Global University Rankings, an Alternative and Their Impacts

  • Don F. Westerheijden

Abstract

Rankings have been debated in higher education since more than two decades, when the US News & World Report made an impact on the higher education community with its first college ranking. The debate reached new heights of intensity since global university rankings appeared, shortly after the turn of the century. This chapter will focus on the rise of those global university2 rankings, and as I am a member of the team that developed U-Multirank (full disclosure), I will present U-Multirank as an alternative to the first three global university rankings: the Shanghai Academic Ranking of World Universities, the Times Higher Education (THE) World University Rankings and the QS World University Rankings. Besides methodological issues, in this chapter I will give attention to the impacts these rankings have, including U-Multirank. As the findings regarding impacts turn out to be not unequivocally positive, should we stop producing or reading them — will there be a fall of rankings?

Keywords

Europe Income Marketing Decid OECD 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allison, G. and P. Zelikow (1999) Essence of Decision (2nd ed) (New York: Longman).Google Scholar
  2. AUBR Expert Group. (2009). Assessing Europe’s University-Based Research — Draft. s.l. [Brussels]: European Commission — DG Research.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, G. S. (ed) (1976) The Economic Approach to Human Behavior (Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
  4. Bonoma, T. V., Tedeschi, J. T. and S. Lindskold (1972) ‘A note regarding an expected value model of social power’, Behavioral Science, 17, 221–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Calaprice, A. (ed) (2010) The Ultimate Quotable Einstein (Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
  6. Cremonini, L., Westerheijden, D. F., Benneworth, P. and H. Dauncey (2014) ‘In the shadow of celebrity? World-Class university policies and public value in higher education’, Higher Education Policy, 27, 341–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cremonini, L., Westerheijden, D. F. and J. Enders (2008) ‘Disseminating the right information to the right audience: Cultural determinants in the use (and Misuse) of rankings’, Higher Education, 55, 373–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Vree, J. K. (1982) Foundations of Social and Political Processes: The Dynamics of Human Behaviour, Politics, and Society (Bilthoven, NL: Prime Press).Google Scholar
  9. Dill, D. D. (2009) ‘Convergence and diversity: The role and influence of university rankings’, in B. M. Kehm and B. Stensaker (eds) University Rankings, Diversity, and the New Landscape of Higher Education (pp. 97–116) (Rotterdam; Boston; Taipeh: Sense Publishers).Google Scholar
  10. Dill, D. D. and M. Soo (2005) ‘Academic quality, league tables, and public policy: A cross-national analysis of university ranking systems’, Higher Education, 49, 495–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dulleck, U. and R. Kerschbamer (2006) ‘On doctors, mechanics and computer specialists: The economics of credence goods’, Journal of Economic Literature, 44 (1), 5–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Filliatreau, G. and M. Zitt (s.a.). Big Is (made) Beautiful Some Comments about the Shanghai Ranking of World-Class Universities. s.l. [Paris]: OST.Google Scholar
  13. Friedman, T. L. (2005) The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux).Google Scholar
  14. Hazelkorn, E. (2011) Rankings and the Reshaping of Higher Education: The Battle for World-Class Excellence (London: Palgrave Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hazelkorn, E., Loukkola, T. and T. Zhang (2014) Rankings in Institutional Strategies and Processes: Impact or Illusion? (Brussels: EUA).Google Scholar
  16. Hicks, D. (2004). The Four Literatures of Social Science, in Moed, H. F., Glänzel, W. & U. Schmoch (eds.), Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research: The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems (pp. 473–496) (Dordrecht etc.: Springer).Google Scholar
  17. Kreps, D. M. (1990) A Course in Micro-Economic Theory (New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf).Google Scholar
  18. Loukkola, T. and R. Morais (2015) EUA Members’ Participation in U-Multirank: Experiences from the First Round (Brussels: EUA).Google Scholar
  19. Marginson, S. (2008) Global, Multiple and Engaged: Has the ‘Idea of a University’ Changed in the Era of the Global Knowledge Economy? Paper presented at the Fifth International Workshop on Higher Education Reforms ‘The Internationalization of Higher Education and Higher Education Reforms’, Shanghai.Google Scholar
  20. Moed, H. F. (2005). Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation (Dordrecht: Springer).Google Scholar
  21. Müller-Böling, D. and G. Federkeil (2007) ‘The CHE-Ranking of German, Swiss and Austrian Universities’, in J. Sadlak and L. N. Cai (eds) The World-Class University an Ranking: Aiming Beyond Status (pp. 189–203) (Bucharest: CEPES).Google Scholar
  22. Nora, A. (2004) ‘The role of habitus and cultural capital in choosing a college, transition-ing from high school to higher education, and persisting in college among minority and nonminority students’, Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 3(2), 180–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Reay, D., Davies, J., David, M. and S. J. Ball (2001) ‘Choices of degree or degrees of choice? class, “Race” and the higher education choice process’, Sociology, 35, 855–874.Google Scholar
  24. Saisana, M. and B. D’Hombres (2008) Higher Education Rankings: Robustness Issues and Critical Assessment. How Much Confidence Can We Have in Higher Education Rankings? (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities).Google Scholar
  25. Salmi, J. (2009) The Challenge of Establishing World-Class Universities (Washington, DC: World Bank).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shields, R. (2013). ‘Globalization and international student mobility: A network analysis’, Comparative Education Review, 7(4), 609–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Simon, H. A. (1957) Models of Man (New York: Wiley).Google Scholar
  28. Stigler, G. J. (1961) ‘The economics of information’, Journal of Political Economy, LXIX, 213–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Trow, M. (1974) ‘Problems in the transition from elite to mass higher education’, in OECD (ed) Policies for Higher Education (pp. 51–101) (Paris: OECD).Google Scholar
  30. University of Oregon (2015) ‘Definition of Diversity’, http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~asuomca/diversityinit/definition.html, accessed 2015–03–14.
  31. Usher, A. and M. Savino (2006) A World of Difference: A Global Survey of University League Ta bles (Toronto: Educational Policy Institute).Google Scholar
  32. Van Leeuwen, T. N., Moed, H. F., Tijssen, R. J. W., Visser, M. S., & A. F. J. van Raan, (2001). ‘Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequences for international comparisons of national research performance’, Scientometrics, 51, 335–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. van Vught, F. A. (2008) ‘Mission diversity and reputation in higher education’, Higher Education Policy, 21(2), 151–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. van Vught, F. A. and F. Ziegele (eds) (2012) Multidimensional Ranking: The Design and Development of U-Multirank (Dordrecht etc.: Springer).Google Scholar
  35. Vossensteyn, J. J. (2005) Perceptions of Student Price-Responsiveness: A Behavioural Economics Exploration of the Relationships Between Socio-Economic Status, Perceptions of Financial Incentives and Student Choice (Enschede: CHEPS).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Don F. Westerheijden 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Don F. Westerheijden

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations