Skip to main content

Abstract

Information and communications technologies (ICTs) have had a tremendous impact on science (Selwyn, 2014). They have enabled scientists from fields as diverse as physics and economics to carry out studies that would have been inconceivable half a century ago, and they have brought forth a significant amount of new knowledge. Nevertheless, these technologies have so far only had a moderate effect on higher education and higher education institutions (HEIs) (Bates, 2014). Although educators have made use of presentation software and made teaching material available online, and administrators have made use of learning management systems and used the Internet to recruit new groups of students, the HEIs themselves and the teaching methods they employ have remained largely the same (Bates, 2014; Daniel, 1996). However, this might be about to change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allen, I. E. and J. Seaman (2014) Grade Change. Tracking Online Education in the United States (Wellesley, MA: Babson College/Sloan Foundation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacow, L. S., Bowen, W. G., Guthrie, K. M., Lack, K. A. and M. P. Long (2012) Barriers to Adoption of Online Learning Systems in U.S. Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.sr.ithaka.org/sites/default/files/reports/barriers-to-adoption-of-online-learning-systems-in-us-higher-education.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baggaley, J. (2013) ‘MOOC rampant’, Distance Education, 34(3), 368–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, T. (2014) Teaching in a Digital Age. Open Textbook. Retrieved from http://opentextbc.ca/teachinginadigitalage/

  • Baumol, W. and W. Bowen (1966) Performing Arts, The Economic Dilemma: A Study of Problems Common to Theater, Opera, Music, and Dance (New York: Twentieth Century Fund).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, W. G. (2013) Higher Education in the Digital Age (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bower, J. and C. M. Christensen (1995) ‘Disruptive technologies: Catching the wave’, Harvard Business Review, 73(1), 43–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breslow L., Pritchard, D., E., DeBoer, J., Stump, G, S., Andrew, Ho, D. and D., T. Seaton (2013) ‘Studying Learning in the Worldwide Classroom: Research into edX’s First MOOC’, Research and Practice in Assessment, Volume Eight.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusilovsky, P. and C. Peylo (2003) ‘Adaptive and intelligent web based educational systems’, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 13, 156–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canals, E. and Y. Mor (2014) MOOCs for Web Talent Network. Final report. European Commission. http://openeducationeuropa.eu/sites/default/files/Final%20Report_Web skillsMOOCs.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, D. M. (2008) ‘A Journey to Legitimacy: The Historical Development of Distance Education Through Technology’, TechTrends: Linking Research and Practice to Improve Learning, 52(2), 45–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M. (1997) The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail (Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M. and M. E. Raynor (2003) The Innovator’s Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth (Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • De Freitas, S. (2013) The Final Frontiers for Higher Education? Coventry University. Retrieved http://benhur.teluq.uquebec.ca/ted/Ressources/mooc.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, J. S. (1996) Mega-Universities and Knowledge Media. Technology Strategies for Higher Education (London: Kogan Page).

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist (2014, June 28), ‘Creative destruction,’ Leader.

    Google Scholar 

  • EFQUEL (2011) Unique. European Universities Quality in e-Learning. Information Package. EFQUEL, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaebel, M., Kupriyanova, V., Morais, R. and E. Colucci (2014) E-learning in European Higher Education Institutions: Results of a Mapping Survey Conducted in October–December2013 (Brussels: European University Association).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaebel, M. (2014) MOOCs — Massive Open Online Courses (Brussels: European University Association).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamdan, N., McKnight, P., McKnight, K. and K. M. Arfström (2013) A Review of Flipped Learning, Flipped learning network 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, A. D., Reich, J., Nesterko, S., Seaton, D. T., Mullaney, T., Waldo, J. and I. Chuang (2014) HarvardX and MITx: The first year of open online courses (HarvardX and MITx Working Paper No. 1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollands, F. and D. Tirthali (2014a) ‘Why do institutions offer MOOCs?’ Online Learning (formerly Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks), 18(3), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollands, F. M. and D. Tirthali (2014b) MOOCs: Expectations and Reality. Full Report. Center for Benefit-Cost Studies of Education, Teachers College, Columbia University, http://cbcse.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/MOOCs_Expectations_and_Reality.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn Academy, https://www.khanacademy.org/.

  • Lage, M. J., Platt G. J. and M. Teglia (2000) ‘Inverting the classroom. A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment’, Journal of Economic Education, Winter, 30–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, P. and G. Siemens (2011) Penetrating the Fog: Analytics in Learning and Education. EDUCAUSE Review, 46(5), 30–32, from http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/penetrating-fog-analytics-learning-and-education.

  • Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M. and K. Jones (2010) Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies (Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development Policy and Program Student Service).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, A. (2013) Learning From MOOCs Inside Higher Ed 24.1.2013. Retrieved at https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2013/01/24/essay-what-professors-can-learn-moocs.

  • NMC Horizon Report: 2014 Higher Education Edition. Retrieved at: www.nmc.org.

  • NOU 2014: 5 MOOCs for Norway — New Digital Learning Methods in Higher Education, The Ministry of Education and Research. Retrieved from https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/ff86edace9874505a3381b5daf6848e6/en-gb/pdfs/nou20142014000 5000en_pdfs.pdf.

  • OECD (2012) Connected Minds: Technology and Today’s Learners, Educational Research and Innovation (Paris: OECD Publishing).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Özyurt, Ö., Özyurt, H., Baki, A. & Güven, B.(2013) ‘Integration into mathematics classroom of an adaptive and intelligent individualized e-learning environment: implementation and evaluation of UZWEBMAT’, Computers in Human Behvior, 29, 726–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pappano, L. (2012) ‘The year of the MOOC’, New York Times, November 4, Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com.

  • Prestidge, S. (2012) ‘The Beliefs behind the teacher that influences their ICT practices’, Computers and Education, 58, 449–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romero, C., Ventura, S., Zafra, A. and P. de Bra (2009) ‘Applying web usage mining for personalizing hyperlinks in web-based adaptive educational systems’, Computers and Education, 53, 828–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N. (2014) Distrusting Educational Technology. Critical Questions for Changing Times (Abingdon: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, J., C. R., Chu, H-C., H., G-J. & Tsai, C-C. (2008) ‘Development of an adaptive learning system with two sources of personalization information’, Computers & Education, 51, 776–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (2012) Learning Analytics. Policy Brief. UNESCO Institute for Information Technology in Education, November 2012, available at http://iite.unesco.org/policy_briefs/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, D. (2014) Koller, Thicke, and Noble: The ‘Blurred Lines’ Between Traditional Online Courses and MOOCs, from http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/3703.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. R. (2013) Beyond the MOOC Hype: A Guide to Higher Education’s High-Tech Disruption (Washington, DC: The Chronicle of Higher Education).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Arne M. Fevolden and Cathrine E. Tømte

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fevolden, A.M., Tømte, C.E. (2015). How Information and Communication Technology Is Shaping Higher Education. In: Huisman, J., de Boer, H., Dill, D.D., Souto-Otero, M. (eds) The Palgrave International Handbook of Higher Education Policy and Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-45617-5_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics