Evidence.” FRB of Philadelphia Working Paper No. 08–01.
Hughes, J.P., Mester, L.J., and Moon, C.G. 2001. “Are Scale Economies in Banking Elusive or Illusive?: Evidence Obtained by Incorporating Capital Structure and Risk-taking into Models of Bank Production.” Journal of Banking & Finance, 25: 2169–2208.
Inanoglu, H., Jacobs, Jr. M., and Karagozoglu, A.K. 2014 (Spring). “Empirical Analysis of Bank Capital and New Regulatory Requirements for Risks in Trading Portfolios.” Journal of Fixed Income, 23 (4): 71–88.
Jorion, P. 2002. “How Informative are Value-at-risk Disclosures?” The Accounting Review, 77 (4): 911–931.
Klein, L.R. 1953. A Textbook of Econometrics. Row, Peterson & Company, Evanston, IL.
Koenker, R. 1984. “A Note on L-estimates for Linear Models.” Statistics & Probability Letters, 2: 323–325.
Koenker, R. 2004. “Quantile Regression for Longitudinal Data.” Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 91: 74–89.
Koenker, R. 2009. “Quantreg: Quantile Regression.” R package version 4.
Koenker, R., Bassett, G. Jr. 1978. “Regression Quantiles.” Econometrica, 46: 33–50.
Mosteller, F. 1946. “On Some Useful ‘Inefficient’ Statistics.” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 17: 377–408.
Newey, W.K. 1990. “Semiparametric Efficiency Bounds.” Journal of Applied Econometrics, 5: 99–135.
Pagan, A., and Ullah, A. 1999. Nonparametric Econometrics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Park, B.U., Sickles, R.C., and Simar, L. 1998. “Stochastic Panel Frontiers: A Semiparametric Approach.” Journal of Econometrics, 84: 273–301.
Park, B.U., Sickles, R.C., and Simar, L. 2003. “Semiparametric-efficient Estimation of AR (1) Panel Data Models.” Journal of Econometrics, 117: 279–309.
Park, B.U., Sickles, R.C., and Simar, L. 2007. “Semiparametric Efficient Estimation of Dynamic Panel Data Models.” Journal of Econometrics, 136: 281–301.
Park, B.U., and Simar, L. 1994. “Efficient Semiparametric Estimation in a Stochastic Frontier Model.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89: 929–936.
Pitt, M.M., and Lee, L.F. 1981. “The Measurement and Sources of Technical Inefficiency in the Indonesian Weaving Industry.” Journal of Development Economics, 9: 43–64.
R Core Development Team. 2010. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
Ritter, C., and Simar, L. 1997. “Pitfalls of Normal-gamma Stochastic Frontier Models.” Journal of Productivity Analysis, 8: 167–182.
Schmidt, P., and Sickles, R.C. 1984. “Production Frontiers and Panel Data.” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 2: 367–374.
Sealey, C.W., and Lindley, J.T. 1977. “Inputs, Outputs, and a Theory of Production and Cost at Depository Financial Institutions.” The Journal of Finance, 32: 1251–1266.
Sickles, R.C. 2005. “Panel Estimators and the Identification of Firm-specific Efficiency Levels in Parametric, Semiparametric and Nonparametric Settings.” Journal of Econometrics, 126: 305–334.
Tarullo, D.K. 2011. Industrial Organization and Systemic Risk: An Agenda for Further Research. Conference on Regulating Systemic Risk, Washington, DC September 15, 2011.
Tracey, B., and Davies, R. 2012. Too Big to be Efficient? The Impact of Implicit Funding Subsidies on Scale Economies in Banking. Working Paper.
Wheelock, D.C., and Wilson, P.W. 2012. “Do Large Banks have Lower Costs? New Estimates of Returns to Scale for US Banks.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 44: 171–199.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 Hulusi Inanoglu, Michael Jacobs, Jr., Junrong Liu and Robin Sickles
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Inanoglu, H., Jacobs, M., Liu, J., Sickles, R. (2016). Analyzing Bank Efficiency: Are “Too-Big-to-Fail” Banks Efficient?. In: Haven, E., Molyneux, P., Wilson, J.O.S., Fedotov, S., Duygun, M. (eds) The Handbook of Post Crisis Financial Modeling. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-49449-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-49449-8_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-57578-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-49449-8
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)