Skip to main content

The Body in Culture: The Body Project

  • Chapter
The Body, Dance and Cultural Theory
  • 66 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter begins by indicating the ways in which feminism and certain aspects of poststructuralism have impacted on the development of the study of the body in social and cultural theory. Feminists and post-structuralists (in very broad terms) have been critical of and attempted to overcome the problems of dualism inscribed in the western humanist tradition of thought. As discussed later in this chapter, they too may be criticised for contributing further to the dominance of the socially constructed body in social and cultural theory and, therefore, perpetuating the mind/body distinction embedded in Cartesian dualist thought. The chapter concludes by focusing on Nick Crossley’s (1995a) merging of two seemingly different approaches to the body. Crossley appropriates the phenomenological framework of Merleau-Ponty, whose attempts to surmount the mind/body dualism in Cartesian thinking were alluded to in the previous chapter, and combines it with a rereading of Goffman’s (1972) analysis of routine everyday bodily behaviour in public places.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Copyright information

© 2003 Helen Thomas

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thomas, H. (2003). The Body in Culture: The Body Project. In: The Body, Dance and Cultural Theory. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-48777-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics