A Colourful Cargo for a Motley People

  • Hanna Hodacs
Part of the Europe’s Asian Centuries book series (EAC)


Christian Jensen Lintrup (1703–1772) made five journeys to Canton, rising through the ranks of the Danish Asiatic Company to become a head supercargo. We shall encounter him later in this chapter as he contracted for thousands of silk pieces in Canton. Lintrup also traded extensively on his private account, a business which earnt him the nickname the ‘Chinese Merchant’ in Copenhagen. When Lintrup was ennobled as Lindencrone in 1756 he was a wealthy man. Fittingly his daughter-in-law, the eighteen-year-old Bolette Maria Haboe, was married in an ivory coloured satin woven silk dress embellished with horizontal and vertical embroideries of flowers and garlands. Most (although possibly not all) of the satin fabric was of Chinese origin. Today the dress belongs to the collection of the Design Museum in Copenhagen, but it has a well-travelled history. The outfit moved back and forth between China and Denmark before the wedding in 1768; the skills and prices of embroidery work in Canton made it worthwhile to have the dress embellished by Chinese craftsmen. Judging by the thread, some of stitches are made from silk thread, the dress was partially sewn in Canton too.1


Eighteenth Century Silk Textile Swedish Company Piece Good Swedish Market 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Toftegaard, Kirsten. ‘Bolette Marie Harboe’s bridal dress: Fashionable encounters told in an 18th-century dress’, in Fashionable encounters: Perspectives and trends in textile and dress in the early modern Nordic world, ed. Tove Engelhardt Mathiassen and others (Oxford: Oxbow Books, 2014), pp. 173–182.Google Scholar
  2. On Lintrup see also Clemmensen, Tove and Mogens B. Mackeprang. Kina og Danmark, 1600–1950: Kinafart og Kinamode (Copenhagen: Nationalmuseet, 1980), pp. 148–158.Google Scholar
  3. 2.
    Lee-Whitman, Leanna. ‘The silk trade: Chinese silks and the British East India Company’, Winterthur Portfolio 17 (1982): 21–41 (pp. 23–25). On exceptions and other problems identifying Chinese silk from the eighteenth century see also Toftegaard, ‘Bolette’, p. 178;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Shaw, Madelyn. ‘“Shipped in good order” Rhode Island’s China trade silks’, in Global trade and visual arts in federal New England, ed. Patricia Johnston and Caroline Frank (Lebanon: University of New Hampshire Press, 2014), pp. 119–133 (129–130).Google Scholar
  5. 3.
    See for example Toftegaard, ‘Bolette’, pp. 177.181. While fashion influenced the type of textiles used in early-modern dresses, they often had multiple lives as they were recycled and changed into different garments (Rasmussen, Pernilla. Skräddaren, sömmerskan och modet: arbetsmetoder och arbetsdelning i tillverkningen av kvinnlig dräkt 1770–1830 (Stockholm: Nordiska museets förlag, 2010), p. 55).Google Scholar
  6. 4.
    Styles, John. The dress of the people. Everyday fashion in eighteenth-century England (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2007);Google Scholar
  7. Roche, Daniel. The culture of clothing: Dress and fashion in the ancient regime (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
  8. 5.
    Rothstein, Natalie. Silk designs of the eighteenth century: In the collection of the Victoria and Albert Museum, London, with a complete catalogue (London: Thames and Hudson, 1990), p. 37.Google Scholar
  9. 6.
    Poni, Carlo. ‘Fashion as flexible production: The strategies of the Lyons silk merchants in the eighteenth century’, in World of possibilities. Flexibility and mass production in western industrialization, ed. Charles F. Sabel and Jonathan Zeitlin (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), pp. 37–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 9.
    Jörg, Christiaan J. A. ‘Chinese export silks for the Dutch in the 18th Century’, Transactions of the Oriental Ceramic Society 73 (2010): 1–23 (p. 14). See also Shaw, ‘“Shipped”’, p. 119.Google Scholar
  11. 10.
    Andersson, Gunilla. ‘Broderad sidenlyx’, in Ostindiska Compagniet: affärer och föremål, ed. Kristina Söderpalm, 2nd ed. (Göteborg: Göteborgs stadsmuseum, 2003), pp. 193–202;Google Scholar
  12. Sjöberg, Lars and Ursula Sjöberg. Ostindiskt: kinesiskt porslin och Kinaintresset i Sverige under 1700-talet (Stockholm: Norstedt, 2011), pp. 194–203.Google Scholar
  13. 11.
    Several global histories on the production and consumption have recently helped problematize the history of cotton, see for example The spinning world, a global history of cotton textiles, 1200–1850, ed. Giorgio Riello and Prasannan Parthasarathi (Oxford: OUP, 2011), and Riello, Giorgio. Cotton: The fabric that made the modern world (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
  14. 12.
    Riello, Giorgio. ‘Asian knowledge and the development of calico printing in Europe in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries’, Journal of Global History 5.1 (2010): 1–28;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Smith, Chloe Wigston. ‘“Callico Madams”: Servants, consumption, and the calico crisis’, Eighteenth-Century Life 31.2 (2007): 29–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 13.
    Runefelt, Leif. Att hasta mot undergången: anspråk, flyktighet, förställning i debatten om konsumtion i Sverige 1730–1830 (Lund: Nordic Academic Press, 2015), pp. 227–239 (227.234).Google Scholar
  17. 14.
    de Vries, Jan. The industrious revolution: Consumer behavior and the household economy, 1650 to the Present (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008), pp. 144–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 15.
    Sewell, William H. ‘The empire of fashion and the rise of capitalism in eighteenth-century France’, Past & Present 206.1 (2010): 81–120;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Elizabeth, Currie. ‘Diversity and design in the Florentine tailoring trade, 1560–1620’, in The material renaissance, ed. Michelle O’Malley and Evelyn Welch (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2008), pp. 154–173 (160).Google Scholar
  20. 16.
    Fairchilds, Cissie. ‘The production and marketing of populuxe goods in eighteenth-century Paris’, in Consumption and the world of goods, ed. John Brewer and Roy Porter (London, New York: Routledge, 1993), pp. 228–248.Google Scholar
  21. 17.
    Van Dyke, Paul A. ‘Weaver Suckin and the Canton silk trade 1750–1781’, Review of Culture, International Edition No. 29 (2009): 105–119 (p. 107).Google Scholar
  22. 25.
    Van Dyke Paul A. Merchants of Canton and Macao: Politics and strategies in eighteenth-century Chinese trade (Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 2011), p. 43.Google Scholar
  23. 26.
    Koninckx, Christian. The fi rst and second charters of the Swedish East India Company (1731–1766): A contribution to the maritime, economic and social history of north-western Europe in its relationships with the Far East (Kortrijk: Van Ghemmert, 1980), pp. 227–228;Google Scholar
  24. Söderpalm, Kristina. ‘Svenska Ost-Indiska Compagniet och den kinesiska vågen’, in Kina slott, ed. Göran Alm (Stockholm: Byggförlaget/Kultur, 2002), pp. 264–284 (275).Google Scholar
  25. 27.
    Nyrop, C. Niels Lunde Reiersen. Et mindeskrift (Copenhagen, 1896), pp. 198–200.Google Scholar
  26. 41.
    Magnusson, Thomas. ‘… till rikets oboteliga skada och deras winning…’: konfl ikten om Ostindiska kompaniet 1730–1747 (Göteborg: Historiska institutionen, Göteborgs universitet, 2008), pp. 129–130.Google Scholar
  27. 43.
    Ulväng, Marie. Klädekonomi och klädkultur: böndernas kläder i Härjedalen under 1800-talet (Möklinta: Gidlund, 2012), p. 99.Google Scholar
  28. See also Aldman, Lili-Annè. En merkantilistisk början: Stockholms textila import 1720–1738 (Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, 2008), pp. 206–207. Aldman has found ‘East Indian’ damask made from linen, wool and silk. In the case of the SEIC and DAC China trade I have found no references to other materials than silk in references to damask. Note also that ‘damask’ sometimes was used as a shorthand for poisee damask. The sales catalogue from 1747 (Försäljningskatalog Vol. 8, KA, RAS) lists 2 869 damask pieces in the lot descriptions but no poi-see damask. In the summary at the beginning of the catalogue 2,400 poisee damask pieces are listed, however. In this case I have chosen to categorize the 2,869 damask pieces as ‘Damask other’ (see Appendix 2).Google Scholar
  29. 58.
    Cumming, V., C.W. Cunnington, and P. E. Cunnington, ed. The dictionary of fashion history (Oxford: Berg, 2010), p. 263. Compare however with Aldman, En merkantilistisk, p. 220.Google Scholar
  30. 69.
    For information on the EIC taffeta cargo see Lee-Whitman, ‘The silk trade’, pp. 34–35. Note also that Dutch silk weavers imitated Chinese silk weaving pieces with this width. When exported abroad they were sized by French customs who thought that they were illegal Chinese goods. Colenbrander, Sjoukje. Zolang de weefkunst bloeit: zijdeweverijen in Amsterdam en Haarlem, 1585–1750, Academisch proefschrift (Amsterstam: Gw: Instituut voor Cultuur en Geschiedenis, 2010), pp. 163–173.Google Scholar
  31. 74.
    Rothstein, Silk designs, p. 291; Söderpalm, Kristina. ‘Auktionen på den första lasten från Kina’, in Ostindiska Compagniet: affärer och föremål, ed. Kristina Söderpalm, 2nd ed. (Göteborg: Göteborgs stadsmuseum, 2003), pp. 88–105 (97).Google Scholar
  32. 91.
    Bresicus, Meike von. ‘Worlds apart? Merchant, mariners, and the organization of the private trade in Chinese export wares in eighteenth-century Europe’, in Goods from the East. Trading Eurasia, ed. Maxine Berg (Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan: Palgrave, 2015), pp. 168–182.Google Scholar
  33. 93.
    Zahedieh, Nuala. The capital and the colonies: London and the Atlantic economy, 1660–1700 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010), pp. 177.277.Google Scholar
  34. 115.
    The total investment equalled 1,064,494 silver dollars, of which 218,270 were spent on silk, 640,165 on tea and 100,786 on porcelain (Kjellberg, Sven, T. Svenska ostindiska compagnierna 1731–1813: kryddor, te, porslin, siden (Malmö: Allhem, 1975), p. 64.Google Scholar
  35. 121.
    Schou, Jacob Henric. Chronologisk register over de kongelige forordninger og aabne breve, som fra aar 1670 af ere udkomne, tillige med et nøiagtigt udtog af de endnu gieldene, for saavidt samme i almindelighet angaae undersaatterne i Danmark og Norge, Vol. IV (Copenhagen: Sebastian Popp, 1795) p. 310 (19 Feb. 1753).Google Scholar
  36. See also Engelhardt Mathiassen, Tove. ‘Tekstil-import til Danmark cirka 1750–1850’, Den gamle By, Danmarks Købstadsmuseum (1996), pp. 80–104 (94), and Idem. ‘Luxurious textiles in Danish Christening garments: Fashionable encounters across social and geographical borders’, in Fashionable encounters: Perspectives and trends in textile and dress in the early modern Nordic world, ed. Tove Engelhardt Mathiassen and others (Oxford: Oxbow Books, 2014), pp. 183–200.Google Scholar
  37. 124.
    Glamann, Kristof. ‘The Danish Asiatic Company, 1732–1772’, Scandinavian Economic History Review 8.2 (1960): 109–149 (pp. 141–142).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 125.
    Müller, Leos. ‘The Swedish East India trade and international markets: Re-exports of teas, 1731–1813’, Scandinavian Economic History Review 51.3 (2003): 28–44 (pp. 35–37).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 126.
    Kjellberg, Sven T. Svenska ostindiska compagnierna 1731–1813: kryddor, te, porslin, siden (Malmö: Allhem, 1975), p. 66.Google Scholar
  40. 127.
    Nyström, Johan Fredrik. De svenska ostindiska kompanierna: historisk-statistisk framställning (Göteborg: D.F. Bonniers boktryckeri, 1883).Google Scholar
  41. 138.
    Rasmussen, Jens Rahbek. ‘The Danish monarchy as a composite state’, in European identities, cultural diversity and integration in Europe since 1700, ed. Nils Arne Sørensen (Odense: Odense University Press, 1995), pp. 23–36.Google Scholar
  42. 139.
    Magnusson, Lars. ‘Merkantilismens teori och praktik: utrikeshandel och manufakturpolitik i sitt idéhistoriska sammanhang’, in Till salu: Stockholms textila handel och manufaktur 1722–1846, ed. Klas Nyberg (Stockholm: Stads- och kommunhistoriska institutet, 2010), pp. 27–45;Google Scholar
  43. Nyberg, Klas. ‘Stockholms handlande borgerskap och manufakturister’, in Till salu: Stockholms textila handel och manufaktur 1722–1846, ed. Klas Nyberg (Stockholm: Stadsoch kommunhistoriska institutet, 2010), pp. 47–62; Aldman, En merkantilistisk, pp. 284–286.Google Scholar
  44. 140.
    Hechscher Eli, F. ‘De svenska manufakturerena under 1700-talet’, Ekonomisk Tidskrift 39 (1937): 152–221 (p. 156).Google Scholar
  45. 146.
    Jørgensen, J. B. Bro. Industriens historie i Danmark. 2, Tiden 1730–1820 (Copenhagen: Selskabet for udgivelse af kilder til dansk historie, 1975), pp. 115.185–186;Google Scholar
  46. Becker-Christensen, Henrik. Dansk toldhistorie. 2, Protektionisme og reformer: 1660–1814 (Copenhagen: Toldhistorisk selskab, 1988), pp. 337–448.Google Scholar
  47. 147.
    Jørgensen, Industriens, pp. 160–120; Kærgård, Niels, Bo Sandelin and Arild Sæther. ‘Scandinavia, Economics’, in The new Palgrave dictionary of economics, ed. Steven N. Durlauf and Lawrence E. Blume, 2nd ed. (The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics Online: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008).> doi:10.1057/9780230226203.1479 (accessed 12 July 2015).Google Scholar
  48. 148.
    Pontoppidan, Erik. Oeconomiske balance eller uforgribelige overslag paa Dannemarks naturlige og borgerlige formue til at giöre sine inbyggere lyksalige, saavidt som de selb ville skiönne derpaa og benytte sig deraf (Copenhagen: printed by Andreas Hartwig Godiche, 1759), p. 267.Google Scholar
  49. 149.
    A less ideologically driven reflection on the segmentation of the Swedish silk market can be found in Charles Irvine’s correspondence. In 1754 Arthur Abercomby wrote on the pending ban of Chinese silk: ‘I am sorry there is such a torrent against the Comp. I dare say that any Silks that are made in the Country must come dear, & since a great deal of French Silks that will be smuggled in, for its impossible that they can be supplied by their own manufactories or they must be a really improved since I left the country’. (A. Abercromby to C. Irvine, 8/3/1754, IC, JFB Library, MU). The provision of French silk on the Swedish market, and English on the Danish and Norwegian, have been registered elsewhere by historians working on early-modern textiles; see Rothstein, Silk designs, p. 24 and Kjellberg, Anne. ‘English 18th-century silks in Norway’, in 18th-century silks: The industries of England and Northern Europe, ed. Regula Schorta (Riggisberg: Abegg-Stiftung Riggisberg, 2000), pp. 135–145.Google Scholar
  50. 152.
    Lönnqvist, Bo. ‘Siden, sammet, trasa, lump… Klädestilar i Helsingfors på1740-talet’, in Narika 1981, ed. L. Arkio and M.-L. Lampinen (Helsinki: Helsingin kaupunginmuseo, 1982), pp. 98–122 (99–100.105, 107.110, 112.113).Google Scholar
  51. 159.
    Nordiska museet. 1700-tals textil: Anders Berchs samling i Nordiska museet (Stockholm: Nordiska museet, 1990 ) pp. 178–185.Google Scholar
  52. 162.
    Turchin’ and ‘Thurchino’ were used in German-Italian silk trade in the late seventeenth century referring to blue shades. Jones, William Jervis. German colour terms: A study in their historical evolution from earliest times to the present (Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, 2013), p. 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Jones, German, pp. 121–124; Bergström, Eva. Den blå handen: om Stockholms färgare 1650–1900 (Stockholm: Nordiska museets förlag, 2013), pp. 46–47.Google Scholar
  54. 172.
    Finlay, Robert. ‘Weaving the rainbow: Visions of color in world history’, Journal of World History 18.4 (2007): 383–431 (p. 399).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 181.
    Ying-Hsing, Sung. Chinese technology in the seventeenth century, translated by E-tu Zen Sun & Shiou-chuan Sun (Minneapolis: Dover publications, 1966), p. 74.Google Scholar
  56. 185.
    Mitchell, David M. ‘“My purple will be too sad for that melancholy room”: Furnishings for interiors in London and Paris, 1660–1735’, Textile History 40.1 (2009): 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 202.
    Aldman, Lili-Annè. ‘Customers and markets for “new” textiles in seventeenth- and eighteenth-century Sweden’, in Selling textiles in the long eighteenth century: Comparative perspectives from Western Europe, ed. Jon Stobart and Bruno Blondé (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014), pp. 46–66 (61).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hanna Hodacs
    • 1
  1. 1.Royal Swedish Academy of SciencesStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations