Skip to main content

Rural Milieus in East-Central Europe — Gendered Attitudes to Post-modern Values

  • Chapter
  • 335 Accesses

Part of the book series: New Geographies of Europe ((NGE))

Abstract

Post-modern societies are often considered to be connected with a strong appreciation of nature, culture and safety (Soule and Lease 1995, Sellamna 1999). The environmental and social aspects of economies are gaining in importance and the adoption of information technology is reducing the importance of physical distance. These processes are part of post-modernisation and may lead to a change in the assessment of under-development, especially in rural peripheries. While new societal framework conditions have the potential to create a new developmental path, rural peripheries often find themselves in a dual cultural trap. On the one hand, rural policies in remote or structurally weak regions often adhere to the paradigm of modernisation, while rural economies find it difficult to compete since they are frequently far from the market, below the threshold of economy of scale and lack skilled labour and financial and social capital. With regard to assets like unspoilt nature or cultural heritage the regions might have more potential for following a post-modern path of development, however local actors are often not ready. Against this backdrop it is a key hypothesis of this chapter that the transformation of societal values in a globalised world also offers favourable opportunities, in particular for the less developed areas in East-Central Europe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Acker, J. (1990), Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organizations. Gender & Society, June 1990, 4, 139–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aylesworth, G. (2005), Postmodernism, in Zalta, Edward N. (eds), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2013/entries/postmodernism, (accessed 11 November 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baracs, G. E. (1997), A nők és a mezőgazdaság (Women and agriculture), In T. Kovács (eds) A fenntartható mezőgazdaságtól a vidékfejlesztésig, IV. Falukonferencia (Pécs: MTA Regionális Kutatások Központja), 465–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, J. (1981), For a Critique of the Political Economy of the Sign (St. Louis, MO.: Telos Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1992), Intimations of Postmodernity (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berényi, I. (1997), A szociálgeográfia értelmezése (The interpretation of social geography). (Budapest: Eötvös Kiadó).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boutilier, R. (2005), Views of Sustainable Development: A Typology of Stakeholders’ Conflicting Perspectives. New Horizons in Research on Sustainable Organisations, Simon Fraser University. Canada: Greenleaf Publishing, 21–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, J. (1990), Conflict: Human Needs Theory (New York: St. Martins Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cloke, P. and Little, J. (eds) (1997), Contested Countryside Cultures: Otherness, Marginalisation, and Rurality. (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, P. (1990), Back to the Future: Modernity, Postmodernity and Locality (London: Unwin Hyman).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstadt, S.N. (2000), Multiple Modernities. Daedalus, 129(1), 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gare, A. (1995), Postmodernism and the Environmental Crisis (New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • G.Fekete É. (2009), Post-Modern Values and Rural Peripheries, in Understanding and Shaping Regions: Spatial, Social and Economic Futures. Annual Conference of Regional Studies Association. Leuven, Belgium, 2009.04.06–2009.04.08.

    Google Scholar 

  • G.Fekete É.. (2010), The Role of Women in the Development of Rural Areas in a Post-Socialist Hungary. Analele Universitatii de Vest Din Timisoara Seria Geografie, 19, 27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • G.Fekete É. (2011), A természet, kultúra és részvétel alapú posztmodern fejlődés helyi társadalmi feltételei elmaradott rurális térségekben (Conditions of Rural Communities for post-Modern (Nature, Culture and Social Participation Based) Revitalization of Rural Spaces) Final Study of OTKA 72743 (Manuscript) (Miskolc: Észak-magyarországi Regionális Kutatásokért Alapítvány).

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1991), The Consequences of Modernity (Cambridge: Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goubman, B. (1998), Postmodernity as the Climax of Modernity: Horizons of the Cultural Future. Philosophy of Culture Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy, in Boston, Massachusetts from August 10–15, 1998. Article 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1987), The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. Frederick Lawrence (trans., (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, D. (1988), The Sociology of Modernization and Development. (London: Unwin Hyman).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1989), The Condition of Postmodernity. (London: Basil Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, S. R. C. (2004), Explaining Postmodernism: Skepticism and Socialism from Rousseau to Foucault. (Tempe, New Berlin: Scholargy Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  • van Hoven, B. (2001), Women at Work — Experiences and Identity in Rural East Germany. Area, 1, 38–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. (1997), Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. (2000), Globalization and Postmodern Values. The Washington Quarterly, 23(1), 215–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. and Abramson, P. (1999), Measuring Postmaterialism. American Political Science Review, September 1999, 665–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. and Baker W.E. (2000), Modernization, Cultural Change and the Persistence of Traditional Values. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 19–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, F. (1991), Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism (Durham, NC: Duke University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Korf, B. and Oughton, E. (2006), Rethinking the European Countryside — Can We Learn from the South? Journal of Rural Studies, 3, 278–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, J. and Jones, O. (2000), Masculinity, Gender and Rural Policy. Rural Sociology, 65(4), 621–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, J. and Panelli, R. (2003), Gender Research in Rural Geography. Gender, Place and Culture, 10(3), 281–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J.-F. (1984), The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge (Manchester: Manchester University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J.-F. (1988), The Difference: Phrases in Dispute (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Macionis, J. J. and Gerber, L. M. (2011), Sociology. Chapter 24: Social Change: Traditional, Modern, and Postmodern Societies. Seventh Canadian Edition with MySocLab (Toronto: Pearson Education Canada).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meenai, Z. (2003), Empowering Rural Women: An Approach to Empowering Women through Credit-Based Self-Help Groups (Delhi: Aakar Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, J. and Pratt, A. C. (1993), Rural Studies: Modernism, Postmodernism and the ‘Post-Rural’. Journal of Rural Studies, 9(4), 411–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, E. (1996), ‘Feminist Ecological Economics and the Growth of Local Economies’. Paper presented at the Summer Conference on Feminist Economics of the International Association for Feminist Economics, American University, Washington DC, June 1996. http://www.facstaff.bucknell.edu/jshackel/iaffe/papers/Perkins.html, (accessed 11 November 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Prügl, E. (2011), Transforming Masculine Rule: Agriculture and Rural Development in the European Union (University of Michigan Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Quintanilla Barba, C. (rapp.) (2010), Rural Women in Europe. Parliamentery Assembly, (Strasbourg: Committee on Equal Opportunities for Women and Men), http://www.assembly.coe.int.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, C. (1994), Culture, Intellectual Property and Territorial Rural Development’. Sociologia Ruralis, 38(1), 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, W. (eds) (1992), The Development Dictionary: A Guide to Knowledge as Power (London: Zed Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Santrock, J.W. (2007), A Topical Approach to Life-Span Development (New York: McGraw-Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, E.F. (1991), A kicsi szép. Tanulmányok egy emberközpontú közgaz-daságtanról. Budapest: Közgazdasági és Jogi Kiadó).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellamna, N-E. (1999), Relativism in Agricultural Research and Development: Is Participation a Postmodern Concept? Working Paper 119, August 1999 (London: Overseas Development Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shortall, S. and Bock, B. (2014), Introduction: Rural Women in Europe: The Impact of Place and Culture on Gender Mainstreaming the European Rural Development Programme. Gender, Place & Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography. 10.1080/0966369X.2014.917819

    Google Scholar 

  • Soule, M. E. and Lease, G. (eds) (1995), Reinventing Nature? Responses to Postmodern Deconstruction (Washington, DC: Island Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sultana, A. (2011), Patriarchy and Women’s Subordination: A Theoretical Analysis. The Arts Faculty Journal, July 2010–June 2011, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timár, J. (2004), Gendered Urban Policy-Making: The Role of Geographical Scale in Women’s Participation in Hungarian Local Governments, in G. Cortesi, F. Cristaldi and F. Droogleever (eds), Gendered Cities. Identities, Activities, Networks a Life-Course Approach (Rome: Societa Geografica Italiana), 227–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vattimo, G. (1988), The End of Modernity: Nihilism and Hermeneutics in Postmodern Culture. (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, E. (1983), A modern világgazdasági rendszer kialakulása. (Budapest: Gondolat Kiadó).

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, M. (2011), Rural (London, New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 Éva G. Fekete

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fekete, É.G. (2016). Rural Milieus in East-Central Europe — Gendered Attitudes to Post-modern Values. In: Wiest, K. (eds) Women and Migration in Rural Europe. New Geographies of Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-48304-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-48304-1_4

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-58076-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-48304-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics