Skip to main content

Abstract

This chapter reviews the state of research into higher education policy and institutional management. It does so by reanalysing in more detail data collected for previous analyses of the state of higher education research overall (Tight, 2003, 2012a), which focused in particular on the articles published in specialist higher education journals in 2000 and 2010.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Amaral, A. and P. Teixeira (2000) ‘The rise and fall of the private sector in Portuguese higher education’, Higher Education Policy, 13(3), 245–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Askling, B. and B. Kristensen (2000) ‘Towards the “learning organisation”: implications for institutional governance and leadership’, Higher Education Management, 12(2), 17–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastalich, W. (2010) ‘Knowledge economy and research innovation’, Studies in Higher Education, 35(7), 845–857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, A. (2010) ‘University involvement in social planning: perspectives of community institutions and universities’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 32(1), 97–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Boer, H., Huisman, J. and C. Meister-Scheytt (2010) ‘Supervision in “modern” university governance: boards under scrutiny’, Studies in Higher Education, 35(3), 317–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogue, G. and B. Johnson (2010) ‘Performance incentives and public college accountability in the United States: a quarter century policy audit’, Higher Education Management and Policy, 22(2), 9–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borden, C., Shaker, G. and B. Kienker (2014) ‘The impact of alumni status on institutional giving by faculty and staff’, Research in Higher Education, 55(2), 196–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosch, H.van den and C. Teelken (2000) ‘Organisation and leadership in higher Education: learning from experiences in the Netherlands’, Higher Education Policy, 13(4), 379–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowden, J. and E. Walsh (eds) (2000) Phenomenography (Melbourne: RMIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, N. (2010) ‘The deanship and its faculty interpreters: do Mertonian norms of science translate into norms for administration?’ Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 284–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breakwell, G. and M. Tytherleigh (2010) ‘University leaders and university performance in the United Kingdom: is it “who” leads or “where” they lead that matter most’, Higher Education, 60(5), 491–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, J., Mills, J., Shah, T. and A. Woodley (2000) ‘Lifelong learning for employment and equity: the role of part-time degrees’, Higher Education Quarterly, 54(4), 411–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruckmann, S. and T. Carvalho (2014) ‘The reform process of Portuguese higher education institutions: from collegial to managerial governance’, Tertiary Education and Management, 20(3), 193–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruininks, R., Keeney, B. and J. Thorp (2010) ‘Transforming America’s universities to compete in the “new normal” ’, Innovative Higher Education, 35, 113–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, J. and S. Modarresi (2000) ‘To keep or not to keep performance funding: signals from stakeholders’, Journal of Higher Education, 71(4), 432–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caboni, T. (2010) ‘The normative structure of college and university fundraising behaviors’, Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 339–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callender, C. (2014) ‘Student numbers and funding: does Robbins add up?’ Higher Education Quarterly, 68(2), 164–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Candy, P. (2000) ‘Knowledge navigators and lifelong learners: producing graduates for the information society’, Higher Education Research and Development, 19(3), 261–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caraca, J., Conceicao, P. and M. Heitor (2000) ‘Towards a public policy for the research university in Portugal’, Higher Education Policy, 13(2), 181–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, M. (2000) ‘Improving campus racial dynamics: a balancing act among competing interests’, Review of Higher Education, 23(2), 153–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colby, J., Raymond, G. and S. Colby (2000) ‘Evaluation of a college policy mandating treatment for students with substantiated drinking problems’, Journal of College Student Development, 41(4), 395–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, C. and R. Rhoads (2010) ‘The World Bank, support for universities and asymmetrical power relations in international development’, Higher Education, 59(2), 181–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, M. (2000) ‘What’s in a name? a historical look at native American-related nicknames and symbols at three US universities’, Journal of Higher Education, 71(5), 515–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, J. and Gunn, A. (2010) ‘Higher skills and the knowledge economy: the challenge of offshoring’, Higher Education Management and Policy, 22(3), 107–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crespo, M. (2000) ‘Managing regional collaboration in higher education: the case of the North American free trade agreement (NAFTA)’, Higher Education Management, 11(3), 23–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delaney, J. and W. Doyle (2014) ‘State spending on higher education capital outlays’, Research in Higher Education, 55(5), 433–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty, K., Nienhusser, K. and B. Vega (2010) ‘Undocumented immigrants and state higher education policy: the politics of in-state tuition eligibility in Texas and Arizona’, Review of Higher Education, 34(1), 123–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doughney, L. (2000) ‘Universal tertiary education: how dual-sector universities can challenge the binary divide between TAFE and higher education — the case of Victoria university of technology’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 22(1), 59–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, W. (2010) ‘Does merit-based aid “crowd out” need-based aid?’ Research in Higher Education, 51, 397–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckel, P. (2000) ‘The role of shared governance in institutional hard decisions: enabler or antagonist?’ Review of Higher Education, 24(1), 15–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckles, J. (2010) ‘Evaluating the efficiency of top liberal arts colleges’, Research in Higher Education, 51, 266–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Khawas, E. (2000) ‘The impetus for organisational change: an exploration’, Tertiary Education and Management, 6(1), 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elton, L. (2000) ‘The UK research assessment exercise: unintended consequences’, Higher Education Quarterly, 54(3), 274–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Essack, S. Naidoo, I. and G. Barnes (2010) ‘Government funding as leverage for quality teaching and learning: a South African perspective’, Higher Education Management and Policy, 22(3), 93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filippakou, O., Salter, B. and T. Tapper (2010) ‘Compliance, resistance and seduction: reflections on 20 years of the funding council model of governance’, Higher Education, 60(5), 543–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flora, B. and J. Hirt (2010) ‘Educational consortia in a knowledge economy: collaboration, competition and organizational equilibrium’, Review of Higher Education, 33(4), 569–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowles, J. (2014) ‘Funding and focus: resource dependence in public higher education’, Research in Higher Education, 55(3), 272–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, B. (2014) ‘Benchmarking Australian and New Zealand university meta-policy in an increasingly regulated tertiary environment’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 36(1), 74–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, G., Habeshaw, T. and M. Yorke (2000) ‘Institutional learning and teaching strategies in English higher education’, Higher Education, 40(3), 351–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gidley, J., Hampson, G., Wheeler, L. and E. Bereded-Samuel (2010) ‘From access to success: an integrated approach to quality higher education informed by social inclusion theory and practice’, Higher Education Policy, 23(1), 123–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, T. and S. Gill (2000) ‘Financial management of universities in developing countries’, Higher Education Policy, 13(2), 125–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gumport, P. (2000) ‘Academic restructuring: organizational change and institutional imperatives’, Higher Education, 39(1), 67–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Haan, H. (2014) ‘Where is the gap between internationalization strategic planning and its implementation? a study of 16 Dutch universities’ internationalization plans’, Tertiary Education and Management, 20(2), 135–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haigh, M. (2014) ‘From internationalisation to education for global citizenship: a multi-layered history’, Higher Education Quarterly, 68(1), 6–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harman, G. (2000a) ‘Allocating research infrastructure grants in post-binary higher education systems: British and Australian approaches’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 22(2), 111–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harman, G. (2000b) ‘Institutional mergers in Australian higher education since 1960’, Higher Education Quarterly, 54(4), 343–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, N. and S. Hatt (2010) ‘ “Disadvantaged learners”: who are we targeting? understanding the targeting of widening participation activity in the United Kingdom using geo-demographic data from southwest England’, Higher Education Quarterly, 64(1), 65–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heck, R., Johnsrud, L. and V. Rosser (2000) ‘Administrative effectiveness in higher education: improving assessment procedures’, Research in Higher Education, 41(6), 663–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, N., Tandberg, D. and J. Gross (2014) ‘Market-based higher education: does Colorado’s voucher model improve higher education access and efficiency?’ Research in Higher Education, 55(6), 601–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, A. and K. Spours (2000) ‘Expanding higher education in the UK: from “system slowdown” to “system acceleration” ’, Higher Education Quarterly, 54(4), 295–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horta, H. (2010) ‘The role of the state in the internationalization of universities in catching-up countries: an analysis of the Portuguese higher education system’, Higher Education Policy, 23(1), 63–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, F. (2000) From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, J. (2014) ‘Research productivity by career stage among Korean academics’, Tertiary Education and Management, 20(2), 85–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kehm, B., Michelsen, S. and A. Vabo (2010) ‘Towards the two-cycle degree structure: Bologna, reform and path dependency in German and Norwegian universities’, Higher Education Policy, 23(2), 227–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, M. and B. Parsons (2000) ‘Sexual harassment in the 1990s: a university-wide survey of female faculty, administrators, staff and students’, Journal of Higher Education, 71(5), 548–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kezar, A. (2000) ‘Pluralistic leadership: incorporating diverse voices’, Journal of Higher Education, 71(6), 722–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirwan, W. (2010) ‘The 21st century: the century of the American research university’, Innovative Higher Education, 35, 101–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitagawa, F. and J. Oba (2010) ‘Managing differentation of higher education system in Japan: connecting excellence and diversity’, Higher Education, 59(4), 507–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulati, T. (2000) ‘Governance, leadership and institutional change in South African higher education: grappling with instability’, Tertiary Education and Management, 6(3), 177–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kushimoto, T. (2010) ‘Outcomes assessment and its role in self-reviews of undergraduate education: in the context of Japanese higher education reforms since the 1990s’, Higher Education, 59, 589–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, D. (2000) ‘Similarities and differences: measuring diversity and selecting peers in higher education’, Higher Education, 39(1), 93–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepori, B. and S. Kyvik (2010) ‘The research mission of universities of applied sciences and the future configuration of higher education systems in Europe’, Higher Education Policy, 23(3), 295–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, C. (ed) (1997) Feminist Critical Policy Analysis (London: Falmer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meer, J. and S. Rosen (2010) ‘Family bonding with universities’, Research in Higher Education, 51, 641–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Middlehurst, R. (2010) ‘Sustaining leadership in challenging times’, Higher Education Management and Policy, 22(3), 73–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, B. (2010) ‘The price of higher education: how rational is British tuition fee policy?’ Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 32(1), 85–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mok, K. H. (2010) ‘When state centralism meets neo-liberalism: managing university governance change in Singapore and Malaysia’, Higher Education, 60(4), 419–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mok, K. H. and H. H. Lee (2000) ‘Globalization or re-colonization? higher education reforms in Hong Kong’, Higher Education Policy, 13(4), 361–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monteverde, K. (2000) ‘Managing student loan default risk: evidence from a privately guaranteed portfolio’, Research in Higher Education, 41(3), 331–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, E. (2000) ‘The changing patterns of university studies: towards lifelong learning in Finnish universities’, Higher Education Management, 12(3), 113–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mora, J. G. and J. Vidal (2000) ‘Adequate policies and unintended effects in Spanish higher education’, Tertiary Education and Management, 6(4), 247–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morphew, C. (2000) ‘The realities of strategic planning: program termination at East central university’, Review of Higher Education, 23(3), 257–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrill, R. (2000) ‘The use of indicators in the strategic management of universities’, Higher Education Management, 12(1), 105–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouwen, K. (2000) ‘Strategy, structure and culture of the hybrid university: towards the university of the 21st century’, Tertiary Education and Management, 6(1), 47–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. (2000) ‘Diversity, differentiation and the market: the debate we never had but which we ought to have done’, Higher Education Policy, 13(1), 7–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelles, J. and T. Vorley (2010) ‘Constructing an entrepreneurial architecture: an emergent framework for studying the contemporary university beyond the entrepreneurial turn’, Innovative Higher Education, 35, 161–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ness, E. (2010) ‘The politics of determining merit aid eligibility criteria: an analysis of the policy process’, Journal of Higher Education, 81(1), 34–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngo, J., de Boer, H. and J. Enders (2014) ‘The way deans run their faculties in Indonesian universities’, Tertiary Education and Management, 20(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odhiambo, G. (2014) ‘The challenges and future of public higher education leadership in Kenya’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 36(2), 183–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olayiwola, S. (2010) ‘Alternative model of funding for academic research in Nigerian universities’, Higher Education Quarterly, 64(2), 149–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pham, B. (2000) ‘Research at regional universities in Australia: vision and realization’, Higher Education Management, 12(2), 117–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polster, C. (2000) ‘The future of the liberal university in the era of the global knowledge grab’, Higher Education, 39(1), 19–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poole, D. and C. Ewan (2010) ‘Academics as part-time marketeers in university offshore programs: an exploratory study’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 32(2), 149–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pounder, J. (2000) ‘Towards a model of institutional effectiveness in higher education: implications of a Hong Kong study’, Higher Education Management, 12(2), 81–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichert, S. (2010) ‘The intended and unintended effects of the Bologna reforms’, Higher Education Management and Policy, 22(1), 99–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivers, D. (2010) ‘Ideologies of internationalisation and the treatment of diversity within Japanese higher education’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 32(5), 441–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rollwagen, I. (2010) ‘Project economy approaches for higher education: diversifying the revenue base of German universities’, Higher Education Management and Policy, 22(3), 9–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, F. (2010) ‘Massification, competition and organizational diversity in higher education: evidence from Italy’, Studies in Higher Education, 35(3), 277–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saarivirta, T. (2010) ‘Finnish higher education expansion and regional policy’, Higher Education Quarterly, 64(4), 353–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarrico, C. (2010) ‘On performance in higher education: towards performance governance’, Tertiary Education and Management, 16(2), 145–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sav, G. (2000) ‘Institutional funding and managerial differences in racially dual higher education systems’, Higher Education Management, 11(3), 41–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scobie, R., Dickson, K., Hanney, S. and G. Rodgers (2010) ‘Institutional strategies for capturing socio-economic impact of higher education research’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 32(5), 499–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, G., Bell, S., Coates, H. and L. Grebennikov (2010) ‘Australian higher education leaders in times of change: the role of pro vice-chancellor and deputy vice-chancellor’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 32(4), 401–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelley, L. (2010) ‘Research managers uncovered: changing roles and “shifting arenas” in the academy’, Higher Education Quarterly, 64(1), 41–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shultz, S., Scherman, A. and L. Marshall (2000) ‘Evaluation of a university-based date rape prevention program: effect on attitudes and behaviour related to rape’, Journal of College Student Development, 41(2), 193–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellers-Rubio, R., Mas-Ruiz, F. and A. Casado-Diaz (2010) ‘University efficiency: comple-mentariness versus trade-off between teaching, research and administrative activities’, Higher Education Quarterly, 64(4), 373–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, J. (2010) ‘Impacts of performance-based accountability on institutional performance in the US’, Higher Education, 60(1), 47–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shehu, J. (2000) ‘Sport in higher education: an assessment of the implementation of the national sports development policy in Nigerian universities’, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(1), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shuen, A. (2000) ‘University financial management under a contraction of government funding: the case of Hong Kong, China’, Higher Education Management, 12(3), 61–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slantcheva, S. (2000) ‘The challenges to vertical degree differentiation within Bulgarian universities: the problematic introduction of the three-level system of higher education’, Tertiary Education and Management, 6(3), 209–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spanier, G. (2010) ‘Creating adaptable universities’, Innovative Higher Education, 35, 91–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland-Smith, W. (2010) ‘Retribution, deterrence and reform: the dilemmas of plagiarism management in universities’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 32(1), 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talib, A. and A. Steele (2000) ‘The research assessment exercise: strategies and trade-offs’, Higher Education Quarterly, 54(1), 68–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tandberg, D. (2010) ‘Politics, interest groups and state funding of public higher education’, Research in Higher Education, 51, 416–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelin, J. (2000) ‘Good sports? historical perspective on the political economy of intercollegiate athletics in the era of Title IX: 1972–1997’, Journal of Higher Education, 71(4), 391–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, H. (2000) ‘Power in the resource allocation process: the impact of “rational” systems’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 22(2), 127–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tight, M. (2003) Researching Higher Education (Maidenhead: Open University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tight, M. (2007) ‘Bridging the divide: a comparative analysis of articles in higher education journals published inside and outside North America’, Higher Education, 53(2), 235–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tight, M. (2012a) Researching Higher Education, 2nd edn (Maidenhead: Open University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tight, M. (2012b) ‘Higher education research 2000–2010: changing journal publication patterns’, Higher Education Research and Development, 31(5), 723–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tight, M. (2014a) ‘Discipline and theory in higher education research’, Research Papers in Education, 29(1), 93–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tight, M. (2014b) ‘Collegiality and managerialism: a false dichotomy? Evidence from the higher education research literature’, Tertiary Education and Management, 20(4), 294–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tight, M. (2014c) ‘Theory development and application in higher education research: the case of academic drift’, Journal of Educational Administration and History, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tight, M. (2014d) ‘Working in separate silos? What citation patterns reveal about higher education research internationally’, Higher Education, 68(3), 379–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toutkoushian, R. and M. Shafiq (2010) ‘A conceptual analysis of state support for higher education: appropriations versus need-based financial aid’, Research in Higher Education, 51, 40–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ursin, J., Aittola, H., Henderson, C. and J. Valimaa (2010) ‘Is education getting lost in university mergers?’ Tertiary Education and Management, 16(4), 327–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varela-Petito, G. (2010) ‘Facing the knowledge society: Mexico’s public universities’, Higher Education Policy, 23(3), 436–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vilkinas, T. and M. Peters (2014) ‘Academic governance provided by academic boards within the Australian higher education sector’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 36(1), 15–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warshaw, J. and J. Hearn (2014) ‘Leveraging university research to serve economic development: an analysis of policy dynamics in and across three US states’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 36(2), 196–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D. (2000) ‘Managing in higher education: the “wicked issues” ’, Higher Education Quarterly, 54(1), 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weerts, D., Cabrera, A. and T. Sandford (2010) ‘Beyond giving: political advocacy and volunteer behaviors of public university alumni’, Research in Higher Education, 51, 346–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weerts, D. and L. Sandmann (2010) ‘Community engagement and boundary-spanning roles at research universities’, Journal of Higher Education, 81(6), 632–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. (2000) ‘Australian universities 1939–1999: how different now?’ Higher Education Quarterly, 54(2), 147–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Wit, K. (2010) ‘The networked university: the structure, culture and policy of universities in a changing environment’, Tertiary Education and Management, 16(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, R. (2000) ‘Tensions between the global and the local: a comparative illustration of the re-organization of China’s higher education in the 1950s and 1990s’, Higher Education, 39(3), 319–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Malcolm Tight

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tight, M. (2015). Research on Higher Education Policy and Institutional Management. In: Huisman, J., de Boer, H., Dill, D.D., Souto-Otero, M. (eds) The Palgrave International Handbook of Higher Education Policy and Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-45617-5_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics