Institutionalism and Organizational Change

  • Sara Diogo
  • Teresa Carvalho
  • Alberto Amaral


Institutional theory usually refers to a broad group of perspectives that interpret the relationship between institutions and human behaviour, assuming that not only human actions (i.e. behaviour, perceptions, power, policy preferences, decision-making processes) shape institutions, but these are also influenced by them. More specifically, institutionalism focuses on the need of organizations to adapt to their institutional environment, such as norms, rules and understandings about what is an acceptable or normal behaviour and that cannot be changed easily and/or instantaneously (March and Olsen, 1984; Meyer and Rowan, 1977). It argues that organizations take rules and norms for granted because they seem obvious or natural. Failure to act in accordance with norms and expectations may lead to conflict and illegitimacy. Changes occurring at the institutional field of higher education (HE) are said to increasingly constrain higher education institutions (HEIs). Given this, it is increasingly relevant to analyse the development of institutionalist theories and the way they have been adapted to the HE field.


Institutional Theory Institutional Actor High Education Policy Historical Institutionalism European High Education Area 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Amaral, A., Jones, G. and B. Karseth (eds) (2002) Governing Higher Education: National Perspectives on Institutional Governance (Dordrecht: Springer).Google Scholar
  2. Amaral, A. and A. Magalhães (2003) ‘The triple crisis of the university and its reinvention’, Higher Education Policy, 16(2), 239–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aspinwall, M. D. and G. Schneider (2000) ‘Same menu, separate tables: the institutionalist turn in political science and the study of European integration’, European Journal of Political Research, 38(1), 1–36.Google Scholar
  4. Bell, S. (2002) ‘Institutionalism’, in J. Summers (ed) Government, Politics, Power and Policy in Australia (pp. 363–380) (Melbourne: Pearson Education Australia).Google Scholar
  5. Bess, J. and J. Dee (2008) ‘The application of organizational theory to colleges and universities’, in Understanding College and University Organization: Theories of Effective Policy and Practice VI (pp. 1–17) (Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing).Google Scholar
  6. Bevir, M. (2009) Key Concepts in Governance (Los Angeles: SAGE).Google Scholar
  7. Bleiklie, I. and M. Kogan (2007) ‘Organization and governance of universities’, Higher Education Policy, 20, 477–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bruckmann, S. and T. Carvalho (2014) ‘The reform process of Portuguese higher education institutions: from collegial to managerial governance’, Tertiary Education and Management, 30(3), 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carvalho, T. and R. Santiago (2010a) ‘Still academics after all’, Higher Education Policy, 23, 397–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carvalho, T. and R. Santiago (2010b) ‘New public management and “middle management”: how do deans influence institutional policies?’, in L. Meek, L. Goedegebuure, R. Santiago and T. Carvalho (eds) The Changing Dynamics of Higher Education Middle Management (pp. 165–196) (Dordrecht: Springer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carvalho, T. (2014) ‘Changing connections between professionalism and managerialism: a case study of nursing in Portugal’, Professions and Organization, 1(2), 1–15.Google Scholar
  12. Chaui, M. (1999) ‘A universidade em ruínas’, in H. Trindade (ed) Universidade em ruiìnas na repuìblica dos professors (pp. 211–222) (Petrópolis: Editora Vozes).Google Scholar
  13. Clark, B. (ed) (1970) The Distinctive College (Chicago: Aldine).Google Scholar
  14. Clark, B. (1972) ‘The organizational saga in higher education’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(2), 178–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clark, B. (ed) (1998) Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation (New York: International Association of Universities Press/Pergamon: Elsevier Science).Google Scholar
  16. Clark, B. (2004) ‘Delineating the character of the entrepreneurial university’, Higher Education Policy, 17(4), 355–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cohen, M., March, J. and J. Olsen (1972) ‘A garbage can model of organizational choice’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cohen, M. and J. March (1974) Leadership and Ambiguity: The American College President (New York: McGraw-Hill).Google Scholar
  19. DiMaggio, P. and W. Powell (1983) (eds) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
  20. Diogo, S. (2014a) ‘Implementing the Bologna Process in Portugal and in Finland: national and institutional realities in perspective’, Journal of the European Higher Education Area, 1(1), 35–54.Google Scholar
  21. Ferlie, E., Musselin, C. and G. Andresani (2008) ‘The steering of higher education systems: a public management perspective’, Higher Education, 56(3), 325–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fligstein, N. (2008) ‘Fields, Power and Social Skill: A Critical Analysis of the New Institutionalisms’, Center for Culture, Organizations and Politics. UC Berkeley: Center for Culture, Organizations and Politics. Retrieved from: Scholar
  23. Fumasoli, T. and B. Stensaker (2013) ‘Organizational studies in higher education: a reflection on historical themes and prospective trends’, Higher Education Policy, 26, 479–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gornitzka, Å. (1999) ‘Governmental policies and organisational change’, Higher Education, 38(1), 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Greenwood, R. and C. Hinings (1993) ‘Understanding strategic change: the contribution of archetypes’, The Academy of Management Journal, 36(5), 1052–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K. and R. Suddaby (eds) (2008) ‘Introduction’, The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 1–46) (London: SAGE Publications Ltd).Google Scholar
  27. Hall, P. and R. Taylor (1996) ‘Political science and the three new institutionalisms’, Political Studies, 44(5), 936–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hannan, T. and J. Freeman (1977) ‘The population ecology of organizations’, The American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 929–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hodgson, G. (2008) ‘The emergence of the idea of institutions as repositories of knowledge’, in A. Ebner and N. Beck (eds) The Institutions of the Market: Organizations, Social Systems, and Governance (pp. 23–40) (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kaplan, G. (2006) ‘Institutions of academic governance and institutional theory: a framework for further research’, in J. C. Smart (ed) Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Volume XXI (pp. 213–281) (Dordrecht: Springer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Koelble, T. (1995) ‘The new institutionalism in political science and sociology’, Comparative Politics, 27(2), 231–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lounsbury, M. and M. Ventresca (2003) ‘The new structuralism in organizational theory’, Organization, 10(3), 457–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mahoney, J. and K. Thelen (eds) (2010) Explaining Institutional Change — Ambiguity, Agency, and Power (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  34. March, J. and J. Olsen (eds) (1989) Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics (New York, NY: Free Press).Google Scholar
  35. March, J. and J. Olsen (1984) ‘The new institutionalism: organizational factors in political life’, The American Political Science Review, 78(3), 734–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. March, J. and J. Olsen (2005) ‘Elaborating the new institutionalism’, Working Paper, 11, retrieved November 2014.Google Scholar
  37. Meyer, J. and B. Rowan (1977) ‘Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony’, American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Meyer, J. and B. Rowan (1985) ‘The structure of educational organizations’, in J. Meyer, and R. Scott (eds) Organizational Environments: Rituals and Rationality (pp. 71–97) (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage).Google Scholar
  39. Meyer, J. and R. Scott (1983) Organizational Environments (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage).Google Scholar
  40. Meyer, J., Ramirez, F., Frank, D. and E. Schofer (2008) ‘Higher education as an institution’, in P. Gumport (ed) Sociology of Higher Education: Contributions and Their Contexts (pp. 187–221) (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar
  41. Nagel, A., Martens, K. and M. Windzio (2010) ‘Introduction — education policy in transformation’, in K. Martens, K. Nagel, M. Windzio and A. Weymann (eds) Transformation of Education Policy (pp. 3–27) (Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar
  42. Neave, G. (ed) (2012) The Evaluative State, Institutional Autonomy and Re-engineering Higher Education in Western Europe. The Prince and His Pleasure (Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar
  43. Nóvoa, A. and T. Yariv-Mashal (2003) ‘Comparative research in education: a mode of governance or a historical journey?’, Comparative Education, 39(4), 423–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ordorika, I. (2014) ‘Governance and change in higher education: the debate between classical political sociology, new institutionalism and critical theories’, Bordon, 66(1), 107–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Souto-Otero, M., Fleckenstein, T. and R. Dacombe (2008) ‘Filling in the gaps: European governance, the open method of coordination and the European commission’, Journal of Education Policy, 23(3), 231–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pietilä, M. (2014) ‘The many faces of research profiling: academic leaders’ conceptions of research steering’, Higher Education, 67, 303–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Parsons, T. (1956) ‘Suggestions for a sociological approach to the theory of organizations’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 1, 63–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pfeffer, J. and G. Salancik (eds) (1978) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (New York: Harper & Row).Google Scholar
  49. Pollack, M. (2009) ‘The new institutionalisms and European integration’, in A. Wiener and T. Diez (eds) European Integration Theory (pp. 125–144) (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  50. Powell, W. (2007) ‘The new institutionalism’, The International Encyclopedia of Organization Studies (Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications).Google Scholar
  51. Ramirez, F. (2012) ‘The world society perspective: concepts, assumptions and strategies’, Comparative Education, 48(4), 423–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Scott, R. (2001) Institutions and Organizations (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage).Google Scholar
  53. Selznick, P. (1948) ‘Foundations of the theory of organizations’, American Sociological Review, 13(1), 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Selznick, P. (1957) Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar
  55. Simon, R. A. (1947) Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization (New York: The Macmillan Co).Google Scholar
  56. Thoenig, J. C. (2012) ‘Institutional theories and public institutions: traditions and appropriateness’, in G. Peters and J. Pierre (eds) Handbook of Public Administration (pp. 127–138) (Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Knowledge).Google Scholar
  57. Thornton, P. and W. Ocasio (2008) ‘Institutional logics’, in R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin and R. Suddaby (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 99–129) (Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tolbert, P. and L. Zucker (1996) ‘The institutionalization of institutional theory’, in S. Clegg, C. Hardy and W. Nord (eds) Handbook of Organization Studies (pp. 175–190) (London: SAGE).Google Scholar
  59. Veiga, A. (2010) Bologna and the Institutionalisation of the European Higher Education Area, Doctoral Dissertation (Porto: University of Porto).Google Scholar
  60. Veiga, A. and A. Amaral (2012) ‘Soft law and implementation problems of the Bologna process’, Educação, Sociedade e Culturas, 36, 121–140.Google Scholar
  61. Välimaa, J. (2005) ‘Social dynamics of higher education reforms: the case of Finland’, in Å. Gornitzka, M. Kogan and A. Amaral (eds) Reform and Change in Higher Education. Analysing Policy Implementation (pp. 245–269) (Dordrecht: Springer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Weick, K. (1976) ‘Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Whitley, R. and J. Gläser (eds) (2014) Organizational Transformation and Scientific Change: The Impact of Institutional Restructuring on Universities and Intellectual Innovation (Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited).Google Scholar
  64. Williamson, O. (1981) ‘The economics of organization: the transaction cost approach’, American Journal of Sociology, 87(3), 548–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Witte, J. (2006) Change of Degrees and Degrees of Change: Comparing Adaptations of European Higher Education Systems in the Context of the Bologna Process, Doctoral Dissertation (Twente: Center for Higher Education Policy Studies, University of Twente).Google Scholar
  66. Zucker, L. (1977) ‘The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence’, American Sociological Review, 42, 726–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Sara Diogo, Teresa Carvalho and Alberto Amaral 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sara Diogo
  • Teresa Carvalho
  • Alberto Amaral

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations