Advertisement

Sons and Heirs pp 160-175 | Cite as

An Italian Heir for the New Century: Vittorio Emanuele, Prince of Naples

  • Valentina Villa
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Modern Monarchy book series (PSMM)

Abstract

When on 14 March 1861 the Italian parliament bestowed institutional and political legitimacy on the rule of Vittorio Emanuele II, the public acceptance enjoyed by the Crown was neither immediate nor complete.1 On the contrary, many subjects were convinced that the kingdom of Italy was nothing more than a geographical expression — as Prince Metternich had famously stated — and that the new sovereign did not represent them. Even years after the country’s unification some foreign observers still held the same opinion; in 1863 Sir Henry Winston Barron, an Irish politician who travelled Italy extensively, detected little unity:

It is absurd, and contrary to fact, to say that the Piedmontese are the same nation [as the rest of Italy], speaking the same language, and united by a solemn compact. They are not the same race; they have not the same habits, customs, or language; and as to the compact, it was a solemn fraud.2

Keywords

Royal Family Royal Court Royal Palace Public Appearance Foreign Observer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    H.W. Barron (1863), Results of Victor Emmanuel’s Rule, London, 66.Google Scholar
  2. 5.
    Lucy Riall (1994), The Italian Risorgimento: State, Society and National Unification, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Catherine Brice (2010), Monarchie et identité nationale en Italie. 1861–1900, ParisGoogle Scholar
  4. Paolo Colombo (2004), ‘Una Corona per una nazione: considerazioni sul ruolo della monarchia costituzionale nella costruzione dell’identità italiana’, in: Marina Tesoro (ed.), Germania, Giappone e Italia tra Ottocento e Novecento, Milan, 21–33Google Scholar
  5. Filippo Mazzonis (2003), La Monarchia e il Risorgimento, BolognaGoogle Scholar
  6. Ilaria Porciani (1997), La festa della nazione: rappresentazione dello Stato e spazi sociali nell’Italia unita, BolognaGoogle Scholar
  7. Francesco Luciani (1996), ‘La “Monarchia popolare”. Immagini del re e nazionalizzazione delle masse negli anni della Sinistra al potere (1876–1891)’, Cheiron. Materiali e strumenti di aggiornamento storiografico XIII, 141–88.Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    Valentina Villa (2011), ‘La visibilità pubblica del re nella storia costituzionale italiana: continuità tra età liberale e fascismo’, Storia Amministrazione Costituzione XIX, 47–65.Google Scholar
  9. 13.
    Silvio Bertoldi (1970), Vittorio Emanuele III, Turin, 6.Google Scholar
  10. 17.
    Pierangelo Gentile (2011), L’ombra del re. Vittorio Emanuele II e le politiche di corte, Rome, 21–33.Google Scholar
  11. 19.
    Carlo Casalegno (1956), La regina Margherita, Turin, 147–48.Google Scholar
  12. 25.
    Silvio Bertoldi (2002), Vittorio Emanuele III: un re tra le due guerre e il fascismo, Turin, 35.Google Scholar
  13. 37.
    Getting married abroad was a tradition in the House of Savoy since the sixteenth 38. Gianpasquale Santomassimo (2000), La marcia su Roma, Florence, 89.Google Scholar
  14. 46.
    Letizia Argenteri (1994), Il re borghese: costume e società nell’Italia di Vittorio Emanuele III, Milan.Google Scholar
  15. 49.
    Sydney Brooks (1903), ‘The King of Italy’, The North American Review 176/555, 246–53, 249.Google Scholar
  16. 53.
    Luigi Pelloux (1967), Quelques souvenirs de ma vie, Rome, 193–94.Google Scholar
  17. 54.
    Ricciotti Garibaldi (1900), ‘Monarchy and Republic in Italy’, The North American Review 171/529, 811–16, 815–16.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Valentina Villa 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Valentina Villa

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations