Research, Development and Innovation: International, National and Regional Perspectives

  • Fumi Kitagawa


University research has undergone profound transformation over the past three decades. Some of the well-known theses and models about the transformation in the academic system and the changing nature of science — such as the ‘Mode 2’ of knowledge production (Gibbons et al., 1994; Nowotny, Scott and Gibbons, 2001) and the ‘triple helix’ (Etzkowitz and Leydesdorff, 1997) model of interactions between government, university and industry — present broad pictures of the transformation of academic and research organization. In addition, in many parts of the world, universities are acknowledged to be important contributors to economic growth and crucial elements of ‘national innovation systems’ (Edquist, 2005; Mowery and Sampat, 2005; Nelson and Rosenberg, 1993) via the different mechanisms of academic knowledge transfers and exchanges at local, national and international level.


Triple Helix High Education System National Innovation System High Education Policy Regional Innovation System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abreu, M., Grinevich, V., Hughes, A. and M. Kitson (2009) Knowledge Exchange between Academics and the Business, Public and Third Sectors (UK Innovation Research Centre: University of Cambridge and Imperial College London).Google Scholar
  2. Benner, M. and U. Sandstrom (2000) ‘Institutionalization of triple helix: research funding and norms in academic system’, Research Policy, 29(2), 291–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bercovitz, J. and M. P. Feldman (2006) ‘Entrepreneurial universities and technology transfer: a conceptual framework for understanding knowledge-based economic development’, Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(1), 175–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bruneel, J., D’Este, P. and A. Salter (2010) ‘Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university-industry collaboration’, Research Policy, 39(7), 858–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Charles, D., Kitagawa, F. and E. Uyarra (2014) ‘Universities in crisis?: new challenges and strategies in two english city-regions’, Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 7(2), 327–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark, B. R. (1998) Creating the Entrepreneurial University (Oxford: IAU Press/Pergammon).Google Scholar
  7. Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. and J. Walsh (2002) ‘Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R & D’, Management Science, 48(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (2003) The Role of the Universities in the Europe of Knowledge, COM (2003) 58 final (Brussels: CEC).Google Scholar
  9. Cooke, P., Uranga, M. and G. Etxebarria (1997) ‘Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions’, Research Policy, 26(4–5).Google Scholar
  10. Deem, R. (1998) ‘New managerialism in higher education — the management of performances and cultures in universities’, International Studies in the Sociology of Education, 8(1), 47–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Deem, R., Hullyard, S. and Reed, M. (2007) Knowledge, Higher Education and the New Managerialism: The Changing Management of UK Universities (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. D’Este, P. and Patel, P. (2007) University — industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? Research Policy 36: 1295–1313.Google Scholar
  13. Dill, D. (2014) ‘Public policy design and university reform: insights into academic change’, in C. Musselin and P. N. Teixeira (eds) Reforming Higher Education: Public Policy Design and Implementation (pp. 21–37) (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dill, D. and F. van Vught (2010) National Innovation and the Academic Research Enterprise: Public Policy in Global Perspective (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar
  15. Edquist, C (2005) ‘Systems of innovation: perspectives and challenges’, in J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery and R. R. Nelson (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (pp. 181–208) (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  16. Etzkowitz, H. (2002) MIT and the Rise of Entrepreneurial Science. (London and New York: Routledge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Etzkowitz, H. (1998) ‘The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university–industry linkages’, Research Policy, 27(8), 823–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Etzkowitz, H. and L. Leydesdorff (eds) (1997) Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy: A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations (London: Pinter).Google Scholar
  19. European Commission (EC) (2011) Connecting Universities to Regional Growth (CEC, Brussels: European Commission).Google Scholar
  20. Feldman, M. and P. Desrochers (2003) ‘Research universities and local economic development: lessons from the history of the Johns Hopkins university’, Industry & Innovation, 10(1), 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Geiger, R. L. and C. M. Sá (2008) Tapping the Riches of Science: Universities and the Promise of Economic Growth (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  22. Gertner, D., Roberts, J. and D. Charles (2011) ‘University-industry collaboration: a CoP approach to KTP’, Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(4), 625–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Geuna, A (1999) The Economics of knowledge production: Funding and the structure of university research. (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).Google Scholar
  24. Geuna, A. and B. Martin (2003) ‘University research evaluation and funding: an international comparison’, Minerva, 41(4), 277–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Geuna, A. and A. Muscio (2009) ‘The governance of university knowledge transfer: a critical review of the literature’, Minerva, 47(1), 93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P. and M. Trow (1994) The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies (London: Sage).Google Scholar
  27. Goddard, J., Coombes, M., Kempton, L. and P. Vallance (2014) ‘Universities as anchor institutions in cities in a turbulent funding environment: vulnerable institutions and vulnerable places in England’, Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 7(2), 307–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gornitzka, A. and M. Massen (2000) ‘Hybrid steering approaches with respect to European higher education’, Higher Educaiton Policy, 13(3), 267–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harrison, R. and C. Leitch (2010) ‘Voodoo institution or entrepreneurial university? spin-off companies, the entrepreneurial system and regional development in the UK’, Regional Studies, 44(9), 1241–1262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hazelkorn, E. (2011) Rankings and the Reshaping of Higher Education: The Battle for World-Class Excellence (London: Palgrave MacMillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Healy A., Perkman M., Goddard J. and L. Kempton (2014) HYPERLINK “/curds/publications/publication/210569”“view complete information on this publication” Measuring the Impact of University-Business Cooperation: Final Report. Brussels: Directorate General for Education and Culture, European Commission.
  32. Hellstrom, T. (2011) ‘Homing in on excellence: dimensions of appraisal in Center of Excellence program evaluations’, Evaluation, 17(2), 117–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Henderson, R., Jaffe, A. and M. Trajtenberg (1998) ‘Universities as a source of commercial technology: a detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965–1988’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(1), 119–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Henkel, M. (1999) ‘The modernisation of research evaluation: the case of the UK’, Higher Education, 38(1), 105–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hicks, D. (2012) ‘Performance based university research funding systems’, Research Policy, 41(2), 251–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Himanen, L., Auranen, O., Puuska, H-M. and M. Mieminen (2009) ‘Influence of research funding and science policy on university research performance: a comparison of five countries’, Science and Public Policy, 36(6), 419–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hood, C. (2004) ‘Conclusion: making sense of controls over government’, in C. Hood, O. James, B. G. Peters and C. Scott (eds) Controlling Modern Government: Variety, Commonality, and Change (pp. 185–205) (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Howells, J., Ramlogan, R. and S-L. Cheng (2012) ‘Innovation and university collaboration: paradox and complexity within the knowledge economy’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 36(3), 703–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Huggins, R., Johnston, A. and C. Stride (2012) ‘Knowledge networks and universities: locational and organisational aspects of knowledge transfer interactions’, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development: An International Journal, 24(7–8), 475–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hughes, A. (2011) ‘Open innovation, the Haldane principle and the new production of knowledge: science policy and university–industry links in the UK after the financial crisis’, Prometheus, 29(4), 411–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hughes, A., Kitson, M., Bullock, A. and I. Millner (2013) The Dual Funding Structure for Research in the UK: Research Council and Funding Council Allocation Methods and the Pathways to Impact of UK Academics, A report from CBR/UK~IRC to BIS.Google Scholar
  42. Jacob, M. and L. Meek (2013) ‘Scientific mobility and international research networks: trends and policy tools for promoting research excellence and capacity building’, Studies in Higher Education, 38(3), 331–344(14), Special issue: Research Universities: Networking the Knowledge Economy.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jongbloed, B. and H. Vossensteyn (2001) ‘Keeping up performances: an international survey of performance-based funding in higher education’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 23(2), 127–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jongbloed, B. and A. Zomer (2011) ‘Valorisation, knowledge transfer and IP: creating value from academic knowledge’, in P. Temple (ed) Universities in the Knowledge Economy: Higher Education Organisation and Global Change (pp. 82–102) (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
  45. Kitagawa, F. (2005) ‘Entrepreneurial universities and the development of regional societies: a spatial view of the Europe of knowledge’, Higher Education Management and Policy, 17(3), 65–90, Special Issue on Entrepreneurship Paris: OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kitagawa, F. and J. Oba (2010) ‘Managing differentiation of higher education system in Japan: connecting excellence and diversity’, Higher Education, 59(4), 507–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Klofsten, M. and D. Jones-Evans (2000) ‘Comparing academic entrepreneurship in Europe — the case of Sweden and Ireland’, Small Business Economics, 14(4), 299–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lam, A. and B-A. Lundvall (2006) ‘The learning organisation and national systems of competence building and innovation’, in E. Lorenz and B. Lundvall (eds) How European Economies Learn: Coordinating Competing Models (pp. 109–139) (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  49. Laredo, P. (2007) ‘Revisiting the third mission of universities: towards a renewed categorisation of university activities?’ Higher Education Policy, 20(4), 441–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Laursen, K., Reichtein, T. and A. Salter (2011) ‘Exploring the effect of geographical proximity and university quality on university–industry collaboration in the United Kingdom’, Regional Studies, 45(4), 507–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lawton Smith, H. (2007) ‘Universities, innovation and territorial development: a review of the evidence’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 25(1), 98–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lawton Smith, H., Chapman, D., Wood, P., Barnes, T. and R. Saverio (2014) ‘Entrepreneurial academics and regional innovation systems: the case of spin-offs from London’s universities’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 32(2), 341–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lester, R. (2005) Universities, Innovation and the Competitiveness of Local Economies: A Summary Report from the Local Innovation Systems Project — Phase I. Retrieved December 23, 2014, from–010.pdf.Google Scholar
  54. Lee, G. E-J. (2000) ‘Brain Korea 21: a development-oriented national policy in Korean higher education’, International Higher Education, 19(Spring).Google Scholar
  55. Levin, R. (2010) The Rise of Asia’s Universities, HEPI Lecturer 2010. Retrieved December 23, 2014, from Scholar
  56. Leydesdorff, L. and M. Meyer (2010) ‘The decline of university patenting and the end of the Bayh-Dole effect’, Scientometric, 83(2), 355–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lucas, L. (2009) ‘Research management and research cultures: power and productivity’, in A. Brew and L. Lucas (eds) Academic Research and Researchers (pp. 66–79) (Maidenhead: SRHE/Open University Press).Google Scholar
  58. Marginson, S. and M. Considine (2000) The Enterprise University: Power, Governance and Re-invention in Australia (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  59. Martin, B. (2003) ‘The changing social contract for science and the evolution of the university’, in A. Geuna, A. Salter and W. E. Steinmueller (eds) Science and Innovation: Rethinking the Rationale for Funding and Governance (pp. 7–29) (London, UK: Edward Elgar).Google Scholar
  60. McNay, I (1999) ‘The paradoxes of research assessment and funding’, in M. Henkel and B. Little (eds) Changing Relationships between Higher Education and the State (pp. 191–203) (London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers).Google Scholar
  61. Meek, L. and D. Davies (2009) ‘Policy dynamics in higher education and research: concepts and observations’, Higher Education, Research and Innovation: Changing Dynamics, Report on the UNESCO Forum on Higher Education, Research and Knowledge 2001–2009. Retrieved November 20, 2014, from Scholar
  62. Merton, R. (1942) ‘The normative structures of science’, in R. K. Merton (ed) The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, 1973 (pp. 267–78) (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
  63. Molas-Gallart, J. and E. Castro-Martinnez (2007) ‘Ambiguity and conflict in the development of “Third Mission” indicators’, Research Evaluation, 16(4), 321–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Montesinos, P., Carot, J. M., Martinez, J-M. and M. Francisco (2008) ‘Third mission ranking for world class universities: beyond teaching and research’, Higher Education in Europe, 33(2/3), 259–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Mowery, D. and B. N. Sampat (2005) ‘Universities in national innovation systems’, in J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery and R. R. Nelson (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (pp. 209–239) (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  66. Nedeva, M. (2013) ‘Between the global and the national: organising European science’, Research Policy, 42(1), 220–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Nelson, R. and N. Rosenberg (1993) ‘Technical innovation and national systems’, in R. Nelson (ed) National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis (pp. 3–22) (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  68. Nelson, R. R. (2001) ‘Observations on the post-Bayh-Dole rise of patenting at American universities’, The journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1), 13–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Nowotny, H., Scott, P. and M. Gibbons (2001) Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty (Cambridge: Polity).Google Scholar
  70. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2003) Turning Science into Business: Patenting and Licensing at Public Research (Paris: OECD).Google Scholar
  71. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2007) Higher Education and Regions, Globally Competitive, Locally Engaged (Paris: OECD).Google Scholar
  72. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2014) Promoting Research Excellence: New Approaches to Funding (Paris: OECD).Google Scholar
  73. Pavitt, K. (1998) ‘The Social Shaping of the National Science Base’, Research Policy, 27(8): 793–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., Fini, R., Geuna, A., Grimaldi, R., Hughes, A., Krabel, S., Kitson, M., Llerena, P., Lissoni, F., Salter, A. and M. Sobrero (2013) ‘Academic engagement and commercialisation: a review of the literature on university–industry relations’, Research Policy, 42(2), 423–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Perkmann, M. and K. Walsh (2007) ‘University-industry relationships and open innovation: towards a research agenda’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4), 259–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Perry, B. and T. May (2007) ‘Governance, science policy and regions: an introduction’, Regional Studies, 41(8), 1039–1050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Pinheiro, R., Geschwind, L. and T. Aarrevaara (2014) ‘Nested tensions and interwoven dilemmas in higher education: the view from the Nordic countries’, Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 7(2), 271–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Power, D. and A. Malmberg (2008) ‘The contribution of universities to innovation and economic development: in what sense a regional problem?’ Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 1(2), 233–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Rip, A. (2004) ‘Strategic research, post-modern universities and research training’, Higher Education Policy, 17(2), 153–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Rogers, J., Youtie, J. and L. Kay (2012) ‘Program level assessment of research centers: contribution of Nano-Science and Engineering Centers (NSEC) to US Nanotechnology National Initiative (NNI) goals’, Research Evaluation, 21(5), 368–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Rossi, F. and A. Rosli (2014) ‘Indicators of university-industry knowledge transfer performance and their implications for universities: Evidence from the United Kingdom’, Studies in Higher Education, ahead-of-print, 1–22.Google Scholar
  82. Rothaermel, F. T., Agung, S. D. and L. Jiang (2007) ‘University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 691–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Sa, C. and A. Oleksiyenko (2010) ‘Between the local and the global: organized research units and international collaborations in the health sciences’, Higher Education, 62(3).Google Scholar
  84. Salmi, J. (2011) ‘Nine common errors in building a new world class university’, International Higher Education, 62(Winter).Google Scholar
  85. Salter, A. J. and B. R. Martin (2001) ‘The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review’, Research Policy, 30(3), 509–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Sánchez-Barrioluengo, M. (2014) ‘Articulating three missions in Spanish universities’, Research Policy, 43(10), 1760–1773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Sanz-Menendz, L. and L. Cruz-Castro (2005) ‘Explaining the science and technology policies of regional governments’, Regional Studies, 39(7), 939–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Shattock, M. (2005) ‘European universities for entrepreneurship: their Role in the Europe of Knowledge — the theoretical context’, Higher Education Management and Policy, 17(3), 13–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Slaughter, S. and R. Leslie (1997) Academic Capitalism: Policies and the Entrepreneurial University (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar
  90. Smith, S. O., Ward, V. and A. House (2011) ‘“Impact” in the proposals for the UK’s research excellence framework: shifting the boundaries of academic autonomy’, Research Policy, 40(10), 1369–1379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Teichler, U. (1988) Changing Patterns of the Higher Education System: The Experience of Three Decades (London: Jessica Kingsley).Google Scholar
  92. Uyarra, E. (2010) ‘Conceptualizing the regional roles of universities, implications and contradictions’, European Planning Studies, 18(8), 1227–1246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Von Hippel, E. (2009) ‘Democratising innovation: the evolving phenomenon of user innovation’, International Journal of Innovation Science, 1(1), 29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Vorley, T. and J. Nells (2008) ‘(Re)conceptualising the third mission: entrepreneurial architecture of higher education institutions’, Policy Futures in Education, 7(3), 284–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Walsh, J. P., Baba, Y., Goto, A. and Y. Yasaki (2008) ‘Promoting university-industry linkage in Japan’, Prometheus, 26(1), 39–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Wigren-Kristoferson, C., Gabrielsson, J. and F. Kitagawa (2011) ‘Mind the gap and bridge the gap: research excellence and diffusion of academic knowledge in Sweden’, Science and Public Policy, 38(6), 481–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Williams, G. (2003) The Enterprising University (Maidenhead: Open University Press).Google Scholar
  98. Youtie, J. and P. Shapira (2008) ‘Building an innovation hub: a case study of the transformation of university roles in regional technological and economic development’, Research Policy, 37(8), 1188–1204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Fumi Kitagawa 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fumi Kitagawa

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations