Disattending Customer Dissatisfaction on Facebook: A Case Study of a Slovenian Public Transport Company

  • Rosina Márquez-Reiter
  • Sara Orthaber
  • Dániel Z. Kádár


In an increasingly mobile and social world, the marketing battle is going digital. A good example was advertising for the 2014 Brazil World Cup.1 Traditional media sectors, including TV and radio, enjoyed their usual advertising revenue but the real winners, in terms of direction of marketing resources and effort, were social media such as Twitter, You Tube and Facebook.


Status Update Computer Mediate Communication Promotional Message Chat Online Page Moderator 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. B. Andrews, 3 June 2014, “Complaining on Twitter may get you better customer service,” Scholar
  2. C. Antaki, 1994, Explaining and arguing: the social organization of accounts (London: Sage).Google Scholar
  3. C. Antaki, E. Ardévol, F. Núñez and A. Vayreda, 2005, “For she who knows who she is: Managing accountability in online forum messages,” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(1).Google Scholar
  4. S. Bruxelles and C. Kerbrat-Orecchioni, 2004, “Coalitions in polylogues,” Journal of Pragmatics, 36(1), 75–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. V. Champoux, J. Dugree and L. McGlynn, 2012, “Corporate Facebook pages: when ‘fans’ attack.” Journal of Business Strategy, 22(2), 22–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. R. Collins, 2004, Interaction ritual chains (Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. L. Dersley, 1998, “Complaining and arguing in everyday conversation,” Unpublished DPhil dissertation, University of York, UK.Google Scholar
  8. D. Edwards, 2005, “Moaning, whinging and laughing: the subjective side of complaints.” Discourse Studies, 7(1), 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. J.J. Gibson, 1979, The ecological approach to perception (London: Houghton Mifflin).Google Scholar
  10. E. Goffman, 1979, “Footing,” Semiotica, 25(1): 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. E Goffman, 1981, Forms of talk (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press).Google Scholar
  12. S. Herring, 2010, “Computer-mediated conversation, Part I: Introduction and overview,” Language@internet, 7, available from .Google Scholar
  13. I. Hutchby, 2001, “Technologies, texts and affordances,” Sociology, 35(2), 441–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. R. Ide, 1998, “Sorry for your kindness: Japanese interactional ritual in public discourse,” Journal of Pragmatics, 29, 509–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. G. Jefferson, 1973, “A case of precision timing in ordinary conversation: over lapped tag-positioned address terms in closing sequences,” Semiotica, 9, 47–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. A.H. Jucker and I. Taavitsainen, 2000, “Diachronic speech act analysis: insults from flyting to flaming.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 1(1), 67–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. D. Kádár, 2013, Relational rituals and communication: ritual interaction in groups (Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. C. Kerbrat-Orecchioni, 2004, “Introducing polylogue,” Journal of Pragmatics, 36(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. J. Lambaise, 2010, “Hanging by a thread: topic development and death in an online discussion of breaking news,” Language@Internet, 7, Article 8.Google Scholar
  20. C.K.M. Lee, 2011, “Micro-blogging and status updates on Facebook: Texts and practices,” in C. Thurlow and K. Mroczek (eds), Digital Discourse: Language in the New Media (New York: Oxford University Press), 110–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. C. Licoppe, 2012, “Understanding mediated apparitions and their proliferation. The case of the phone ring and the ‘crisis of the summons,’” New Media & Society, 14(7), 1073–1091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. C. Licoppe and J. Morel, 2012, “Video-in-interaction: ‘talking heads’ and the multimodal organization of mobile and Skype video calls,” Research in Language and Social Interaction, 45(4), 399–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. W. Glynn Mangold and D.J. Faulds, July–August 2009, “Social media: the new hybrid element of the promotion mix,” Business Horizons, 52(4), 357–365; Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. D.W. Maynard and P.L. Hudak, 2008, “Small talk, high stakes: interactional disat-tentiveness in the context of prosocial doctor—patient interaction,” Language in Society, 37, 661–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. J. Meredith, 2014, “Chatting online: comparing spoken and online written inter action between friends,” Doctoral thesis, Loughborough University.Google Scholar
  26. M. Neurauter-Kessels, 2011, “Im/polite reader responses on British online news sites,” Journal of Politeness Research, 7(2), 187–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. S. Orthaber and R. Márquez-Reiter, 2011, “‘Talk to the hand’; complaints to a public transport company,” Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 3860–3876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. M. Richins, 1983, “Negative word-of-mouth by dissatisfied customers: a pilot study,” Journal of Marketing, 47(1), 68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. E. Rooksby, 2002, E-mail and ethics: style and ethical relations in computer-mediated communication (London: Routledge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. H. Sacks, 1992, Lectures on conversation Vols 1 and 2, edited by Gail Jefferson (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
  31. S. Sigman, 1991, “Handling the discontinuous aspects of continuous social relationships: Toward research on the persistence of social forms,” Communication Theory, 1, 106–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. J. Schönfeldt and A. Golato, 2003, “Repair in chats: a conversation analytic approach,” Research on Language and Social Interaction, 36(3), 241–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Slovenian Railways, 2012, Summary of the Annual Report . Retrieved from: Scholar
  34. J.B. Walther and J. Jang, 2012, “Communication processes in participatory websites,” Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 18, 2–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Rosina Márquez-Reiter, Sara Orthaber and Dániel Z. Kádár 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rosina Márquez-Reiter
  • Sara Orthaber
  • Dániel Z. Kádár

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations